[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]Karl Lueger wrote:
A whole lot of bigoted crap.
[/quote]
…
As for you not debating with me, well you never did that when you responded to my posts so its not as if there has been a profound change.
[/quote]
Altering history seems to become a habit for you, but then cannabinoids do have a effect on the memory.
For example in:
http://tnation.T-Nation.com/hub/DrSkeptix#myForums/thread/4032238/
I responded to your distortion and your “source,” word for word, and you did the appropriate thing for someone with no defense and no facts…you hid. You never acknowledge your ignorance or when you are wrong, but consider yourself complimented, since, whether we speak of Abraham Lincoln, or of Navajos, or of Iraq sanctions, or of the Talmud’s interesting points, it is better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and to remove all doubt.
For readers at these forums, all doubt was removed, in your case, long ago.
[/quote]
Getting bored and hiding is not quite the same.
Lincoln was a criminal, the Talmud has some interesting passages about Jesus as well as Christians and the Iraqui sanctions were implemented because of the US and mainly carried out by US forces.
The fact that you want to discuss numbers is interesting, I wonder what you would think if I started to downplay numbers caused by my country.
You are missing the point, it is entirely irrelevant of it was 100000, 500000 or one million, America went apeshit because of a mere 3000, which, in the grand scheme of things is a drop in the bucket.
You can also blame that evil Hussein is to blame or the “cowardly” “terrorists” that choose to hide in the civilian populaton instead of engaging the American troops head on and being torn apart from miles away by “brave” American “heroes” (all of them), but that does of course also miss the point that that was a game the US deliberately chose to engage in without any apparent necessity.
I wonder what would happen if US federal troops “blockaded” a building block to starve out a gang, knowing full well that said gang was in control of the food supply, or opened fire in a crowded theater because 3-4 out of ten are alleged criminals.
The very things you so cavalierly accept in US foreign policy would be an outrage if the same narrative was used on American soil, causing the deaths of American citizens.
You would demand that heads roll and so do they.
The only difference is that they have the guts and teh initiative to go out and get the heads to roll themselves.
[/quote]
You are entirely predictable: you go on unitelligible and puerile tirade if you don’t get the respect you imagine that arrogate to yourself; in this particular case you are particularly mistaken and nutso.
“Lincoln was a criminal…” And your source is? You lost that argument with me in February. Your sources are stupid ejaculators, but not as stupid as the swallower.
“The Talmud has interesting passages…” And your source is? I presume that your knowledge of either Eastern or Western Aramaic is something less than my own, and that you rely on filthy websites like most cut-and-paste bigots and blowhards. In every case you rely on the Internet as the exclusive source–quite often, given the narrow nature of your experience and your cultural and intellectual self-imprisonment–you are wrong in your facts, and therefore wrong in your ideation. Your opinions, then, cannot be respected.
All that other crap of Iraq has nothing to do with what I wrote or how I feel on the matter. a subtler mind than yours would see that.
But now that we all have your manic attention, I was thinking, why not use your chief skill, that of throwing out arrogant opinions about thing which you know nothing, without a basis in facts, derived from some crap swalowed whole off the web? For example:
—What does an Austrian Economist think about the Infield Fly Rule–a tool of unbridled statism?
–Millard Fillmore…was he or wasn’t he?
–Hopi pottery of the 2nd Mesa: Proof of Lincoln’s treachery.
Or just come up with your own nonsense; the unending torrent needs no further encouragement from me.
You jew-apologists get dumber with each injection…lol!
impressive how you all follow that same imbecile tendency of denying facts…
one must realize your feeble intellects not able to form any actual thoughts so you tards simply repeat the same drivel your been fed over the years.
some idiot mentioned “cut’/paste”…of irrefutable facts
facts as opposed to braindead attempt to use lies as some kind of what…comeback?
the kosher motto you losers clealry follow…
Attack any aspect of western civilization and Christianity but
ALWAYS deflect attention away form the jews!
depsite the fact the ugliest form of HATE in world history is judaism.
now obviously you’ve failed
but your persistence is marginally amusing,
perhaps you have other gems of metal deficiency to amuse us with?
