[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I jave pain
and I will unleash it upon you all
muhuhahahahahahahaha
I M M O R T A L[/quote]
And here I thought the pain in my ass was just my sciatica acting up.
[quote]polo77j wrote:
My favorite part of your post toots is when you said “mad shady.” Pure. Poetry.
[/quote]
I’ve known quite a few ‘mad shady’ people! Too bad for me, since I only made me old and jaded. (:
Morning all. Take ONE day off work and the place falls apart. Geesh.
[quote]tootles27 wrote:
[quote]polo77j wrote:
My favorite part of your post toots is when you said “mad shady.” Pure. Poetry.
[/quote]
I’ve known quite a few ‘mad shady’ people! Too bad for me, since I only made me old and jaded. (:[/quote]
Me too…
That’s why I have no issue with the ‘love the one your with’ attitiude. having been on the opposite side of the ‘cheating’ spouse has left me with a ‘hold on loosly’ kind of attitude. where, if your outta town, and something happens, then as long as its discreet, then it’s fine.
This is probably a skewed way of looking at things, and that’s why I’m asking the question.
btw… I hate it when people over use ‘quotation marks’!
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]tootles27 wrote:
[quote]polo77j wrote:
My favorite part of your post toots is when you said “mad shady.” Pure. Poetry.
[/quote]
I’ve known quite a few ‘mad shady’ people! Too bad for me, since I only made me old and jaded. (:[/quote]
Me too…
That’s why I have no issue with the ‘love the one your with’ attitiude. having been on the opposite side of the ‘cheating’ spouse has left me with a ‘hold on loosly’ kind of attitude. where, if your outta town, and something happens, then as long as its discreet, then it’s fine.
This is probably a skewed way of looking at things, and that’s why I’m asking the question.
btw… I hate it when people over use ‘quotation marks’![/quote]
Are you condoning cheating, Edgy?
Where is this coming from?
is it cheating Tigerman?
you’ve been in many relationships, I value your opinion.
I think I’m taking a more west coast point of view on this (or I’m just fucked up!)
[quote]Edgy wrote:
is it cheating Tigerman?
you’ve been in many relationships, I value your opinion.
I think I’m taking a more west coast point of view on this (or I’m just fucked up!)[/quote]
Really Edgy? If you have to ask, you already know. It’s cheating, now how you feel about it is a different story. We don’t judge 'round here, well unless you have bad DL form or your squat depth isn’t below parallel. Then hell breaks lose.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
is it cheating Tigerman?
you’ve been in many relationships, I value your opinion.
I think I’m taking a more west coast point of view on this (or I’m just fucked up!)[/quote]
Listen, like the others have said, if you and your SO agreed on being in a monogamous relationship, then it’s wrong. There’s deception and lying involved and as we all know as adults, these are both wrong… no matter how you try and justify it.
I’ve been on both ends…with the same person, and it took more out of me than I thought was possible. Guilt and lowered self-esteem, that took a long time to get back.
The things you’re getting from someone else, because the person you’re with isn’t meeting your needs, is only temporary and it will suck you dry if you have any self worth at all.
Just my 2 cents.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
is it cheating Tigerman?
you’ve been in many relationships, I value your opinion.
I think I’m taking a more west coast point of view on this (or I’m just fucked up!)[/quote]
It is if you make a commitment to someone and don’t say you want to be in an open relationship. People should just be honest.
'kay - point taken.
thanks, ya’all-
A relationship is a social contract that is mutually agreed upon by both parties at the beginning of said relationship. Unless explicitly stated and understood, by no means is one to ‘cheat’ on the other. It is a violation of trust and breaks the special bond that held the two parties together. The meaning of ‘cheat’ needs to be understood by both parties to avoid confusion, but this is rarely the case as it is viewed different throughout our society.
Basically, it is a violation of trust. Trust in a relationship is inherently agreed upon by both parties, and, unless explicitly discussed, is understood to be the societal norm (i.e. thou shalt not kiss another person in a romantic manner, thou shalt not make contact with foreign genitals, etc). I’m assuming that by ‘cheat’ you mean of the physical manner (there is emotional ‘cheating’ but for the sake of argument and understanding I will henceforth be referring to ‘cheating’ as the physical type).
As I’ve stated, unless explicitly discussed and understood that some romantic physical contact with a foreign body (foreign body = another person other than your significant other or s.o.) is acceptable, any contact with a foreign body is prohibited under the implied trust adopted at the beginning of the relationship. This is very important in identifying ‘cheating.’
As if an understanding is reach and it is agreed that romantic physical contact is allowed then it is no longer ‘cheating’ as there is no breaking of trust. This trust must be established in order to avoid being labeled a ‘cheater’ (one who cheats) as it is a negative and life long brand.
btw…my DL form needs some help. I could use a trainer who knows 'bout powerlifting.
