[quote]doogie wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
PLEASE SOMEONE EXPLAIN THIS!!!
Fuck zionist and ANYONE that supports them[/quote]
You don’t actually believe that wasn’t a cheap fake voice over do you?[/quote]
I dont support the Israeli offensive, but this is obviously fake. Good imitator though, whoever did the voice over is skilled.
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]kamui wrote:
A problem With the idea that africans have an average IQ score of 70 and aboriginals have an IQ score of 60, kind of suggests its a miracle that they have survided. Humans in contrast too animals are weak and slow and ergo Depends on Our minds and ability to make Things With Our hands. A score of 60 and 70 seems to low for a human cultures existing for thousands of years. It opens the question regarding the validity regarding IQ tests and the concept of IQ. How important can IQ be if we dont need to much of it to survive and dominate other animals?[/quote]
Having an iq of 70 is enough intelligence to have a spoken language and manipulate simple tools. That of course makes them able to survive in numbers and overcome wild animals. What a silly notion[/quote]
I suppose a keyboard also qualifies as a simple tool. That explains how you are able to post your bigoted and vapid thoughts upon this forum.
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]kamui wrote:
A problem With the idea that africans have an average IQ score of 70 and aboriginals have an IQ score of 60, kind of suggests its a miracle that they have survided. Humans in contrast too animals are weak and slow and ergo Depends on Our minds and ability to make Things With Our hands. A score of 60 and 70 seems to low for a human cultures existing for thousands of years. It opens the question regarding the validity regarding IQ tests and the concept of IQ. How important can IQ be if we dont need to much of it to survive and dominate other animals?[/quote]
Having an iq of 70 is enough intelligence to have a spoken language and manipulate simple tools. That of course makes them able to survive in numbers and overcome wild animals. What a silly notion[/quote]
“A diagnosis of intellectual disability is in part based on the results of IQ testing. Borderline intellectual functioning is a categorization where a person has below average cognitive ability (an IQ of 71Ã??Ã?¢??85), but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (70 or below).” ( IQ. 02/08-2014. Wikipedia.org )
Acording to the wikipedia article on IQ a score of 70 is classified as “intellectual disability”. Are you telling me that the cultures of Africa and the Aboriginals came to be within Groups of People who are in plain Language retarded? Remember that both Africans and Aboriginals had more than simple Tools, they had art and religion. You need abstract thinking to develop art and religion. [/quote]
Lol please show said art and religion haha. I hope you don’t mean south Africa and the pyramids that are a result of Caucasoid descent.[/quote]
aboriginal art:
Aboriginal religion:
[/quote]
Wow cave drawings how surprising. I wrote and painted on walls when I was 4. Do you see how sophisticated art and religion is separated by intelligence. What’s so hard to understand lol
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
I think it’s apparent who’s intelligence and critical thinking is low.[/quote]
I continue to be baffled by the inability of stupid people to understand that grammar and spelling, if they ever matter at all, matter when the intelligence of someone else is being questioned.
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]kamui wrote:
A problem With the idea that africans have an average IQ score of 70 and aboriginals have an IQ score of 60, kind of suggests its a miracle that they have survided. Humans in contrast too animals are weak and slow and ergo Depends on Our minds and ability to make Things With Our hands. A score of 60 and 70 seems to low for a human cultures existing for thousands of years. It opens the question regarding the validity regarding IQ tests and the concept of IQ. How important can IQ be if we dont need to much of it to survive and dominate other animals?[/quote]
Having an iq of 70 is enough intelligence to have a spoken language and manipulate simple tools. That of course makes them able to survive in numbers and overcome wild animals. What a silly notion[/quote]
“A diagnosis of intellectual disability is in part based on the results of IQ testing. Borderline intellectual functioning is a categorization where a person has below average cognitive ability (an IQ of 71Ã???Ã??Ã?¢??85), but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (70 or below).” ( IQ. 02/08-2014. Wikipedia.org )
Acording to the wikipedia article on IQ a score of 70 is classified as “intellectual disability”. Are you telling me that the cultures of Africa and the Aboriginals came to be within Groups of People who are in plain Language retarded? Remember that both Africans and Aboriginals had more than simple Tools, they had art and religion. You need abstract thinking to develop art and religion. [/quote]
Lol please show said art and religion haha. I hope you don’t mean south Africa and the pyramids that are a result of Caucasoid descent.[/quote]
aboriginal art:
Aboriginal religion:
[/quote]
Wow cave drawings how surprising. I wrote and painted on walls when I was 4. Do you see how sophisticated art and religion is separated by intelligence. What’s so hard to understand lol
[/quote]
Some archeologists and experts in human evolution regard the emerging of Cave-art and other paleolithic atr as a very important evolutionary step for the human mind. In short when we started to create art we became modern-humans. Since you are a modern-human( I assume ) there is no shock that you where able to Draw when you was four. I doubt however that you where able to create Cave-drawings on par With what adults have made since the paleolithic era.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
Oh yeah. Saudia Arabia currently possesses nuclear weapons? Sure.[/quote]
lol. Why wouldn’t it?
