[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I finally got to watch this Chris. Has nothing to do with the system of thought I hold except formally, down a peripheral hallway or two. Man how I wish we could talk in person.[/quote]
Call him…
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I finally got to watch this Chris. Has nothing to do with the system of thought I hold except formally, down a peripheral hallway or two. Man how I wish we could talk in person.[/quote]
Call him…
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
How I feel sometimes:
I like the little jig the protestant guy does…Did you make this movie??
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
How I feel sometimes:
I like the little jig the protestant guy does…Did you make this movie??[/quote]
Nope. I found it on a friend’s blog.
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I finally got to watch this Chris. Has nothing to do with the system of thought I hold except formally, down a peripheral hallway or two. Man how I wish we could talk in person.[/quote]
Call him…[/quote]I’m talkin about dear Christopher. Not the guy who made the video.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I finally got to watch this Chris. Has nothing to do with the system of thought I hold except formally, down a peripheral hallway or two. Man how I wish we could talk in person.[/quote]
Call him…[/quote]I’m talkin about dear Christopher. Not the guy who made the video.
[/quote]
I know.
Interesting article:
http://www.almostnotcatholic.com/2011/07/communion-of-saints-and-few-other.html
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I finally got to watch this Chris. Has nothing to do with the system of thought I hold except formally, down a peripheral hallway or two. Man how I wish we could talk in person.[/quote]
Call him…[/quote]I’m talkin about dear Christopher. Not the guy who made the video.
[/quote]
I know.[/quote]What makes you think I would be able to do that? How would I have a number for him?
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I finally got to watch this Chris. Has nothing to do with the system of thought I hold except formally, down a peripheral hallway or two. Man how I wish we could talk in person.[/quote]
Call him…[/quote]I’m talkin about dear Christopher. Not the guy who made the video.
[/quote]
I know.[/quote]What makes you think I would be able to do that? How would I have a number for him?
[/quote]
Ask him?
Was St. Augustine Catholic? I say he was a devout Catholic, and Russ Rentler proves this:
http://youngevangelicalandcatholic.blogspot.com/2011/07/st-augustine-was-devout-catholic.html
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Was St. Augustine Catholic? I say he was a devout Catholic, and Russ Rentler proves this:
//youngevangelicalandcatholic.blogspot.com/2011/07/st-augustine-was-devout-catholic.html[/quote]I say he was devout catholic too. Augustine improved as he matured btw. I’m not diggin out the quotes. It won’t do any good anyway. Anybody who thinks Augustine would own that monster headquarted in vatican city today is nuts. Yes I read all the quotes (for the hundredth time).
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Was St. Augustine Catholic? I say he was a devout Catholic, and Russ Rentler proves this:
//youngevangelicalandcatholic.blogspot.com/2011/07/st-augustine-was-devout-catholic.html[/quote]I say he was devout catholic too. Augustine improved as he matured btw. I’m not diggin out the quotes. It won’t do any good anyway. Anybody who thinks Augustine would own that monster headquarted in vatican city today is nuts. Yes I read all the quotes (for the hundredth time).
[/quote]
Of course not, he wasn’t the pope. And it would have required him to bathe… I heard he wasn’t a fan.
The article you linked is gone Chris. I wanted one of the very telling responses from a Catholic reader, but the link now goes to a piece about the communion of the saints.
Jesus is the Church, to not “own that monster” would be to deny the Church, deny the Scriptures, deny Jesus Christ, &c. for Augustine. Yeah, I’m sure Augustine would have some kind words for the sinners in the Church (who would have thought the Church is not a club of Saints, but a hospital for the sick?) as he did since the day he came back to the Church.
I agree Augustine matured as he got older, but looking at his latest pieces of works:
Chapters 20-22 of City of God
Writings against the Semipelagians (the last of the three he wrote a year before he died)
And, especially reading his writing of Retractations (428, or two years before his death) you can see that going over all his works that he still held to the Catholic Faith without reservation and condition. So much so that the writings have a Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur today.
The Catholic Faith has not changed, you can attempt to prove that it has. But, if St. Augustine lived today he would own the monster as much as he did when he was alive. The only thing that has changed since Augustine was alive…well actually it hasn’t changed, is that there are sinners in the Church.
Did not Jesus tell us the parable of the weeds among the wheat? Who is surprised of this when they have been warned that it is so? The weeds will be harvested along with the wheat and thrown into the fire.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
The article you linked is gone Chris. I wanted one of the very telling responses from a Catholic reader, but the link now goes to a piece about the communion of the saints.[/quote]
What link are you talking about.
I figure since the anti-Catholicism has slowed to a screeching halt lately I would help you guys out, every week I’ll find some awesome anti-Catholicism work and post it up here so you can use to throw at Catholics.
Here is some serious anti-Catholicism, not as in it is big, but that the author is not writing satire.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[/quote]
You have a partial Bible, I have the whole Bible. ![]()
Romans alone is enough Chris.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
Romans alone is enough Chris.[/quote]
No, it’s not. If it were, that would be the only epistle in the Bible. Let me translate that in to plain English. Romans, if taken out of context, supports the assertion of divine election which is what you believe in and so that all you need. Corinthians supports the Holy Eucharist so it’s no wonder you don’t give it any credence.