[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Okay, I said I agree with him not you. [/quote]
Will you please join me in asking Pittbulll to give us his opinion on murder laws? [/quote]
Please do Pitt?
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
you agree that murder does not infringe on the victims right to life ?[/quote]
What?
How did you arrive at this conclusion from what he wrote?
[/quote]
you said
“Okay, I said I agree with him not you.”
the average US family size in America 2.6 just as the average income $50,054 the average dog ownership is 1.6
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
you agree that murder does not infringe on the victims right to life ?[/quote]
What?
How did you arrive at this conclusion from what he wrote?
[/quote]
you said
“Okay, I said I agree with him not you.”
[/quote]
Yes I did. I have not read a single thing written by NickViar that suggests he beleive murder does not infringe on the victims right to life. As a matter of fact the response he wrote to me read that murder does in fact infringe on the victims right to life.
[quote]NickViar wrote:
One’s freedom ends where another’s begins. That creates maximum freedom. Anything more, one way or the other, is encroachment on another’s freedom, so a law against murder does not infringe on the right/s of anyone. It may infringe on the murderer’s ability, but not his rights or freedom.[/quote]
Am I missing something here?
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Okay, I said I agree with him not you. [/quote]
Will you please join me in asking Pittbulll to give us his opinion on murder laws? [/quote]
Please do Pitt?[/quote]
Murder deprives the victim the right to live , can I explain it any more simply ? And what part would you disagree with ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Okay, I said I agree with him not you. [/quote]
Will you please join me in asking Pittbulll to give us his opinion on murder laws? [/quote]
Please do Pitt?[/quote]
Murder deprives the victim the right to live , can I explain it any more simply ? And what part would you disagree with ?
[/quote]
None and I don’t think NickViar does either.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
the average US family size in America 2.6 just as the average income $50,054 the average dog ownership is 1.6[/quote]
These are meaningless. They have no context, and please dont’ pretend you can give them context in light of that stupid graph you love.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
the average US family size in America 2.6 just as the average income $50,054 the average dog ownership is 1.6[/quote]
These are meaningless. They have no context, and please dont’ pretend you can give them context in light of that stupid graph you love. [/quote]
OK please state your graph that requires a 4 year degree to understand
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Okay, I said I agree with him not you. [/quote]
Will you please join me in asking Pittbulll to give us his opinion on murder laws? [/quote]
Please do Pitt?[/quote]
Murder deprives the victim the right to live , can I explain it any more simply ? And what part would you disagree with ?
[/quote]
None and I don’t think NickViar does either.
[/quote]
then what are you talking about ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Okay, I said I agree with him not you. [/quote]
Will you please join me in asking Pittbulll to give us his opinion on murder laws? [/quote]
Please do Pitt?[/quote]
Murder deprives the victim the right to live , can I explain it any more simply ? And what part would you disagree with ?
[/quote]
None and I don’t think NickViar does either.
[/quote]
then what are you talking about ?
[/quote]
This is what you wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
you agree that murder does not infringe on the victims right to life ?[/quote]
Then I was like, WTF are you talking about no one is saying that. And lo and behold no one was saying that.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Okay, I said I agree with him not you. [/quote]
Will you please join me in asking Pittbulll to give us his opinion on murder laws? [/quote]
Please do Pitt?[/quote]
Murder deprives the victim the right to live , can I explain it any more simply ? And what part would you disagree with ?
[/quote]
None and I don’t think NickViar does either.
[/quote]
then what are you talking about ?
[/quote]
This is what you wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
you agree that murder does not infringe on the victims right to life ?[/quote]
Then I was like, WTF are you talking about no one is saying that. And lo and behold no one was saying that. [/quote]
that was a question
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not want to redistribute any one’s wealth , I just want the wealth the middle class lost to the upper class , returned . I call it REREDISTRIBUTION .
I think America needs a liberal dose of progress, Conserving our fiscal assets . (ASK)
Our problem is the way we elect our politicians . The people that contribute to the campaigns expect results for their contribution .
50 American (PEOPLE) donate more than %50 of all Americans .Policy is written to benefit the wealthy . Citizens United is the reason we can not tell Bush from Obama and we would never seen any difference between Obama and Romney besides a white president and maybe minus Obama care
[/quote]
What principles would run your ideal government system?[/quote]
freedom . The only laws on the books are where people or corporations infringed on people’s rights
[/quote]
So laws against say murder aren’t good in your opinion?[/quote]
Murder doesn’t infringe on others rights?[/quote]
Laws against murder infringe on the murders right to freedom. [/quote]
this is what you wrote
@USMC and NIk VAR this is a classic example of why to ignore stupid questions
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not want to redistribute any one’s wealth , I just want the wealth the middle class lost to the upper class , returned . I call it REREDISTRIBUTION .