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
@beans racism is not just some outdated concept. Races exist for a reason, and that’s because so called “racism.” Without it we’d all be the same shade of grey. I’m very proud of my white ethnicity and so is everyone else of theirs. American white and some in Europe are the only one ones who seem to think like this around the globe, that racism is something evil or outdated. Being racist actually means to acknowledge the actual diffrences between each race that science proves is real, but won’t get published and taught because it’s deemed politically incorrect and racist. Boo hoo. Did You know the average white Caucasian in us or Europe iq is 100, in China Japan and Korea is 105, Arabs south Americans and African Americans avg around 80-85, and Africans at 70 iq. Then not to mention the distinct thought patterns races have exclusively. Not to also mention the physical aspects.
[/quote]
Just curious; what would the average Ashkenazim IQ be?
[/quote]
Beat me to it.[/quote]
Ashkenazi are European I believe so at least 100.[/quote]
No the Khazar theory is nonsense but it as a useful tool for Islamic fundamentalists and neo-Nazis. The Ashkenazim are the descendants of Israelites who went to or were brought as slaves to Southern Italy mostly between the 1st Century BC and the 2nd Century AD. A sizable community was in German by the 4th Century AD. Large numbers of the Italian Jews began migrating to Germany after Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire.
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]kamui wrote:
A problem With the idea that africans have an average IQ score of 70 and aboriginals have an IQ score of 60, kind of suggests its a miracle that they have survided. Humans in contrast too animals are weak and slow and ergo Depends on Our minds and ability to make Things With Our hands. A score of 60 and 70 seems to low for a human cultures existing for thousands of years. It opens the question regarding the validity regarding IQ tests and the concept of IQ. How important can IQ be if we dont need to much of it to survive and dominate other animals?[/quote]
Having an iq of 70 is enough intelligence to have a spoken language and manipulate simple tools. That of course makes them able to survive in numbers and overcome wild animals. What a silly notion[/quote]
“A diagnosis of intellectual disability is in part based on the results of IQ testing. Borderline intellectual functioning is a categorization where a person has below average cognitive ability (an IQ of 71Ã???Ã??Ã?¢??85), but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (70 or below).” ( IQ. 02/08-2014. Wikipedia.org )
Acording to the wikipedia article on IQ a score of 70 is classified as “intellectual disability”. Are you telling me that the cultures of Africa and the Aboriginals came to be within Groups of People who are in plain Language retarded? Remember that both Africans and Aboriginals had more than simple Tools, they had art and religion. You need abstract thinking to develop art and religion. [/quote]
Lol please show said art and religion haha. I hope you don’t mean south Africa and the pyramids that are a result of Caucasoid descent.[/quote]
aboriginal art:
Aboriginal religion:
[/quote]
Wow cave drawings how surprising. I wrote and painted on walls when I was 4. Do you see how sophisticated art and religion is separated by intelligence. What’s so hard to understand lol
[/quote]
The more one does IQ tests, the better one gets at them. They aren’t an objective assessment of intellect or aptitude. Take any baby of any race and put them in a nice European or American middle class home and they will have the IQ of their European or American peers by the time they are 12.
Take a European or American baby and give them to a primitive tribe, and by the age of 12 they will have the same IQ as the people they are living with.
Talking about surviving in the wild is interesting because you and most people in the West simply wouldn’t have the intellectual capacity to survive in the wild. Where is water? What is poisonous to eat? How can I track an animal or make sure something doesn’t track me? You just couldn’t remember and assimilate the wide variety of information needed to get by.
