[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I wrote a post… Is it lost in space?[/quote]
Did somebody say something?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I wrote a post… Is it lost in space?[/quote]
[quote]debraD wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I wrote a post… Is it lost in space?[/quote]
Did somebody say something?[/quote]
Not sure why it wasn’t allowed through.
I was just pontificating on the finer points of nudity in photo media…
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I wrote a post… Is it lost in space?[/quote]
Did somebody say something?[/quote]
Not sure why it wasn’t allowed through.
I was just pontificating on the finer points of nudity in photo media…[/quote]
Odd, I didn’t know such content was being moderated.
[quote]nlmain wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I wrote a post… Is it lost in space?[/quote]
[/quote]
haha, that one is pretty funny.
Care to re-phrase?
[quote]debraD wrote:
Care to re-phrase? [/quote]
Okay…
SO I was asking if the nudie PM’s were straight up penhouse type porn, or tasteful use of shadow and small bits of cloths to force the use of imagination.
Then I went on to say, that while I prefer the nasty porn type, the “romantic” art type is much hotter.
Trust me, I’m into some freaky ass shit, assuming the girl I’m with is down. (I’m also content with much less than “holy shit, you’re a dirty perv” if she is not.) But a pic with yoga pants, creative lighting, or even a perfectly placed thong can be so much hotter than the actual picture of the goods… But the pic of the goods is what I prefer when looking for nudie pics.
Does that even make sense?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
Care to re-phrase? [/quote]
Okay…
SO I was asking if the nudie PM’s were straight up penhouse type porn, or tasteful use of shadow and small bits of cloths to force the use of imagination.
Then I went on to say, that while I prefer the nasty porn type, the “romantic” art type is much hotter.
Trust me, I’m into some freaky ass shit, assuming the girl I’m with is down. (I’m also content with much less than “holy shit, you’re a dirty perv” if she is not.) But a pic with yoga pants, creative lighting, or even a perfectly placed thong can be so much hotter than the actual picture of the goods… But the pic of the goods is what I prefer when looking for nudie pics.
Does that even make sense?
[/quote]
LOL!!
Yes.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
Care to re-phrase? [/quote]
Okay…
SO I was asking if the nudie PM’s were straight up penhouse type porn, or tasteful use of shadow and small bits of cloths to force the use of imagination.
Then I went on to say, that while I prefer the nasty porn type, the “romantic” art type is much hotter.
Trust me, I’m into some freaky ass shit, assuming the girl I’m with is down. (I’m also content with much less than “holy shit, you’re a dirty perv” if she is not.) But a pic with yoga pants, creative lighting, or even a perfectly placed thong can be so much hotter than the actual picture of the goods… But the pic of the goods is what I prefer when looking for nudie pics.
Does that even make sense?
[/quote]
yup - it terms of photographic beauty and art some veiling is always good stimulates the imagination and all but in terms of a little more stimulation of full pic is needed.
an erotic picture - stimulates but I would not masterbate
porn - good shit that is, is useful to finish the job.
amiright?
[quote]nlmain wrote:
an erotic picture - stimulates but I would not masterbate
porn - good shit that is, is useful to finish the job.
amiright?[/quote]
Spot on…
Nice to know my mindless rambles are comprehend-able .
ha! Yes it makes sense 
I have no idea what the content of the nudie PMs are however.
Erotic pics = Appetizer.
Porn = Steak.
Masturbation = Desert.
I’m intellismart!
[quote]debraD wrote:
I have no idea what the content of the nudie PMs are however.[/quote]
Interesting.
I wouldn’t have the steal reserve to not read them, and inspect the photos, if only for future reference of what may be coming.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
I have no idea what the content of the nudie PMs are however.[/quote]
Interesting.
I wouldn’t have the steal reserve to not read them, and inspect the photos, if only for future reference of what may be coming.[/quote]
Oh I don’t mean the ones I get 
I mean the ones involved in the SAMA drama of the day.
But there are some I never looked at because I turn images off on my browser at work and so I just see a placeholder.
[quote]debraD wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
I have no idea what the content of the nudie PMs are however.[/quote]
Interesting.
