[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
I just get sick of their whining. They are the whiniest people.
I do agree that their agenda is not acceptance or rights, it’s to shove that life-style down people’s throats and make them choke on it. If you don’t agree with their lifestyle choices you must be destroyed. It’s become militant. [/quote]
I don’t know man.
Of all the things that a stranger can see and/or find out about you, “I’m gay” is the “worst” in contemporary America. I mean other than “I’m a murderer” and the like.[/quote]
Nah.
It’s more nuanced than that. The most distrusted figures in contempory America, in order of “worstness”:
- Serial killer
- Child molester
- Serial rapist
- Atheist
- Homosexual
- Liberal
- Intellectual
Obviously, any combination of five of these attributes would send you right up to the top of the worstness scale.
Freddie Mercury could really work a crowd.
I’d bet my house the guy in the original video can’t watch 3:54-4:00 without a life-altering crisis of faith immediately afterward
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Freddie Mercury could really work a crowd. [/quote]
That video–that whole 25 minute set–is unreal. Most people would look at that many faces screaming in their direction and have a stroke on the spot.
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Freddie Mercury could really work a crowd. [/quote]
That video–that whole 25 minute set–is unreal. Most people would look at that many faces screaming in their direction and have a stroke on the spot.[/quote]
He could have got that crowd to invade Poland. That was sick.
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Freddie Mercury could really work a crowd. [/quote]
That video–that whole 25 minute set–is unreal. Most people would look at that many faces screaming in their direction and have a stroke on the spot.[/quote]
He could have got that crowd to invade Poland. That was sick. [/quote]
If you haven’t seen the whole set, definitely watch it on Youtube. He does this mimesis game with the audience that is hilarious, and he does Bohemian/Rock you/Champions and it is glory. Gay, gay glory.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
I just get sick of their whining. They are the whiniest people.
I do agree that their agenda is not acceptance or rights, it’s to shove that life-style down people’s throats and make them choke on it. If you don’t agree with their lifestyle choices you must be destroyed. It’s become militant. [/quote]
I don’t know man.
Of all the things that a stranger can see and/or find out about you, “I’m gay” is the “worst” in contemporary America. I mean other than “I’m a murderer” and the like.[/quote]
Nah.
It’s more nuanced than that. The most distrusted figures in contempory America, in order of “worstness”:
- Serial killer
- Child molester
- Serial rapist
- Atheist
- Homosexual
- Liberal
- Intellectual
Obviously, any combination of five of these attributes would send you right up to the top of the worstness scale.
[/quote]
Is that list worst to least, least to worst, or are they so close as to be indiscernible?
I know a good many liberals, couple of intellectuals, a good handful of homosexuals, and one serial child molester. The last one is the only one that I’d really like to sadistically murder though. The rest are pretty cool.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
I just get sick of their whining. They are the whiniest people.
I do agree that their agenda is not acceptance or rights, it’s to shove that life-style down people’s throats and make them choke on it. If you don’t agree with their lifestyle choices you must be destroyed. It’s become militant. [/quote]
I don’t know man.
Of all the things that a stranger can see and/or find out about you, “I’m gay” is the “worst” in contemporary America. I mean other than “I’m a murderer” and the like.[/quote]
Nah.
It’s more nuanced than that. The most distrusted figures in contempory America, in order of “worstness”:
- Serial killer
- Child molester
- Serial rapist
- Atheist
- Homosexual
- Liberal
- Intellectual
Obviously, any combination of five of these attributes would send you right up to the top of the worstness scale.
[/quote]
I would split homosexual to gay and lesbian. Lesbian would rank higher on the scale than gay male. Girls generally get along with gay guys fine, but generally nobody gets along with lesbians.
EDIT: except lesbians.
You have the conservative party to thank for the fact that Freddy Mercury is not back with us.
For the money they spent on her funeral, they could have brought him back from the dead to shit on her grave, and it would have been far more appropriate.
[quote]pat wrote:
I just get sick of their whining. They are the whiniest people.
I do agree that their agenda is not acceptance or rights, it’s to shove that life-style down people’s throats and make them choke on it. If you don’t agree with their lifestyle choices you must be destroyed. It’s become militant. [/quote]
Careful. If you don’t loudly support peepers’ rights, free sex change ops for convicted murderers, flashers’ rights and government funded trans-sexual folk dancing classes then you are clearly a closet homosexual.
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
I just get sick of their whining. They are the whiniest people.
I do agree that their agenda is not acceptance or rights, it’s to shove that life-style down people’s throats and make them choke on it. If you don’t agree with their lifestyle choices you must be destroyed. It’s become militant. [/quote]
I don’t know man.
