Christopher Hitchens Dies

[quote]Mr. Chen wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:
Translation errors in the bible?

Really?

[/quote]

Well I don’t know, which ones were you referring to?

Your weight suggests you are a boy, but your avatar confuses me.

It is really colorful though, I like that. It’s kinda psychedelic.

You’re not one of those dirty, pot smoking gypsies are you?[/quote]

Well, the word for camel and the ropes to tie something to a camels back were the same in Aramaic, gamla , and the word for camel in Greek is kamelos and for that kind of rope kamilos or vice versa.

There just exists the tiniest possibility here that someone fucked up.

Then, Jesus was sneaky.

If you look how this guy was described he was very good at at letting his opponents hang themselves with their own words.

There must have been puns that are completely or partly untranslatable.

[quote]orion wrote:
Then, Jesus was sneaky.

If you look how this guy was described he was very good at at letting his opponents hang themselves with their own words.

There must have been puns that are completely or partly untranslatable.

Young Orion, you’ve been studying the bible, or at least about the bible!

A very good find you have here. I see you were actually searching for puns in the bible. Were you seeking to help your teacher, or throw him a curveball? Yes yes, it’s all good! Thanks for the link.

And as you’ve shown, puns and such are one area a translation often times can’t render well. This still is not really an error, more like you just miss out on a portion of the meaning, maybe 20-30% I think, if you want a number. What’s cool though is you could get a book like above and study it out.

And God expects you to young man:

Lam 3:27 (KJV) It is good for a man that he bear the yoke in his youth.

Pro 1:4 (KJV) To give subtilty to the simple, to the young man knowledge and discretion.
Pro 1:5 A wise man will hear, and will increase learning; and a man of understanding shall attain unto wise counsels:
Pro 1:6 To understand a proverb, and the interpretation; the words of the wise, and their dark sayings.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Mr. Chen wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:
Translation errors in the bible?

Really?

[/quote]

Well I don’t know, which ones were you referring to?

Your weight suggests you are a boy, but your avatar confuses me.

It is really colorful though, I like that. It’s kinda psychedelic.

You’re not one of those dirty, pot smoking gypsies are you?[/quote]

Well, the word for camel and the ropes to tie something to a camels back were the same in Aramaic, gamla , and the word for camel in Greek is kamelos and for that kind of rope kamilos or vice versa.

There just exists the tiniest possibility here that someone fucked up.[/quote]

Dude, English has stuff like this, I suppose German does too. I wouldn’t blame God for it. That would be petty, don’t you think? Rather, blame your barbaric forefathers for their careless spelling habits. I’m sure God considers it a sin.

[quote]pushharder wrote:<<< Sam thinks he’s an unstoppable juggernaut >>>[/quote]It looks like we can add the little " =] " to the list things that are lost on you. There are times to lighten up a bit ya know. Late for prayer though again. Can’t REALLY be late for prayer, but the Presbyterian influence makes for a lotta optional structure that is still with me.

So I got an answer. He wrote:

“You might want to go to a more reliable source but what I know is on the day of pentacost (after Jesus’ death) the followers of Christ were gathered for fellowship, and in the middle of their prayer meeting they were touched by the Holy Spirit and began speaking in tongues, but like I said I would go to a more reliable source if you would like to educate yourself on the topic.”

I mean this as absolutely no insult to you or him, but, while that bare statement is true, it says nothing of what tongues were/are for. I just hadta stick my 2 cents in while waiting for brother Chen. As usual I could say plenty about this, but will resist the urge because I do not have time now.

[quote]therajraj wrote:
So I got an answer. He wrote:

“You might want to go to a more reliable source but what I know is on the day of pentacost (after Jesus’ death) the followers of Christ were gathered for fellowship, and in the middle of their prayer meeting they were touched by the Holy Spirit and began speaking in tongues, but like I said I would go to a more reliable source if you would like to educate yourself on the topic.”
[/quote]
If your friend speaks in “tongues”, but doesn’t know why, I suggest that’s a problem.

He did do good though to recommend a more reliable source, so how about taking the Word of God as reliable:

1Co 14:22(KJV) Wherefore tongues are for______

a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.

Notice also it’s not a sign for believers.