I wouldn’t have the steal reserve to not read them, and inspect the photos, if only for future reference of what may be coming.[/quote]
Oh I don’t mean the ones I get I mean the ones involved in the SAMA drama of the day.
But there are some I never looked at because I turn images off on my browser at work and so I just see a placeholder.[/quote]
Honest question:
How many cock shots have you gotten? And does that freak you out?
I mean if one of the chicks sent me a bent over pucker hole pic, I would super appreciate it, but it would be a little weird too. I mean, at least strike up normal convo first. for like 2 or 3 PMs, then give me the good stuff. I may be a man, but warm me up a little here… You know “spit on your palm first”…
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
I have no idea what the content of the nudie PMs are however.[/quote]
Interesting.
I wouldn’t have the steal reserve to not read them, and inspect the photos, if only for future reference of what may be coming.[/quote]
Oh I don’t mean the ones I get I mean the ones involved in the SAMA drama of the day.
But there are some I never looked at because I turn images off on my browser at work and so I just see a placeholder.[/quote]
Honest question:
How many cock shots have you gotten? And does that freak you out?
I mean if one of the chicks sent me a bent over pucker hole pic, I would super appreciate it, but it would be a little weird too. I mean, at least strike up normal convo first. for like 2 or 3 PMs, then give me the good stuff. I may be a man, but warm me up a little here… You know “spit on your palm first”…[/quote]
Too many to count lol. No I don’t appreciate them! They don’t upset me either but random cock shots from strangers are not that exciting.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
I have no idea what the content of the nudie PMs are however.[/quote]
Interesting.
I wouldn’t have the steal reserve to not read them, and inspect the photos, if only for future reference of what may be coming.[/quote]
Oh I don’t mean the ones I get I mean the ones involved in the SAMA drama of the day.
But there are some I never looked at because I turn images off on my browser at work and so I just see a placeholder.[/quote]
Honest question:
How many cock shots have you gotten? And does that freak you out?
I mean if one of the chicks sent me a bent over pucker hole pic, I would super appreciate it, but it would be a little weird too. I mean, at least strike up normal convo first. for like 2 or 3 PMs, then give me the good stuff. I may be a man, but warm me up a little here… You know “spit on your palm first”…[/quote]
Aren’t you married? Have your wife send you a pic of her pucker.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
Care to re-phrase? [/quote]
Okay…
SO I was asking if the nudie PM’s were straight up penhouse type porn, or tasteful use of shadow and small bits of cloths to force the use of imagination.
Then I went on to say, that while I prefer the nasty porn type, the “romantic” art type is much hotter.
Trust me, I’m into some freaky ass shit, assuming the girl I’m with is down. (I’m also content with much less than “holy shit, you’re a dirty perv” if she is not.) But a pic with yoga pants, creative lighting, or even a perfectly placed thong can be so much hotter than the actual picture of the goods… But the pic of the goods is what I prefer when looking for nudie pics.
Does that even make sense?
[/quote]
IH agrees with this, obviously. Before I moved here I would send him pix and I would send some in black and white and he preferred color because “we don’t have sex in black and white” or something like that. So if I wanted to be “artsy” I would have to keep the pix in color.
[quote]debraD wrote:
Too many to count lol. No I don’t appreciate them! They don’t upset me either but random cock shots from strangers are not that exciting.
[/quote]
This is what I’m saying. Some rando cock sitting there, not quite fully erect if not flaccid, because no matter how hard you try you can never get the camera ready in time without losing some of it. Tell me the put a dollar bill on teh counter next to it to show you how big it is.
And if it is flaccid? FUCK. Hanging there all frumpy, foreskin wrinkled and over whelming, seriously looks like a depressed sweet potato, crying the lonely tears of a mime never allowed to entertain.
I’m sure these sully fuckers never manscape appropriately either. They are no doubt using a super high def (hey look I’m a man over compensating for the tiny hairy penis i’m sending you a pic of) camera. So there is Mr. Saggy balls with a random patch of hair that has been missed every shave session for the last three years.
So when you try and find beauty in the poor, sad little cock in in your inbox, you are ultimately just dragged into depression, and disgusted by the 15cm gnarly pubic hair in the upper left hand corner of the pic.
WTF is wrong with people?
Yeah I used metric cuz you are tha Canadianz