The Talmud is book-of vile, disgusting racist hatred, not a one of you can deny that…
try as you may, it cant be done;
look at passover, purim, hanukah…ALL of them celebrations of murder and hatred,
No supernatural bullshit involved, just psychopaths killing “goyim”
and their insane decedents venerating that as “religious”
only cementing beyond d that that to even call “judaism” a religion is like saying battery acid makes a good mouthwash.
"judaism’ is nothing than a racist-supremacist doctrine masquerading at “religion”.
dull dudes, to quote some facts:
The Talmud not the Torah (Bible) is the chief authority of Judaism
Most Christians are under the impression that Judaism is primarily based on the biblical Old Testament.
Actually the ultimate authority for Judaism is not the Bible but on what they call the Babylonian Talmud,
a series of writings set down in Babylon in the sixth century after Christ.
The American Heritage Dictionary describes the Talmud as â??constituting the basis of religious authority for traditional Judaism.â??
The authoritative Universal Jewish Encyclopedia compiled by the leading Rabbinic organizations of the world, makes it very clear that the Talmud,
not the Torah or Old Testament, is the supreme authority for Judaism.
â??Thus the ultimate authority for Orthodoxy is the Babylonian Talmud.
The Bible itself ranks second to it in reality, if not in theory. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, â??Authorityâ?? pg. 637) 2
What does the Talmud, the chief authority of Judaism, have to say about Jesus Christ?
Balaam [Jesus] fornicated with his jackass. (Sanhedrin 105a-b)3
Jewish priests raised Balaam [Jesus] from the dead and punished him in boiling hot semen.(57a Gittin)4
She who was the descendant of princes and governors [The Virgin Mary] played the harlot with a carpenter. (Sanhedrin 106a)
[Jesus] was lowered into a pit of dung up to his armpits. Then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead. (Sanhedrin 52b) 5
end quote
[quote]Marzouk wrote:
When u say oppresion? ‘‘Oppression is the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner’’
No there isn’t. Women can drive here, they don’t have to wear veils, christians have large churches and aren’t persecuted. Alcohol can be purchased easily and legally. Egypt is probably one of the most western of the muslim countries, a lot of foreigners leave here aswell so western life is tolerated.
The is slight political oppresion but that is politics and not religion.
People are happy with their lives and there doesn’t seem to be any resentment towards any religious authority for pushing beliefs onto anyone.[/quote]
Saying there is no violent oppression of Christians in Egypt is a goddamn lie:
Back to the Koran:
Burning Korans puts one on the same level as the muslim retards.
This was more appropriate:
[quote]Karl Lueger wrote:
perhaps you have other gems of metal deficiency to amuse us with?
[/quote]
Well, metals are certainly more unstable than non-metals, the former having a lower ionization energy than the latter. However, I’m not sure this makes them deficient. After all, if it wasn’t the case we’d sorely miss NaCl on our vittles. At least I would. Or maybe you meant like an iron deficiency?
quote
"Judaism is imbued with a very deep hatred toward Christianity…
This attitude was clearly aggravated by the Christian persecutions of Jews, but is largely independent of them.
In fact, it dates from the time when Christianity was still weak and persecuted ( by Jews),
and it was shared by Jews who had never been persecuted by Christians or who were even helped by themâ?¦
According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority.
All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it;
in the Talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned. . .
The very name Jesus was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable, and this popular tradition still persists.
The Gospels are equally detested, and they are not allowed to be quoted (let alone taught) even in modern Israeli schools.
Jewish children are actually taught â?? passages such as that which commands every Jew, whenever passing near a cemetery,
to utter a blessing if it is Jewish, but to curse the mothers of the dead if it is non-Jewish. . .
it became customary to spit (usually three times) upon seeing a church or a crucifix â?¦"
Jewish History, Jewish Religion
ALWAYS deflect attention away from the jews!
quote
As for the goyimâ?¦Zalmanâ??s attitude (was):
â??Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.â?? â?¦I
f every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA. â?¦
If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value,â?? he explained. â??There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life. â?? Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in Jewish Week, the largest Jewish publication in the United States.
