PtrDr:
?You have a hard heart. You wouldn’t admit the truth of God is someone held a gun to your head.?
??your an agnostic and that explains why you do not want to see the truth.?
No, I?m a deist, and a quite jolly one at that. I believe in one God. I hope there is an afterlife. I believe that to say the Bible is an account of God is a complete insult to Him.
?Mythology?..Thomas Paine?..?
You do know who Thomas Paine is, right? You?ve read ?Common Sense? and ?The Crisis?, right? After all, you are an Air Force captain. You do realize that without him the Revolutionary War quite possibly would have turned out different. Let me quote a nice big chunck of THE AGE OF REASON for you, since I?m quite sure you don?t have the courage to read it yourself. This follows a discussion of the obvious parallels between the old greek mythologies and Christianity:
?Having thus made an insurrection and a battle in Heaven, in which none of the combatants could be either killed or wounded?put Satan in a pit?let him out again?giving him a triumph over the whole creation?damned all mankind by the eating of an apple, these Christian Mythologists bring the two ends of their fable together. They represent this virtuous and amiable man, Jesus Christ, to be at once both God and Man, and also the Son of God, celestially begotten, on purpose, to be sacrificed, because they say that Eve in her longing had eaten an apple.
Putting aside everything that might excite laughter by its absurdity, or detestation by its profaneness, and confining ourselves merely to an examination of the parts, it is impossible to conceive a story more derogatory to the Almighty, more inconsistent with his wisdom, more contradictory to his power than this story is.
In order to make for it a foundation to rise upon, the inventors were under the necessity of giving to the being whom they call Satan, a power equally as great, if not greater than they attribute to the Almighty. They have not only given him the power of liberating himself from the pit, after what they call his fall, but they have made that power increase afterward to infinity. Before this fall they represent him only as an angel of limited existence, as they represent the rest. After his fall, he becomes, by their account omnipresent. He exists everywhere, and at the same time. He occupies the whole immensity of space.
Not content with this deification of Satan, they represent him as defeating, by stratagem, in the shape of an animal of creation, all the power and wisdom of the Almighty. They represent him as having compelled the Almighty to the direct necessity either of surrendering the whole of the creation to the government and sovereignty of this Satan, or of capitulating for its redemption by coming down upon earth, and exhibiting himself upon a cross in the shape of a man.
Had the inventors of this story told it the contrary way, that is, had they represented the Almighty as compelling Satan to exhibit himself on a cross, in the shape of a snake, as punishment for his new transgression, the story would have been less absurd?less contradictory. But instead of this, they make the transgressor triumph, and the Almighty fall.?