This time it’t the AP… The Hezbol press machine is getting a flat tire…
http://drinkingfromhome.blogspot.com/2006/08/extreme-makeover-beirut-edition.html
[quote]pat36 wrote:
This time it’t the AP… The Hezbol press machine is getting a flat tire…
Drinking From Home: Extreme Makeover - Beirut Edition [/quote]
Thanks for posting. I heard about it on the radio.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
pat36 wrote:
This time it’t the AP… The Hezbol press machine is getting a flat tire…
http://drinkingfromhome.blogspot.com/2006/08/extreme-makeover-beirut-edition.html
Thanks for posting. I heard about it on the radio.[/quote]
No sympathy. As long as those f-rs keep hiding weapons military headquarters in schools, hospitals, mosques, and neighborhoods they are targets. They did the same thing in Somalia and Iraq. They have no qualms about using human shields. Perhaps I’m a little calloused, but I could care less when I see stuff like this. They didn’t care when Americans were crying in NYC on 9/11. Why are we supposed to feel sympathy?
[quote]Applesauce wrote:
http://www.infowar-monitor.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1336
[/quote]
I saw that report by Cooper the other day and was very impressed. He’d be standing there saying, “We are supposed to be shooting this guy on the balcony playing the pro-Hez. music, but in truth the Hez. media handlers told him to turn it on and wave.” I guess his handlers didn’t speak enlish.
It’s refreshing to see that you guys don’t take anything for granted.
After all, you bought the iraq-al quada link hook line and sinker.
You believed Colin Powell when he showed you artist impressions of WMD in Iraq.
From gullible fool to critical thinker in only a couple of years eh…
And back to gullible fool in a few days I guess.
[quote]wreckless wrote:
More of his usual bulshit.[/quote]
You conveniently ignore all of the supporting facts regarding pre war intelligence regarding WMD’s in Iraq and Saddam’s intention on aquiring increased capabillities.
Your comparison is so radically incomplete it’s laughable. But hey, thanks for the laughs.
On the eighth day god created the perfect internet troll. And he named him wreckless.
Foolish Hezbelloh, they don’t know shit about propaganda!
Really they should hire some US government consultants or even Israeli psy-op professionals if they want to garner sympathy or make the world believe the sky is green.
Foolish, foolish muslim extremists. When will they learn you can’t bullshit the best of the bullshitters?
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
wreckless wrote:
More of his usual bulshit.
You conveniently ignore all of the supporting facts regarding pre war intelligence regarding WMD’s in Iraq and Saddam’s intention on aquiring increased capabillities.
Your comparison is so radically incomplete it’s laughable. But hey, thanks for the laughs.
On the eighth day god created the perfect internet troll. And he named him wreckless.[/quote]
supporting facts ? ? ?.
That’s very funny ! ! !
So it’s back to gullible fool already?
Thanks for prooving my point.
[quote]Wreckless wrote:
bigflamer wrote:
wreckless wrote:
More of his usual bulshit.
You conveniently ignore all of the supporting facts regarding pre war intelligence regarding WMD’s in Iraq and Saddam’s intention on aquiring increased capabillities.
Your comparison is so radically incomplete it’s laughable. But hey, thanks for the laughs.
On the eighth day god created the perfect internet troll. And he named him wreckless.
supporting facts ? ? ?.
That’s very funny ! ! !
So it’s back to gullible fool already?
Thanks for prooving my point.[/quote]
Supporting facts that have been discussed and rehashed so many times on this forum it’s ridiculas. What point were you trying to prove specifically? Am I a gullible fool because I point out your hate filled idiocy? Or is it because I don’t accept your anti Bush, anti-war mantra at face value?
So again, your comparison was radically incomplete and quite wreckless (pun intended).
You must enjoy being a douchebag. You’re quite good at it.
[quote]Wreckless wrote:
bigflamer wrote:
wreckless wrote:
More of his usual bulshit.
You conveniently ignore all of the supporting facts regarding pre war intelligence regarding WMD’s in Iraq and Saddam’s intention on aquiring increased capabillities.
Your comparison is so radically incomplete it’s laughable. But hey, thanks for the laughs.
On the eighth day god created the perfect internet troll. And he named him wreckless.
supporting facts ? ? ?.
That’s very funny ! ! !
So it’s back to gullible fool already?
Thanks for prooving my point.[/quote]
You seemed to have miss the fact that they have infact found WMD’s in Iraq, over 500 of them so far. I guess that doesn’t matter 'cause they were made before 1991 so if we blew a few of them off in your home town, you wouldn’t mind a bit.
And I am not a huge fan of the war. But support the boots on the ground for sure…
[quote]Wreckless wrote:
It’s refreshing to see that you guys don’t take anything for granted.
After all, you bought the iraq-al quada link hook line and sinker.
You believed Colin Powell when he showed you artist impressions of WMD in Iraq.
From gullible fool to critical thinker in only a couple of years eh…
And back to gullible fool in a few days I guess.[/quote]
More comment from the Islamo-Fascist neo-Nazi.
[quote]pat36 wrote:
You seemed to have miss the fact that they have infact found WMD’s in Iraq, over 500 of them so far. I guess that doesn’t matter 'cause they were made before 1991 so if we blew a few of them off in your home town, you wouldn’t mind a bit.
And I am not a huge fan of the war. But support the boots on the ground for sure…[/quote]
Heres proof about the over 500 WMD’s found.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/12/wmd.search/
sheesh
[quote]pat36 wrote:
You seemed to have miss the fact that they have infact found WMD’s in Iraq, over 500 of them so far. I guess that doesn’t matter 'cause they were made before 1991 so if we blew a few of them off in your home town, you wouldn’t mind a bit.
