Forum Name Change: Bro Politics

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
61

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

Ahh right. Bush and Reagan both left with balanced budgets, certainly not massive deficits…

wait a second…[/quote]

Yeah and Obama is leaving a balanced budget…wait a second.[/quote]

Yeah wait a second, he sure inherited a balanced budget what with two wars being waged. And Bush’s unfunded mandates…Yeah, that Obama…How has he managed to ruin the country so quickly? With only one major piece of legislation that the bi-partisan congressional budget office says is going to reduce the deficit?

its mind blowing really.[/quote]

No.

The CBO is bound to take the claims that the legislators make at face value and can only look at a 10 year period.

So what the CBO really said is that IF the claims that are made are true, which they are not, then the next ten years it would, as fare as one can tell right now, reduce the deficit.

Nwo of course no social program ever has actually cost as much as advertised, the law was written in a way that the CBO was bound by law to say what it said and to claim that piece of talking point bullshittery on this board can only mean that you are ignorantg of the limitations of the CBO or you think that everybody else is.

Socialiced medicine will ruin you, trust me on that and I am 30 years ahead of the curve when it comes to that.

62

Brocialised medicine.

63

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

Ahh right. Bush and Reagan both left with balanced budgets, certainly not massive deficits…

wait a second…[/quote]

Yeah and Obama is leaving a balanced budget…wait a second.[/quote]

Yeah wait a second, he sure inherited a balanced budget what with two wars being waged. And Bush’s unfunded mandates…Yeah, that Obama…How has he managed to ruin the country so quickly? With only one major piece of legislation that the bi-partisan congressional budget office says is going to reduce the deficit?

its mind blowing really.[/quote]

No.

The CBO is bound to take the claims that the legislators make at face value and can only look at a 10 year period.

So what the CBO really said is that IF the claims that are made are true, which they are not, then the next ten years it would, as fare as one can tell right now, reduce the deficit.

Nwo of course no social program ever has actually cost as much as advertised, the law was written in a way that the CBO was bound by law to say what it said and to claim that piece of talking point bullshittery on this board can only mean that you are ignorantg of the limitations of the CBO or you think that everybody else is.

Socialiced medicine will ruin you, trust me on that and I am 30 years ahead of the curve when it comes to that.

[/quote]

Honestly I’ve gotten to the point where I tend to think anybody who is for socialized medicine is economically retarded. I listen to them much like I would a small child.

64

[quote]Deorum wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

Ahh right. Bush and Reagan both left with balanced budgets, certainly not massive deficits…

wait a second…[/quote]

Yeah and Obama is leaving a balanced budget…wait a second.[/quote]

Yeah wait a second, he sure inherited a balanced budget what with two wars being waged. And Bush’s unfunded mandates…Yeah, that Obama…How has he managed to ruin the country so quickly? With only one major piece of legislation that the bi-partisan congressional budget office says is going to reduce the deficit?

its mind blowing really.[/quote]

No.

The CBO is bound to take the claims that the legislators make at face value and can only look at a 10 year period.

So what the CBO really said is that IF the claims that are made are true, which they are not, then the next ten years it would, as fare as one can tell right now, reduce the deficit.

Nwo of course no social program ever has actually cost as much as advertised, the law was written in a way that the CBO was bound by law to say what it said and to claim that piece of talking point bullshittery on this board can only mean that you are ignorantg of the limitations of the CBO or you think that everybody else is.

Socialiced medicine will ruin you, trust me on that and I am 30 years ahead of the curve when it comes to that.

[/quote]

Honestly I’ve gotten to the point where I tend to think anybody who is for socialized medicine is economically retarded. I listen to them much like I would a small child.[/quote]

Brohans…brobull…broirish…brorion, broeli…stop this. This is the Brotastic thread bro. Bring your brodatious examples here, and stop the angry bro hate.

Y’all are just Racial Brofiling with all the tax/spend/defict brolib GOP Brocialized Med BroJob Barnyard…talk.

I can’t wait til the broliberals finally figure out that the US is not really Bro bad.

65

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

Ahh right. Bush and Reagan both left with balanced budgets, certainly not massive deficits…

wait a second…[/quote]

Yeah and Obama is leaving a balanced budget…wait a second.[/quote]

Yeah wait a second, he sure inherited a balanced budget what with two wars being waged. And Bush’s unfunded mandates…Yeah, that Obama…How has he managed to ruin the country so quickly? With only one major piece of legislation that the bi-partisan congressional budget office says is going to reduce the deficit?

its mind blowing really.[/quote]

No.

The CBO is bound to take the claims that the legislators make at face value and can only look at a 10 year period.

