They were trying to “convert” people to heterosexuality. They do it every Friday.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
ninearms wrote:
It’s within my rights walk around Harlem with a sign that reads “I hate niggers” too. Doesn’t mean it’s not stupid and provocative.
/thread
Just like any girl that dresses “sexy” is asking to be raped right? Its her own fault and she shouldn’t get mad about it.
Your comparing dressing attractively to dressing offensively.
If you wear fur to a PETA event, and are surprised when people throw paint on you, yes. It was your fault. And you are an asshole.
No, I’m comparing dressing sexy walking down the street to singing hymns.[/quote]
Refer to my above post. I don’t believe for a second that any of this happened.
I think there was a protest, and a counter-protest. The counter-protest yelled a little.
Watch the video. There is no excessive, extreme violence like the supposed “eye witness” is reporting.
[quote]Beowolf wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
ninearms wrote:
It’s within my rights walk around Harlem with a sign that reads “I hate niggers” too. Doesn’t mean it’s not stupid and provocative.
/thread
Just like any girl that dresses “sexy” is asking to be raped right? Its her own fault and she shouldn’t get mad about it.
Your comparing dressing attractively to dressing offensively.
If you wear fur to a PETA event, and are surprised when people throw paint on you, yes. It was your fault. And you are an asshole.
If you wear asslesschaps to church and they scream at you, same difference.[/quote]
A church is a privately owned facility expressly for a given purpose. This was a public street.
[quote]Beowolf wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
ninearms wrote:
It’s within my rights walk around Harlem with a sign that reads “I hate niggers” too. Doesn’t mean it’s not stupid and provocative.
/thread
Just like any girl that dresses “sexy” is asking to be raped right? Its her own fault and she shouldn’t get mad about it.
Your comparing dressing attractively to dressing offensively.
If you wear fur to a PETA event, and are surprised when people throw paint on you, yes. It was your fault. And you are an asshole.
No, I’m comparing dressing sexy walking down the street to singing hymns.
Refer to my above post. I don’t believe for a second that any of this happened.
I think there was a protest, and a counter-protest. The counter-protest yelled a little.
Watch the video. There is no excessive, extreme violence like the supposed “eye witness” is reporting.
[/quote]
Once there were a couple dozen cops on the scene?
I suppose blacks during the civil rights movement should have just stayed out of white owned businesses and out of the white side of town, because that would provoke violence.
Bible thumpers need to mind their own business.
[quote]GumsMagoo wrote:
Bible thumpers need to mind their own business.[/quote]
So do the militant fucking gay motherfuckers.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
GumsMagoo wrote:
Bible thumpers need to mind their own business.
So do the militant fucking gay motherfuckers. [/quote]
It’s almost as if Genesis 19 was right on the money!
Again with the militant.
When is this rainbow army attacking?
[quote]ninearms wrote:
It’s within my rights walk around Harlem with a sign that reads “I hate niggers” too. Doesn’t mean it’s not stupid and provocative. [/quote]
I’m all for free speech, but you are quite wrong.
You most certainly cannot walk around, in Harlem, wearing that sign. It’s speech that is very likely to cause violence. Court refers to it as fighting words. It is therefore not protected by the First Amendment.
EDIT: unless your name is John Mclain and you are trying to save NYC from some terrorist attack lol
And standing in the middle of the Castro telling gays they should “convert” isn’t fighting talk?
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Again with the militant.
When is this rainbow army attacking?[/quote]
Here:
Castro street (see above).
The Mormon temple last week.
[quote]ninearms wrote:
And standing in the middle of the Castro telling gays they should “convert” isn’t fighting talk?[/quote]
I dunno. Are all the Prop 8 protests “fighting talk” for the rest of straight California, since the gays are calling us “bigots” and “homophobes” and blocking traffic?
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Again with the militant.
When is this rainbow army attacking?
Here:
Castro street (see above).
The Mormon temple last week. [/quote]
I will give my support to cinemark.
If this lady has a son he should be very ashamed.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
ninearms wrote:
And standing in the middle of the Castro telling gays they should “convert” isn’t fighting talk?
I dunno. Are all the Prop 8 protests “fighting talk” for the rest of straight California, since the gays are calling us “bigots” and “homophobes” and blocking traffic? [/quote]
Disorderly conduct, insighting a riot, both I believe are criminal charges. harassing customers, also a criminal charge, maybe different in Cali,
200 M1’s coming up.
[quote]apbt55 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
ninearms wrote:
And standing in the middle of the Castro telling gays they should “convert” isn’t fighting talk?
I dunno. Are all the Prop 8 protests “fighting talk” for the rest of straight California, since the gays are calling us “bigots” and “homophobes” and blocking traffic?
Disorderly conduct, insighting a riot, both I believe are criminal charges. harassing customers, also a criminal charge, maybe different in Cali,
[/quote]
Birds fly, dogs bark, Sodomites act like Sodomites.
The gay movement is largely a “Stuff White People Like” movement. I’m not sure harassing the most famous Mexican restaurant in Los Angeles is the way to go as far as winning over the Mexicans who voted 2:1 against gay marriage.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
apbt55 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
ninearms wrote:
And standing in the middle of the Castro telling gays they should “convert” isn’t fighting talk?
I dunno. Are all the Prop 8 protests “fighting talk” for the rest of straight California, since the gays are calling us “bigots” and “homophobes” and blocking traffic?
Disorderly conduct, insighting a riot, both I believe are criminal charges. harassing customers, also a criminal charge, maybe different in Cali,
Birds fly, dogs bark, Sodomites act like Sodomites.
The gay movement is largely a “Stuff White People Like” movement. I’m not sure harassing the most famous Mexican restaurant in Los Angeles is the way to go as far as winning over the Mexicans who voted 2:1 against gay marriage. [/quote]
Yes but I notice a lot of these movements are happening in areas where they are tolerated.
If a group tried pulling that in the area I live in, it would have a much different result. And I don’t think it would be tried again.
In fact where I live if there were a large group of gay protesters saying don’t go there it would probably draw more business form the local people and supporters of traditional family.
And any gay activist that uttered an obscenity at patron families would be immediately shackled and taken the local barricks.
But we are also still allowed to shoot people in self defense in our state too.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
ninearms wrote:
And standing in the middle of the Castro telling gays they should “convert” isn’t fighting talk?
I dunno. Are all the Prop 8 protests “fighting talk” for the rest of straight California, since the gays are calling us “bigots” and “homophobes” and blocking traffic? [/quote]
That’s just stating facts though, kind of like live news reporting.
[quote]ninearms wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
ninearms wrote:
And standing in the middle of the Castro telling gays they should “convert” isn’t fighting talk?
I dunno. Are all the Prop 8 protests “fighting talk” for the rest of straight California, since the gays are calling us “bigots” and “homophobes” and blocking traffic?
That’s just stating facts though, kind of like live news reporting.[/quote]
LOL. So it would be fine with you if we just grabbed some bats and crowbars and went out and handled the Big Gay Hissy Fit of 2008 ourselves then?