[quote]pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Look I don’t watch Beck on Fox because…
Time for you to skip town, friend. Your work here is done.[/quote]
So in order to have a view on someone I find irritating I have to watch his show?
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Look I don’t watch Beck on Fox because…
Time for you to skip town, friend. Your work here is done.
So in order to have a view on someone I find irritating I have to watch his show?
So in order to have a view on the Battle of Britain I have to have studied history?
So in order to speak Spanish I actually have to study the language?
So in order to comment on the 2nd Amendment I actually have to have read it?
So in order to know whether Family Guy is funny I have to watch the show?
So in order to learn to tie my shoes I had to have paid attention to Mom when she was teaching me?
So in order to be an oceanographer I may not be able to live in Kansas?
So in order to have a view on Scotch whisky I may have to have drunk it?
So in order to understand boxing I may have to get near a ring someday?[/quote]
What? I stated that having watched Beck a couple of times, he irritates me so I don’t choose to whatch his show on Fox. Am I the worlds expert on Beck? No. Can I have an opnion on how much of a fucking douche he is? Yes.
Sorry if someone not agreeing with your worldview upsets you but tough titty!
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Look I don’t watch Beck on Fox because…
Time for you to skip town, friend. Your work here is done.
So in order to have a view on someone I find irritating I have to watch his show?
So in order to have a view on the Battle of Britain I have to have studied history?
So in order to speak Spanish I actually have to study the language?
So in order to comment on the 2nd Amendment I actually have to have read it?
So in order to know whether Family Guy is funny I have to watch the show?
So in order to learn to tie my shoes I had to have paid attention to Mom when she was teaching me?
So in order to be an oceanographer I may not be able to live in Kansas?
So in order to have a view on Scotch whisky I may have to have drunk it?
So in order to understand boxing I may have to get near a ring someday?[/quote]
You’re so biased.
[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
blah blah blah
[/quote]
I don’t really read your posts, but my opinion is that you’re an idiot.
[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
John Stewart is a comedian on the comedy channel yet has greater integrity than Beck who is supposedly a serious news commentator on a news channel.
John Stewart presents what he does as comedy. Beck presents what he does as serious journalism. One of them is right.
So Beck’s alleged lack of integrity should surely be backed up with numerous examples, right? Get busy and buena suerte. Usted va a necesitar ello, mi amigo que sabe no de lo que el dice.
Whoopi Goldberg calls him out as a liar then Beck even admits that he doesn’t need to check his facts because he is a commentator.
That was pathetic, Cock. A bunch of hens a-cluckin’ is your #1 answer to my question? You truly are a piece of work.
What about calling Jill Greenburg a left wing nut and then having her take photos of him shortly afterwards for GQ.
Another stellar example of his lack of integrity. Cock, you need to start doing some coke or something to cause you to post more intelligently.
What about all the fake on air crying?
I read on internet crying from you all the time. Right here on TESTOSTERONE Nation.
He clearly will say or do anything for ratings and money.
And you clearly couldn’t produce any evidence of his lack of integrity just as I suspected you couldn’t. No wonder Sifu dismembers you so easily. My youngest horse could smack you down in one of these discussions.
Look I don’t watch Beck on Fox because he comes across as a total buffoon to me. Possibly he is hugely insightful and shows great integrity for most of the time on his show. I admit I wouldn’t know this because what I see is when examples of his buffoonery are emailed around or commented on by comedians. [/quote]
Wssn’t it YOU who just the other day was complaining about the use of soundbites? Yes it was you. It is funny that you trash Beck then admit that all you know about him is from soundbites used by people posing as comedians to smear him.
[quote]
The examples I posted were a great example of how false he is though. He goes through a big spiel on his show then dick tucks like crazy when someone confronts him with the facts.
He slates a photographer then fawns cringes and cries for her to get her to take his photo for a magazine.
He bawls his eyes out on TV to show how much he loves his country simply because he knows it gets his key demographic up.
He even manages to contradict himself withing the same rant. One moment saying Obama hates white people then a few seconds later saying ‘I wouldn’t say that he hates white people.’
The guy is a clown, a goon and you guys are lapping it up as serious commentary on a news channel. [/quote]
Beck has an hour long show that is on five days a week. Everyday he is bringing information that no one else is. None of the other supposedly “real news” organisations thinks that being a marxist communist who idolizes Mao, Castro, Chavez is news worthy in an administration official.
Obama has hired people who hate our way of life, our system of gevernment and put them in positions of power where they could damage or destroy them.
Beck has been bringing news of who these people are to the American people and he has already brought one down. If Beck was only a clown he would not have been able to bring down Van Jones.
[quote]
As for Sifu, you are talking about someone who couldn’t find a fact in an encyclopedia, resorts to cutting and pasting because he has no cognitive process and name calls like a five year old any time anyone posts an opposing opinion. [/quote]
The reason why you don’t like my use of cut and paste is because I am able to bring information that backs up my statements. I never used cut and paste until people on this board started challenging me to provide information to back up my statements. So too bad for you, because that is how we roll around here at T-Nation.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
blah blah blah
I don’t really read your posts, but my opinion is that you’re an idiot.[/quote]
It’s the British dry sense of humour. I was raised around it so I get him. Cock is the thinking mans idiot. Why everyday I read at least one of his posts and I think to myself what an idiot.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Look I don’t watch Beck on Fox because…
Time for you to skip town, friend. Your work here is done.
So in order to have a view on someone I find irritating I have to watch his show?
So in order to have a view on the Battle of Britain I have to have studied history?
So in order to speak Spanish I actually have to study the language?
