[quote]Professor X wrote:
CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Fulmen wrote:
Hey X and Tiri-
Remember “I KO’ed Functional Training”?
Good times.
You actually have people trying really really hard to bring it back. I can only assume it is justification for not making any progress. There really is no other use for it.
If an athlete decides to focus on unilateral leg exercises (as opposed to squats and deads) and speed/agility work [and calls this functional training] as opposed to doing squats and barbell curls and trying primarily to gain size, and it improves their game, how is it “a justification for not making any progress”?
You follow me around like my dog when I was a kid.
I would consider an athlete getting better at their own sport to BE progress. I would consider some jackass who doesn’t even play any formal sports yet talks endlessly about their “sports performance training” as justification for why they still have 14" arms to be a blatant failure.
Which group do YOU fall in?[/quote]
Wait who was the first one to reply to whom on this thread? Something about “great balls of bullshit”? Yet I’m following you around like a dog. Right.
Seriously, you need to learn to read. When did I say anything about MY “sports performance training”? Go ahead, read back, you wont find it. Because I never said anything about MY training. I merely made the point that not everyone who prefers “functional training” is doing so “as an excuse for a lack of progress”.
Just like in the other thread: I point out challenges various people may have in their goals, and I’m suddenly “Making excuses for myself”, when, again, I had never said anything about myself.
When I tell you about MY training or routines, or I talk about challenges or problems I have, then you can try talking down to me, specifically. Till then, try to learn to read the actual words I post and not what underlying message you think they maybe could mean.