Brokeback Propaganda

Firlife, could you also comment on the Economist’s piece?

The more I think about it, the more I realize that legal rights are not separable from societal recongnition. WHY do married couples have those extra rights? I think initially those rights were given to them to make things easier for a family; an economic incentive to get married/stay married (implicit rather than explicit). Why did the government provided such incentives? Because families were primarily formed to have kids and families were more efficient economic structures. These days, however, the proportion of families without kids is growing and overall institure of marriage is getting weaker. Would you agree that 100-200 years ago gay marriage did not make much sense?

So, if marriage is about kids (and it’s less and less about it) - gays can’t have those extra rights. When proportion of childless marriages was small, this was the case.

If marriage is about more stable/efficient formation (hence government providing those benefits), those rights ARE govermental recognition of gay unions as something benefitial to society. Hence giving those legal rights to gay unions goes beyond just the legal question in the eyes of opposition.

Gays also want to adopt kids, hence mimicing traditional family. Legal rights granted to families are closely related to what family represents in the eyes of society. Granting all legal rights to gays means saying that their union serves the same purpose as traditional union (in eyes of society). And I don’t think many are convinced that’s true.

I’d still vote for all legal rights granted to gays, but I start to understand opposition’s position.

Blacks did not fight just for legal rights. They wanted (rightfully so) more. I think the same is the case with gays.

[quote]forlife wrote:
skor wrote:
Forlife,

What are the demand/goals of the majority of gays in relation to gay marrige/civil union: legal rights or more? Would most gays be satisfied with civil unions? Not as an intermidiate point, but as a final goal.

I’m not aware of any formal polls, but I can tell you what I want and what my friends have expressed.

Personally, I don’t care if they call it a marriage or a civil union. There is an important caveat, though. Whatever they call it, it -must- be recognized at the federal level. There are numerous important benefits (social security, tax benefits, survivor benefits, etc.) which are federally recognized and would not be available to a gay union that is only recognized at the state level.

The religious right sometimes gets confused and thinks that gays want their approval. We don’t (at least I don’t). I couldn’t care less what they think about my sexual orientation. If they want to consider me a heathen bound for hell, more power to them. I think their world view is fundamentally flawed, and their moral opinions carry no weight with me.

I don’t care if their religion recognizes my union. All I’m asking for is equal treatment on the civil level.

P.S. Steve0, you need to educate yourself. If marriage has always been between a man and a woman, how do you explain Abraham’s multiple wives (and the other numerous examples of divine-sanctioned polygamy in the bible)?[/quote]

[quote]forlife wrote:
skor wrote:
Forlife,

What are the demand/goals of the majority of gays in relation to gay marrige/civil union: legal rights or more? Would most gays be satisfied with civil unions? Not as an intermidiate point, but as a final goal.

I’m not aware of any formal polls, but I can tell you what I want and what my friends have expressed.

Personally, I don’t care if they call it a marriage or a civil union. There is an important caveat, though. Whatever they call it, it -must- be recognized at the federal level. There are numerous important benefits (social security, tax benefits, survivor benefits, etc.) which are federally recognized and would not be available to a gay union that is only recognized at the state level.

The religious right sometimes gets confused and thinks that gays want their approval. We don’t (at least I don’t). I couldn’t care less what they think about my sexual orientation. If they want to consider me a heathen bound for hell, more power to them. I think their world view is fundamentally flawed, and their moral opinions carry no weight with me.

I don’t care if their religion recognizes my union. All I’m asking for is equal treatment on the civil level.

P.S. Steve0, you need to educate yourself. If marriage has always been between a man and a woman, how do you explain Abraham’s multiple wives (and the other numerous examples of divine-sanctioned polygamy in the bible)?
[/quote]

Who says they were “divine sactioned?” Actually, Abram’s fornication with Hager was a manifestation of Abram’s unbelief or lack of complete faith in God. God is gracious, however, and still blessed Abram. The blessings that God gives to us, in spite of ourselves, only shows the love of God and that He (thank God) is not like unto us.

More to the point, however, Abram was having relations with women – not homosexual relations. Give me an example in the Bible where this was ever sanctioned, since you seem to want to use the Bible in your argument.

I’ll save you the hastle, although I would encourage you to look – it ain’t there, bro. It is not there, because the Bible calls sodomy (which is the word God uses) an ABOMINATION. It is not only sin, but ABOMINAL SIN!

[quote]rainjack wrote:
harris447 wrote:
Jersey-haired: yes, indubitably. My poodle-fro rocked out with its cock out in 7-11 parking lots all through Bon Jovi-land.

I demand, however, you recant you claim of ‘guido’. I have never worn a wife-beater, necklace outside my shirt, spiked my hair or sculpted my eyebrows.

I can’t. I won’t. I will not change the sterotype I have created in my mind. You will forever be just as I described you.

As to your points: we have already defended lifestyle choices (though I will only believe that homosexuality is a “choice” when you can tell me when you “chose” to be heterosexual.)

A person’s religion is a choice. Interracial marriage is a choice. Being a fatty-boombalatty is a choice. Disriminating against these groups is illegal.

I will believe homosexuality is not a choice as soon as I am presented the genetic proof. Until then, homosexuality is as much a choice as “original or extra-crispy”.

I agree that discrimination is wrong. We are not talking about discrimination. We are talking about affording special rights to a group of people who have made a lifestyle choice. Fat people do not get special rights afforded them. Alcoholics don’t. Bodybuilders don’t. Why gays then?

