How are the effects of a high dose of Deca (say, 500 mg/week) different than a lower dose (say, 300 mg/week) of Tren-E? Let suppose each of the compounds is being stacked with 750 mg/week of Test-E. Which would produce greater gains, and which would have more side effects?
This is a horrible comparison, the two are completely different compounds.
Do some research and who knows, you may just answer your own question.
“Speaking from a structural standpoint, Trenbolone is actually very similar to Deca-Durabolin (Nandrolone Decanoate), except for a c-9 and c-11 double bond.”
So it would seem that my question is pretty reasonable. I’m not asking about the structure though, I’m asking about the effects that real users have experienced.
I havent used tren - but i have sure read alot about it.
I would have to say that IMO nandrolone and Trenbolone are seriously different drugs.
Nandrolone is a very low androgen, making it very easy on the body. Low aggression levels, low increase in strength, aromatises slightly, massively anabolic, little acne issues, low problems with gyno when used correctly.
tren on the other hand is an androgen that is 5x the potency of DHT, and is very hard on the body - causing sweating (probably due to the androgenic component in adipose), aggression, acne, massive increases in strength, on paper massively anabolic but doesnt produce enormous changes in size, does not aromatise.
And in real world results they differ too - one is purely a bulking drug - deca is amazing with test and dbol and the sizes possible are IMO one of the main weapons of growth in pro’s arsenals.
Tren on the other hand is primarily a cutting drug - with the zero water, the aggression (useful on stage and during low calorie dieting), the strength, the loss of appetite and of course the adipose metabolism due to the psycho-like androgenic component.
IMO they are different drugs entirely. Like comparing Eq and Test - which on paper look very similar.
It is a common mistake that people think that if a drug is similar to another structurally then it will be in effect. this is not the case, and this is very clear in AAS pharmacology.
Just the mere addition of a methyl group to a compound will change its properties totally from the parent compound.
If you know a little about AAS structure, they all follow the same basic shape - a tetracyclic base structure containing 4 connected hexagonal rings A through D, just with different bonds/methylation etc.
So as you can see (breifly) it is common for ALL steroids to share some similarities in structure - and obviously SOME similarities in effect.
they are after all, all Anabolic Androgenic Steroids.
Brook
Hello bro’s i need some help can anybody help me out with a good canadian ug lab an email or somethin,let me know cheers