Beautiful.
That’s the spirit!!!
Thank you, even though I do not believe in luck
Assalamu 'Alaikum wa rahmatullah
I don’t approve of you modifying anything I post.
I stated a simple conditional sentence: “If… , then…” In simple logic terms:
If A, then B. Do you understand that it is not required that I add “always” to make the conditional sentence valid?
When in doubt if you are intelligent, I would wait for someone else to say that for you.
You think you’re clever but you are wrong. If could have been replaced with when, as in context they mean the same thing, which makes the statement grammatically correct (removing then) therefore, if is also correct. You could replace if or when with every time, and it would still be correct.
And if you have only judged once, you have always judged correctly. Change the word order: We are always judging rightly if (or when) we…
You need to understand the costs of trying too hard.
That’s essentially what inshallah is, since Mohammad was a fraud.
He’s trying too hard to appear intelligent. He posts things that no one can decipher and rather than explain what he meant, he pretty much says that we’re too dumb to get it. Truly intelligent people can figure out how to convey meaning to those who are too “dumb” to get it.
The Bible clearly states that Jesus was God manifested in the flesh, (1 Timothy 3:16). From my perspective that is not an alleged difference. That is the ultimate difference.
I wondered what you thought of 1 Corinthians 5:12 and 6:2. The Church is said to judge others. Your silence was deafening.
1 Like
Anyone that quotes the bible as a source of credibility is dogmatic and should be ignored.
1 Like
Did the Holy Spirit rattle your cage?
1 Like
No, he lives within me and I don’t need a book that has been mistranslated to guide me.
Do you?
Since you failed to capitalize “He” (the Holy Spirit), you might want to test the spirits residing in you. You might have a devil.
1 Like
You follow your grammar rules, I will follow mine.
Actually it, the source. But you follow the mistranslated written word of man meant to control the masses, and be mindlessly happy.
As grammar rules go, how does that qualify as a sentence? Where is the verb? Some more of “your” grammar rules?
Lol - did you miss that lesson?
Sit!
That is a complete sentence.
It is based on context - assuming the audience has the capacity to understand.
I guess I misjudged your capacity.
But if you prefer to focus on the grammar rather than the message, I guess that shows your slavery to the written word - mistranslated or not.
The literalists are always the terrorists.
Now get off my lawn old man.
If you hadn’t noticed, it is you that is standing in my lawn.
If you like, I’ll tag you every time I post a Bible quote so you don’t miss any of mine. I know it irritates you, as you have mentioned previously, as you would like to be the Bible Quote Police.
1 Like
That is a complete sentence. It has a VERB.
Look… no VERB. Cannot be a sentence.
You offered no antecedent for the pronoun. You do know what a pronoun is, don’t you? Are you being intentionally vague?
So a verb makes a complete sentence?
No - it has an implied subject - you.
Great writing doesn’t always follow the rules. Just like your fourth grade teacher told you to never start a sentence with because doesn’t mean that you can’t start a sentence with because.
Because literalists want you to follow the bible, eye for an eye, this leads to a perversion of the intent.
See, I broke the rule, wrote a compound sentence with an independent clause starting with the word because.
So let’s talk grammar.
A lawn is solid, so I can’t stand in it.
I can stand on it, but not in it - it is not a pool.
But, you are being literal here while I was being metaphorical - you are so old you missed the boat.
Get off my lawn is a common taunt from the younger generation to the older generation - old, angry, literal, yelling at kids to get off their lawn.
Ring a bell?
YES!
1 Like
Therefore biblical prophesy is correct.
Lol.
Of course not.
(I’m trying to come up with verbless sentences).
So far, so good, so what?
I didn’t think much of them. I haven’t read Corinthians for myself, I had little context
I didn’t read Saints as the Church
I didn’t read it as a recommendation for future saints to be judgemental
Depends on how you look at it
Logically, grammatically valid, yes
I had communicated why the way you wrote it can be misleading.
I had communicated a (decreasing) distance from truth, twice
I hadn’t accused you of breaking rules or being dimwitted
Well that’s interesting because it seems to be in response to my statement where I neither asked nor stated anything of approval. It’s just interesting, you’ve added a variable, it’s not rule breaking or anything
I think I might recall earlier you telling me something along the lines that your approval should be unnecessary