As for the Constitution…where does it mention marriage?

I think it has more to do with the way certain judges have interpreted the constitution that harms its integrity than it does with the actual verbage.

[/quote]

Well, now we’re in disagreement of the term “special rights.”

Special rights are “Gays get free parking,” or “Lesbians vote twice.” Having the same rights as other people is not special, it’s just equal.

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
Actually, Abram’s fornication with Hager was a manifestation of Abram’s unbelief or lack of complete faith in God.[/quote]

You do realize that Abram’s wife, Sarah, gave Hagar to him as a second wife right? It wasn’t like Abram was having sex on the sly.

“Now Sarai Abram’s wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar.” Genesis 16:1

“And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.” Genesis 16:3

Apparently father Abraham continued challenging the “traditional” definition of marriage, since he took yet another plural wife:

“Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah.” Genesis 25:1

You fundamentalists don’t even know your own bible. Your so-called “traditional marriage” was frequently challenged in the bible by men that had multiple wives. David, Solomon, and others had many wives. As a more general example:

Deuteronomy 21:15:
If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated…

[quote]It is not there, because the Bible calls sodomy (which is the word God uses) an ABOMINATION. It is not only sin, but ABOMINAL SIN!
[/quote]

The bible also says that eating lobster is an ABOMINATION. It is not only sin, but ABOMINABLE SIN!

Leviticus 11:10-12
"And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:

They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.

Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you."

Repent, ye that visit the den of iniquity known as Red Lobster! You shall be worthy of death by stoning!

[quote]skor wrote:
Would you agree that 100-200 years ago gay marriage did not make much sense?
[/quote]

I don’t think marriage is inherently tied to procreation. Infertile couples have been marrying for thousands of years. Marriage is a declaration of fidelity and commitment to another person. It provides stability to society, so there is reason for society to support it. That principle applies regardless of whether the couple is gay or straight.

I love how the fundamentalists blame gays for lacking social stability on one hand, while refusing to grant them the social structure which would help them achieve that stability.

[quote]forlife wrote:
steveo5801 wrote:
Actually, Abram’s fornication with Hager was a manifestation of Abram’s unbelief or lack of complete faith in God.

You do realize that Abram’s wife, Sarah, gave Hagar to him as a second wife right? It wasn’t like Abram was having sex on the sly.

“Now Sarai Abram’s wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar.” Genesis 16:1

“And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.” Genesis 16:3

Apparently father Abraham continued challenging the “traditional” definition of marriage, since he took yet another plural wife:

“Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah.” Genesis 25:1

You fundamentalists don’t even know your own bible. Your so-called “traditional marriage” was frequently challenged in the bible by men that had multiple wives. David, Solomon, and others had many wives. As a more general example:

Deuteronomy 21:15:
If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated…

It is not there, because the Bible calls sodomy (which is the word God uses) an ABOMINATION. It is not only sin, but ABOMINAL SIN!

The bible also says that eating lobster is an ABOMINATION. It is not only sin, but ABOMINABLE SIN!

Leviticus 11:10-12
"And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:

They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.

Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you."

Repent, ye that visit the den of iniquity known as Red Lobster! You shall be worthy of death by stoning![/quote]

I think we all get it. You like to have sex with men and mock the Bible. What a good example you are for your two children.

I know you like to change subjects whenever you are losing in any certain direction.

You lose this argument on health.

You lose it on tradition.

You lose it on public support.

So now it’s time to take it to the Bible and attempt to make it look like the only ones who oppose your abberant lifestyle are fundamentalist Christians.

This could not be further from the truth as only 22% or so decalre themselves to be “fundamentalist Christians.” Yet, anywhere between 55% to 70% oppose gay marraige.

So much for your “nasty fundamentalist” argument.

But since you continue to bang away at the Bible…it might be time that we debate the religious aspect again. Caution, this will have the same result that every other area of your argument has: You losing.

Keep in mind that certain rules were set down in the old levitical law for various reasons. Some had to do with health etc.

Gods laws were to be obeyed for a variety of reasons however.

When Jesus Christ entered the picture things changed didn’t they?

Well not everything changed, as homosexuality was still forbidden.

And as long as you want to stay on the Bible keep this passage in mind:

Corinthians 6:9

“Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immmoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders…(will inherit the kingdom of God.”)

And since we are on the topic of religion:

There are no major religions that accept, much less sanction the practice of homosexuality. Perhaps they all know something that you don’t? Perhaps you know deep down that your current lifestyle is not good and won’t admit it…

I know…I know…you have a hot date and don’t care…

[quote]forlife wrote:
skor wrote:
Would you agree that 100-200 years ago gay marriage did not make much sense?

I don’t think marriage is inherently tied to procreation.[/quote]

That statement is totally off base. Marriage was always about procreation. One does not have to believe in God to understand this. It is about the furthering of the species. Nature…

The single gay community has far higher heatlth problems (both physical and emotional), because of the gay act and the lifestyle than single heterosexuals. They lead the way proportionally and many times outright in AIDS, STD’s Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphilis depression, anxiety, suicide and surprise of all surprises: promiscuity! Really… the list is virtually endless…

Solve that riddle first then get back to me on how a marriage certificate would change all of that.

And once again…

…forlife attacks "fundamentalists directly. As if they are the only ones who oppose gay marriage.

Nice try forlife. But as I stated in my previous post between 55% and 70% (most serious polls) of the people are opposed to gay marriage, 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 times the amount of fundamentalists in the USA!