So in order to comment on the 2nd Amendment I actually have to have read it?
So in order to know whether Family Guy is funny I have to watch the show?
So in order to learn to tie my shoes I had to have paid attention to Mom when she was teaching me?
So in order to be an oceanographer I may not be able to live in Kansas?
So in order to have a view on Scotch whisky I may have to have drunk it?
So in order to understand boxing I may have to get near a ring someday?
What? I stated that having watched Beck a couple of times, he irritates me so I don’t choose to whatch his show on Fox. Am I the worlds expert on Beck? No. Can I have an opnion on how much of a fucking douche he is? Yes.
Sorry if someone not agreeing with your worldview upsets you but tough titty!
Only watching Beck “a couple of times” (and probably some YouTube snippets if I recall correctly) completely disqualifies you from this debate. Don’t let the screen door hit you on the ass on the way out, pard.
[/quote]
Don’t be so mean Push, he’s providing comic relief. Watch this I’ll post something relevant from the BNP to get his knickers in a knot.
I didn’t post the full article which is fairly long so as not to get Cockney all worked up. Follow the link if ou want to read the full story.
The Case for War Crimes Trials â?? Is Rupert Murdoch the Julius Streicher of Our Time?
October 21, 2009 by BNP News
There is an open-and-shut case for War Crimes Trials against Tony Blair and all others involved in the planning and commission of the aggressive, immoral and illegal war against Iraq.
Furthermore, there is also a prima facie case against the media bosses who deliberately incited the war against Iraq. The chief culprit in this regard is Rupert Murdoch, owner of The Sun newspaper. That propaganda sheet has consistently lied to the British public on all manner of issues, most notably the famous Blair-lie â??Saddamâ??s 45 minute missiles.â??
The Sun has also repeatedly claimed to be the kingmaker in British politics, and even boasted on its front page about how it was responsible for election victories. The Nazi propagandist Julius Streicher, who was responsible for incitement against Jews in Nazi Germany with his Der Sturmer newspaper, was arrested, tried and executed at the Nuremburg Trials.
Good idea, Sifu. We need to start posting more BNP stuff around here. The liberals hate them, so they must be saying something worth hearing.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
blah blah blah
I don’t really read your posts, but my opinion is that you’re an idiot.[/quote]
LOL!
[quote]pushharder wrote:
In all fairness if there was a thread about Keith Olberman and I got on there and trashed him soundly, repudiated his integrity and then let everyone know “But I don’t watch him except for 32 second YouTube clips” it would be completely appropriate for me to be tarred and feathered and run off the forum.[/quote]
The thread is not about Beck, it is about Fox choosing to cover one large march on Washington (that they were involved in setting up) and failing to provide cover for another large march on Washington that they were not actively involved in setting up.
It just descended into a back and forth about Beck because you guys have a hard on for him and I think he’s a douchebag.
[quote]Sifu wrote:
I didn’t post the full article which is fairly long so as not to get Cockney all worked up. Follow the link if ou want to read the full story.
The Case for War Crimes Trials â?? Is Rupert Murdoch the Julius Streicher of Our Time?
October 21, 2009 by BNP News
There is an open-and-shut case for War Crimes Trials against Tony Blair and all others involved in the planning and commission of the aggressive, immoral and illegal war against Iraq.
Furthermore, there is also a prima facie case against the media bosses who deliberately incited the war against Iraq. The chief culprit in this regard is Rupert Murdoch, owner of The Sun newspaper. That propaganda sheet has consistently lied to the British public on all manner of issues, most notably the famous Blair-lie â??Saddamâ??s 45 minute missiles.â??
The Sun has also repeatedly claimed to be the kingmaker in British politics, and even boasted on its front page about how it was responsible for election victories. The Nazi propagandist Julius Streicher, who was responsible for incitement against Jews in Nazi Germany with his Der Sturmer newspaper, was arrested, tried and executed at the Nuremburg Trials.
[/quote]
I doubt it would be an open and shut case however there are certainly a number of unanswered questions about the war on both sides of the Atlantic. Seeing Captain Smarm, Tony Blair hauled over the coals would be very interesting.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
…I think he’s a douchebag.
Based on “not watching him.”
[/quote]
Based on watching him a few times and seeing that he is a douchebag.
[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
Sifu wrote:
I didn’t post the full article which is fairly long so as not to get Cockney all worked up. Follow the link if ou want to read the full story.
The Case for War Crimes Trials �¢?? Is Rupert Murdoch the Julius Streicher of Our Time?
October 21, 2009 by BNP News
There is an open-and-shut case for War Crimes Trials against Tony Blair and all others involved in the planning and commission of the aggressive, immoral and illegal war against Iraq.
Furthermore, there is also a prima facie case against the media bosses who deliberately incited the war against Iraq. The chief culprit in this regard is Rupert Murdoch, owner of The Sun newspaper. That propaganda sheet has consistently lied to the British public on all manner of issues, most notably the famous Blair-lie �¢??Saddam�¢??s 45 minute missiles.�¢??
The Sun has also repeatedly claimed to be the kingmaker in British politics, and even boasted on its front page about how it was responsible for election victories. The Nazi propagandist Julius Streicher, who was responsible for incitement against Jews in Nazi Germany with his Der Sturmer newspaper, was arrested, tried and executed at the Nuremburg Trials.
I doubt it would be an open and shut case however there are certainly a number of unanswered questions about the war on both sides of the Atlantic. Seeing Captain Smarm, Tony Blair hauled over the coals would be very interesting.[/quote]
GWB also. He should at least be made to run some sort of gauntlet.