Next installment we’ll go back and look at the verses in Acts your friend is referring to. If we read carefully, we can know exactly what they were doing, no speculation or “interpretation” is necessary.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
I think you’re doing quite well Sir Chen. Keep kickin’ some “speakin’ in unknown tongues iz kewl” butt, dood!

BTW, which cartoon character do YOU want to be or do you want me to choose for you?

As you know, Yosemite Sam and the Tasmanian Devil are already taken (by the same guy) so what will it be?[/quote]

Can I choose Calvin?

I’m gonna watch a movie though; I don’t want to talk with you guys right now. Besides, I’m eating my dinner salad. That’s all I get; I didn’t work out today.

[quote]Mr. Chen wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
So I got an answer. He wrote:

“You might want to go to a more reliable source but what I know is on the day of pentacost (after Jesus’ death) the followers of Christ were gathered for fellowship, and in the middle of their prayer meeting they were touched by the Holy Spirit and began speaking in tongues, but like I said I would go to a more reliable source if you would like to educate yourself on the topic.”
[/quote]
If your friend speaks in “tongues”, but doesn’t know why, I suggest that’s a problem.

He did do good though to recommend a more reliable source, so how about taking the Word of God as reliable:

1Co 14:22(KJV) Wherefore tongues are for______

a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.

Notice also it’s not a sign for believers.

Next installment we’ll go back and look at the verses in Acts your friend is referring to. If we read carefully, we can know exactly what they were doing, no speculation or “interpretation” is necessary.[/quote]

Next installment

We shall keep in mind from our first installment (from my 540th post) on pg 10 of this thread, where we checked all mentions of “tongues” in the Old Testament, and noted in EVERY case it referred to the tongue in the mouth, or a dialect of some region.

Pentacostals, on the other hand, believe to speak in “tongues” is to speak some kind of unintelligible language, that no human on earth speaks. Some claim it is the tongue of angels. Some say it is a prayer language. The ability is given by God, and is a miraculous occurrence. When they do it, it sounds like gibberish to any normal person.

For this installment, our task is to understand exactly what was going on at Pentacost in Acts Ch 1, when the apostles first spoke in tongues. Really, we just need to read through text, keeping in mind what we have already have learned from the Old Testament. I will underline what is pertinent, and also insert short observations in parenthesis.

Act 2:1 And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.
Act 2:2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
Act 2:3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. (obviously referring to the shape of the flames)
Act 2:4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
Act 2:5 And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.
Act 2:6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language.(the “other tongues” of vs 4)
Act 2:7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? (that is- they would not have had a chance to study our dialects)
Act 2:8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
Act 2:9 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,
Act 2:10 Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,
Act 2:11 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God. (the areas of the dialects are even listed!)
Act 2:12 And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another, What meaneth this? (it is a miracle obviously)

After reading through the whole passage, it’s hardly even necessary to ask- Is it an unintelligible language, or earthly dialects spoken? The only thing the Pentacostals have correct is that it’s a miraculous occurrence. There hastalo-shan-die-untie-a-bow-tie nonsense is just that.

The next thing to do would be to take this information and use it to understand 1Corinthians Ch 14. If there’s interest, I’ll write it.

This is my thread so I’m allowed to go off topic alright folks? It’s a good thing I’m not Catholic because I just might find in this honest to goodness unaltered picture I took of myself today with a customer’s laptop webcam, the glory and anointing of the omniscient creator God erupting from my spirit filled brain LOL!!! I couldn’t resist.

It burned out a whole area of pixels on my screen before I had enough sense to scroll away. You should take more care.

Or maybe it was the tie that did it.

You know, any negative experience the customer has, may effect his decision about calling you next time. Even those subconscious ones. Such as the slight discomfort or queasiness he feels when confronted with a poor tie choose. It’s odd, but these minor perceptions often trump more logical considerations like- did he do a good job fixing my computer.

Solution:

For the next 6 months, have your wife check you’re tie choice before you go out the door. Also take a photo of your outfit. If you don’t get any negative comments that day, put the photo in your “ok tie choices” file. Even ask some folks randomly as you go here and there- “hey whadoya think of my tie?” If you get some genuine approval, put a star by that one when you get home.

After 6 months, print them all out on one 8 by 10 and put it on your closet door, and you won’t have to bother your wife any more.

Hope this helps.

Now you look here bub, that tie has little Holy Spirit doves on it to match my anointing if you had only taken a moment to notice. Sheesh.