Must be all sorts of people oppose sanctioning what you do as marriage.

Try again.

Way ahead of you, Zeb. I know fundamentalists like to claim that commandments in the old testament are no longer relevant (despite claiming in the same breath that god doesn’t change). However, you forgot to mention that several of the “commandments” in the New Testament have similarly become irrelevant, like women being required to have their heads covered and being forbidden from speaking in church. I can point to the scriptural injunctions against those “sins” as well if you like. The bible is a largely outdated document. It is a relic of a culture that existed millenia ago, and while slavery, misogynism, and homophobia were perpetrated in those days, people have become more enlightened since then.

If marriage was always about procreation, infertile couples would be disallowed from marrying. Duh.

I’m glad you’re revising the statistics on support for gay marriage, but you are misleading people by claiming that it is 55% to 70%. The truth is that it has dropped from 68% to 51% in the last 2 years, and is likely to continue doing so.

People are realizing that despite the Henny Pennies of the religious right, the world hasn’t collapsed since Massachusetts began allowing gays to marry. In fact, Massachusetts currently enjoys the LOWEST DIVORCE RATE IN THE COUNTRY.

[quote]forlife wrote:
If marriage was always about procreation, infertile couples would be disallowed from marrying. Duh.[/quote]

Is that the stance you want to take on this?

Rather, why dissolve a marriage between one man and one woman AFTER they realize that they cannot have children?

DUH!

No sane person can argue that procreation was not the single most important determinant to marriage.

Let me put it another way. It’s called “nature.” That is one more thing that is against you in this debate, as if you needed one more huh?

One man plus one woman and the possiblity to continue life exists.

Two of the same gender cannot do this. Again…N A T U R E !

More lying to make the issue look like it’s in your favor? Or, are you just confused like you are with…other things?

Here’s a poll from April of 2005. That would be only 14 months ago.

"Public opposition to “marriages” between homosexuals is at an all-time high, according to a poll released yesterday.

When asked whether they thought same-sex “marriages” should be recognized by the law as valid and come with the same rights as traditional marriages, 68 percent of the respondents in the CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll said they should not."

The study also said:

“A similar poll by Gallup last year found that 55 percent thought homosexual “marriages” should not be valid…”

Let’s see, 68% against gay marriage 14 months ago.

Two years ago only 55% were against gay marriage…

Hey, that’s about the exact opposite of what you claim!

LOL

Unless you are now going to resort to one of your standard ploys and claim that CNN, USA Today and Gallup are all fundamentalist institutions with secret agendas to crush gay hope. (funny stuff huh?)

That means that opposition is growing against gay marriage.

To further make my point, (only) “Twenty-eight percent said same-sex “marriages” should be valid.”

In other polls I have found that the only people who feel that gay marriage should be legalized are the following:

-Homosexuals

-Those who have friends and or relatives who are homosexuals

-Ultra left wing liberals who think pretty much everything should be allowed. I won’t get into what else they want…

-Singles under the age of 30 (who rarely vote).

Those four groups sum up the bulk of the 28% who want gay marriage in the United States.

It must suck to be you and have ALL of the facts, history, religion, tradition, nature, polls and referendums against you.

But even so when you make stuff up I’m going to have to call you on it. I know that might be embarassing for most. But I figure you don’t embarass easily given what I know about you.

By the way…

Will you be pushing for polygamists to marry as well? Or, are should marriage rights ONLY be expanded for homosexuals?

That would be the next logical step right?

Are you actually claiming that people have never been married for a purpose other than having children?

LOL!

My grandma remarried at 70 after my grandfather died. According to you, her marriage was a sham because it didn’t include procreation.

Nice try though.

As far as trends on acceptance of gay marriage, I’ll post this again since you conveniently missed it last time:

The Pew Research Center recently found in March, 2006:

"Public acceptance of homosexuality has increased in a number of ways in recent years, though it remains a deeply divisive issue. Half of Americans (51%) continue to oppose legalizing gay marriage, but this number has declined significantly from 63% in February 2004, when opposition spiked following the Massachusetts Supreme Court decision and remained high throughout the 2004 election season. Opposition to gay marriage has fallen across the board, with substantial declines even among Republicans.

These are among the results of the latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted among 1,405 adults from March 8-12. The poll also finds less opposition to gays serving openly in the military and a greater public willingness to allow gays to adopt children. A 60% majority now favors allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military, up from 52% in 1994, and 46% support gay adoption, up from 38% in 1999.
"

Imagine that…

MORE Americans now favor gay marriage than ever before.

MORE Americans now favor gays serving openly in the military.

MORE Americans now favor allowing gays to adopt children.

Maybe there’s some hope for our country after all.

http://people-press.org/...p3?ReportID=273

Y’know, Zeb: if you want to be a bigot, then that’s fine.

But stop being a liar.

http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm

The numbers for gay marriage or civil unions go up; the numbers for discrimination and hatred go down.

[quote]forlife wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
Sometimes in life compassion is measured by one’s non-acceptance of things or lifestyles that are known to be destructive to those that engage in them.

That line is how bigots have justified their actions for millenia. They always claim to be acting in the best interests of society. In reality, they are doing damage to people.
[/quote]

I’m sure that is what you use to justify it to yourself, but that is far from true.

And as for damage, I think the psychological and physical damage that a gay lifestyle does to the person is clearly outlined by the CDC and other non-biased medical authorities. So your statement is very inaccurate.

