Could Nutrition Labels Be Full of Crap?

[quote]on edge wrote:
Stength4life wrote:
on edge wrote:
Stength4life wrote:
Well whatever the case is, I’m pretty sure pumpkin isn’t as low in calories as it says it is. I know what is feels like to eat foods that are low and calories and then train. This isn’t one of them.

Are the calories claimed on your can comparable to this
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgi-bin/list_nut_edit.pl

I can’t read that shit.

Pumpkin, canned, without salt

New Search
Refuse: 0%
NDB No: 11424 (Nutrient values and weights are for edible portion)

Nutrient Units 1.00 X 1 cup

245g
Proximates
Water
g
220.43
Energy
kcal
83
Energy
kJ
348
Protein
g
2.69
Total lipid (fat)
g
0.69
Ash
g
1.37
Carbohydrate, by difference
g
19.82
Fiber, total dietary
g
7.1
Sugars, total
g
8.09

Sorry, not much better[/quote]

Heres what it says on the back

Serving size 1/2 c

cal 40

CARB 8
FIBER 4

PROTEIN 0

fAT 1

No sugar though