So what the CBO really said is that IF the claims that are made are true, which they are not, then the next ten years it would, as fare as one can tell right now, reduce the deficit.

Nwo of course no social program ever has actually cost as much as advertised, the law was written in a way that the CBO was bound by law to say what it said and to claim that piece of talking point bullshittery on this board can only mean that you are ignorantg of the limitations of the CBO or you think that everybody else is.

Socialiced medicine will ruin you, trust me on that and I am 30 years ahead of the curve when it comes to that.

[/quote]
We don’t have socialized medicine though…we have an incentive to buy insurance from private corporations.

66

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

Ahh right. Bush and Reagan both left with balanced budgets, certainly not massive deficits…

wait a second…[/quote]

Yeah and Obama is leaving a balanced budget…wait a second.[/quote]

Yeah wait a second, he sure inherited a balanced budget what with two wars being waged. And Bush’s unfunded mandates…Yeah, that Obama…How has he managed to ruin the country so quickly? With only one major piece of legislation that the bi-partisan congressional budget office says is going to reduce the deficit?

its mind blowing really.[/quote]

No.

The CBO is bound to take the claims that the legislators make at face value and can only look at a 10 year period.

So what the CBO really said is that IF the claims that are made are true, which they are not, then the next ten years it would, as fare as one can tell right now, reduce the deficit.

Nwo of course no social program ever has actually cost as much as advertised, the law was written in a way that the CBO was bound by law to say what it said and to claim that piece of talking point bullshittery on this board can only mean that you are ignorantg of the limitations of the CBO or you think that everybody else is.

Socialiced medicine will ruin you, trust me on that and I am 30 years ahead of the curve when it comes to that.

[/quote]
We don’t have socialized medicine though…we have an incentive to buy insurance from private corporations.[/quote]

Actually it is more like fascism in that the illusion of private ownership is upheld and the corporations are tightly regulated to achieve goals that are deemed beneficial by the state.

Makes no difference in the end, it still is redistribution, the prevention of serious innovation and competition and the politiciation of every aspect of your health.

69

[quote]Vegita wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:
I am going to change my name to brorelius.

funny post OP I did LOL.[/quote]

We made it funny, he was being serious.

V[/quote]

This IS why it’s funny. And because it’s true. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, broseph.

70

[quote]Broharder wrote:
Somebody’s gotta load me up with bro-props for workin in an Alabama classic into PWI.[/quote]

Mad Props Broharder.

71

Obama mama bro

72

[quote]Otep wrote:
Mad Props Broharder.[/quote]

Brotep

73

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

Ahh right. Bush and Reagan both left with balanced budgets, certainly not massive deficits…

wait a second…[/quote]

Yeah and Obama is leaving a balanced budget…wait a second.[/quote]

Yeah wait a second, he sure inherited a balanced budget what with two wars being waged. And Bush’s unfunded mandates…Yeah, that Obama…How has he managed to ruin the country so quickly? With only one major piece of legislation that the bi-partisan congressional budget office says is going to reduce the deficit?

its mind blowing really.[/quote]

No.

The CBO is bound to take the claims that the legislators make at face value and can only look at a 10 year period.

So what the CBO really said is that IF the claims that are made are true, which they are not, then the next ten years it would, as fare as one can tell right now, reduce the deficit.

Nwo of course no social program ever has actually cost as much as advertised, the law was written in a way that the CBO was bound by law to say what it said and to claim that piece of talking point bullshittery on this board can only mean that you are ignorantg of the limitations of the CBO or you think that everybody else is.

Socialiced medicine will ruin you, trust me on that and I am 30 years ahead of the curve when it comes to that.

[/quote]
We don’t have socialized medicine though…we have an incentive to buy insurance from private corporations.[/quote]

incentive? Do you mean coercion?

74

[quote]polo77j wrote:
incentive? Do you mean coercion?[/quote]

Broercion

75

Ha,ha

Gotta give props to Rockscar…racial brofiling…favorite one so far

76

[quote]brorey420 wrote:
Ha,ha

Gotta give props to Rockscar…racial brofiling…favorite one so far[/quote]

I too thought it was brotastic!

V

77


Elena BroKagan…

78

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Elena BroKagan…[/quote]

There was no need to doctor that picture…at all.

79

[quote]jsbrook wrote:

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Elena BroKagan…[/quote]

There was no need to doctor that picture…at all.[/quote]

Jeez going for a cheap laugh…what …you never seen big frizzy black hair on old ladies?

80

[quote]jsbrook wrote:

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Elena BroKagan…[/quote]

There was no need to doctor that picture…at all.[/quote]

I might add many of my own pics have been doctored for the purposes defamation. Some very classic and very insulting…I thought it was funny.