[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
When you say single payer, do you mean the person who receives the healthcare service should be the only one who pays for it, or do you mean the government should confiscate the property of another to pay for said healthcare services?
[/quote]
He is referring to the latter.[/quote]
That’s why when I see the Pitttttbulllll claim to be a libertarian I laugh and I laugh and I laugh and I laugh and I laugh. He’s a statist to the core.
He’s under the mistaken assumption that if one is for the legalization of pot you’re automatically a libertarian. He wants the freedom to possess weed but not his other property.
Unfortunately there are many other small minds that have the same ethos – gimme my drugs and you can take my money.
(I am for the legalization of MJ but I don’t base my libertarianism on that tenet)[/quote]
This amuses me the shove it harder thinks because he does not like Obama that he is a libertarian when he rolls over and pees on himself when it comes to the rights of business VS: the rights of people …
I take the Liberty out of libertarian , that goes from the Gov. my Boss and you .
The Government has a function granted it is not functioning well since Obama got elected . And unlike you I blame the Republicans . You can not blame Obama for the fact the only thing he ever did was ACA .
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
This amuses me the shove it harder thinks because he does not like Obama that he is a libertarian when he rolls over and pees on himself when it comes to the rights of business VS: the rights of people …
I take the Liberty out of libertarian , that goes from the Gov. my Boss and you .
The Government has a function granted it is not functioning well since Obama got elected . And unlike you I blame the Republicans . You can not blame Obama for the fact the only thing he ever did was ACA .
[/quote]
You take the “liberty” out of “libertarian?” I suppose that makes you an -arian. The definition of “-arian,” according to Cambridge Dictionaries Online, is, “(a person who has) a connection with or belief in the stated subject.” So you either have a connection with or belief in nothing?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
This amuses me the shove it harder thinks because he does not like Obama that he is a libertarian when he rolls over and pees on himself when it comes to the rights of business VS: the rights of people …
I take the Liberty out of libertarian , that goes from the Gov. my Boss and you .
The Government has a function granted it is not functioning well since Obama got elected . And unlike you I blame the Republicans . You can not blame Obama for the fact the only thing he ever did was ACA .
[/quote]
You take the “liberty” out of “libertarian?” I suppose that makes you an -arian. The definition of “-arian,” according to Cambridge Dictionaries Online, is, “(a person who has) a connection with or belief in the stated subject.” So you either have a connection with or belief in nothing?[/quote]
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I kept the liberty and left you arian
[/quote]
Maybe what you believe in would better be described as “pittbulll rules.” You want liberty only for yourself, while everyone else subjugates himself to you.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I kept the liberty and left you arian
[/quote]
Maybe what you believe in would better be described as “pittbulll rules.” You want liberty only for yourself, while everyone else subjugates himself to you.[/quote]
NO , I want every one to have the advantage of buying VIA a collective and I want liberty for all . I also think the people that do not want the purchasing power of the collective should move where there is no GOV to interfere with their financial freedom .
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
NO , I want every one to have the advantage of buying VIA a collective and I want liberty for all . I also think the people that do not want the purchasing power of the collective should move where there is no GOV to interfere with their financial freedom .
[/quote]
LOL!
Do you want everyone to “have the advantage of buying VIA a collective,” or do you want “liberty for all?”
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
NO , I want every one to have the advantage of buying VIA a collective and I want liberty for all . I also think the people that do not want the purchasing power of the collective should move where there is no GOV to interfere with their financial freedom .
[/quote]
LOL!
Do you want everyone to “have the advantage of buying VIA a collective,” or do you want “liberty for all?”
[/quote]
both and I don’t want my employer to dictate shit to me or my family , I don’t give a fuck what God he believes in or what the fuck (HE THINKS) his God says about anything I feel better
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
NO , I want every one to have the advantage of buying VIA a collective and I want liberty for all . I also think the people that do not want the purchasing power of the collective should move where there is no GOV to interfere with their financial freedom .
[/quote]
LOL!
Do you want everyone to “have the advantage of buying VIA a collective,” or do you want “liberty for all?”
[/quote]
both and I don’t want my employer to dictate shit to me or my family , I don’t give a fuck what God he believes in or what the fuck (HE THINKS) his God says about anything I feel better
[/quote]
Why don’t you leave your employer and then you can dictate to yourself.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
So essentially, Pitt, what you are saying is that you are all for tyranny as long as it comes from the government and not from the private sector. [/quote]
He’s saying that he wants to be king. Remember talking about what you would do if you were king when you were a kid? He wants a pittbulllocracy.
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
When you say single payer, do you mean the person who receives the healthcare service should be the only one who pays for it, or do you mean the government should confiscate the property of another to pay for said healthcare services?
[/quote]
He is referring to the latter.[/quote]
That’s why when I see the Pitttttbulllll claim to be a libertarian I laugh and I laugh and I laugh and I laugh and I laugh. He’s a statist to the core.
He’s under the mistaken assumption that if one is for the legalization of pot you’re automatically a libertarian. He wants the freedom to possess weed but not his other property.
Unfortunately there are many other small minds that have the same ethos – gimme my drugs and you can take my money.
(I am for the legalization of MJ but I don’t base my libertarianism on that tenet)[/quote]
True story. In my experience too many people base their alleged libertarianism on one or two topics with legal weed being at the top. Now I’m not saying actual card-carrying libertarians are like this, but the people who just like to tell you they’re libertarian.
Bill Mahar a few years ago claimed he was a libertarian and I got a nice chuckle out of that.
I feel better