Do You Know This Guy? You Should.

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
21

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

Liberals have us brainwashed into believing there are no double standards in their media coverage.
[/quote]

http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/?action=click®ion=Masthead&pgtype=Homepage&module=SearchSubmit&contentCollection=Homepage&t=qry218#/Edward+Mezvinsky+fraud/

106 hits, including the article about Clinton’s wedding.[/quote]

did you read them?

in one all it says is his father was in prison for fraud. that isn’t the point of why i posted this thread.

journalistic details connecting his fraud with friendship to clintons are omitted as per usual.

i don’t think the clintons even know anyone that haven’t served prison time or that carries a red pitchfork.

23

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

journalistic details connecting his fraud with friendship to clintons are omitted as per usual.

[/quote]

There were definitely articles talking about the fraud and also connecting him to Clintons. A few of the wedding stories–and I was surprised by this, because I’d have thought they’d leave it out of the kids’ wedding–did this.

If you’re talking about a more substantial or incriminating connection, I don’t think one exists.

24

It’s fun to not sign in to read the circle jerk troll (wait, is this going to lead to another thread!) crowd bash you and then remember to hurry and get signed in so you don’t have to see the idiocy of two older men who are politically aligned and as immature as it comes.

Although the charge of not believing in something is not true. I don’t believe in God and I do believe in small government and I don’t believe in letting the hypocrisy of one political side go just because someone prefers the other. I also believe middle to late aged men with thousands of posts on an internet forum searching for dick picks, talking about rectums and cum, and making fake names for someone is probably the epitome of people needing to get a life.

Also seeing two well known trolls join forces to say things like Harold and H factless and search for their pictures because real life hasn’t offered them much in a while makes me feel like it is pretty ok to have them on ignore.

But hey, that’s just two “Christian” men who believe in something. One of whom isn’t intelligent enough to figure out that entering one of his troll threads might lead to me seeing something worth talking about to someone else even though we always know the OP is just a troll fest.

The predictable response would be some sort of picture. Some type of insanely idiotic analogy. Some type of pet name to show off the obsessions (Harold or H Factless are both really witty I know). And perhaps a slice of asking for personal details about my life like one in particular is really fond of. Perhaps they will be able to give something a little better to you guys to read as I’m not going to be able to see this one.

Although you can see how strong the imagination is with things like Harold, H factless, Brad Pitt pictures, and “special prosecutor.” Damn, if you’re going to have two people be obsessed with you and troll you it’s a shame you couldn’t get anyone more witty :frowning:

25

You won’t see either one put me on ignore though because they have built up a lot of their lives into T-Nation and this trolling is something they like. In fact one quotes me more now for some reason that he is on ignore. He doesn’t WANT to not see my posts because he still wants the ability to call out things that I may argue. Which is weird because he has certain other people on ignore, but can’t really quit trolling whether I talk to him or not.

Although I doubt a special prosecutor in real life has the time to make pushing 40,000 posts on T-Nation. They are probably way too busy with real life to search for pictures.

26

[quote]Mufasa wrote:

[quote]carbiduis wrote:

What sad is many conservatives and liberals inability to be INDIVIDUALS, they are such a group, a mob. They can’t think for themselves, or be themselves. Why? Why such uniform thinking? Because what they share in common are their biases and emotions. They are so controlled by their own biases and emotions and base all thoughts on their biases and emotions. Their emotions are constantly manipulated by their politicians, and actors, activists that they can’t even think in a straight logical path…They can’t PROBLEM SOLVE.

So with both so called liberals or so called conservatives in office; you are still left with all of the problems that they promised to fix. Which leaves them with more problems to promise to fix in the next election.
[/quote]

As the old Forum saying goes…fixed that for 'ya.

Mufasa
[/quote]

fixed that for 'ya. :slight_smile:

27

[quote]H factor wrote:
It’s fun to not sign in to read the circle jerk troll (wait, is this going to lead to another thread!) crowd bash you and then remember to hurry and get signed in so you don’t have to see the idiocy of two older men who are politically aligned and as immature as it comes.

Although the charge of not believing in something is not true. I don’t believe in God and I do believe in small government and I don’t believe in letting the hypocrisy of one political side go just because someone prefers the other.

