[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Also now we have reason for to over spend for Submarines and all the conventional war tools that were becoming so obsolete in the post cold war era . [/quote]
Oh, no? The nuclear triad is no longer relevant? What else is obsolete Clauswitz junior?[/quote]
I will bet we will double down on ships , subs ,tanks and the like a resurgence of Conventional Warfare
[/quote]
Those weapons platforms are necessary for any spectrum of warfare. Again, what is “so obsolete”?[/quote]
You will have to excuse me if I say BULL SHIT
[/quote]
How are any of those weapon systems obsolete? They could all be argued to be vital in actions as unconventional as counter-insurgency operations. [/quote]
We have the best conventional army in the world, in the sense of the cold war had ended decades ago there was no need to bolster our conventional forces (hence obsolete) . I will agree not the best choice of word
My point was , I am betting we will spend shit loads of money bolstering an already superior conventional force . That is not needed