Rabbi Ginsburgh, Jewish Week.
sweet as hamentaschen itz,
“Iâ??ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation,
I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist.
Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp.
There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. â?¦”
Stephen Steinlight, Director of National Affairs, the American Jewish Committee.
so far, the sum total of your efforts to counter is zero…
not unusual for our wonderful jewish fiends,
but if you profess being useful shabbaz you MUST do a better job to justify that great honor.
form what Ive seen you dull dudes have a better chance of cranking out few reps w 1,000 ponds on the flat-bench
then forming even one coherent sentence or marginally valid post…
those above the neck calcium-deposits are not working apparently…
nothing objectionable in continually stomping your drivel into the dirt…high rep amusemt itz…
a huge, massive iron lifting training parter gives more facts…
"The jews operate by Mossadist principle:
“by way of deception shalt thou do war.”
Lying is as jewish as swindling.
The jews are using you and your son and your daughter
and your money to subsidize their hate state israel,
and to destroy their enemies.
What happens to you is of absolutely NO interest to them.
Iraq is your fellow victim.
These jews are your real enemy.
Individuals pursuing individual interests has nothing to do with it.
If it weren’t Feith, Perle and Wolfowitz, it would be some other jews,
and they’d be doing exactly the
same thing: making up lies to advance policies succoring Israel.
Jews pursuing jewish interests explains everything. Only
when the big picture is understood does it make sense to focus on the day to day tactical
shifts, both in Iraq and in the way ground-happenings are midrashed for the bovine
masses."
“One of these days, even sorry-ass sad-sack Muslims are going to figure
out how to build or acquire nukes, and, as their behavior amply demonstrates, they will
go right to the source of the problem in person like so many Slim Pickinses in kaffiyehs.
Some free advice: get the fuck out of any jew-filled population center. Let
Seinfeld ‘n’ friendz suffer the consequences they’ve earned with their foreign policy
about nothing but whatz good for Israel.
The jews have ruined America’s reputation,
and they’re just getting started. I still think the most ironic summary of the current
craziness, invading Iraq, lying about WMDs, enraging Asia and Europe, is that the
American fool who says “bring it on” to a billion Muslims would quite literally
shit himself before standing up in public and critizing a single one of the JEWS who
brought on this whole utterly ridiculous yet extremely dangerous mess.”
[quote]Karl Lueger wrote:
dull dudes, to quote some facts:
The Talmud not the Torah (Bible) is the chief authority of Judaism
Most Christians are under the impression that Judaism is primarily based on the biblical Old Testament.
Actually the ultimate authority for Judaism is not the Bible but on what they call the Babylonian Talmud,
a series of writings set down in Babylon in the sixth century after Christ.
The American Heritage Dictionary describes the Talmud as �¢??constituting the basis of religious authority for traditional Judaism.�¢??
The authoritative Universal Jewish Encyclopedia compiled by the leading Rabbinic organizations of the world, makes it very clear that the Talmud,
not the Torah or Old Testament, is the supreme authority for Judaism.
�¢??Thus the ultimate authority for Orthodoxy is the Babylonian Talmud.
The Bible itself ranks second to it in reality, if not in theory. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, �¢??Authority�¢?? pg. 637) 2
What does the Talmud, the chief authority of Judaism, have to say about Jesus Christ?
Balaam [Jesus] fornicated with his jackass. (Sanhedrin 105a-b)3
Jewish priests raised Balaam [Jesus] from the dead and punished him in boiling hot semen.(57a Gittin)4
She who was the descendant of princes and governors [The Virgin Mary] played the harlot with a carpenter. (Sanhedrin 106a)
[Jesus] was lowered into a pit of dung up to his armpits. Then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead. (Sanhedrin 52b) 5
end quote[/quote]
To quote Karl Lueger:
Antisemitism is a great way of getting ahead in politics but after you made it you have to tune it down because it really is the sport of the unwashed masses.
edited
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]Karl Lueger wrote:
A whole lot of bigoted crap.
