Following Politics, Following the Money

The government is the entity that make the laws. They’re the ones that schedule drugs. They’re the ones that keep Stem Cells treatments off the shelf. Companies in all industries lobby in their self-interest (as do people). It’s up to the government to act or not act on it.

Corporations don’t run things. The government does. If the FDA is in bed with corporations that’s a GOVERNMENTAL FAILURE and you’d be handing that failure more power via single-payer.

Tell me that breached your thick skull, please.

What you post isn’t evidence.

If the PNHP is “evidence” worth considering so is what the CATO Institute puts out.

For anyone that understands how analysis works controlled data is what matters when measuring the efficacy of something. Anecdotal evidence isn’t enough in and of itself.

Nah, it’s dumb because it’s dumb. Like really fucking dumb. Like not having a fucking clue what you’re talking about at all kinda dumb.

I noticed you skipped over the rest. Having trouble googling what COGS is?

The technology that evolved from this era was nothing short of revolutionary: civilian nuclear energy, advanced jet engines that enabled civilian aviation, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), the transistor and semiconductor technology, computer languages, satellites, advanced radar, and ultimately space exploration, which culminated with one of America’s proudest moments with the moon landing in 1969. I don’t believe that the private sector could have successfully funded these kinds of R&D projects that require decades of work without the federal government’s assistance

Initiated by the dynamic public sector.

And wow, an article written by Amity Shlaes of The Bush Institute.

And it says the opinions written by her are her own.

The IRS reckoned the effective tax rate for top earners in 1954 was 70%

And in 1953 it is estimated to be 49% by Marc Linder. Far higher than they are today.

Ya, if I didn’t understand anything I wouldn’t even bother to re-write someone else’s opinion either.
image

You didn’t even change the font. Fucking clown. You should try actually reading the article you stole from:


image




Do you really want to go down this road?

3 Likes

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

1 Like

Here, since I’m sure you’re confused:
image

Ya, heaven forbid we listen to the opinion of a YALE Graduate (with honors).

What an awful resume…

Clown. You’re nothing but a clown.

1 Like

Great stuff, truly great government care.
https://tribunist.com/news/double-amputee-vet-turned-away-from-va-without-treatment-video/

@Zeppelin795 Summary:
Affiliate links
Plagiarism
Attacking people that want the same thing as you (legalized MJ)
:roll_eyes:

1 Like

And he doesn’t even understand that he’s making money for some capitalist “shill”. he’s a true Alt Left believer. Scary really.

Nothing is more terrifying than a true believer.

You can most likely apply that statement to any point in human history anywhere in the world

1 Like

I usually picture him as a Templar with a big ol joint on his chest instead of the cross, lol.

100% chance he feels like a real crusader for justice and the people! :roll_eyes:

1 Like

The data from Piketty, Saez, and Zucman is not divided among federal, state, and local taxes, so it is difficult to tell exactly how much the rich were paying in federal income taxes specifically during this period.

Even if this is true, does this have a deleterious effect or is it overall taxation that counts?

The technology that evolved from this era was nothing short of revolutionary: civilian nuclear energy, advanced jet engines that enabled civilian aviation, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), the transistor and semiconductor technology, computer languages, satellites, advanced radar, and ultimately space exploration, which culminated with one of America’s proudest moments with the moon landing in 1969.

Was this mostly accomplished by the private sector?

Oh no, gasp! The federal government remained a large part of US GDP.

Another oh no. I don’t believe that the private sector could have successfully funded these kinds of R&D projects that require decades of work without the federal government’s assistance
(NASA), which was once the technological envy of the solar system, confirm my view.
A program that was funded by the public sector. Not your heros of your free-market fantasies.

Perhaps, it could lead to something of a renaissance in health and medical sciences as the demand for improved medicine would rise as the population got older his may be true to an extent but will be muffled by the monopoly behavior of the healthcare industry.

So what does this tell us?

Inequality does matter, and measures to reduce it have a proper place in economic policy. But by promoting efficiency and raising living standards, a market economy has proved its worth. To argue that inequality is the fundamental weakness of modern capitalism, while ignoring capitalism’s achievements, may excite the well-heeled intellectual salons of Paris and New York, but most of us recognise that a market economy has served us well by creating growth and reducing poverty.

Is this true? Look at the inequality of the U.S.

The billionaires who make up the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans now have as much wealth as all African-American households, plus one-third of America’s Latino population, combined. In other words, just 400 extremely wealthy individuals have as much wealth as 16 million African-American households and 5 million Latino households.

Wow, what a great service Capitalism has accomplished.

You didn’t even change the font. Fucking clown. As if this matters and oh no you called me a name again.

And there are far more people today that would fit into the top tax bracket. Do you think that would make any difference? And there is a distinction between income and capital gains.

The majority of the advances were begun in the public sector(government). I know this is hard for you to admit as you continue to suck the cock of Capitalism.

Where have I tried to pass off anyone’s work as my own?

If I source something it is not plagiarism. If that was the case, who wouldn’t be guilty?

W went to Yale. Should he be listened to? As if he got in there through merit and not his daddy.

If we are to pay attention to someone because of their credentials why not: Noam Chomsky - Biography - IMDb

Great stuff by the pro-capitalist governors. death toll from Medicaid rejection is likely to run between 7,000 and 17,000 Americans each year.

Where has this occurred? Usmccd423 promotes monopolies. His remedy to the MJ question is to let people go and buy it from the local drug dealer. And risk going to jail. Not to mention that medical MJ is administered in other forms like drops, tinctures and vaporizing to name a few. And often this different form of administration is better. Plus, buying from the dealer will not give you the ratio of THC vs. CBD. Another very important distinction. Just goes to show his absolute ignorance of the subject and his inability to offer a viable alternative. I guess we should have more studies. Never mind the vast amount of people who are already getting relief from the substance. There have to be clinical trials. A smokescreen designed to delay any approval to carry on their monopoly practices. A position he agrees with. A natural outgrowth of capitalism. It is a failed system that is eating itself.

Again you display your ignorance by not making a critical distinction between differences in profit. It is all the same to you.

A true believer in what the mainstream media indoctrinates him on. Now that is scary.

And I usually picture you wearing a diaper and sucking on a pacifier shaped like an erect penis. I bet it is you that believes they are doing God’s work sticking up for monopolies.