[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
[quote]NativeTX wrote:
[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
[quote]NativeTX wrote:
As far as the other “comments”
EQ is not a shit compound. A lot of people speak very highly about it. That’s your opinion and a bad one.
I put it on another thread, because I was getting little response. Sorry, but I am not going to go just off one person’s opinion. I ideally would like input from several people.
And, I did do a lot of homework and took several ideas from different people and combined what I liked. Just because one person on here thinks differently does not mean it’s a shit cycle. Your entitled to your opinion, and I want an honest critique with CONSTRUCTIVE crticism
I was valuing your opinion until you started acting like a child.
I see a lot of posts on here. Some people take their advice seriously and know their shit. Others take it as an opportunity to SLAM someone in a forum.[/quote]
Where did I say that EQ was shit?
If I thought it was shit, I wouldn’t be using it right now.
I love EQ. I also love NPP and winstrol. IN fact, with the addition of test and GH, this is my current pre-contest cycle.
No, the reason your cycle is shit, was laid out by me in constructive style on your other thread. You blatantly ingnored my advice there and in fact REPOSTED the same cycle again in that same thread, before acting impatient and deciding to post THE SAME THING in a brand new thread. You couldn’t even offer a constructive riposte to my advice, so don’t talk to me about ‘research’ and ‘acting like a child’.
And if you think that was being SLAMMED, then you really have no idea just how ugly this forum can get. Personally I try to always remain polite, but when you couldn’t even be bothered to reply constructively to my critique and were in fact behaving rudely yourslef (by starting another samey thread, which is pretty insulting when you think about it), I did take my comments up a notch - mostly to see if they would penetrate your veil of ignorance.
Have you considered that maybe the reason there was no other input on your first thread was because I had already pretty much nailed it?
Anyway, my opinion apparently isn’t good enough for you, which doesn’t bother me. I’ll just save myself the time and effort it takes to answer your questions. Which leaves me more time to devote to my paying clients. You know, the ones that pay me hundreds of dollars to design their cycles and advise them on PEDs, nutrition, training, injuries, etc.
All the best. Hope your cycle works out for you in whatever way you decide to run it.
BBB[/quote]
Why would anyone on an internet forum assume that everyone knows and thinks that “they are THE MAN” as a couple have said. If some guy that I met in the gym that I saw was in competitive shape gave me advice, I would respect it (still I would take other advice)…no direspevt in that. Howver, you and some others assume I know who you are and your exp, bachkground, etc. Only women expect men to assum what’s in their heads with out saying it, and then get pissed when they don’t.
Many on this thread are acting like F* women…not what I expcected from this forum (or any forum of straight guys).
If you had started off with this is similar to my competition cycle…I would have had a totally different take…still would have wanted more than 1 opinion.[/quote]
You already replied to this post. Only a woman would pick up an old comment and reply to it again when it had clearly been ignored.
You still don’t get it really, from my point of view.
You asked for advice and it was given. You rudely ignored the advice, didn’t bother to explain why you chose to disregard it (with some sort of scientific counterpoint) and then went and childishly started essentially the same thread again.
It doesn’t matter WHO gave the advice as long as it was clearly written and explained (as I thought it was). Ettiquette demands that you at least give it consideration and a polite, reasoned response, since you ask for polite, reasoned input. It shouldn’t need to come from a ‘guru’ or whatever ‘steroid social status’ turns you on enough for you to deign to consider it worthy of consideration. All clearly explained, rational advice SHOULD be worthy of consideration and retort. Apparently not though, in your case.
I’m not being emotional or ‘female’ when I say that I won’t be inputting into any of your threads from now on. I’m not being petulant; I just have more important things to do with my time, like offer advice to those who appreciate it and more importantly know what to do with it.
So goodbye, good luck.
BBB[/quote]
Did you not read this:
Let me just throw this out there. If I were getting elective surgery, and the doc said “great let’s cut you open and get to work”. I would not follow that advice…who would? I would get 2-3 more opinions, and it would not matter where he went to Med School or what he had on his wall. It’s always best to get a greater perspective. And, if when I told the doc, “hey, sounds good but I want a couple of other opinions”, he said, “I am the SHIT and listen to my nurses who agree.”. " IF you do not want me to due the F* surgery, then F* you. That’s disrespcet and you can find someone else to do your surgery…you petulant child". I would run from that DR. in a heartbeat and assume he had mental “issues”.
That is pretty much what happened here, and that’s why I do not understand the response.
If you choose to respond, do not restate the situation and twist around with some smart ass comments. But, you proabaly will anyway.
"i’ve tried to make you understand where I was coming from. Less and apology, becasue you don’t deserve one:
If you look at the post times, you had given me less than 24 hours to respond to your advice. And, in the mean time I had to respond to the jokers making shit comments towards me. When the heck was I supposed to reply. I would think 48-72 hours is reasonable on an internet forum. YOu called me out in less than 24 for not responding, and we are in different time zones.
Let’s get some logic going on here…
