Do You Support the Troops?

[quote]vroom wrote:
We don’t have a need or a right to know everything. You don’t WANT to know everything. It kills me to see the local college kids or the lady that works at the coffee shop complaining about the President, like they know something.

No need to idolize the guy, he’s just a man, with all the faults and failings that this entails…[/quote]

The problem with the current administration (and I’m pushing the edge of my professionalism as an officer of Marines) is that it does a terrible job at communicating to the American public. The greatest contrast between Clinton’s administration and Bush’s is that Clinton had the gift of communication.

I saw that guy speak on the news a while ago and had forgetten how smooth he is. That instills confidence. He did some pretty unprofessional things in the oval office, almost got impeached, and still walked away with a pretty good approval rating.

Bush can’t pull it off. He can’t seem to get his point across to the American public. If he could effectively communicate to the American public, he would be more successful. There seems to be an assumption in the administration that the public is too stupid to understand the real reasons behind the war on terror.

So they don’t tell us anything, or they dumb it down so much that it is no longer the truth. No one wants to follow a leader they can’t trust. That is basic leaderhip 101. The advantage any president has is that Americans want to believe that he knows what he is doing and that he will make the right decisions. Americans want to follow the president.

Bush squandered his advantage by not firing certain individuals in the administration, nevery learning to speak well in public, and hiring the worst group of speech writers ever. I believe if he sat down, talked straight about the issues, and gave the people the scoop on what is going on, he could have revived his presidency a year ago. I fear he is too far gone now to be effective.

Hey PGJ,

First of all, I support the troops and their mission in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Both were right and needed to happen.

I want to personally thank you.

Please stay safe.

JeffR

[quote]PGJ wrote:

You are right, politics is nasty and I think a lot of really good people have been run off or fear to even try public service for fear of public embarassment. My dream is for some day, the Presidential candidates make a gentlemans agreement NOT to run negative ads or criticize each others performance. Whouldn’t that be cool if the candidates just stuck to the issues and told us their plans?

[/quote]

If such behaviour was rewarded by the voters, politicians would act that way.

What are they supposed to do? Play fair and lose?

[quote]PGJ wrote:
vroom wrote:
It’s a well-funded, strategically planned personal attack on the President and all things conservative. I can not let that go uncontested. You seem like a reasonable guy. I like your style.

Stick around, I seem to grate on people after a while… but I promise to try to leave any potential animosity in the political arena! :wink:

Anyway, I think you have blinders on for one side. Are you trying to tell me that swift-boating (which is now a verb) wasn’t a well funded strategically planned personal attack?

Look, unfortunately, politics is played pretty dirty in the states. This is true of BOTH sides. You are going to have to try to recognize it on both sides of the political spectrum or nobody will take you seriously… exept Jerffy, and if he is your only ally, you’ve already lost.

Swift-boat was crap. Kerry is a phony and he knows it, but the swift-boat thing was stupid. Putting yourself in for a medal is really bad form in the military. I do try to see both sides and sometimes both suck really bad. However, I am conservative Christian by nature. I know what I believe. I do lots of research and read lots of books (you should try General Tommy Franks’ book “American Soldier” for an inside look at the war).

One thing I never saw while any Democrat was in office were hords of Republicans protesting, shouting-down public speakers, disrupting peaceable assemblies, and displaying outright hatred and vileness towards the President. No President is perfect and he can NEVER make everyone happy.

It’s the outright disrespect that bothers me most. How can we expect a Democracy (Republic actually) to flourish in the Middle East when we can’t even get it right here? Shouldn’t we be the example? Where’s the civility? The open debate and sharing of ideas? It has totally turned into you vs. me on EVERY issue. “The sky is blue…no, it’s baby blue…no, it’s blue and you’re stupid…well, you’re more stupid and I’m shocked and offended at your statements…”

You are right, politics is nasty and I think a lot of really good people have been run off or fear to even try public service for fear of public embarassment. My dream is for some day, the Presidential candidates make a gentlemans agreement NOT to run negative ads or criticize each others performance. Whouldn’t that be cool if the candidates just stuck to the issues and told us their plans?

[/quote]

Last time a Democrat was in office, I saw him getting impeached for getting a blowjob.

Much better than what is being done now: attacking a paragon of incompetence for how he does his job.

[quote]PGJ wrote:
It has become very fasionable to say “I support the troops”. This is great, and being on active duty I really appreciate the support.

