Peeking in - I was looking for the smart guy thread. I’ll keep looking. Thanks.
[quote]forlife wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
Your disease has progressed. Please locate the antidote… Reality.
If I have anti-Bush disease, it is shared by the majority…which includes at this point a large number of Republicans as well.[/quote]
No. It’s called BUSH DERAGEMENT SYNDROME. Suffered by many liberals who just can’t seem to say the word Bush without losing their cool. In your case, I know you don’t like Bush…but I really mean GW Bush. 
[quote]forlife wrote:
If I have anti-Bush disease…[/quote]
Oh, Great Muse of Comedy, why dost thou drop these gifts onto my lap so freely?
[quote]orion wrote:
Though it will take decades to undo the damage, he will finally fuck up no more, or, at least, only in private.
[/quote]
The question is, will we be spared having to hear about his private fuck ups in the news media?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
forlife wrote:
If I have anti-Bush disease…
Oh, Great Muse of Comedy, why dost thou drop these gifts onto my lap so freely?[/quote]
indeed, good catch!
[quote]forlife wrote:
Ding Dong, the Bitch is Dead.
What 4 or 5 people do you consider more powerful than the U.S. President?[/quote]
- The Queen
- The Vatican
- The Gettys
- The Rothschilds
- Colonel Sanders (before he went tits up…oh how I hated that one with his wee beady eyes and that smug look on his face)
Getting rid of Bush was great. What sucks is now we have Obama for 4 years.
[quote]forlife wrote:
Ding Dong, the Bitch is Dead.
What 4 or 5 people do you consider more powerful than the U.S. President?[/quote]
osama bin laden!
hands down
[quote]forlife wrote:
Ding Dong, the Bitch is Dead.
What 4 or 5 people do you consider more powerful than the U.S. President?
[/quote]
Oprah.
Bernanke.
Putin.
Professor X.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
forlife wrote:
If I have anti-Bush disease…
Oh, Great Muse of Comedy, why dost thou drop these gifts onto my lap so freely?[/quote]
That took me 30seconds but then I LOld
Any 5 people of the many who are pulling his strings
Bush Derangement Synrdrome clearly cannot exist. Bush Exaggeration Syndrome maybe. People hate Bush so much they blame him for things that are really not his fault.
But Bush was clearly an awful president and made many, many far-reaching mistakes. Some of which he’s finally admitted. Conservatives should be no happier with him than liberals or anyone in between. He’s destroyed the Republican party. Spending that was beyond reckless and utter abandonment of fiscal conservatism is one of his many failings.
Bush ran as a conservative. That was phony.
Obama ran as a lib. That was phony.
Both men said whatever it took to get elected, given the country’s mood. Very little will change, except taxes will go up.
Healthcare will still be mostly for those with money, while the poor get crumbs. Schools will still be top heavy with bureaucrats while teachers get crumbs. Banks will continue to loot the Treasury. On and on…
Nothing in politics will change. We all know it, so just carry on until you’re completely drained and you die.
At least we can be entertained by Christine.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
At least we can be entertained by Christine.[/quote]
at least that’s something.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Sloth wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Jesus?
You’re cheating! I’m assuming fully man, and present.
Whoa, whoa whoa. Jesus IS fully man. And fully God. And omnipresent.
Yeah, I didn’t word that well. How about, ONLY fully man? I don’t think that trips me up anywhere.
Edit: Oh, and present in the material, presently living man (no divinity!) sense. Who knew this was going to get so complicated?[/quote]
Try “non-fictional.”
See? Simple.
[quote]pookie wrote:
Sloth wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Sloth wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
Jesus?
You’re cheating! I’m assuming fully man, and present.
Whoa, whoa whoa. Jesus IS fully man. And fully God. And omnipresent.
Yeah, I didn’t word that well. How about, ONLY fully man? I don’t think that trips me up anywhere.
Edit: Oh, and present in the material, presently living man (no divinity!) sense. Who knew this was going to get so complicated?
Try “non-fictional.”
See? Simple.
[/quote]
Well, that’s not my belief. So, why I would I use it?