Dallas-Green Bay Wager

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
analog_kid wrote:
That was some crazy shit. After Fav-re got hurt, I figured for sure the shit would hit the fan. Rodger’s played better than Favre!

Apparently the Packer’s game plan was to pull crazy plays out of their ass all first quarter. Good idea.

TO is on crack. A one-armed retarded midget could have caught that pass.

I can’t decide on that pass interference call. IMO, it was pass interference, but the ball was uncatchable. Collinsworth made it sound like the rules take that into account. Green Bay could have reviewed it had they not wasted it on the bullshit TO pass in the first quarter.

Green Bay should have gone for it in the 4th. Bad call.

Considering Green Bay played as well as they did sans Favre, Woodson, and KGB…I see a really great NFC Championship game rematch.

Yeah, and I’ll do the COCKFACE thing tomorrow. LOL, can’t wait! Am I the only one that gets to make an ass out of themselves? Cheeseheads = Dickless ninny’s.

It was not pass interference. Lower body contact like that is incidental and should not be called pass interference by rule. bad call.[/quote]

It was close, but the kicker for me was the slight push in the back. If you watch close, the defender got him in the back and moved his hand back quickly after.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
analog_kid wrote:
That was some crazy shit. After Fav-re got hurt, I figured for sure the shit would hit the fan. Rodger’s played better than Favre!

Apparently the Packer’s game plan was to pull crazy plays out of their ass all first quarter. Good idea.

TO is on crack. A one-armed retarded midget could have caught that pass.

I can’t decide on that pass interference call. IMO, it was pass interference, but the ball was uncatchable. Collinsworth made it sound like the rules take that into account. Green Bay could have reviewed it had they not wasted it on the bullshit TO pass in the first quarter.

Green Bay should have gone for it in the 4th. Bad call.

Considering Green Bay played as well as they did sans Favre, Woodson, and KGB…I see a really great NFC Championship game rematch.

Yeah, and I’ll do the COCKFACE thing tomorrow. LOL, can’t wait! Am I the only one that gets to make an ass out of themselves? Cheeseheads = Dickless ninny’s.

It was not pass interference. Lower body contact like that is incidental and should not be called pass interference by rule. bad call.[/quote]

The defender was looking at the receiver - not the ball. Pass interference. Great call.

But, I think those long PI calls need to be reviewable.

[quote]rainjack wrote:

The defender was looking at the receiver - not the ball. Pass interference. Great call.

But, I think those long PI calls need to be reviewable.
[/quote]

That rule was removed this year, regardless of that tangling of the legs is not pass interference.

Not the tangling of the legs. It was the push in the back.

Doesn’t really matter. The talking heads want us to believe that the call turned the game. It didn’t.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Not the tangling of the legs. It was the push in the back.

Doesn’t really matter. The talking heads want us to believe that the call turned the game. It didn’t. [/quote]

I didn’t see the push in the back on the highlights. If he pushed it was PI.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Not the tangling of the legs. It was the push in the back.

Doesn’t really matter. The talking heads want us to believe that the call turned the game. It didn’t. [/quote]

Probably not. Even if the ball was uncatchable(which it was in my mind), who’s to say they couldn’t have done it again and made it happen, that’s how they won the football game all night. Even if you take away that 7 Dallas still wins. Green bay did it to themselves.

I would love to see a rematch with a healthy Green Bay secondary and McCarthy not being a dumbass(which may not be possible). Losing Woodson, Rouse, and KGB could not have happened at a worse time for the Slackers.

[quote]analog_kid wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Not the tangling of the legs. It was the push in the back.

Doesn’t really matter. The talking heads want us to believe that the call turned the game. It didn’t.

Probably not. Even if the ball was uncatchable(which it was in my mind), who’s to say they couldn’t have done it again and made it happen, that’s how they won the football game all night. Even if you take away that 7 Dallas still wins. Green bay did it to themselves.

I would love to see a rematch with a healthy Green Bay secondary and McCarthy not being a dumbass(which may not be possible). Losing Woodson, Rouse, and KGB could not have happened at a worse time for the Slackers.

[/quote]

I agree. They were hitting long passes all night.

I wouldn’t blame McCarthy. Favre never looked underneath. He was throwing to his x-receiver the whole time.

When he left, and the second stringer (can’t remember his name) came in, he moved the ball very effectively by hitting his y and z guys underneath and short.

When TO gave up that stupid interception in the endzone, I figured I would be posing in a thong today.

Don’t want to play the Pack again.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Where’s Malone? [/quote]

I’m here. I was pretty busy yesterday and was waiting on Woodson’s status before I made my decision regarding the bet. Though, being the fan that I am, I probably still would have taken the bet, so I’ll get my photos up later.

Though I don’t like that GB lost, I think there were some definite bright spots in the loss. I, for one, was kind of excited for Aaron Rodgers to get in the game. Favre looked out of control heaving the ball 60 yards downfield every play. I don’t understand what was going on there.

I think they played pretty well for a road team with some key injuries, a backup qb, and a couple questionable calls. I think we will have very exciting playoff rematch – if the Cowboys don’t ruin it and lose in the divisional round.