However, there are a lot of folks out there who say they support us, but then hate the President and hate the mission. You can’t have it both ways. We are all volunteers. We know what we are getting in to. Not a single person has joind the military in the last 5 years without knowing they would probably end up in Iraq or Afghanistan.

So, how can someone support the troops AND at the same time hate the mission and our Commander? That’s like saying I’m against abortion but support abortion doctors. Thoughts?

[/quote]

Excellent post and excellent reasoning!

I support our brave and fine soldiers [b] 100% and their mission and our President!

God bless you all!

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
PGJ wrote:
It has become very fasionable to say “I support the troops”. This is great, and being on active duty I really appreciate the support.

However, there are a lot of folks out there who say they support us, but then hate the President and hate the mission. You can’t have it both ways. We are all volunteers. We know what we are getting in to. Not a single person has joind the military in the last 5 years without knowing they would probably end up in Iraq or Afghanistan.

So, how can someone support the troops AND at the same time hate the mission and our Commander? That’s like saying I’m against abortion but support abortion doctors. Thoughts?

Excellent post and excellent reasoning!

I support our brave and fine soldiers [b] 100% and their mission and our President!

God bless you all!

[/quote]

You are just ridiculous. I’m laughing out loud.

[quote]harris447 wrote:
…Last time a Democrat was in office, I saw him getting impeached for getting a blowjob.

…[/quote]

Who was this? Clinton was impeached for perjury.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
steveo5801 wrote:
PGJ wrote:
It has become very fasionable to say “I support the troops”. This is great, and being on active duty I really appreciate the support.

However, there are a lot of folks out there who say they support us, but then hate the President and hate the mission. You can’t have it both ways. We are all volunteers. We know what we are getting in to. Not a single person has joind the military in the last 5 years without knowing they would probably end up in Iraq or Afghanistan.

So, how can someone support the troops AND at the same time hate the mission and our Commander? That’s like saying I’m against abortion but support abortion doctors. Thoughts?

Excellent post and excellent reasoning!

I support our brave and fine soldiers [b] 100% and their mission and our President!

God bless you all!

You are just ridiculous. I’m laughing out loud.[/quote]

Why, are you looking in the mirror?

lol

[quote]PGJ wrote:
However, there are a lot of folks out there who say they support us, but then hate the President and hate the mission.[/quote]

How about the other way around?
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/34068

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
steveo5801 wrote:
PGJ wrote:
It has become very fasionable to say “I support the troops”. This is great, and being on active duty I really appreciate the support.

However, there are a lot of folks out there who say they support us, but then hate the President and hate the mission. You can’t have it both ways. We are all volunteers. We know what we are getting in to. Not a single person has joind the military in the last 5 years without knowing they would probably end up in Iraq or Afghanistan.

So, how can someone support the troops AND at the same time hate the mission and our Commander? That’s like saying I’m against abortion but support abortion doctors. Thoughts?

Excellent post and excellent reasoning!

I support our brave and fine soldiers [b] 100% and their mission and our President!

God bless you all!

You are just ridiculous. I’m laughing out loud.

Why, are you looking in the mirror?

lol
[/quote]

Hahahahaha. THAT WAS FUNNY!

By “funny” I mean “retarded”.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
harris447 wrote:
…Last time a Democrat was in office, I saw him getting impeached for getting a blowjob.

Who was this? Clinton was impeached for perjury.[/quote]

Yeah. He lied. About getting a bowjob.

As opposed to lying to get us into a war.

Much, much worse.

Reading these posts definitely had an unsettling effect on me. I know America isn’t looked at very well in the rest of the world, but even so, there is no reason for some of these words and excuses and cop-outs. I personally am sick and tired of europeans criticizing from the sidelines and saying they would do things differently when they lack the testicular fortitude to man up and make a change in the world. Anyone can talk from the sideline, so far its taken an American. Namely an American Soldier as the main driving force for positive change in this world. Without the American Fighting Man (or woman), Europe would be Germany. Without the American Fighting Man, terror would reign supreme on free thinkers across the world. The American Fighting Man gets looked down on because of his status as the worlds most elite, most fit, top of the line soldier on the planet. He gets spit on, mistreated, and abused. Yet with tenacity, professionalism and strength he carries on.