[/quote]
…
As for you not debating with me, well you never did that when you responded to my posts so its not as if there has been a profound change.
[/quote]
Altering history seems to become a habit for you, but then cannabinoids do have a effect on the memory.
For example in:
http://tnation.T-Nation.com/hub/DrSkeptix#myForums/thread/4032238/
I responded to your distortion and your “source,” word for word, and you did the appropriate thing for someone with no defense and no facts…you hid. You never acknowledge your ignorance or when you are wrong, but consider yourself complimented, since, whether we speak of Abraham Lincoln, or of Navajos, or of Iraq sanctions, or of the Talmud’s interesting points, it is better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and to remove all doubt.
For readers at these forums, all doubt was removed, in your case, long ago.
[/quote]
Getting bored and hiding is not quite the same.
Lincoln was a criminal, the Talmud has some interesting passages about Jesus as well as Christians and the Iraqui sanctions were implemented because of the US and mainly carried out by US forces.
The fact that you want to discuss numbers is interesting, I wonder what you would think if I started to downplay numbers caused by my country.
You are missing the point, it is entirely irrelevant of it was 100000, 500000 or one million, America went apeshit because of a mere 3000, which, in the grand scheme of things is a drop in the bucket.
You can also blame that evil Hussein is to blame or the “cowardly” “terrorists” that choose to hide in the civilian populaton instead of engaging the American troops head on and being torn apart from miles away by “brave” American “heroes” (all of them), but that does of course also miss the point that that was a game the US deliberately chose to engage in without any apparent necessity.
I wonder what would happen if US federal troops “blockaded” a building block to starve out a gang, knowing full well that said gang was in control of the food supply, or opened fire in a crowded theater because 3-4 out of ten are alleged criminals.
The very things you so cavalierly accept in US foreign policy would be an outrage if the same narrative was used on American soil, causing the deaths of American citizens.
You would demand that heads roll and so do they.
The only difference is that they have the guts and teh initiative to go out and get the heads to roll themselves.
[/quote]
You are entirely predictable: you go on unitelligible and puerile tirade if you don’t get the respect you imagine that arrogate to yourself; in this particular case you are particularly mistaken and nutso.
“Lincoln was a criminal…” And your source is? You lost that argument with me in February. Your sources are stupid ejaculators, but not as stupid as the swallower.
“The Talmud has interesting passages…” And your source is? I presume that your knowledge of either Eastern or Western Aramaic is something less than my own, and that you rely on filthy websites like most cut-and-paste bigots and blowhards. In every case you rely on the Internet as the exclusive source–quite often, given the narrow nature of your experience and your cultural and intellectual self-imprisonment–you are wrong in your facts, and therefore wrong in your ideation. Your opinions, then, cannot be respected.
All that other crap of Iraq has nothing to do with what I wrote or how I feel on the matter. a subtler mind than yours would see that.
But now that we all have your manic attention, I was thinking, why not use your chief skill, that of throwing out arrogant opinions about thing which you know nothing, without a basis in facts, derived from some crap swalowed whole off the web? For example:
—What does an Austrian Economist think about the Infield Fly Rule–a tool of unbridled statism?
–Millard Fillmore…was he or wasn’t he?
–Hopi pottery of the 2nd Mesa: Proof of Lincoln’s treachery.
Or just come up with your own nonsense; the unending torrent needs no further encouragement from me.
[/quote]
Ha ha ha!
Classic, Doc.[/quote]
Could either one of you master the quote function?
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]Karl Lueger wrote:
A whole lot of bigoted crap.
[/quote]
…
As for you not debating with me, well you never did that when you responded to my posts so its not as if there has been a profound change.