Of all the things that a stranger can see and/or find out about you, “I’m gay” is the “worst” in contemporary America. I mean other than “I’m a murderer” and the like.[/quote]
Nah.
It’s more nuanced than that. The most distrusted figures in contempory America, in order of “worstness”:
- Serial killer
- Child molester
- Serial rapist
- Atheist
- Homosexual
- Liberal
- Intellectual
Obviously, any combination of five of these attributes would send you right up to the top of the worstness scale.
[/quote]
I would split homosexual to gay and lesbian. Lesbian would rank higher on the scale than gay male. Girls generally get along with gay guys fine, but generally nobody gets along with lesbians.
EDIT: except lesbians. [/quote]
Unless they’re hot lesbians and being filmed, I agree. Lesbians tend to be more hated. And, in all fairness, the ones I’ve met are tougher to get along with.
Why are these exchanges always so predictable? Take this for instance:
The standard, fixed penalty for that particular comment is 3 hours inside Elton John’s rectum.
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
Unless they’re hot lesbians and being filmed, I agree. Lesbians tend to be more hated. And, in all fairness, the ones I’ve met are tougher to get along with.[/quote]
Love Jim Jefferies; the man is a comedic god IMHO.
God might not be real, but Jim Jefferies is, and that’s close enough for me. LOL
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
Unless they’re hot lesbians and being filmed, I agree. Lesbians tend to be more hated. And, in all fairness, the ones I’ve met are tougher to get along with.[/quote]
Love Jim Jefferies; the man is a comedic god IMHO.
God might not be real, but Jim Jefferies is, and that’s close enough for me. LOL[/quote]
I find this ironic and funny as…well you get the point.
oh never mind…
Why does anyone give 2 shits what gays do or dont do… The only time you should be concerned about gay stuff is when your in the county jail shower room. Other than that bitching about gay rage, gay jaugernuts, gay agendas.. Just makes you sound like a bitch.. If dudes wanna bang ass, and bitches wanna munch carpet so fucking what.. They should have the same rights as any other asshole.
Watch yur cornhole
[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:
Why does anyone give 2 shits what gays do or dont do… The only time you should be concerned about gay stuff is when your in the county jail shower room. Other than that bitching about gay rage, gay jaugernuts, gay agendas.. Just makes you sound like a bitch.. If dudes wanna bang ass, and bitches wanna munch carpet so fucking what.. They should have the same rights as any other asshole.
Watch yur cornhole[/quote]
There is a difference between being concerned about what they do and accepting what they do as OK.
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
[quote]thehebrewhero wrote:
Why does anyone give 2 shits what gays do or dont do… The only time you should be concerned about gay stuff is when your in the county jail shower room. Other than that bitching about gay rage, gay jaugernuts, gay agendas.. Just makes you sound like a bitch.. If dudes wanna bang ass, and bitches wanna munch carpet so fucking what.. They should have the same rights as any other asshole.
Watch yur cornhole[/quote]
There is a difference between being concerned about what they do and accepting what they do as OK.[/quote]
On Star Trek The Next Generation there’s a brilliant episode called The Outcast, in which the Enterprise encounters a humanoid species that has evolved into a completely androgynous race. Not only have they perfected asexual reproduction, but they have also abolished gender distinctions: there is no such thing as “male” or “female”. Every once in a while, however, there is an evolutionary throwback, a person who, early in life, realizes that they feel “male” or “female”. Naturally, they keep this a secret, because to feel or act in a gender-specific way is not only considered abnormal, but is also illegal. A person who relizes that he is male, or that she is female, is shunned by their society, and is given “psychotactic therapy” to correct this aberration.
In the episode, one of the people, in the course of interacting with the First Officer, Commander Riker, realizes that she is female, and they fall in love. The leader of the society picks up on this, and she is forced to undergo the therapy.
Watch the episode. It may not change your mind about how you feel about homosexuality, but it may inspire you to think about whether a society has the right to force someone to be someone that they were born not to be.
You are attracted to women, presumably, and probably find the prospect of being attracted to, mating with and being married to a man physically repugnant. That’s fine. For you. But now imagine that homosexuality was the norm in our society, and you were expected to pair with a male mate, with serious social consequences if you didn’t. How would you deal with your attraction and sexual desire for women? Would you even admit to it, considering that it would make you a social pariah?
And if there were enough “queers” like you, wouldn’t you agitate to change society so that they would be more accepting of your inborn nature and way of life?