[quote]
The basis for your “knowledge” comes from your religious beliefs, whether you admit it or not. You are absolutely convinced that your particular brand of religion is correct, and nobody can tell you otherwise. Therefore, you feel justified in condemning everyone that doesn’t see the world as you do.

I know your mindset. I used to be like you.[/quote]

My “knowledge” comes from medical and mental health experts and has been clearly demonstrated to be accurate many, many, many times on this site. So I’m not even going to there.

I know you desperately want these things to be true, but unfortunately you may wake up one morning and “receive the results of your error [error in lifestyle] within you” and will then know that what we are saying is true.

That’s right, Lorisco…it is just an enormous “coincidence” that every single one of the homophobes in this thread is a fundamentalist Christian. You’re all here because of the objective evidence…your faith has no bearing whatsoever on your beliefs about homosexuality.

LOL.

I’ve pointed out repeatedly why Zeb’s “statistics” are inherently flawed, and you just gloss over all of it because deep down in your little Christian heart you know that your god has condemned homosexuality and therefore the statistics -must- support your frame of reference.

But that doesn’t change the reality that EVERY LEADING MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION IN THE WORLD universally states that homosexuality is not a mental illness, that it does not need to be cured, and that attempting to do so can be damaging to people.

It also doesn’t change the personal reality of my own experience after having spent decades listening to religious bigots that don’t have a clue what they are talking about.

[quote]forlife wrote:
Are you actually claiming that people have never been married for a purpose other than having children?[/quote]

No, and I never said that.

(This is the part of the debate where forlife goes on fishing trips and twists my words. Good job.)

However, if you think for a second that this is not the main function then you are off base.

Again, nature…nature…nature…Keep saying that to yourself and then try to justify gay marriage.

[/quote]
As far as trends on acceptance of gay marriage, I’ll post this again since you conveniently missed it last time:[/quote]

More pointless nonsense.

For every poll you show me that has gays being MORE accepted I will show you two that show they are less accepted.

This proves what?

No matter where you go fishing for polls Americans are still by majority against gay marriage.

In addition to that there are now about 30 states with anti-gay marriage laws on the books!

This demonstrates that while Americans are still against gay marriage in every single poll taken. Even the nuttiest liberal, politically correct polls that you might want to look up, they are dead set against gay marriage when it comes to an actual vote.

Most referendums against gay marriage pass by wide wide majorities.

See Texas almost 75% against gay marriage. Only cockeyed optimist, or someone very desparate would look at those figures and see improvement in their situation.

I will remind you again of the situation on Massachusetts since you never ever acknowledge this that tells me that it might be something that you simply can’t respond to:

Backers of a constitutional ban on gay marriage in Massachusetts have shattered a 20-year-old record for the most certified signatures ever gathered in support of a proposed ballot question.

"Breaking News Alerts Secretary of State William F. Galvin this week certified the signatures of 123,356 registered voters, nearly twice as many as the number required to get on the ballot.

Supporters of the ban said their effort shows that gay marriage is still a burning issue among thousands of voters, and legislators should pay heed.

The people have not just spoken, they have shouted to let the people vote on the definition of marriage," said Kristian Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, which spearheaded the signature drive.

Whenever the people have a chance to speak they say NO to gay marriage. They don’t want state sanctioned abberrant behavior.

[quote]MORE Americans now favor gays serving openly in the military.
[/quote]

This may surprise you but I have no problem with homosexuals serving in the military.

Hey…we actually may agree on something here.

You are not paying attention my friend.

Oklahoma, as well as other states, are reversing gay adoption laws:

“Oklahoma State Rep. Tim Pope said, ?Homosexual people are unstable in their lifestyle?period.? Pope contends that children deserve better than to be adopted by gay parents. Therefore, he is sponsoring a bill that would forbid homosexuals from adopting children.”

Can you imagine that?

Someone finds that the homosexual lifestyle is “unstable” for children. Wow…

Do you think it has anything to do with things like this very important data largely ignored by the main stream politically correct liberal media:

Mental Health & Substance Abuse of Homosexuals

Aaron, D.J., Markovic, N., Danielson, M.E., et al. (2001). Behavioral risk factors for disease and preventive health practices among lesbians. American Journal of Public Health. 91 (6): 972-975.

Lesbians were more likely to report cigarette use, alcohol use, and heavy alcohol use.
Bailey, J.M. (1999, October). Homosexuality and Mental Illness. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56: 883-884.

?Homosexual people are at a substantially higher risk for some forms of emotional problems, including suicidality, major depression and anxiety disorder. Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people were at an increased lifetime risk for suicidal ideation and behavior, major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, conduct disorder, and nicotine dependence.?
Beitchman, J., Zucker, K., Hood, J., DaCosta, G., Akman, D. (1991) A review of the short-term effects of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect. 15:257-556.

