Also last line of the definition “ According to the quantity theory of inflation, excessive issuance of fiat money can lead to its depreciation in value.”
Quantity theory is at least as valid (likely more so) as MMT.
16th amendment allowed congress to impose income taxes.
Ratified in 1913 when the dollar was still backed by the gold standard.
And from the site you referenced earlier:
And from the Britannica article above, the gold standard existed until 1971 so really fiat currency in the US was not the first currency to pay income taxes.
Since I referenced taxes and you responded to my post with this where is the part where it describes what satisfies a tax liability? Read most of the article and didn’t see it if it’s there.
No dumbass, you referenced that the only thing that gives a dollar value is it’s ability to be used to pay US taxes.
Read the definition of fiat currency posted. It has value because people believe in the entity that issued it. Nothing more nothing less. The threat of violence (I.e. incarceration for failure to pay taxes) does not give anything value.
You also have mentioned (in other posts) that issuing money doesn’t cause inflation according to MMT. I presented an alternative theory that printing money does indeed lead to inflation.
@castoli your responses are mostly ad hominem at this point. This is a sign of a losing opinion, but to be fair: your opinion was worth it’s weight in MMT currency to start with.
You realize there is a lag in price fluctuation correct? Product is not made instantaneously and then teleported to all the gas stations for immediate price reduction.