Although you can see how strong the imagination is with things like Harold, H factless, Brad Pitt pictures, and “special prosecutor.” Damn, if you’re going to have two people be obsessed with you and troll you it’s a shame you couldn’t get anyone more witty :frowning: [/quote]

…oh just cut it out.

everyone knew you didn’t put anyone on ignore, just like they knew you lied about having a masters degree in anything other that getting your buttons pushed so easily.

nobody hates you or wants you to leave or believes you have anything worthwhile to add to any conversation. it’s like having the kansas city chiefs in your division, you’re another easy foe to stomp on or raise moral during an off week.

you often serve a higher purpose. you are a barometer of sorts. so i thank personally thank you for being here.

P.S.

link us to an ACTUAL penis or cum posts such as you mentioned so those reading this know what a little liar you can be.

28

[quote]H factor wrote:
Actually I have had you on ignore, I do have a masters and you are completely full of shit as usual. Though not signing in lets someone see the posts. No idea why I did not do that as life is much better without you.

As for your request:

Page 6 you link a penis museum. An actual picture you searched for, found, and posted to a thread.

Oh yeah, while on page 6 you can see a naked man with his dick covered up that you posted.

And this is without me going through all your other posts, these are just the two I remembered off the top of my head.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/wheres_batman?id=5461836&pageNo=6

Link to old man searching for penis pictures to post on the internet is above.

Conservative? Doesn’t seem like it.

Christian? Not practicing it very well.

Continue to think I’m a liar and goodbye sir. It may be time for some counseling when you’re middle aged and searching for penis pictures to show to other guys on an internet forum.

You’re also ironically opposed to gay marriage right despite your obsession with showing other people men’s genitals.

Good day sir. I’m sure I’m just lying again with those links though. That isn’t you at all. [/quote]

thanks for the non-links to men’s genitals. whale parts and shadows.

and then i’m supposed to take the high road as a Christian and let dumb fucks like yourself lie about me in their troll posts since 2012 and boast NO GOD.

i forgot to tell you two things. i’m sorry and forgive me.

forgive me for not being a Christian pacifist and i’m sorry that you are a dumb fuck.

i’m sorry you think in all of the thousands of years of the world’s history of civilizations, this generation gets to redefine marriage.

i’m sorry you can’t figure out when you claim to have a masters degree and put me on the forums ignore function only to show up within several weeks to make a full page rebuttal with links to whale parts and shadows makes you a really dumb fuck.

people that boast NO GOD shouldn’t try to define who is Christian and who is not. now put me back on your ignore function and stay out of threads i start like the admins suggested.

29

He didn’t say picture, reading comp fail.

30

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
He didn’t say picture, reading comp fail.[/quote]

matty and H-factless are like dogs that return to their own vomit.

matty’s READING COMP FAILS:

1.) matty i recall you wrote to me and i assume you read, “I won’t be continuing in this thread, or any other threads you create.”

10th post:
http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/a_pale_blue_dot?id=5937987&pageNo=16

you must have failed to comprehend that because here you are.

2.) the kent hovind 100 reasons evolution is stupid youtube:

somehow i didn’t warrant your intelligent responses because of a youtube of a man arguing against evolution. you asked why i would listen to him. kent hovind was sent to federal prison by the irs. if he were timothy geithner he would have been made secretary of the treasury.

because hovind is a Bible believing Christian his Christian theme park was deemed a NON tax-exempt nonprofit organization. he is serving five years in federal prison. maybe you fail to read certain groups are targeted by the irs.

i recall reading the irs targeting tea party and conservative organizations. although several liberal organizations were denied it was ONLY the tea party and conservative groups that were AUDITED. link below:

matty inferred hovind held some diplomas from supposedly non-accredited schools.

READ THIS:

mattys failure to go beyond wiki & urbandictionary.com

SEE IF IT IS TRUE:

http://www.patriotuniversity.org/university/accreditation-and-consumer-protection/

http://highered.colorado.gov/Academics/Colleges/privateaccredited.asp

it was not true.