?Among adolescents, commonly reported sequalae (of child sexual abuse) include sexual dissatisfaction, promiscuity, homosexuality, and an increased risk for re-victimization.? (p. 537)

?A review of studies reporting symptomology among sexually abused adolescents revealed evidence for the presence of depression, low self-esteem, and suicidal ideation.? (p. 544)

Bradford, J. et al. (1994). National Lesbian Health Care Survey: Implications for Mental Health Care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 62: 239, cited in Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality, p. 81.
More than half of lesbians had felt too nervous to accomplish ordinary activities at some time during the past year and over one-third had been depressed.
Bradley, S., Zucker, K. (1997) Gender identity disorder: A review of the past 10 Years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 34, 7:872-880.
?Girls with GID [Gender Identity Disorder] ?have difficulty connecting with their mothers, who are perceived as weak and ineffective. We see this perception as arising from the high levels of psychopathology observed in these mothers, especially severe depression and borderline personality disorder.? (p. 877)

?In our female adolescents with GID, a history of sexual abuse or fears of sexual aggression has appeared commonly.? (p. 878)
Cochran, S.D., Mays, V.M. (2000). Relation between psychiatric syndromes and behaviorally defined sexual orientation in a sample of the US population. American Journal of Epidemiology. 151 (5): 516-523.
Homosexually active men were more likely than other men to have evidence of major depression and panic attack syndromes. Homosexually active women were more likely than other women to be classified with alcohol or drug dependency syndromes. Both men and women reporting any same-gender sex partners were more likely than others to have used mental health services.
Diamant, A.L., Wold, C., Sritzer, K., Gelberg, L. (2000, November-December). Health Behaviors, Health Status, and Access to and Use of Health Care. Archives of Family Medicine. 9: 1043-1051.

Lesbians and bisexual women were more likely than heterosexual women to use tobacco products and to report any alcohol consumption, but only lesbians were significantly more likely than heterosexual women to drink heavily.
Fergusson, D., Horwood., L., Beautrais, A. (1999) Is sexual orientation related to mental health problems and suicidality in young people? Archives of General Psychiatry. 56, 10:876-888.
The gay, lesbian, bisexual subjects have significantly higher rates of: suicidal ideation (67.9%/29.0%), suicide attempt (32.1%/7.1%), and psychiatric disorders age 14-21 ? major depression (71.4%/38.2%), generalized anxiety disorder (28.5%/12.5%), conduct disorder (32.1%11.0%), nicotine dependence (64.3%/26.7%), other substance abuse/dependence (60.7%/44.3%), and multiple disorders (78.6%/38.2%) than the heterosexual sample. (p. 879)
Findings support recent evidence suggesting that gay, lesbian, and bisexual young people are at increased risk of mental health problems, with these associations being particularly evident for measures of suicidal behavior and multiple disorder.
Fifield, L., Latham, J., Phillips, C.

(1977) Alcoholism in the Gay Community: The Price of Alienation, Isolation and Oppression, A Project of the Gay Community Service Center, Los Angeles, CA.
??an alarming number of gay men and women (31.96%) are trapped in an alcohol-centered lifestyle.?
Garafolo, R., Wolf, R., Kessel, S., Palfrey, J., DuRant, R., (1998) The association between health risk behaviors and sexual orientation among a school-based sample of adolescents: Youth risk behavior survey. Pediatrics. 101, 5:895-903.
?Gay and bisexual teenagers may take more risks, and engage in risky behavior earlier in life, than teenagers who describe themselves as heterosexual. GLB [gay, lesbian, bisexual] teenagers were more likely to consider or attempt suicide, abuse alcohol or drugs, participate in risky sexual activity, or be victimized, and to initiate these behaviors earlier.?

Gilman, S.E., Cochran, S.D., Mays, V.M., et al. (2001) Risk of psychiatric disorders among individuals reporting same-sex sexual partners in the National Comorbidity Survey. American Journal of Public Health. 91 (6): 933-939.
Higher 12-month prevalences of anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders and of suicidal thoughts and plans than did respondents with opposite-sex partners only. Homosexual orientation, defined as having same-sex sexual partners, is associated with a general elevation of risk for anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders and for suicidal thoughts and plans.

Herrell, R. et al. (1999, October). Sexual Orientation and Suicidality: a Co-Twin Control Study in Adult Men. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56 (10): 867-874.
This study of male twins who were Vietnam veterans found that male homosexuals were 5.1 times more likely to experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors than were their heterosexual twins.

Jorm, A.F. et al. (2002). Sexually orientation and mental health: results from a community survey of young and middle-aged adults. British Journal of Psychiatry. 180: 423-427.
The bisexual group was highest on measures of anxiety, depression and negative affect, with the homosexual group falling between the other two groups. Both the bisexual and homosexual groups were high on suicidality.

McKirnan, D.J., Peterson, P.L., (1989). Alcohol and drug use among homosexual men and women: epidemiology and population characteristics. Addictive Behavior. 14 (5): 545-553.
?This paper presents the findings of a large (n-3400) survey of the homosexual population?Substantially higher proportions of the homosexual sample used alcohol, marijuana, or cocaine than was the case in the general population.?
Moran, N. (1996, May). Lesbian health care needs. Canadian Family Physician. 42: 879-884.

Lesbians were found to smoke, drink alcohol and use caffeine more than other women.
Mulry, G., Kalichman, S., Kelly, J. (1994) ?Substance use and unsafe sex among gay men: Global versus situational use of substances. Journal of Sex Educators and Therapy. 20, 3: 175-184.