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]kamui wrote:
A problem With the idea that africans have an average IQ score of 70 and aboriginals have an IQ score of 60, kind of suggests its a miracle that they have survided. Humans in contrast too animals are weak and slow and ergo Depends on Our minds and ability to make Things With Our hands. A score of 60 and 70 seems to low for a human cultures existing for thousands of years. It opens the question regarding the validity regarding IQ tests and the concept of IQ. How important can IQ be if we dont need to much of it to survive and dominate other animals?[/quote]
Having an iq of 70 is enough intelligence to have a spoken language and manipulate simple tools. That of course makes them able to survive in numbers and overcome wild animals. What a silly notion[/quote]
“A diagnosis of intellectual disability is in part based on the results of IQ testing. Borderline intellectual functioning is a categorization where a person has below average cognitive ability (an IQ of 71Ã?¢??85), but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (70 or below).” ( IQ. 02/08-2014. Wikipedia.org )
Acording to the wikipedia article on IQ a score of 70 is classified as “intellectual disability”. Are you telling me that the cultures of Africa and the Aboriginals came to be within Groups of People who are in plain Language retarded? Remember that both Africans and Aboriginals had more than simple Tools, they had art and religion. You need abstract thinking to develop art and religion. [/quote]
Lol please show said art and religion haha. I hope you don’t mean south Africa and the pyramids that are a result of Caucasoid descent.[/quote]
Caucasian is a pretty meaningless term. The best descriptor term is the ethnic tribal group - German, Celt, Jew, Arab, Slav etc. where the ancient Egyptians white? No. There was a black underclass(mostly Nubians) and the Egyptians had coppery coloured skin and what Europeans would call “Eastern” features - almost Asiatic. This is disputed by many but the evidence is there in their artistic depictions of themselves.
[quote]squatbenchhench wrote:
The more one does IQ tests, the better one gets at them.
[/quote]
No. This should be self evident. It has been shown that people can increase their IQ by about 1.5 standard deviations or 10-15 points depending on which test is used.
[quote]
They aren’t an objective assessment of intellect or aptitude. Take any baby of any race and put them in a nice European or American middle class home and they will have the IQ of their European or American peers by the time they are 12.
Take a European or American baby and give them to a primitive tribe, and by the age of 12 they will have the same IQ as the people they are living with.
Talking about surviving in the wild is interesting because you and most people in the West simply wouldn’t have the intellectual capacity to survive in the wild. Where is water? What is poisonous to eat? How can I track an animal or make sure something doesn’t track me? You just couldn’t remember and assimilate the wide variety of information needed to get by. [/quote]
IQ correlates very closely with the “Eurocentric” view of civilisation. Civilisations with high IQs tend to have written languages and produce things like motor cars, symphony concertos etc. people with low IQs tend to produce things like bones to put through their noses and languages with clicking noises in place of consonants. When it comes to value judgements I don’t consider the life of a Bantu tribesman to be of lesser value than anyone else’s but I do consider his culture to have lesser value.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
@beans racism is not just some outdated concept. Races exist for a reason, and that’s because so called “racism.” Without it we’d all be the same shade of grey. I’m very proud of my white ethnicity and so is everyone else of theirs. American white and some in Europe are the only one ones who seem to think like this around the globe, that racism is something evil or outdated. Being racist actually means to acknowledge the actual diffrences between each race that science proves is real, but won’t get published and taught because it’s deemed politically incorrect and racist. Boo hoo. Did You know the average white Caucasian in us or Europe iq is 100, in China Japan and Korea is 105, Arabs south Americans and African Americans avg around 80-85, and Africans at 70 iq. Then not to mention the distinct thought patterns races have exclusively. Not to also mention the physical aspects.
[/quote]
Just curious; what would the average Ashkenazim IQ be?
[/quote]
Beat me to it.[/quote]
Ashkenazi are European I believe so at least 100.[/quote]
IQ is a function of embedded human capital. It has little if any generic basis. [/quote]
This is nonsense. Why is the Ashkenazim IQ so high? Because the kohanim and the Rabbis spent three thousand years studying the bible all day. Their high IQ is a biological consequence of intellectual pursuit. Their brains adapted to the workload over generations. Just like people’s physical characteristics adapt to their environment - West Africans: high muscle mass. East Africans: low muscle mass.