[/quote]
Altering history seems to become a habit for you, but then cannabinoids do have a effect on the memory.
For example in:
http://tnation.T-Nation.com/hub/DrSkeptix#myForums/thread/4032238/
I responded to your distortion and your “source,” word for word, and you did the appropriate thing for someone with no defense and no facts…you hid. You never acknowledge your ignorance or when you are wrong, but consider yourself complimented, since, whether we speak of Abraham Lincoln, or of Navajos, or of Iraq sanctions, or of the Talmud’s interesting points, it is better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and to remove all doubt.
For readers at these forums, all doubt was removed, in your case, long ago.
[/quote]
Getting bored and hiding is not quite the same.
Lincoln was a criminal, the Talmud has some interesting passages about Jesus as well as Christians and the Iraqui sanctions were implemented because of the US and mainly carried out by US forces.
The fact that you want to discuss numbers is interesting, I wonder what you would think if I started to downplay numbers caused by my country.
You are missing the point, it is entirely irrelevant of it was 100000, 500000 or one million, America went apeshit because of a mere 3000, which, in the grand scheme of things is a drop in the bucket.
You can also blame that evil Hussein is to blame or the “cowardly” “terrorists” that choose to hide in the civilian populaton instead of engaging the American troops head on and being torn apart from miles away by “brave” American “heroes” (all of them), but that does of course also miss the point that that was a game the US deliberately chose to engage in without any apparent necessity.
I wonder what would happen if US federal troops “blockaded” a building block to starve out a gang, knowing full well that said gang was in control of the food supply, or opened fire in a crowded theater because 3-4 out of ten are alleged criminals.
The very things you so cavalierly accept in US foreign policy would be an outrage if the same narrative was used on American soil, causing the deaths of American citizens.
You would demand that heads roll and so do they.
The only difference is that they have the guts and teh initiative to go out and get the heads to roll themselves.
[/quote]
You are entirely predictable: you go on unitelligible and puerile tirade if you don’t get the respect you imagine that arrogate to yourself; in this particular case you are particularly mistaken and nutso.
“Lincoln was a criminal…” And your source is? You lost that argument with me in February. Your sources are stupid ejaculators, but not as stupid as the swallower.
“The Talmud has interesting passages…” And your source is? I presume that your knowledge of either Eastern or Western Aramaic is something less than my own, and that you rely on filthy websites like most cut-and-paste bigots and blowhards. In every case you rely on the Internet as the exclusive source–quite often, given the narrow nature of your experience and your cultural and intellectual self-imprisonment–you are wrong in your facts, and therefore wrong in your ideation. Your opinions, then, cannot be respected.
All that other crap of Iraq has nothing to do with what I wrote or how I feel on the matter. a subtler mind than yours would see that.
But now that we all have your manic attention, I was thinking, why not use your chief skill, that of throwing out arrogant opinions about thing which you know nothing, without a basis in facts, derived from some crap swalowed whole off the web? For example:
—What does an Austrian Economist think about the Infield Fly Rule–a tool of unbridled statism?
–Millard Fillmore…was he or wasn’t he?
–Hopi pottery of the 2nd Mesa: Proof of Lincoln’s treachery.
Or just come up with your own nonsense; the unending torrent needs no further encouragement from me.
[/quote]
Ha ha ha!
Classic, Doc.[/quote]
Could either one of you master the quote function?[/quote]
I yield to the master of cut-and-paste!
How about “Orion’s Guide to Embryology?”
Or “My Oppressed Life: On Guard against Ebil, Within 300 Meters of the American Embassy”
Your followers cry, “More, More…on…”
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Karl Lueger wrote:
dull dudes, to quote some facts:
The Talmud not the Torah (Bible) is the chief authority of Judaism
Most Christians are under the impression that Judaism is primarily based on the biblical Old Testament.
Actually the ultimate authority for Judaism is not the Bible but on what they call the Babylonian Talmud,
a series of writings set down in Babylon in the sixth century after Christ.