[quote]orion wrote:
PGJ wrote:
Austria-Hungary, you mean, right? And you seem quite proud of that accomplishment. Actually I was refering to WWII, started by Hitler’s sudden rise to power by enciting the population in to believing it was the Jews who caused the German defeat. Then his brown-shirts went around and literally beat up anyone who opposed him. Hmmm, sound like anyone we know…Saddam perhaps…maybe the Iranian crack-pot even? As far as I’m concerned, Germany and Austria have lost all rights to be judgemental about world peace.

That is seriously stupid though, because we still have it in our bones, as a society, how shit like that begins.

Once the brown-shirts are on the streets it is usually to late to do anything about it, most people are too scared to make a move then.[/quote]

Fear is not an excuse for apathy or inaction. It is more an excuse for the weak to do nothing. This is why major issues in the world have taken place. Had europe acted earlier in WWII, the outcome would have been very different. It is the same here. “Its too late” Apathy is not acceptable.

[quote] No, you must stop them when they start making excuses after excuses after excuses why they constantly want more power.

Your stance is pretty much the same that German generals took; they had sworn an oath, who were they to question him, they were only following orders.

Theirs was not to question why, theirs was just to do or die. [/quote]

The issue here is that soldiers have a duty not to follow a lawful order. As humans, you have choice not to follow the wrong, and turn to the right. Our American Founders, were soldiers for England. They refused to obey the orders of England, and set us on the way to becoming the most powerful nation on this planet. The duty of the soldiers, and the people when given those orders, was to disobey and revolt against the tyrannical.

[quote]I understand that this is basically your job too, but how that implies in any way that a government may not be critizised by civilians during wartime is beyond me…

Plus and that may be a bit extreme for a true patriot American, supporting your troops unconditionally is not necessarily a virtue. [/quote]

Here you are 100% correct. Supporting the troops is NOT a virtue. Is it the privillage of American citizens to have the best military on the planet here for its defense, these troops are not a right or a given, they are a privallage. Furthermore, support the troops is supporting the front line soldier who left his home, wife, children , and put everything on the line for you so you may continue to be in your warm home, with your wife, with your children. They deserve not only the support of Americans but the support of everyone in every nation that has been freed by previous generations of American Fighting Men. That means you, Orion. You are austrian. Your nation was given back its freedom after WWII and allowed to flourish once again.

[quote] We supported our troops, it was cold in Russia, they should not have been there in the first place though.

Or we become ultra-liberal and re-define “supporting our troops”:

“Supporting our troops” means from now on to have political plans in the drawer that are as well thought out and executed as the military ones, preferably with decently armored vehicles and body armour, because of all the nasty shit that flies around in a war zone. [/quote]

You speak from a comfortable spot, in your safe neighborhood and bring up a war zone. Without the threat of a military, german, american, the nationality does not matter, your very neighborhood would be a war zone. You would be fighting for your life every day. Its the strong, and the threat of reprisal by the strong, that keeps the “bad” out of your neighborhood and maintains your freedom.

I sincerely pity you, Orion. Because somewhere along the line you have lost the point. The only way throughout history that drastic changed has occured is through conflict. By your own speech, you would spit on those who paid the ultimate price for your freedom to be here on this message board condemning those who appreciate and respect the sacrifices borne by so many, to allow us all the freedoms I have today.

The other point to be made here, is Americans believe in certain rights. These are the right to free speech, and the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The American soldiers are defending those rights for myself, and for you, and for the entire world right this minute, and will continue to do so, for as long as America stands strong. Please remember that they are fighting for you, while you run your mouth.

[quote]TrainerinDC wrote:
Reading these posts definitely had an unsettling effect on me. I know America isn’t looked at very well in the rest of the world, but even so, there is no reason for some of these words and excuses and cop-outs. I personally am sick and tired of europeans criticizing from the sidelines and saying they would do things differently when they lack the testicular fortitude to man up and make a change in the world. Anyone can talk from the sideline, so far its taken an American. Namely an American Soldier as the main driving force for positive change in this world. Without the American Fighting Man (or woman), Europe would be Germany. Without the American Fighting Man, terror would reign supreme on free thinkers across the world. The American Fighting Man gets looked down on because of his status as the worlds most elite, most fit, top of the line soldier on the planet. He gets spit on, mistreated, and abused. Yet with tenacity, professionalism and strength he carries on.

orion wrote:
PGJ wrote:
Austria-Hungary, you mean, right? And you seem quite proud of that accomplishment. Actually I was refering to WWII, started by Hitler’s sudden rise to power by enciting the population in to believing it was the Jews who caused the German defeat. Then his brown-shirts went around and literally beat up anyone who opposed him. Hmmm, sound like anyone we know…Saddam perhaps…maybe the Iranian crack-pot even? As far as I’m concerned, Germany and Austria have lost all rights to be judgemental about world peace.