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]kamui wrote:
A problem With the idea that africans have an average IQ score of 70 and aboriginals have an IQ score of 60, kind of suggests its a miracle that they have survided. Humans in contrast too animals are weak and slow and ergo Depends on Our minds and ability to make Things With Our hands. A score of 60 and 70 seems to low for a human cultures existing for thousands of years. It opens the question regarding the validity regarding IQ tests and the concept of IQ. How important can IQ be if we dont need to much of it to survive and dominate other animals?[/quote]
Having an iq of 70 is enough intelligence to have a spoken language and manipulate simple tools. That of course makes them able to survive in numbers and overcome wild animals. What a silly notion[/quote]
“A diagnosis of intellectual disability is in part based on the results of IQ testing. Borderline intellectual functioning is a categorization where a person has below average cognitive ability (an IQ of 71Ã??Ã?¢??85), but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (70 or below).” ( IQ. 02/08-2014. Wikipedia.org )
Acording to the wikipedia article on IQ a score of 70 is classified as “intellectual disability”. Are you telling me that the cultures of Africa and the Aboriginals came to be within Groups of People who are in plain Language retarded? Remember that both Africans and Aboriginals had more than simple Tools, they had art and religion. You need abstract thinking to develop art and religion. [/quote]
Lol please show said art and religion haha. I hope you don’t mean south Africa and the pyramids that are a result of Caucasoid descent.[/quote]
aboriginal art:
Aboriginal religion:
[/quote]
This sort of relativist argument must surely strain the credulity of the most ardent Marcusians. I feel sorry for you having to defend it. When someone claims that the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel is of equal culture value as a squiggly snake with orange dots on it scraped on a rock it falls upon them to explain how and why. It’s a task I don’t envy you.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
I think it’s apparent who’s intelligence and critical thinking is low.[/quote]
I continue to be baffled by the inability of stupid people to understand that grammar and spelling, if they ever matter at all, matter when the intelligence of someone else is being questioned.[/quote]
It’s one of the vexing ironies of life that stupid people are always the least likely to realize just how stupid they are.[/quote]
Yeah because me typing on my phone and not giving a fuck about the grammar really proves my intelligence cock suckers.
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
I think it’s apparent who’s intelligence and critical thinking is low.[/quote]
I continue to be baffled by the inability of stupid people to understand that grammar and spelling, if they ever matter at all, matter when the intelligence of someone else is being questioned.[/quote]
It’s one of the vexing ironies of life that stupid people are always the least likely to realize just how stupid they are.[/quote]
Yeah because me typing on my phone and not giving a fuck about the grammar really proves my intelligence cock suckers.[/quote]
Typing on your phone could be an excuse for a typographical error. But your error was not typographical. Adding an apostrophe to “whose” and leaving off the “e” is not a typo. It’s a spelling/grammatical error. There is a direct correlation between grammatical proficiency in one’s native tongue to their proficiency in logic. That’s why the trivium is supposed to be taught in a certain order: grammar then logic then rhetoric. For a demonstration of this correlation see any of the posts by “pittbulll.”
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]kamui wrote:
A problem With the idea that africans have an average IQ score of 70 and aboriginals have an IQ score of 60, kind of suggests its a miracle that they have survided. Humans in contrast too animals are weak and slow and ergo Depends on Our minds and ability to make Things With Our hands. A score of 60 and 70 seems to low for a human cultures existing for thousands of years. It opens the question regarding the validity regarding IQ tests and the concept of IQ. How important can IQ be if we dont need to much of it to survive and dominate other animals?[/quote]
Having an iq of 70 is enough intelligence to have a spoken language and manipulate simple tools. That of course makes them able to survive in numbers and overcome wild animals. What a silly notion[/quote]
“A diagnosis of intellectual disability is in part based on the results of IQ testing. Borderline intellectual functioning is a categorization where a person has below average cognitive ability (an IQ of 71Ã???Ã??Ã?¢??85), but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (70 or below).” ( IQ. 02/08-2014. Wikipedia.org )
Acording to the wikipedia article on IQ a score of 70 is classified as “intellectual disability”. Are you telling me that the cultures of Africa and the Aboriginals came to be within Groups of People who are in plain Language retarded? Remember that both Africans and Aboriginals had more than simple Tools, they had art and religion. You need abstract thinking to develop art and religion. [/quote]
Lol please show said art and religion haha. I hope you don’t mean south Africa and the pyramids that are a result of Caucasoid descent.[/quote]
aboriginal art:
Aboriginal religion:
[/quote]
This sort of relativist argument must surely strain the credulity of the most ardent Marcusians. I feel sorry for you having to defend it. When someone claims that the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel is of equal culture value as a squiggly snake with orange dots on it scraped on a rock it falls upon them to explain how and why. It’s a task I don’t envy you.[/quote]
You are missing the point. Art and religion, regardless if its Michelangelo or Cave-paintings or shamanism or christianity is that they are all a Product of the ability to think abstract.
[quote]Liv92 wrote:
Zionist are ruining this country through multiculturalism, faggotry, and open immagration laws. Not to mention the undeniable push in the media to glorify black gangsters. [/quote]
You know it’s times like these when I’m at odds with my usual propensity for supporting a very small, limited government, because, in a Fascist sense, I would prefer that we sterilize people like you asap.
Please never have children.