[quote]polo77j wrote:
A relationship is a social contract that is mutually agreed upon by both parties at the beginning of said relationship. Unless explicitly stated and understood, by no means is one to ‘cheat’ on the other. It is a violation of trust and breaks the special bond that held the two parties together. The meaning of ‘cheat’ needs to be understood by both parties to avoid confusion, but this is rarely the case as it is viewed different throughout our society. Basically, it is a violation of trust. Trust in a relationship is inherently agreed upon by both parties, and, unless explicitly discussed, is understood to be the societal norm (i.e. thou shalt not kiss another person in a romantic manner, thou shalt not make contact with foreign genitals, etc). I’m assuming that by ‘cheat’ you mean of the physical manner (there is emotional ‘cheating’ but for the sake of argument and understanding I will henceforth be referring to ‘cheating’ as the physical type).
As I’ve stated, unless explicitly discussed and understood that some romantic physical contact with a foreign body (foreign body = another person other than your significant other or s.o.) is acceptable, any contact with a foreign body is prohibited under the implied trust adopted at the beginning of the relationship. This is very important in identifying ‘cheating.’ As if an understanding is reach and it is agreed that romantic physical contact is allowed then it is no longer ‘cheating’ as there is no breaking of trust. This trust must be established in order to avoid being labeled a ‘cheater’ (one who cheats) as it is a negative and life long brand.[/quote]
I thought PMPM was the lawyer
[quote]polo77j wrote:
A relationship is a social contract that is mutually agreed upon by both parties at the beginning of said relationship. Unless explicitly stated and understood, by no means is one to ‘cheat’ on the other. It is a violation of trust and breaks the special bond that held the two parties together. The meaning of ‘cheat’ needs to be understood by both parties to avoid confusion, but this is rarely the case as it is viewed different throughout our society. Basically, it is a violation of trust. Trust in a relationship is inherently agreed upon by both parties, and, unless explicitly discussed, is understood to be the societal norm (i.e. thou shalt not kiss another person in a romantic manner, thou shalt not make contact with foreign genitals, etc). I’m assuming that by ‘cheat’ you mean of the physical manner (there is emotional ‘cheating’ but for the sake of argument and understanding I will henceforth be referring to ‘cheating’ as the physical type).
As I’ve stated, unless explicitly discussed and understood that some romantic physical contact with a foreign body (foreign body = another person other than your significant other or s.o.) is acceptable, any contact with a foreign body is prohibited under the implied trust adopted at the beginning of the relationship. This is very important in identifying ‘cheating.’ As if an understanding is reach and it is agreed that romantic physical contact is allowed then it is no longer ‘cheating’ as there is no breaking of trust. This trust must be established in order to avoid being labeled a ‘cheater’ (one who cheats) as it is a negative and life long brand.[/quote]
There’s a joke in here somewhere about toots and a foreign body, but I’m lazy. Someone pick up the slack.
[quote]pch2 wrote:
[quote]polo77j wrote:
A relationship is a social contract that is mutually agreed upon by both parties at the beginning of said relationship. Unless explicitly stated and understood, by no means is one to ‘cheat’ on the other. It is a violation of trust and breaks the special bond that held the two parties together. The meaning of ‘cheat’ needs to be understood by both parties to avoid confusion, but this is rarely the case as it is viewed different throughout our society. Basically, it is a violation of trust. Trust in a relationship is inherently agreed upon by both parties, and, unless explicitly discussed, is understood to be the societal norm (i.e. thou shalt not kiss another person in a romantic manner, thou shalt not make contact with foreign genitals, etc). I’m assuming that by ‘cheat’ you mean of the physical manner (there is emotional ‘cheating’ but for the sake of argument and understanding I will henceforth be referring to ‘cheating’ as the physical type).
As I’ve stated, unless explicitly discussed and understood that some romantic physical contact with a foreign body (foreign body = another person other than your significant other or s.o.) is acceptable, any contact with a foreign body is prohibited under the implied trust adopted at the beginning of the relationship. This is very important in identifying ‘cheating.’ As if an understanding is reach and it is agreed that romantic physical contact is allowed then it is no longer ‘cheating’ as there is no breaking of trust. This trust must be established in order to avoid being labeled a ‘cheater’ (one who cheats) as it is a negative and life long brand.[/quote]
I thought PMPM was the lawyer
[/quote]
Yes. PMPM is the only lawyer in the world. There can never be another lawyer because PMPM is [u][i]THE[/u][/i] lawyer
:-/
Polo, you never cease to amaze me!
I appreciate your posts, and your opinions.
you are the bestest!
can you help me with my DL form?
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I jave pain
and I will unleash it upon you all
muhuhahahahahahahaha
I M M O R T A L[/quote]
And here I thought the pain in my ass was just my sciatica acting up.
[/quote]
I LOL’D!! 
ya, what Polo said.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I jave pain
and I will unleash it upon you all
muhuhahahahahahahaha
I M M O R T A L[/quote]
And here I thought the pain in my ass was just my sciatica acting up.
[/quote]
That is only the beginning, Tiger. Extinction, its here.