3.) you also stated about me “The big bang and evolution are separate theories you know? You seem like you’re unaware of this.”

you didn’t comprehend the hovind video that i repeatedly posted. he clearly stated anyone arguing with those that fawn over darwin should make sure “which” theory of evolution they are debating.

he lists “six evolution theories” with COSMIC EVOLUTION being NUMBER ONE on his list:

SEE 3:05 MINUTE MARK:

yes matty reading comp fails happen to us all. yo comprendo?

i also asked you a simple question. i asked if you knew who wrote the SCIENCE BOOKS. you gave a smart ass comeback.

the reason i asked was that universities and colleges are led by 75%-85% liberal non Bible believing “experts.” if the MEDIA excludes scientists that disagree with liberal beliefs (global warming/evolution) what makes you think they welcome them in the universities and colleges? they do not.

i wrote in TRT and Steroid forums, so H-fathead’s penis museum with whale parts is not the same as “talking to other men about their genitals.”

i can’t find anything other than how testosterone replacement therapy can lower sperm count in those TRT writings.

maybe you can. but i would prefer you revisit your feelings from when you wrote “i won’t be continuing in this thread, or any other threads you create.”

31

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]carbiduis wrote:
What sad is liberals inability to be INDIVIDUALS, they are such a group, a mob. They can’t think for themselves, or be themselves. Why? Why such uniform thinking? Because what they share in common is their emotions. They are so controlled by their own emotions and base all thoughts on their emotions.
[/quote]
Studies have actually shown this. It is also 50% or so genetic. [/quote]
I should have added that it is the same for members of either cult, I mean party. In fact, it’s pretty stupid to point a finger at one group, for behaving like a group, when you are pointing that finger as a member of another group.

32

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]carbiduis wrote:
What sad is liberals inability to be INDIVIDUALS, they are such a group, a mob. They can’t think for themselves, or be themselves. Why? Why such uniform thinking? Because what they share in common is their emotions. They are so controlled by their own emotions and base all thoughts on their emotions.
[/quote]
Studies have actually shown this. It is also 50% or so genetic. [/quote]
I should have added that it is the same for members of either cult, I mean party. In fact, it’s pretty stupid to point a finger at one group, for behaving like a group, when you are pointing that finger as a member of another group. [/quote]

if one group tries to break the country, redefining it’s American constitution, culture and implementing fascism,then anything the conservative group did to impede that is valiant.

to treat each as though they are both cults with equally bad qualities is activism.

33

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
when one group tries to break the country by redefining it’s American constitution, culture and implementing fascism i would say anything the conservative group did to keep that in check is valiant not cult like.

to each as though they are both cults with equally bad qualities is activism.
[/quote]
Is that English?

34

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

blah, blah, blah
[/quote]
Is that English? [/quote]

i have an english masters degree, but rarely know what the practical applications of my degree are.

35

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
matty inferred hovind held some diplomas from supposedly non-accredited schools.

READ THIS:

mattys failure to go beyond wiki & urbandictionary.com

SEE IF IT IS TRUE:

http://www.patriotuniversity.org/university/accreditation-and-consumer-protection/

http://highered.colorado.gov/Academics/Colleges/privateaccredited.asp

it was not true. [/quote]

Yeah, your link, Patriot university isn’t a nationally accredited university.
Follow-up on your source of accreditation

Again you fail.

No one is going to watch your stupid Kent Hovind video, get over it.
If I were a creationist, I’d stay as far away as possible from that guy.

So to reiterate, Patriot University still isn’t accredited, and you continue to lack skills of critical thinking and comprehension.

If you’re actually interested in discussing this, go follow-up on your sources of accreditation that you seem so confident in.

36

Honestly I had to sign out again just to see the insanity (can’t quote him because he is actually on ignore which he doesn’t believe).

Whale parts and shadows. Whale parts and shadows! LMFAO, a picture from a penis museum and a picture of a naked person with his dick covered up gets dismissed as whale parts and shadows.

The middle aged grown man talks about redefining marriage when he has a fascination with posting pictures of other men’s genitals into a section of a forum that is almost entirely male.

