Hahahahahahaha no man I stuck with MY Avi for a month. Whew man I didnt know how to react with you liking Brady. Making me re-evaluate “Vikings” [/quote]
nope…truth be told, I’ve been a Raider fan since I been shittin yellow.
uhh, I think my hubby just may be able to make a hunting partner outta this dog…
She yelps as she chases the kitty around…I decided the kitty has hidden in the room long enough…time to face the music.
poor poor kitty…
The dog could care less about the old man cat. Is that cause he just lays there? [/quote]
I read it. But then again I watched a A&E thing on how the collapse happened years ago. Trying to convince people there is no conspiracy is impossible, even absence of evidence is seen as evidence.
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
I can’t believe the Osama bin Laden thread turned into a “Did 9/11 really happen?” thread…[/quote]
Yes you do.
You dropped a little bomb in that one, I see.
[/quote]
Which no one is going to read, but I don’t care. Stupid fucker. “9/11 was an inside job.”[/quote]
I read it. But then again I watched a A&E thing on how the collapse happened years ago. Trying to convince people there is no conspiracy is impossible, even absence of evidence is seen as evidence.
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
I can’t believe the Osama bin Laden thread turned into a “Did 9/11 really happen?” thread…[/quote]
Yes you do.
You dropped a little bomb in that one, I see.
[/quote]
Which no one is going to read, but I don’t care. Stupid fucker. “9/11 was an inside job.”[/quote]
[/quote]
True that! The more “evidence” given is used to “prove” the vastness of the “conspiracy” yet if little evidence was given that TOO would be used to “prove” the “conspiracy”. You can’t win.
Nope, can I interest you in a giant bunny instead?
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]Charlie Horse wrote:
I read it. But then again I watched a A&E thing on how the collapse happened years ago. Trying to convince people there is no conspiracy is impossible, even absence of evidence is seen as evidence.
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
I can’t believe the Osama bin Laden thread turned into a “Did 9/11 really happen?” thread…[/quote]
Yes you do.
You dropped a little bomb in that one, I see.
[/quote]
Which no one is going to read, but I don’t care. Stupid fucker. “9/11 was an inside job.”[/quote]
[/quote]
True that! The more “evidence” given is used to “prove” the vastness of the “conspiracy” yet if little evidence was given that TOO would be used to “prove” the “conspiracy”. You can’t win.[/quote]
So, have you guys every run into say…Meni in a different part of the interwebs? Or any other member here, without them giving you there information (Hallows, or stalking them)? Is it weird when it happens? I felt very weirded out.
[quote]Charlie Horse wrote:
Nope, can I interest you in a giant bunny instead?
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]Charlie Horse wrote:
I read it. But then again I watched a A&E thing on how the collapse happened years ago. Trying to convince people there is no conspiracy is impossible, even absence of evidence is seen as evidence.
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
I can’t believe the Osama bin Laden thread turned into a “Did 9/11 really happen?” thread…[/quote]
Yes you do.
You dropped a little bomb in that one, I see.
[/quote]
Which no one is going to read, but I don’t care. Stupid fucker. “9/11 was an inside job.”[/quote]
[/quote]
True that! The more “evidence” given is used to “prove” the vastness of the “conspiracy” yet if little evidence was given that TOO would be used to “prove” the “conspiracy”. You can’t win.[/quote]
[/quote]
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
So, have you guys every run into say…Meni in a different part of the interwebs? Or any other member here, without them giving you there information (Hallows, or stalking them)? Is it weird when it happens? I felt very weirded out.[/quote]
Um are you trying to say you are seeing other forums?