The American Heritage Dictionary describes the Talmud as �?�¢??constituting the basis of religious authority for traditional Judaism.�?�¢??
The authoritative Universal Jewish Encyclopedia compiled by the leading Rabbinic organizations of the world, makes it very clear that the Talmud,
not the Torah or Old Testament, is the supreme authority for Judaism.
�?�¢??Thus the ultimate authority for Orthodoxy is the Babylonian Talmud.
The Bible itself ranks second to it in reality, if not in theory. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, �?�¢??Authority�?�¢?? pg. 637) 2
What does the Talmud, the chief authority of Judaism, have to say about Jesus Christ?
Balaam [Jesus] fornicated with his jackass. (Sanhedrin 105a-b)3
Jewish priests raised Balaam [Jesus] from the dead and punished him in boiling hot semen.(57a Gittin)4
She who was the descendant of princes and governors [The Virgin Mary] played the harlot with a carpenter. (Sanhedrin 106a)
[Jesus] was lowered into a pit of dung up to his armpits. Then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead. (Sanhedrin 52b) 5
end quote[/quote]
To quote Karl Lueger:
Antisemitism is a great way of getting ahead in politics but after you made it you have to tune it down because it really is the sport of the unwashed masses.
edited[/quote]
A lesson from the original Karl Lueger, perhaps?
A single church with 50 members threaten to burn copies of the Koran and there’s riots worldwide.
6 muslims allegedly plot to KILL THE POPE and there’s no reaction anywhere.
Anyone see anything wrong here?
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Karl Lueger wrote:
dull dudes, to quote some facts:
The Talmud not the Torah (Bible) is the chief authority of Judaism
Most Christians are under the impression that Judaism is primarily based on the biblical Old Testament.
Actually the ultimate authority for Judaism is not the Bible but on what they call the Babylonian Talmud,
a series of writings set down in Babylon in the sixth century after Christ.
The American Heritage Dictionary describes the Talmud as �??�?�¢??constituting the basis of religious authority for traditional Judaism.�??�?�¢??
The authoritative Universal Jewish Encyclopedia compiled by the leading Rabbinic organizations of the world, makes it very clear that the Talmud,
not the Torah or Old Testament, is the supreme authority for Judaism.
�??�?�¢??Thus the ultimate authority for Orthodoxy is the Babylonian Talmud.
The Bible itself ranks second to it in reality, if not in theory. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, �??�?�¢??Authority�??�?�¢?? pg. 637) 2
What does the Talmud, the chief authority of Judaism, have to say about Jesus Christ?
Balaam [Jesus] fornicated with his jackass. (Sanhedrin 105a-b)3
Jewish priests raised Balaam [Jesus] from the dead and punished him in boiling hot semen.(57a Gittin)4
She who was the descendant of princes and governors [The Virgin Mary] played the harlot with a carpenter. (Sanhedrin 106a)
[Jesus] was lowered into a pit of dung up to his armpits. Then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead. (Sanhedrin 52b) 5
end quote[/quote]
To quote Karl Lueger:
Antisemitism is a great way of getting ahead in politics but after you made it you have to tune it down because it really is the sport of the unwashed masses.
edited[/quote]
A lesson from the original Karl Lueger, perhaps?
[/quote]
Absolutely.
He did not care for Jews one way or the other, he just thought that it was a cheap way to get ahead.
I find it funny when someone takes him at face value, when he himself freely admitted why he did what he did.
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
A single church with 50 members threaten to burn copies of the Koran and there’s riots worldwide.
6 muslims allegedly plot to KILL THE POPE and there’s no reaction anywhere.
Anyone see anything wrong here?[/quote]
…no evidence of a terrorist plot was found. Perhaps that’s why there was no reaction?
“The six men who are aged 26, 27, 29, 36, 40 and 50 Ã?¢?? were arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000, on suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism”
Maybe it was just a precaution.
Seems odd to go through all the trouble for nothing.
edit:
it seems there actually are protests going on…
not exactly the protests I hoped for…
lol