Don’t confuse that with being pro Jewish.
Not so sure. He does posses some superficial knowledge about the subject and my guess would be he’s a recent Western convert who’s halfway to being radicalized.
I’ve seen these guys on flights to KSA for the Hajj. Conscious that their beards are paler they try to overcompensate that by treating women at the airport terminal like shit - pushing them, yelling and so forth. They don’t have that “you’re an inanimate object” mindset actual Saudis display towards women.
Are you referring to the individual at hand being born of another religious affiliation?
Or conversion from secular/modern conservative Islamism towards radical, fundamentalist Islam?
However the borderline anti Semitic rhetoric he spouts would mute this agenda. Wouldn’t a troll wish to bait one into making islamophobic remarks perhaps through more devious, manipulative means as opposed to resorting to the exact conduct he is trying to bait out of the reader.
And what would he hypothetically get out of making someone accidentally drop a discriminatory remark after he’s already made like 1000 of them himself?
This. For example, an incel who blames “feminists” for not getting laid and yearns for the 7th century and women as spoils of war.
You’re trying to make sense of the nonsensical my man. A troll doesn’t have to be someone who is faking what they believe just to get a rise out of people. It can also be someone who wants to fight over stuff just because they want to fight over stuff.
Neither are conducive to discussion that moves the needle and in my experience you aren’t going to tire any of them out or hit them with a logic bomb and make them change.
IMO, the guy just thought he is smarter than he really is. Because of that, he defended his positions as strongly as he could. Just my read on the guy.
A socialist here once posted a link to a very interesting paper that showed Sweden’s marked improvement after financial deregulation and privatization of various government services thinking it was arguing against them.
Why? Because he’s a socialist of the Marxist-Leninist variety and socialists generally aren’t very bright or they wouldn’t be socialists.
It was pretty compelling. Can’t remember the title, though.
So, you like the social democracy/Nordic model?
I like that they aren’t socialist.
I’m not even sure it’s accurate to call it THE Nordic Model now since these countries do not operate the same way even though there are lots of similarities.
Denmark is essentially a State Capitalist country that has economic policies very similar to China’s.
It’s also interesting to note that one of the differences in their social policies is that China does NOT have Universal Healthcare.
He would win the internet.
I know this isn’t supposed to be part of the thread but it’s a fucking stupid title to begin with and we’ve already veered off into another discussion:
Guys, tell me honestly. Does this sound more like Right or Left wing rhetoric?
Also:
“We eliminated the exploitative feudal system that had persisted in China for thousands of years and established socialism,” he said. “The Chinese people are not only good at destroying an old world, but also good at building a new world. Only socialism can save China, and only socialism with Chinese characteristics can develop China.”
You see what I mean by ideology vs actual systems of governance? These fuckers will allow a jobless guy to obtain 5 credit cards from different banks and people have been speculating in property and stocks for over a decade to the point where the property prices in places like Shenzhen have gone up to over 10 times their original value while some average citizens ended up losing millions when the oil prices went negative last year and the banks put out an arbitrary stop loss.
Does this sound anything like socialism to you?
It still doesn’t stop them from using it for political purposes as some kind of “unifying ideal” to appeal to the masses AND to justify a one party system.
Note:
“Socialism with Chinese Characteristic” was essentially Deng Xiaoping saying, “Fuck this socialist bullshit!” after the Cultural Revolution while gradually privatizing several sectors without getting to the point where fuckheads had an excuse to call him a counter revolutionary.
If they aren’t socialist, is what Bernie proposing really socialist? After all, he is proposing their model, right?
I was under the assumption that he/they still want a capitalist society, where private initiative is fully encouraged but also with universal healthcare, education, paid vacation, maternal/parental leave, etc.
Basically like a good number of European countries, not just Nordic ones.
That’s how I got it anyway. Feel free to correct me, though.
I AM the internet! #artificialintelligence
I somehow thought to post this here. The original poster isn’t posting for a while yet, and there is more violence going on than just the Middle East.
As to the question in the thread title, there are some who join PEGIDA and others who attended a huge rally in support of the victim family. The rally drew thousands, I take it at least a fair number are Christians.
(Hope, optimism as boy who survived alleged hate killings continues to heal | London Free Press)
I wouldn’t… Generally associating with any form of political extremism tends to bring about a toxic crowd. If you mix with shit, you smell like shit.
Pediga has been and is associated with nationalism, anti semitism etc. They’re a far right movement founded on fighting against Islamic extremism. That alone is a fantastic concept… Some of the other shit they preach is insane
Because he’s a troll.
Actually he was suspended, so he can’t post