[quote]malonetd wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Where’s Malone?

I’m here. I was pretty busy yesterday and was waiting on Woodson’s status before I made my decision regarding the bet. Though, being the fan that I am, I probably still would have taken the bet, so I’ll get my photos up later.

[/quote]

I’m still pissed about your ‘bitter old man’ comment about me…but you sir are a stand up guy.

[quote]rainjack wrote:

When TO gave up that stupid interception in the endzone, I figured I would be posing in a thong today.

[/quote]

You know we were both shitting bricks and questioning why we did this at that point huh??? Somehow I knew it would be OK though.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
malonetd wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Where’s Malone?

I’m here. I was pretty busy yesterday and was waiting on Woodson’s status before I made my decision regarding the bet. Though, being the fan that I am, I probably still would have taken the bet, so I’ll get my photos up later.

I’m still pissed about your ‘bitter old man’ comment about me…but you sir are a stand up guy.[/quote]

Huh? Bitter old man? I don’t remember saying that.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
rainjack wrote:

When TO gave up that stupid interception in the endzone, I figured I would be posing in a thong today.

You know we were both shitting bricks and questioning why we did this at that point huh??? Somehow I knew it would be OK though.[/quote]

I was torn. On the one hand - I damn sure didn’t want to have to pose in a thong. On the other - Jana in a wet t-shirt.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
rainjack wrote:

When TO gave up that stupid interception in the endzone, I figured I would be posing in a thong today.

You know we were both shitting bricks and questioning why we did this at that point huh??? Somehow I knew it would be OK though.

I was torn. On the one hand - I damn sure didn’t want to have to pose in a thong. On the other - jana in a wet t-shirt.

[/quote]

Would have been quite the double shot …

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
rainjack wrote:

When TO gave up that stupid interception in the endzone, I figured I would be posing in a thong today.

You know we were both shitting bricks and questioning why we did this at that point huh??? Somehow I knew it would be OK though.

I was torn. On the one hand - I damn sure didn’t want to have to pose in a thong. On the other - Jana in a wet t-shirt.

[/quote]

Dang, I was REALLY hoping to see rainjack in a thong! :wink:

[quote]Mod Laurie wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
rainjack wrote:

When TO gave up that stupid interception in the endzone, I figured I would be posing in a thong today.

You know we were both shitting bricks and questioning why we did this at that point huh??? Somehow I knew it would be OK though.

I was torn. On the one hand - I damn sure didn’t want to have to pose in a thong. On the other - Jana in a wet t-shirt.

Dang, I was REALLY hoping to see rainjack in a thong! ;)[/quote]

You would probably be the only one. Even Jana was gagging a little at the thought of it.

The PI was questionable, but that it came in so late is odd. Another call that screwed the Packers was the takeaway on Dallas’ first drive. Ref that is closest but can’t see blows it dead. Had it not been blown dead it is reviewable and should have gone as a takeaway. Away team playing that hurt, missing what 4 starters?
The January rematch, should it happen, is going to be great.

[quote]tedro wrote:
Just watched TO stand around on a run play and let Al Harris knock him on his butt, Harris then tackled barber on the 10. If TO makes an attempt to block, Barber walks in, yet Collinsworth and Gumbel are still riding his cock. Announcers ruin the game.

Quit being so selfish and play football.[/quote]

hmmm 150 yards and a touchdown…id say thats playing football.

TO is known as one of the leagues best blocking recievers. Every player on dallas and the coaching staff commends him for being the hardest worker on the team. Your just nit picking at an easy issue. How about the time that crayton caught the ball and owens turned it on overdrive from 10 yards behind to catch up, pass him then make the block to score the touchdown. And fuck if selfish means the most reception yards in the league, and second most TDs, ill take selfish hands down

[quote]jp_dubya wrote:
The PI was questionable, but that it came in so late is odd. Another call that screwed the Packers was the takeaway on Dallas’ first drive. Ref that is closest but can’t see blows it dead. Had it not been blown dead it is reviewable and should have gone as a takeaway. Away team playing that hurt, missing what 4 starters?
The January rematch, should it happen, is going to be great.[/quote]

People tend to forget dallas is alos missing tery glenn, there leading reciver the last 4 years, and are playing with henry and newman hurt, there starting corner(henry only subbing in on the nickel package). KGB is a nickel rusher, dallas hasnt had problems with nickle rushers this year so i dont see a problem arrising. Woodson is the wildcard. keep in mind it was colombo going against khampan the league sack leader, who only had a couple pressure in the game. That means KGB will be going against Flozell, a match up ill take any day.

the pass interfernce was pass interfernce. The back ref didnt call it because he didnt see the tug on the arm and then tug on the jersey. the side judge ended up calling it because he saw that. for anyone that deosnt understand. You tug someones arm, tug there jersey, it slows them down making it so that theres even the possibilty of the feet tangling.

the call against harris was bullshit, he intercepted or stripped the ball, whichever you want to call it.

Overall the cowboys get glenn back, the cheese heads get woodson back, fair trade. Harris played like dog shit anyway, id take crayton over harris. when glenn comes back crayton goes back to the slot where hes more dangerous anyway

Fuck me, I have to wear a thong!