So is being a football coach. So is being a gymnastics coach. So is being a pediatrician. So is being a teacher. So is having a family. The list can go on. All these societal positions have resulted in FAR more instances of child abuse/pedophilia than fucking drag queens. You’re unbelievably naive if you think that someone who would become a drag queen specifically to get close to children wouldn’t have an easier path going one of these other, more discreet, directions.
2 Likes
In all of these there’s no sexual connotation involved. If the teacher would be twerking in front of the kids and getting the kids to dance with them in a sexual way, parents would be outraged.
I’ve also never claimed that there’s a higher incidence of pedophilia going on there. The question was what the difference to a priest is.
If a priest dresses up revealingly and dances with the kids, the parents will report him.
Putting on a wig and a skirt and high heels is also way easier than doing all of the other things. Since the other things take more time and effort.
2 Likes
I’m going to guess that something pedos need is to be trusted to be alone with a child. What would be the circumstances under which a drag queen would be alone with a child that wasn’t their own?
I think you’re missing the point. Which is, there are a LOT of ways to earn trust with parents of young children… Being a drag queen is very, very far down on that list, with anyone, liberals included. Most child abuse occurs within families.
I’m going to disagree with pretty much your entire comment here.
Priests and Altar boys ring any bells? Would parents trust a religious leader they’ve known for years who offers to further the godliness of their child? Pretty sure there’s quite a few parents who have mistakenly trusted these figures.
But yes, i agree that the religion of leftism can pursuade idiot parents to do the same dumb things with their kids over ideology. To me, these situations are very similar, except that at least priests answer to a higher power (speaking in both senses).
I would be less worried about a kid seeing a drag queen, who the kid might find funny and not a role model, and more concerned about the parent who decides to raise their child genderless and refers to him or her as they.
Drag Queens who want to perform for children are sick individuals, as are parents who seek these experiences out for their children. Once again, none of this is about making better kids, it is about the perverse satisfaction of the adults who seek validation through the approval of innocent children. Whether it’s drag queen story hour or a burlesque performance, the goal is not helping the children grow into healthy, well-rounded adults. The goal is the perverse satisfaction of the adults involved.
I never took my son to any bars to watch scantily clad women dance for money, but somehow it is “progressive” to do this now if it is men behaving in the exact same way as a plain-old-stripper, but dressed as caricatures of hyper-sexualized females. It would be fucked up to bring your kids to either, in my opinion.
Just as if he happened to end up gay, my son needed to work at a job, save up his own money and then blow $1,000 in one night at a Miami strip club without any early-age encouragement from me. #noregrets, apparently.
Back to the drag queens, I don’t really see much of a comparison to priests, teachers, etc. We should have a baseline level of trust among each other, especially people who live more public lives like teachers and priests. There are always predators in the world and some disguise themselves very well.
Fortunately for parents, a drag queen interested in performing for children does not. A parent is foolish to bring their child around someone who feels compelled to stage sexual performances for children. That’s just dumb parenting, period. Why would you trust your child around someone who wants to put on woman-face and read to children, let alone twerk onstage in front of them?
What’s the benefit to the child?
4 Likes
I don’t understand. The question was raised what the difference is, my answer is:
I don’t think that’s wrong.
In other words, a priest does not get paid to perform sexually suggestive acts in front of kids. If the priest does something even remotely sexual, he acts AGAINST what he should do.
That’s all I’m saying.
4 Likes
I may have misinterpreted your post, these are all fair points.
1 Like
I thought so, that’s why I clarified. Thanks
2 Likes
Check out their twitter as well. Can’t post those links….
1 Like
I agree with you regarding all of the above.
However the performances put on by the drag queens are considerably milder relative to what you might see at an 18+ drag show. They’re typically fully clothed, however drag does have sexual connotations and I wouldn’t want a kid to learn about drag, go home and look it up on the internet.
A child cannot comprehend the concepts of sexual orientation or cross dressing.
I find the whole concept of drag story time to be quite disturbing. It’s not child abuse per se, but it is a ham fisted attempt to force through an agenda.
Not sure why parents or activists think this is a good idea. Why does a child need to know what a drag queen is?
It’s the other way around; drag queens have the need to be known. Ask yourself what the chances are that one of these storytimes isn’t being recorded and then put on social media.
1 Like
I bow to your wisdom, sir.
Not ironically, I just heard a stat (need to verify) that the largest growing demographic of homelessness are middle to late middle aged women and many single mothers.
That is not the least bit terrifying to many young women, who are hanging on by a financial string being a waitress or bartender and barely able to pay rent, who are one bad illness away from being broke and homeless. ← Anecdotal, but it’s what I see.
2 Likes
I’m okay with women getting the ‘equality’ they’ve been asking for.
Cant get the pay without the responsibility!
2 Likes
You and @Andrewgen_Receptors, what’s with the incel behavior?
I see this term used a lot on this board. Do you know what it means? At least one of the guys you’re talking to is married and has a child.
3 Likes
@NickViar I don’t know why @tlgains used it, but the term is often used for anyone who makes critical, unflattering or mean statements about women.
4 Likes
That’s how it seems to me as well.
If a zherp can identify as a stripped giraffe then married men with children can be incel.
Celebrate diversity or else!
1 Like