And I am not a huge fan of the war. But support the boots on the ground for sure…[/quote]
In good company:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060806/ap_on_re_us/iraq_believing_wmd;_ylt=IDIOTS;_ylu=FOOLS
[quote]Z-Man wrote:
pat36 wrote:
You seemed to have miss the fact that they have infact found WMD’s in Iraq, over 500 of them so far. I guess that doesn’t matter 'cause they were made before 1991 so if we blew a few of them off in your home town, you wouldn’t mind a bit.
And I am not a huge fan of the war. But support the boots on the ground for sure…
In good company:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060806/ap_on_re_us/iraq_believing_wmd;_ylt=IDIOTS;_ylu=FOOLS
[/quote]
What an INCREDIBLY hostile article!!!
The partisan nature of this is beyond belief.
I’m not going to go into many of the findings (unless you choose to make an argument of it) but, to present scott ritter as an expert invalidates the entire premise.
You will recall that the saddam tapes clearly state in 1995 that saddam had wmd and was actively hiding them. It was this exact time frame that shows ritter screaming that the wmd’s had all been found and dismantled.
Then for that person to claim in your article that “they weren’t hidden” shows you exactly how far people will go with denial.
You can see that the sarin/ricin shells were dispersed along with convential artillery.
Coincidence? Bull.
JeffR
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Z-Man wrote:
pat36 wrote:
You seemed to have miss the fact that they have infact found WMD’s in Iraq, over 500 of them so far. I guess that doesn’t matter 'cause they were made before 1991 so if we blew a few of them off in your home town, you wouldn’t mind a bit.
And I am not a huge fan of the war. But support the boots on the ground for sure…
In good company:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060806/ap_on_re_us/iraq_believing_wmd;_ylt=IDIOTS;_ylu=FOOLS
What an INCREDIBLY hostile article!!!
The partisan nature of this is beyond belief.
I’m not going to go into many of the findings (unless you choose to make an argument of it) but, to present scott ritter as an expert invalidates the entire premise.
You will recall that the saddam tapes clearly state in 1995 that saddam had wmd and was actively hiding them. It was this exact time frame that shows ritter screaming that the wmd’s had all been found and dismantled.
Then for that person to claim in your article that “they weren’t hidden” shows you exactly how far people will go with denial.
You can see that the sarin/ricin shells were dispersed along with convential artillery.
Coincidence? Bull.
JeffR[/quote]
More WMD in Iraq, the US government said so themselves.
Poor Jerffy…
[quote]bigflamer wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
bigflamer wrote:
wreckless wrote:
More of his usual bulshit.
You conveniently ignore all of the supporting facts regarding pre war intelligence regarding WMD’s in Iraq and Saddam’s intention on aquiring increased capabillities.
Your comparison is so radically incomplete it’s laughable. But hey, thanks for the laughs.
On the eighth day god created the perfect internet troll. And he named him wreckless.
supporting facts ? ? ?.
That’s very funny ! ! !
So it’s back to gullible fool already?
Thanks for prooving my point.
Supporting facts that have been discussed and rehashed so many times on this forum it’s ridiculas. What point were you trying to prove specifically? Am I a gullible fool because I point out your hate filled idiocy? Or is it because I don’t accept your anti Bush, anti-war mantra at face value?
So again, your comparison was radically incomplete and quite wreckless (pun intended).
You must enjoy being a douchebag. You’re quite good at it.
[/quote]
Listen guys, you can’t rewrite history.
The truth is that Iraq didn’t have wmd. It was known and accepted as fact that the weapons had either deteriorated after years of international boycot, or had been found and destroyed by international inspectors and their teams.
Remember Blickx? The guy got rediculed by Bush and his merry band of warmongers because he couldn’t find any wmd. Blickx told them there were none. He was right.
But Dubious kept pouring tenthousands of soldiers in the area. He was desperate to get a war going. He got what he wanted. But not like he wanted it.
Tough luck.
You’re a gullible fool if you beleive those that want to rewrite history.
Where do you point out my hate filled idiocy. Namecalling != pointing out.
You don’t have to accept my anti-war mantra at face value. But you sure bought the Bush lies about wmd and ties with Al-Qada.
THAT my friend, makes you a gullible fool.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Z-Man wrote:
pat36 wrote:
You seemed to have miss the fact that they have infact found WMD’s in Iraq, over 500 of them so far. I guess that doesn’t matter 'cause they were made before 1991 so if we blew a few of them off in your home town, you wouldn’t mind a bit.
And I am not a huge fan of the war. But support the boots on the ground for sure…
In good company:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060806/ap_on_re_us/iraq_believing_wmd;_ylt=IDIOTS;_ylu=FOOLS
What an INCREDIBLY hostile article!!!
The partisan nature of this is beyond belief.
I’m not going to go into many of the findings (unless you choose to make an argument of it) but, to present scott ritter as an expert invalidates the entire premise.
You will recall that the saddam tapes clearly state in 1995 that saddam had wmd and was actively hiding them. It was this exact time frame that shows ritter screaming that the wmd’s had all been found and dismantled.
Then for that person to claim in your article that “they weren’t hidden” shows you exactly how far people will go with denial.
You can see that the sarin/ricin shells were dispersed along with convential artillery.
Coincidence? Bull.
JeffR[/quote]
EffR,
The article may clash with the dreamworld that you have build around you, but that doesn’t make it a hostile article.
Please, go into some of the findings. Please do.