??men who never drank prior to sex were very unlikely to have engaged in unprotected anal intercourse, whereas 90% of men who had at least one occasion of unprotected anal intercourse also drank at least some of the time prior to sexual intercourse.? ??a virtual absence of individuals who did not drink but did engage unprotected anal intercourse.? (p. 181)

Parris, J., Zweig-Frank, H., Guzder, J. (1995) Psychological factors associated with homosexuality in males with borderline personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders. 9, 11: 56-61.
The rate of homosexuality in the BPD [Borderline Personality Disorder] sample was 16.7%, as compared with 1.7% in the non-BPD comparison group. The homosexual BPD group had a rate of overall Childhood Sexual Abuse of 100% as compared to 37.3% for the heterosexual BPD group. ?It is interesting that 3 out of 10 homosexual borderline patients also reported father-son incest.? (p. 59)
Remafedi, G. (1999, October). Suicide and Sexual Orientation. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56: 885-886.
The 1989 Report of the Secretary?s Task Force on Youth Suicide concluded that ?gay youth are 2 to 3 times more likely to attempt suicide than other young people. They may comprise up to 30% of completed youth suicides annually. To date, at least 10 peer-reviewed studies have found unusually high rates of attempted suicide, in the range of 20% to 42% among young bisexual and homosexual research volunteers. All have found a clinically and statistically significant association between suicide attempts and homosexuality, strongest among males.
Ritter, Malcolm (May 1999) Study: Some Gays Can Go Straight, Associated Press.

“Perhaps the most significant study to date was reported by Robert L. Spitzer, MD at the American Psychiatric Association. In his research, Dr. Spitzer studied 200 men and women who had participated in gender affirmative therapy. He concluded that 66% of the men and 44% of the women had arrived at what he called good heterosexual functioning. In addition, 89% of the men and 95% of the women said they were bothered slightly, or not at all, by unwanted homosexual feelings.”
Rogers, C., Roback, H., McKee, E., Calhoun, D. (1976) Group psychotherapy with homosexuals: A review. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 31, 3: 3-27
?In general, reports on the group treatment of homosexuals are optimistic; in almost all cases the therapists report a favorable outcome of therapy whether the therapeutic goal was one of achieving a change in sexual orientation or whether it was a reduction in concomitant problems.? (p.22)

Saghir, J., Robins, E. (1973) Male and Female Homosexuality: A Comprehensive Investigation. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins.
30% of the homosexuals in their sample reported excessive drinking or alcohol dependence. (p. 119)
The average male homosexual live-in relationship lasts between two and three years (p. 225)
Sandfort, T.G., de Graaf, R., Bijl, R.V., Schnabel, P. (2001, January). Same-Sex Sexual Behavior and Psychiatric Disorders: findings from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study. (NEMESIS). Archives of General Psychiatry. 58: 85-91.

A Dutch study of 5998 homosexual men and women showed that ?psychiatric disorders were more prevalent among homosexually active people compared with heterosexually active people?On a lifetime basis, homosexual women had a significantly higher prevalence of general mood disorders and major depression than did heterosexual women?Lifetime prevalence of both alcohol and other drug dependence was also significantly higher in homosexual women than in heterosexual women.?
Skegg, K. et al. (2003, March). Sexual orientation and self-harm in men and women. American Journal of Psychiatry. 160 (3): 541-546.

New Zealand study of 770 heterosexual men and women and 172 men and women who experienced different degrees of same sex attraction, the authors found: That attempts to inflict self harm increase with the degree of homosexual attraction. There were elevated rates of substance abuse in both sexes experiencing same sex attraction. This was particularly prominent in lesbians.

Valamis, B.G., Bowen, D.J., Bassford, T., et al. (2000, September-October). Sexual Orientation and Health. Archives of Family Medicine. 9: 843-853.

Lesbian and bisexual women more often used alcohol and cigarettes, exhibited other risk factors for reproductive cancers and cardiovascular disease, and scored lower on measures of mental health and social support.
Whitehead, Neil, Whitehead, Brian. (1999) My Genes Made Me Do It! A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation, 158-159.

Neil Whitehead tabulated other twin studies on other topics and those traits’ heritability: lying–43%, anorexia nervosa–44%, fear of the unknown–46%, psychological inpatient care–47%, extroversion–50%, depression–50%, altruism–50%, divorce–52%, racial prejudice, bigotry–70%.

“(Dean) Hamer’s genetic sequences have been calculated to affect about 5% of the homosexual population, so even if he is correct, there must be some other explanation for what causes the vast majority of homosexuality.”
“If a hormonal imbalance was responsible for homosexuality, then perhaps a simple dose of hormones to an adult would cure homosexuality. This is not the case, as has been demonstrated several times.”
Zubenko, G., George, A., Soloff, P., Schulz, P. (1987) Sexual practices among patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal Psychiatry. 144, 6: 748-752.
?Homosexuality was 10 times more common among the men and six times more common among the women with borderline personality disorder than in the general population or in a depressed control group.? (p. 748) "

It’s all right there take a good long look!

How many states had laws on the books banning gay marriage 5 years ago?

None!

How many have them today?

Around 30!

The more people see the gay lifestyle the more they don’t like it. And these are the people that actually vote, not some starry eyed 18 year old who might answer a poll to feel important, or out of boredom.

You are losing ground yearly and you refuse to accept it.

[quote]harris447 wrote:
Y’know, Zeb: if you want to be a bigot, then that’s fine.

But stop being a liar.

The numbers for gay marriage or civil unions go up; the numbers for discrimination and hatred go down.[/quote]

I know it’s fun for you to call people names on the Internet. It probably makes you feel really really good huh?

But you see harris in the adult world we know that there are all sorts of polls that one can quote.

You’re getting to be a big boy now and you need to understand that there is something more important than polls.