That is seriously stupid though, because we still have it in our bones, as a society, how shit like that begins.

Once the brown-shirts are on the streets it is usually to late to do anything about it, most people are too scared to make a move then.

Fear is not an excuse for apathy or inaction. It is more an excuse for the weak to do nothing. This is why major issues in the world have taken place. Had europe acted earlier in WWII, the outcome would have been very different. It is the same here. “Its too late” Apathy is not acceptable.

No, you must stop them when they start making excuses after excuses after excuses why they constantly want more power.

Your stance is pretty much the same that German generals took; they had sworn an oath, who were they to question him, they were only following orders.

Theirs was not to question why, theirs was just to do or die.

The issue here is that soldiers have a duty not to follow a lawful order. As humans, you have choice not to follow the wrong, and turn to the right. Our American Founders, were soldiers for England. They refused to obey the orders of England, and set us on the way to becoming the most powerful nation on this planet. The duty of the soldiers, and the people when given those orders, was to disobey and revolt against the tyrannical.

I understand that this is basically your job too, but how that implies in any way that a government may not be critizised by civilians during wartime is beyond me…

Plus and that may be a bit extreme for a true patriot American, supporting your troops unconditionally is not necessarily a virtue.

Here you are 100% correct. Supporting the troops is NOT a virtue. Is it the privillage of American citizens to have the best military on the planet here for its defense, these troops are not a right or a given, they are a privallage. Furthermore, support the troops is supporting the front line soldier who left his home, wife, children , and put everything on the line for you so you may continue to be in your warm home, with your wife, with your children. They deserve not only the support of Americans but the support of everyone in every nation that has been freed by previous generations of American Fighting Men. That means you, Orion. You are austrian. Your nation was given back its freedom after WWII and allowed to flourish once again.

We supported our troops, it was cold in Russia, they should not have been there in the first place though.

Or we become ultra-liberal and re-define “supporting our troops”:

“Supporting our troops” means from now on to have political plans in the drawer that are as well thought out and executed as the military ones, preferably with decently armored vehicles and body armour, because of all the nasty shit that flies around in a war zone.

You speak from a comfortable spot, in your safe neighborhood and bring up a war zone. Without the threat of a military, german, american, the nationality does not matter, your very neighborhood would be a war zone. You would be fighting for your life every day. Its the strong, and the threat of reprisal by the strong, that keeps the “bad” out of your neighborhood and maintains your freedom.

I sincerely pity you, Orion. Because somewhere along the line you have lost the point. The only way throughout history that drastic changed has occured is through conflict. By your own speech, you would spit on those who paid the ultimate price for your freedom to be here on this message board condemning those who appreciate and respect the sacrifices borne by so many, to allow us all the freedoms I have today.

The other point to be made here, is Americans believe in certain rights. These are the right to free speech, and the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The American soldiers are defending those rights for myself, and for you, and for the entire world right this minute, and will continue to do so, for as long as America stands strong. Please remember that they are fighting for you, while you run your mouth. [/quote]

The founders were not British soldiers. They were rich land-owners who wanted to keep the taxes for themselves. The American Revolution was, like every other war in the history of man, about money and power.

Americans do not “believe” in certain rights. They are endowed upon us and Congress is forbidden to make any law enjoining them.

“It’s the strong, and the threat of the strong that keeps your neighborhood safe.” WTF? You do realize that is totalitarianism you’re describing, right? Might makes right?

Stop wrapping yourself in the fucking flag and playing more-patriotice-than-thou.

[quote]harris447 wrote:
The founders were not British soldiers. They were rich land-owners who wanted to keep the taxes for themselves. The American Revolution was, like every other war in the history of man, about money and power.
[/quote]

Many of those who fought and died in the revolutionary war were originally british soldiers and up until the war believed themselves loyal to the crown.

Yes it is the threat of the strong that keeps your neighborhood safe. Without the strong, i.e. military or police, every neighborhood would not have the safety and security that it has currently. Do you think for one minute that if we could not defend ourselves, the terrorists would stay away? Absolutely not. 9-11 was a warm up to what they want to do, and it is our military and police keeping them at bay.