Someone has yet to explain to me why a few of the anti-gay marriage people on this board are the ones who talk about dicks, rectums, cum, and post pictures of genitals. And yet the people who say I don’t see what the big deal is don’t do any of that. I guess straight guys who don’t care what other consenting adults do are much less homo interested than supposedly straight guys who can’t stop talking and posting about other men’s genitals. Ironically also “Christian” men. Does Mark or Luke have a section about talking to non-believers through pictures of penises in order to convert them?

As if it’s “less bizarre” that it was a whale penis you found a picture of to post onto a predominantly male message board in “response” to another man (ironically a 30 year old white male as opposed to the black male with multiple accounts and connections at T-Nation like paranoid penis poster thinks).

I think if I’m H factless conservative dog can be paranoid penis poster. Triple P man!

Whatever. Hate on and I’ll let this thread get back to the mind blowing political analysis that is consent with any C-dog thread. Sure would hate to get in the way of these life saving revelations and discussions. Although kudos bonus points for starting a thread not based on race. I call that progress!

37

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

blah, blah, blah
[/quote]
Is that English? [/quote]

i have an english masters degree, but rarely know what the practical applications of my degree are.
[/quote]
You mean a master’s in English? And the answer is no, you don’t.

38

[quote]H factor wrote:
Honestly I had to sign out again just to see the insanity (can’t quote him because he is actually on ignore which he doesn’t believe).

Whale parts and shadows. Whale parts and shadows! LMFAO, a picture from a penis museum and a picture of a naked person with his dick covered up gets dismissed as whale parts and shadows.

The middle aged grown man talks about redefining marriage when he has a fascination with posting pictures of other men’s genitals into a section of a forum that is almost entirely male.

Someone has yet to explain to me why a few of the anti-gay marriage people on this board are the ones who talk about dicks, rectums, cum, and post pictures of genitals. And yet the people who say I don’t see what the big deal is don’t do any of that. I guess straight guys who don’t care what other consenting adults do are much less homo interested than supposedly straight guys who can’t stop talking and posting about other men’s genitals. Ironically also “Christian” men. Does Mark or Luke have a section about talking to non-believers through pictures of penises in order to convert them?

As if it’s “less bizarre” that it was a whale penis you found a picture of to post onto a predominantly male message board in “response” to another man (ironically a 30 year old white male as opposed to the black male with multiple accounts and connections at T-Nation like paranoid penis poster thinks).

I think if I’m H factless conservative dog can be paranoid penis poster. Triple P man!

Whatever. Hate on and I’ll let this thread get back to the mind blowing political analysis that is consent with any C-dog thread. Sure would hate to get in the way of these life saving revelations and discussions. Although kudos bonus points for starting a thread not based on race. I call that progress! [/quote]

try finding your ignore function.

it’s in the same drawer with your underwear and your “masters degree.” next to the playgirl magazines.

39

992×648 149 KB

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:

No one is going to watch your stupid Kent Hovind video, get over it.
If I were a creationist, I’d stay as far away as possible from that guy.

So to reiterate, Patriot University still isn’t accredited, and you continue to lack skills of critical thinking and comprehension.
If you’re actually interested in discussing this, go follow-up on your sources of accreditation that you seem so confident in. [/quote]

you and i are of different ideologies. you are about darwin and i think he was a nut. guess which side gets all the fawning in 2014?

the only cave man was osama bin laden.

you could put 100 people in a room to view the kent hovind video it and the only ones that would call it stupid would be the “new age, social warrior liberal elite.”

also i am fully aware there are diploma mills.

some seminaries and religious schools DO go for secular accreditation.

but there are colleges and universities that in today’s world of social change that go out of their way to AVOID secular backing and accreditation.

kent hovind made convincing arguments whether he owns a piece of toilet paper with an accredited school’s name on it or a religious non secular school education.

the fact that the irs went after hovind and his anti-evolution materials and creationism museum as non- tax exempt then put him in federal prison speaks for itself in 2014 obamaland.

…kind of like the reacharound buddies H-factless and zecarlo going after you. you know you must be doing something right.

40

995×579 174 KB

…definition of insanity.

now go back to twirling your nipples while you search my 1600+ posts.

and stop using the word “honestly” to begin that diarrhea you keep posting.