These things are called “laws.” There are now almost 20 states that have banned gay marriage. You can read about it right here. Caution this site is almost one year old and does not have the very latest states to join the “gay backlash.” But after reading the article you’ll get a really good idea of which way this issue is going.

Hint…it’s not going your way. :slight_smile:

http://www.statesman.com/metrostate/content/metro/stories/11/9gaymarriage.html

In Texas it was 3 to 1 against gay marriage.

Pretty decisive victory for the good guys, huh hate boy?

By the way harris that is the first time I heard from you since you went running from this thread with your tail between your legs after I brought up a few things which you obviously could not refute.

Here it is again:

"harris,

Glad you brought up the statistics again. It gives me one more opportunity to state the truth to those who have been brain washed by the politically correct, and powerful gay lobby.

Let’ start here:

Violence

"Greenwood, G.L. et al. (2002, December). Battering Victimization Among a Probability-Based Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men. American Journal of Public Health. 92 (12): 1964-1969.
Intimate partner battering victimization to be 39.2% among men who had sex with men during the last 5 years.

Groth, A.N., Burgess, A.W. (1980, July). Male Rape: Offenders and Victims. American Journal of Psychiatry. 137 (7): 806-810.
This study analyzes 22 cases of male rape and the impact it had on the rapists and their male victims.
Lie, G.Y., Gentlewarrier, S. (1991). Intimate Violence in Lesbian Relationships: Discussion of Survey Findings and Practice Implications. Journal of Social Service Research. 15: 41-59.

?Slightly more than half of the [lesbians] reported that they had been abused by a female lover/partner.?
Lockhart, L., et al. (1994, December). Letting out the Secret: Violence in Lesbian Relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 9: 469-492.
90% of the lesbians surveyed had been recipients of one or more acts of verbal aggression from their intimate partners during the year prior to this study, with 31% reporting one or more incidents of physical abuse."

If you see anything you don’t like I want you to point to it specifically and tell me what’s wrong with it by using actual facts from reputable sources."

This is the second post by me that you ignored. I would not have brought either of them up again. But I’m not going to allow you to give your usual two or three sentence drive by “hating”
and leave.

"harris,

Care to debate the facts as to why people become homosexual?

Let’s start here:

Looks less like genetics and more like something gone wrong in childhood.

But of course the jury is still out on this.

"1995) Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us. Child Abuse and Neglect. 19: 582.
59% of male child sex offenders had been ?victim of contact sexual abuse as a child.?
Byne, W., (1994). The Biological Evidence Challenged. Scientific American, 54.
“The incidence of homosexuality in the adopted brothers of homosexuals (11%) was much higher than recent estimates for the rate of homosexuality in the population (1 to 5%).”
“Indeed, perhaps the major finding of these heritability studies is that despite having all of their genes in common and having prenatal and postnatal environments as close to identical as possible, approximately half of the identical twins were nonetheless discordant for orientation. This finding underscores just how little is known about the origins of sexual orientation.”
Byne, W., Parsons, B. (1993, March). Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories Reappraised. Archives of General Psychiatry. 50: 228-39 (228).
?It is imperative that clinicians and behavioral scientists begin to appreciate the complexities of sexual orientation and resist the urge to search for simplistic explanations, either psychosocial or biologic.?
?Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking.?
“Although identical twins have the same genetic code, non-identical twins and regular siblings share the same proportion of genetic material. Therefore, the genetic theories should show a similar amount of homosexual concordance between non-identical twins and regular siblings.”

“First, they point out the fact that the study rests on the assumption that the relevant environment is the same for identical twins and non-identical twins. Then, the effects of potential bias in the sample is called into question, as Bailey and Pillard recruited their homosexual research subjects by advertising in various homosexually-oriented publications.”
“Third, there was no way to separate the intermingling of environmental and genetic effects, since all sets of twins in the study had been raised together and presumably subject to most, if not all, of the same environmental effects.”

“The most interesting question, however, is that if there is something in the genetic code that makes a person homosexual, why did not all of the identical twins become homosexual, since they have the exact same genetic code?”

“While all behavior must have an ultimate biologic substrate, the appeal of current biologic explanations for sexual orientation may derive more from a dissatisfaction with the current status of psychosocial explanations than from a substantiating body of experimental data. Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking. In an alternative model, temperamental and personality traits interact with the familial and social milieus and the individual’s sexuality emerges.”

Chapman, B., Brannock, J. (1987) Proposed model of lesbian identity development. An empirical examination. Journal of Homosexuality. 14:69-80.
63% of lesbians surveyed stated that they had chosen to be lesbians, 28% felt they had no choice, and 11% did not know why they were lesbians.
Elliott, D.M., Brier, J. (1992, February). The Sexually Abused Boy: Problems in Manhood. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality. 26 (2): 68-71.
Boys who were sexually molested have subsequently ?a higher incidence of homosexuality.?

Friedman, Richard, Downey, Jennifer. (1993) Neurobiology and Sexual Orientation: Current Relationships, 5. J. Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 131, 139.
“Some typical childhood factors related to homosexuality are: feeling of being different from other children; parent, sibling, peer relationships; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved, unapproving; perception of parental perfection required; perception of mother as being too close, too involved; premature introduction to sexuality (such as child abuse or incest); gender confusion; defensive detachment, reparative drive, same-sex ambivalence; unmet affection needs; diminished/distorted masculinity, femininity.”