For another example lets look closer to home. What keeps the burglars, rapists, pedophiles, thieves, extortionist, and every form of criminal or sleaze away from your neighborhood? The police. They fight the crime that would plague and cripple entire neighborhoods. Look at places like Somalia or Africa, the warlords and the gangs are in control, because there is nobody to step in and control it. The police and military are our might for right, keeping us safe, and free. [/quote]

[quote] Stop wrapping yourself in the fucking flag and playing more-patriotice-than-thou.
[/quote]

I am a very proud, and very patriotic American, however this I don’t see as patriotism. I see is as being pro-active. If today, I slap you, and you do nothing, tomorrow I will slap you again. The day after I will do it twice, if you do nothing, then I will escalate once again. This is a never ending cycle. Being pro-active, we act the first time, or even before the other person can do it a first time, and they think differently. This is certainly better than the alternative, of doing nothing and allowing ourselves to be slapped.

[quote]TrainerinDC wrote:
harris447 wrote:
The founders were not British soldiers. They were rich land-owners who wanted to keep the taxes for themselves. The American Revolution was, like every other war in the history of man, about money and power.

Many of those who fought and died in the revolutionary war were originally british soldiers and up until the war believed themselves loyal to the crown.

Americans do not “believe” in certain rights. They are endowed upon us and Congress is forbidden to make any law enjoining them.

Perhaps you do not believe in your rights, but I believe in mine. They are not endowed, not given. Privalleges are given. and may be taken away. Rights are definite, they may not be infringed or removed. The ability to drive on the road is a privallege given and may be removed, free speech is a right, and is permanent.

“It’s the strong, and the threat of the strong that keeps your neighborhood safe.” WTF? You do realize that is totalitarianism you’re describing, right? Might makes right?

Yes it is the threat of the strong that keeps your neighborhood safe. Without the strong, i.e. military or police, every neighborhood would not have the safety and security that it has currently. Do you think for one minute that if we could not defend ourselves, the terrorists would stay away? Absolutely not. 9-11 was a warm up to what they want to do, and it is our military and police keeping them at bay.

For another example lets look closer to home. What keeps the burglars, rapists, pedophiles, thieves, extortionist, and every form of criminal or sleaze away from your neighborhood? The police. They fight the crime that would plague and cripple entire neighborhoods. Look at places like Somalia or Africa, the warlords and the gangs are in control, because there is nobody to step in and control it. The police and military are our might for right, keeping us safe, and free.

Stop wrapping yourself in the fucking flag and playing more-patriotice-than-thou.

I am a very proud, and very patriotic American, however this I don’t see as patriotism. I see is as being pro-active. If today, I slap you, and you do nothing, tomorrow I will slap you again. The day after I will do it twice, if you do nothing, then I will escalate once again. This is a never ending cycle. Being pro-active, we act the first time, or even before the other person can do it a first time, and they think differently. This is certainly better than the alternative, of doing nothing and allowing ourselves to be slapped.

[/quote]

Wow.

Yes, let’s talk about rights. You believe they are not endowed upon us. I believe they are, and that they’re inalienable. Thomas Jefferson agreed with me. (Actually, I with him.)

http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm

You’re also setting up a strawman argument about the military and police. Your original statement (and subsequent one) was in favor of preemptive strikes. Taking out troublemakers before they can harm you.

So, by your logic, Pearl Harbor was fine. So was 9/11. Both “pro-active” moves.

You’re right: nothing you said can be construed as patriotic in any way.

Yes, with intelligence, and dilligence, and by showing the troublemakers that they will not succeed. That is what I mean by the defense of the strong. You wouldn’t walk up and punch Ken Shamrock, or Hoyce Gracie. This is the same idea.

Where did I say that these were fine? I did not condone cowardly attacks on the innocent. Pro-active is having the remedy for the situation available before it happens, showing the troublemaker that it is not worth it. Being able to stop a problem before it happens is nowhere near a pre-emptive attack. Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were attacks on the US by people who had recieved no agression from the US, and the intended targets were innocent. The terrorists and criminals are not innocent. Furthermore, if we can stop them before and save a single american life, that to me is 100% worth it.

[quote]You’re right: nothing you said can be construed as patriotic in any way.
[/quote]

How is it not patriotic to want a strong, prepared, aware and pro-active nation? I believe your definition of patriotism is skewed.

[quote]TrainerinDC wrote:

Wow.