I think America needs a liberal dose of progress, Conserving our fiscal assets . (ASK)
Our problem is the way we elect our politicians . The people that contribute to the campaigns expect results for their contribution .
50 American (PEOPLE) donate more than %50 of all Americans .Policy is written to benefit the wealthy . Citizens United is the reason we can not tell Bush from Obama and we would never seen any difference between Obama and Romney besides a white president and maybe minus Obama care
[/quote]
What principles would run your ideal government system?[/quote]
freedom . The only laws on the books are where people or corporations infringed on people’s rights
[/quote]
So laws against say murder aren’t good in your opinion?[/quote]
Murder doesn’t infringe on others rights?[/quote]
Laws against murder infringe on the murders right to freedom. [/quote]
this is what you wrote
[/quote]
I wrote that before we established you meant something else. The above statement is outside the context of the current line of statements. I was playing devils advocate at the time because it appeared to me you were advocating anarchy.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Okay, I said I agree with him not you. [/quote]
Will you please join me in asking Pittbulll to give us his opinion on murder laws? [/quote]
Please do Pitt?[/quote]
Murder deprives the victim the right to live , can I explain it any more simply ? And what part would you disagree with ?
[/quote]
None and I don’t think NickViar does either.
[/quote]
then what are you talking about ?
[/quote]
This is what you wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
you agree that murder does not infringe on the victims right to life ?[/quote]
Then I was like, WTF are you talking about no one is saying that. And lo and behold no one was saying that. [/quote]
that was a question
[/quote]
Yes a rhetorical one.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not want to redistribute any one’s wealth , I just want the wealth the middle class lost to the upper class , returned . I call it REREDISTRIBUTION .
I think America needs a liberal dose of progress, Conserving our fiscal assets . (ASK)
Our problem is the way we elect our politicians . The people that contribute to the campaigns expect results for their contribution .
50 American (PEOPLE) donate more than %50 of all Americans .Policy is written to benefit the wealthy . Citizens United is the reason we can not tell Bush from Obama and we would never seen any difference between Obama and Romney besides a white president and maybe minus Obama care
[/quote]
What principles would run your ideal government system?[/quote]
freedom . The only laws on the books are where people or corporations infringed on people’s rights
[/quote]
So laws against say murder aren’t good in your opinion?[/quote]
Murder doesn’t infringe on others rights?[/quote]
Laws against murder infringe on the murders right to freedom. [/quote]
this is what you wrote
[/quote]
I wrote that before we established you meant something else. The above statement is outside the context of the current line of statements. I was playing devils advocate at the time because it appeared to me you were advocating anarchy. [/quote]
hense I hope I have learned not to answer questions that are just too stupid , the whole fucking discussion was about your advocacy of the devil
I don’t even know what to say.
Don’t worry Pitt I’ll just gloss over your posts, like I already do with several others, from now on. You won’t have to worry about my stupid fucking question anymore.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I don’t even know what to say.
Don’t worry Pitt I’ll just gloss over your posts, like I already do with several others, from now on. You won’t have to worry about my stupid fucking question anymore.[/quote]
Dude, do not try and engage…trust me, your blood pressure will thank you.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I don’t even know what to say.
Don’t worry Pitt I’ll just gloss over your posts, like I already do with several others, from now on. You won’t have to worry about my stupid fucking question anymore.[/quote]
Dude, do not try and engage…trust me, your blood pressure will thank you.[/quote]
Ya, I’m starting to figure that out.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not want to redistribute any one’s wealth , I just want the wealth the middle class lost to the upper class , returned . I call it REREDISTRIBUTION .
I think America needs a liberal dose of progress, Conserving our fiscal assets . (ASK)
Our problem is the way we elect our politicians . The people that contribute to the campaigns expect results for their contribution .
50 American (PEOPLE) donate more than %50 of all Americans .Policy is written to benefit the wealthy . Citizens United is the reason we can not tell Bush from Obama and we would never seen any difference between Obama and Romney besides a white president and maybe minus Obama care
[/quote]
What principles would run your ideal government system?[/quote]
freedom . The only laws on the books are where people or corporations infringed on people’s rights
[/quote]
So laws against say murder aren’t good in your opinion?[/quote]
Murder doesn’t infringe on others rights?[/quote]
if you kill some one , you have taken away that person’s right to live
[/quote]
this was my first comment on murder , how it could be deemed pro Anarchy is beyond me .