Sounds as if Obama’s team is not overly confident about Ohio…
http://www.cleveland.com/newsflash/cleveland/ind
ex.ssf?/base/politics-
2/121361694242060.xml&storylist=cleveland&thispa
ge=1
[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
Sounds as if Obama’s team is not overly confident about Ohio…
http://www.cleveland.com/newsflash/cleveland/ind
ex.ssf?/base/politics-
2/121361694242060.xml&storylist=cleveland&thispa
ge=1[/quote]
Weird, because he’s got a nice lead there.
[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
100meters wrote:
translation: another round of Obama’s a muslim emails to be sent out.
Incorrect. Translation: Another brush with self-induced implosion by the Dems if they try to create some “Republicans are mean liers” storyline while ignoring the underlying issues.[/quote]
I think that’s my point. He can’t win on the issues. So he has to lie or deceive (see social security/surge/reform).
[quote]100meters wrote:
hedo wrote:
100meters wrote:
hedo wrote:
100meters wrote:
hedo wrote:
100meters wrote:
hedo wrote:
100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
…
The Democrats are disenfranchising their own. Glad you support it.
I don’t see why the DNC needs to let Florida legislature dictate the primary schedule. Most of us support supporting the rules, as Hillary said she would. Some of us have stuck to that, others haven’t. Since their delegates will be seated in some fashion, and their votes don’t change the outcome regardless, not much to worry about.
Dictate the primary schedule? Who the hell cares? They stripped the state of Florida of their votes, quite ironic considering 2000.
Ironic that Florida would do it to themselves you mean.
You mean vote? Nice blaming the victim here.
The victim?
So people who break the well established and preset rules with repeatedly spelled out consequences are “victims” now? Interesting.
Stripping people of their votes becuase they did not meet the whims of the party makes them victims. Florida has every right to vote when it wants.
Just Florida though? Yes lets just let every state decide when they want to vote, no organizational problems there…(Lets’s all vote first!)
Funny stuff.
Brilliant strategy. Please stay with it.
Don’t worry about Florida.
It’s weird, the delegates are going to be seated, but still we pretend this matters somehow?
And seated or unseated, Obama’s numbers would change very little, and again he doesn’t plan on winning FL. I feel like I’ve mentioned this a couple times now.
You really assume people read all of your posts. That is kind of funny and egotistical…small wonder you support Barack Hussein Obama.
If he can’t carry Fla. he surely isn’t going to carry the rest of the Southern states. In Pa. he has no chance, he’s toast in this state (ask Rendell). Same for WV and Ohio. He’ll battle for the West but the West is McCain country. Unless he gets the Rock Band to do a free concert on election day he won’t do much in Oregon either. He’ll carry the NE except for PA and most likely California. He’ll be strong in Ill and Indiana, maybe Wisc and MI. Rove’s map makes a lot more sense the the DNC’s.
Hope you weren’t counting on a job with him.
And Santorum will beat Casey.
But if Boston is reading this… This is the kind of annoying over-confident post I was referring to…
And Gore will beat Bush and so will Kerry. Some record you have.
Wow well thought out rebuttal. What times recess at your school.
Of course nevermind I never made those predictions.
And how was I supposed to respond to stupidity like “no chance in PA”? It is clear you don’t seem to understand the state of PA anyway, hence “Santorum Rising!”
but to put it out to an honest broker…
Boston, does Barry have a chance to win in PA?
I understand PA a hell of a lot more then you understand national elections. To really think you need to take of the blinbers of bias and you can’t do that. That’s why most people only taunt you. You’re just too easy to fuck with.
Why didn’t you mention your brilliant Kerry prediction?
Obama is anti gun and anti-coal. He is a postive moonbat on national defense and has a tax policy that will inhibit growth and drive corporations offshore. His tax policies will also hurt those who create jobs…small business owners. Those are core issues to PA. voters you blithering fool. At least Hillary had the good sense to lie about her goals.
By the way. Don’t misinterpet what I’m saying (hard for you) but I want Barack Huessien Obmam to be the nominee. He is a gift.
Again I never predicted Kerry. If you have to lie to make your case, don’t make the case.
Hillary’s policies are the same as Barry’s. Both are currently preferred over McCain. I really don’t know what else to say except…
SANTORUM!!![/quote]
So you predicted Bush. You are full of shit. What screen name were you using back then “Lumpy”, “Brad 63” ?
Go back to the DNC.
[quote]100meters wrote:
BostonBarrister wrote:
100meters wrote:
translation: another round of Obama’s a muslim emails to be sent out.
Incorrect. Translation: Another brush with self-induced implosion by the Dems if they try to create some “Republicans are mean liers” storyline while ignoring the underlying issues.
I think that’s my point. He can’t win on the issues. So he has to lie or deceive (see social security/surge/reform).[/quote]
You are correct. Obama cannot win on the issues. He denies the realities of Social Security. he was dead wrong on the Surge. His generic “Change” promises are clearly bullshit.