[quote]Shadowzz4 wrote:
KombatAthlete wrote:
mike08042 wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
BrwnbellyYankee wrote:
learn to network and that degree will take you places.
at least thats what i learned from talking with the old strength coach for the NY Yankees.
Who you know is only second to what you know. But it is SECOND. It may (and should) open some doors and opportunties, but if you’re not skilled and educated, it won’t take you very far.
I have to totally disagree, its all about who you know, not what you know. ( In most cases almost anyone can be trained for most jobs, I have seen alot of non-experienced people get undeserved promotions without any education get recognized and end up getting the job. But jsbrook said learn to network and his degree will take him places, and you said that if your not educated you wont get anywhere? Well to me having a degree doesnt mean your uneducated. Regardless I believe a good education can go far if you know how to network well.
I would imagine in depending on the field. I bet its far more important on Wall Street than it is for chemists, for example.
Thats a good point. I would definitely say that any profession in which you can practice either without the requirement of a degree or a profession in which you actually can feasably practice (chemistry obviously no one has the substances and equipment necessary to learn at home), doesnt need a degree, for that field. I do agree a BS in something should be a minimum though. The way I look at school in general no matter what degree you have is it shows a certain amount of work has been done. And if you have one of the summas, you are probably pretty organized and studious. A degree does not show a certain amount of understanding in a subject, or even the potential for such.
My main problem with degrees is that there is no guarantee the person is qualified for what he/she is doing, it is very conceivable that you have a BS, MS, Phd in Ex Phys, and not understand the mechanics of doing a lunge. I also think that school is misconstrued as being the only honorable and hard working way to do things. What if you are training at a good gym and in your spare time you read biomechanics, physiology and anatomy books.
If you are eager to learn and read those books all the time should you be thought of as less than a kid who studies for a half hour before his clinical exercise midterm, just because you are not in school? FUCK NO! I say all this because I am in school right now at Umass-Boston and I see people graduating with 4.0’s who havent a fucking clue about training, but by some they would be looked to as an expert/professional, because they went to school…
[/quote]
I agree, it’s kinda messed up that there are people in a profession who don’t have a clue about it, yet still act as if they know everything and no one else knows better.
But then again, it’s hard to evaluate a persons knowledge anyhow. There are people/consumers/customers, who value a degree above anything else. The higher the degree, the more these people presume that this “professional” knows what he’s doing. That might be true, but it might not.
Then there are those who don’t look at degrees, but the professionals achievements… But it’s hard to have any achievements when you’re just starting. This is where I think that knowing the right people come into play. To get one started. It could also be just a matter of being an intern in the right place. In athletics though, I believe that an athletic background gives some credibility, because one has already been through some of the tribulations the prospective clients are about to go through (now talking about s&c).