[quote]jsbrook wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Can we at least change the thread title to “Eat as I Say to Eat and Eat as I Eat” so that it’s accurate and reflects reality?[/quote]
Yes, we can do that when you get a real job and move out of your parents home.
(Was that mean?)
[/quote]
No. Just stupid. I’m fucking 28 years old and a lawyer. Get with the program grampa. [/quote]
Lawyer, That explains alot[/quote]
Like the ability to logically reason and actually think as opposed to spouting partisian soundbites that have little basis in fact? You might do well to think of a career change. [/quote]
NO, I meant the fact that no matter what you will only see your side and argue untill you annoy every one around you. No matter how wrong or retarded your argument is and you know it you stick to it. btw I am an engineer[/quote]
But you were clearly wrong in this thread, misrepresenting Michelle Obama’s position on fast food. I merely pointed that out. If, instead, you had laid out discrete legislation or regulation Michelle Obama is pushing that you disagree with (and why), that might have been a worthwhile thread. [/quote]
How was I wrong? I did not mention her stance all I said was that if she and the current admin want to regulate food like that or make it more epensive with a ta, which has been mentioned, I think they should avoid it. They beleive it is so bad they have to tell the country how much they should eat it. If they feel that strongly then they should not eat it. That is my opinion any one is welcome to disagree. I for one like the debate back and forth, but come on when you resort to insults the true debate ends and then starts the bashing. You seem to be bright, so use your knowledge and engage instead of low class cheap shots, and by saying low class I am not calling you low class. I am saying that behavoir is. Have a good one. T[/quote]
Fair enough. Perhaps it was just the title, for in fact, she discusses eating fast food in moderation and not as a dietary staple. In my view, regulation prohibiting deceptive advertising and requiring certain labeling is in no way inconsistent with that. Nor is it coercive. The ultimate choice still rests with the consumer.
More importantly, I still have yet to see any specific pieces of legislation or regulation she is seeking cited in these three pages. And in fact, the 70-point plan released by Obama and Michelle back in May did NOT recommend regulatory actions or federal taxes on unhealthy foods. I’d like to see a credible source that says otherwise. [/quote]
How do you know what’s in the monstrous bill called “health care?” There might be something in there about fast food, who knows? Granted no one knows as no one has ever read it. That’s why it was a good idea to pass it into law. Uh huh, a good idea. How many contracts have you okay’d for your clients without reading them? None I’m sure, because you are a young bright lawyer on the way to the very top. But this health care bill, well no one needed to read it because Obama said it was good.
It is good isn’t it? Oh that’s right you wouldn’t know, no one knows because it has never been read by anyone other than the lawyers that put it together with directions from Obama. Yeah I feel good about that.
[/quote]
No. If someone posts, complaining about regulations and taxes Michelle Obama is pushing, they should have some actual evidence. If someone (i.e. you) complains about hypocritical positions with respect to fast food, they should have some actual evidence. This entire thread, particularly arguing with you over trivialties, has been a waste of my time. I’m done.[/quote]
I have no idea how you have the time to answer every one of my posts especially in light of the fact that you hold me in such low regard. And I can understand why you would be done with this thread being a young bright lawyer on the way to the very top and everything. You don’t have time for such nonsense. But as long as we common people have your attention why don’t you answer my previous post regarding Michelle Obama’s hypocritical behavior?
As I posted earlier in the thread. She is a lousy role model (even though she claims to be a good one) for our children when it comes to avoiding junk food.
In her own words: “We are our children’s best, first and often only role models,” she says. “Kids are looking to us to be examples. They watch everything we do…”
http://www.parentdish.com/2010/07/13/michelle-obama-admits-to-loving-fast-food-more-than-the-presiden/
Knowing she is supposed to be a role model and claiming kids watch her every move she chows down on a big mac and fries. I think that’s hypocritical. But of course the mainstream liberal media and the T Nation liberal suck ups (like you counselor) have no problem with it.
For more evidence as to how out of place this is, let me take you back to a time long before you were a thriving young lawyer on the way to the top. A time when you were maybe 4 years old. It was 1990 and George Bush was President (the first one don’t get confused junior). He appointed a guy named Arnold Schwarzenegger as head of the Presidents council on physical fitness. Arnold smoked a cigar in public and the liberal media ate him for lunch. He only lasted in that job two years. Many at the time (when you were 4 years old)believed that it had a lot to do with him being a hypocrite. Telling kids not to smoke while chomping down on his favorite cigar in public.
Fast forward 20 years later and the press is silent about Michelle Obama’s hypocritical behavior.
Yeah she’s a hypocrite every bit as much as Arnold was 20 years ago.
[/quote]