Yes, let’s talk about rights. You believe they are not endowed upon us. I believe they are, and that they’re inalienable. Thomas Jefferson agreed with me. (Actually, I with him.)

http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm

We’re saying the same thing here. That our rights come from a higher power than government and can not be taken away by government.

You’re also setting up a strawman argument about the military and police. Your original statement (and subsequent one) was in favor of preemptive strikes. Taking out troublemakers before they can harm you.

Yes, with intelligence, and dilligence, and by showing the troublemakers that they will not succeed. That is what I mean by the defense of the strong. You wouldn’t walk up and punch Ken Shamrock, or Hoyce Gracie. This is the same idea.

So, by your logic, Pearl Harbor was fine. So was 9/11. Both “pro-active” moves.

Where did I say that these were fine? I did not condone cowardly attacks on the innocent. Pro-active is having the remedy for the situation available before it happens, showing the troublemaker that it is not worth it. Being able to stop a problem before it happens is nowhere near a pre-emptive attack. Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were attacks on the US by people who had recieved no agression from the US, and the intended targets were innocent. The terrorists and criminals are not innocent. Furthermore, if we can stop them before and save a single american life, that to me is 100% worth it.

You’re right: nothing you said can be construed as patriotic in any way.

How is it not patriotic to want a strong, prepared, aware and pro-active nation? I believe your definition of patriotism is skewed. [/quote]

So…we (America) did NOTHING to provoke any aggression or anger in the people that attacked the Trade Center?

We didn’t arm these people and then turn our backs on them?

We don’t continue to fund their bullshit because of our addiction to gasoline?

We don’t create another terroroist with every bomb dopped in Iraq?

They just hate our freedom, right?

Okay. Now I see this for what it is. In every conflict, the democrats side with the enemy. You are no different. You side with the enemy and against your own people.

It is not our fault that we used the tools available to make a profitable, sucessful, free, free-thinking society and the “oppressed” did not. They were around long before us, on the same planet with the same rules, they simply did not achieve what we did. That is not our fault. They should have used the energy in their “agression and anger” to improve their own society. They have all the opportunity, and the resources of the oil and the money it pays, they had every opportunity to create a better world for themselves. They chose not to.

As far as creating new terrorists, that will happen. We have no control over that, we can choose to let them kill us, or kill them and create new terrorists. I pick Americans over terrorists.

It is not our responsiblity to supervise the world. We sell weapons to the entire world, the rest require no supervision.

As far as the oil goes, if the need for oil was to dissipate, they would all be broke and starving. The oil is the main product of all those nations. Without an oil demand, they would go bankrupt. Bankruptcy would create a lot more terrorists than bombs.

Finally, the rich are exploiting the poor over there anyway. The rich are our enemy. They make the poor strap up with bombs and blow themselves up. They are denied education, denied the right to think for themselves. By winning the war on terrorism, we will be empowering the people of the Middle East, giving them choices other than poverty or suicide bombs.

[quote]harris447 wrote:
So…we (America) did NOTHING to provoke any aggression or anger in the people that attacked the Trade Center?

We didn’t arm these people and then turn our backs on them?

We don’t continue to fund their bullshit because of our addiction to gasoline?

We don’t create another terroroist with every bomb dopped in Iraq?

They just hate our freedom, right?
[/quote]

[quote]TrainerinDC wrote:
I personally am sick and tired of europeans criticizing from the sidelines and saying they would do things differently when they lack the testicular fortitude to man up and make a change in the world. Anyone can talk from the sideline, so far its taken an American.

[/quote]

http://www.palacebarracksmemorialgarden.org/Para-Iraq.htm

Tell that to the families of those cowardly Europeans in that link, …just a tiny fraction of all the British troops killed fighting in wars America Started.

How long, do you figure, should Europe worship at your feet for WWII?

There needs to be a time limit. Perhaps when all the veterans and all the people that remember the soldiers fighting in their land have died?

When?

Anyone young enough to be fighting online here is too young to have been in Europe fighting in WWII. It’s not your bravery or heroism that saved the day, I think your bragging rights are expiring.

It’s time to move forward… instead of focusing on how great the US was, howabout you focus on how it sets higher standards and upholds higher principles that the rest of the world would do well to emulate.

Oh, yeah, we’ll have to wait for a different administration.

However, the troops themselves, those in Iraq or Afghanistan, those men I’m happy to heap praise on. They actually deserve it… but don’t think you can magically take credit for past actions indefinitely because of them.