[quote]Nards wrote:
I’m OK with that. I mean the movies don’t have a lot of time to slowly build things up. They sort of need to combine characters and storylines into what they think is best.
I think Marvel should do this IM3, Thor 2 and Captain America 2 and then focus just on Avengers movies.[/quote]
I want a Hulk sequel with The Leader[/quote]
I would rather see Hulk sent off to another planet.[/quote]
You have to build up to that, you have to introduce an illuminati and then you have to have the Hulk go on a rampage, he has never really done that he only attacks when provoked and he has never hurt anyone. Even in the Avengers film the guy who gave Banner pants said Hulk avoided living things as he was freefalling.[/quote]
I don’t think they will do it only because an entire world would cost more than the studios are willing to spend on a Hulk only movie since the others had a bad track record as far as ticket sales.
However I do think they could build up to a Hulk world with small cameos in IM3 all it would take is for Tony to see Hulk lose it and someone to die. But they would have to lose some of the members like Namor it could be done just not to the letter of the books. But $ is the real reason we will never see that movie.[/quote]
Marvel are still pressing ahead with the Hulk TV series, which will be a separate continuity to the movies.
[quote]Nards wrote:
I’m OK with that. I mean the movies don’t have a lot of time to slowly build things up. They sort of need to combine characters and storylines into what they think is best.
I think Marvel should do this IM3, Thor 2 and Captain America 2 and then focus just on Avengers movies.[/quote]
There’ll be a fourth solo movie featuring an as-yet-unnamed character before Avengers 2 (the most likely candidates are Ant-Man - with Edgar Wright saying that his script is nearly complete - or Guardians of the Galaxy, based on the extra-terrestrial villains in Avengers). It all depends on the direction IM3, Thor 2 and Cap 2 take.
[/quote]
That sort of stuff is getting into territory where the general public has no idea who those characters are.
I mean lots of women may have no idea who Iron Man and Thor were before their respective movies…but most males did.
[quote]Nards wrote:
I’m OK with that. I mean the movies don’t have a lot of time to slowly build things up. They sort of need to combine characters and storylines into what they think is best.
I think Marvel should do this IM3, Thor 2 and Captain America 2 and then focus just on Avengers movies.[/quote]
There’ll be a fourth solo movie featuring an as-yet-unnamed character before Avengers 2 (the most likely candidates are Ant-Man - with Edgar Wright saying that his script is nearly complete - or Guardians of the Galaxy, based on the extra-terrestrial villains in Avengers). It all depends on the direction IM3, Thor 2 and Cap 2 take.
[/quote]
That sort of stuff is getting into territory where the general public has no idea who those characters are.
I mean lots of women may have no idea who Iron Man and Thor were before their respective movies…but most males did.[/quote]
That’s why they’ll need to do the after the credits teasers like Marvel is known for, who knew there was a black Nick Fury until Iron Man?
If anyone wants to get caught up with season 2 of Earth’s Mightiest Heroes that link has up to episode 14, 8 was the last wpisode Disney XD aired, also I believe this ends the multi episode story arcs Jeph Loeb(who destroyed the Ultimate Universe) is too stupid to follow multi plot points and wants episodes to be single stand alones
She better not be completely worthless as an AI partner in this game (like Sheva was in the last game), it was bad enough escorting her around the entire 2nd half of RE4.
She better not be completely worthless as an AI partner in this game (like Sheva was in the last game), it was bad enough escorting her around the entire 2nd half of RE4.[/quote]
Too be honest…that was the last thing I noticed in the trailer. I was more focused on the awesome…lol.
Getting a little more satisfied as DMC fan the more they’re showing. People complaining about the lack of “Dante” will be happy to see the white hair…red jacket…etc.
sigh Used to absolutely love Splinter Cell games…but this…I’m not sold on. No Michael Ironside behind the voice…gameplay too Assassin Creed-ish(not necessarily bad…but it’s not 50 yr old Sam Fisher) We shall see.
Man, the only one I think looks good is dishonored.
Splinter cell and Metal Gear don’t look like themselves. Looks like stealth isn’t as important, which makes those games. Devil May Cry hasn’t done it for me since like the second one. Metal Gear and Devil May Cry look pretty similiar and they shouldn’t. Black Ops looks decent, but I’m tired of COD. I don’t like the single player games and multi-player has lost its appeal for me. There is no skill involved at all in COD, it’s about who can blow the most stuff up while being as annoying and racist as possible.
Dishonored looks awesome though! I’d like to see some more original stories/games like this.
For me
Assassins Cred 3 > Metal Gear or Splinter Cell
Darksiders 2 > Devil May Cry (Not the same gameplay, but that’s where my $ is going)
Yeah…I will most likely rent Metal Gear Rising,Splinter Cell,DMC. Dishonored…AC3…The Last of Us…RE6 are all must haves for me.
My biggest gripe with most games now is the replay factor. If I shell out $60 for a game…I shouldn’t be tired of it 2-3 weeks after purchasing it. Multiplayer gets old…they need to start handing out something that makes it rewarding beside “bragging rights” with online buddies. Imo,multiplayer is to games…as 3D is to movies these days.
It’s a shame they let go of the stealth emphasis. Crysis 2, Deus Ex and the Batman games are all better stealth games than the newer SC games. No more lightbulb assassin.