“?homosexual men are more likely to become sexually active at much younger ages than heterosexual men. The average age of homosexual males at their first sexual encounter was 12.7, versus 15.7 for heterosexual males.”
“This evidence may suggest that abuse and early sexual experiences can contribute to homosexuality, perhaps because of familiarity with sexual acts, and in some cases because of an initial sexual experience with someone of the same gender.”
Golwyn, D., Sevlie, C. (1993) Adventitious change in homosexual behavior during treatment of social phobia with phenelzine. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 54, 1:39-40.
?We conclude that social phobia may be a hidden contributing factor in some instances of homosexual behavior.? (p. 40)
Harry, J. (1989) Parental physical abuse and sexual orientation in males. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 18, 3:251-261.
?These data suggest that some history of childhood femininity is almost always a precursor of adolescent homosexual behavior.? (p. 259)
Herrell, R., et al. (1999, October). Sexual Orientation and Suicidality: a Co-Twin Control Study in Adult Men. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56 (10): 867-874.
This study of male twins who were Vietnam veterans found that male homosexuals were 5.1 times more likely to experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors than were their heterosexual twins.
Hockenberry, S., Billingham, R. (1987) Sexual orientation and boyhood gender conformity: Development of the boyhood gender conformity scales (BGCS) Archives of Sexual Behavior. 16, 6:475-492.

??the absence of masculine behaviors and traits appeared to be a more powerful predictor of later homosexual orientation than the traditionally feminine or cross-sexed traits and behaviors.? (p. 475)
Horgan, J., (1995) Gay genes, revisited: Doubts arise over research on the biology of homosexuality. Scientific American. Nov.: 28. Hubbard, Ruth, Wald, Elijah (1993). Exploring the Gene Myth 6.
“The myth of the all-powerful gene is based on flawed science that discounts the environmental context in which we and our genes exist.”
“A gene does not determine a phenotype [noticeable trait] by acting alone; a gene cannot act by itself?Each gene simply specifies one of the proteins involved in the process.”
Jefferson, D.J., (1993, August 12). Studying the Biology of Sexual Orientation Has Political Fallout. Wall Street Journal. 1A.

Lisak, D., Luster, L. Educational, occupational, and relationship histories of men who were sexually and/or physically abused as children. J Trauma Stress. 1994 Oct; 7(4): 507-23.
Nearly one in four young men report sexual abuse as a child resulting in significant life difficulties (as compared to non-abused males).
McGuire, T., (1995) Is homosexuality genetic? A critical review and some suggestions. Journal of Homosexuality. 28, 1/2: 115-145.
?Even if we knew absolutely everything about genes and absolutely everything about environment, we still could not predict the final phenotype of any individual." (p. 142)
Nimmons, David. (March 1994). Sex and the Brain, Discover, 64-71.
“It is important to stress what I didn’t find. I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn’t show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain. INAH 3 is less likely to be the sole gay nucleus of the brain than a part of a chain of nuclei engaged in men and women’s sexual behavior?. Since I looked at adult brains, we don’t know if the differences I found were there at birth, or if they appeared later.”
Pollak, M. Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, ed. P. Aries and A. Bejin, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Tomeo, M.E., et al. (2001, October). Comparative data of childhood and adolescence molestation in heterosexual and homosexual persons. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 30 (5): 535-541.
942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation that did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation.
Whitehead, Neil, Whitehead, Brian. (1999) My Genes Made Me Do It! A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation, 158-159.

"Neil Whitehead tabulated other twin studies on other topics and those traits’ heritability: lying–43%, anorexia nervosa–44%, fear of the unknown–46%, psychological inpatient care–47%, extroversion–50%, depression–50%, altruism–50%, divorce–52%, racial prejudice, bigotry–70%.

“(Dean) Hamer’s genetic sequences have been calculated to affect about 5% of the homosexual population, so even if he is correct, there must be some other explanation for what causes the vast majority of homosexuality.”
“If a hormonal imbalance was responsible for homosexuality, then perhaps a simple dose of hormones to an adult would cure homosexuality. This is not the case, as has been demonstrated several times.”
Wolf, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life, Spence Publishing Co., Dallas, 1999, p. 70-71.

Homosexually-assaulted males identified themselves as subsequently becoming practicing homosexuals almost 7 times as often as bisexuals and almost 6 times as often as the non-assaulted control group. 58% of adolescents reporting sexual abuse by a man prior to puberty revealed either homosexual or bisexual orientation (control group 90% heterosexual). Age of molestation was 4-14 years. ?Nearly half of men who have reported a childhood experience with an older man were currently involved in homosexual activity.? A disproportionately high number of male homosexuals were incestuously molested by a homosexual parent. Conclusion was that the experience led the boy to perceive himself as homosexual based on his having been found sexually attractive by an older man."

[b]When you are through looking at this and the previous post I have some startling statistics on how many have left the homosexual lifestyle to become happy well adjusted heterosexuals.

Get back to me soon…>We have a great deal to talk about.[/b]

Gay marriage defeated overwhelmingly!

Hey forlife, while you and your buddy harris have been playing pretend on the Internet grown up people who are fed up with your nonsense have decided act.

On June 6th while we were right here on this site making believe that things were going your way., 81% of Alabama residents voted to ban gay marriage.

81%

WOW.

"Only Mississippi – which passed an amendment in 2004 with 86 percent of the vote – surpassed Alabama’s tally.

86% of the vote! If you are not going to concede until you see 100% that might not happen. As I stated on another post there will always be the fringe left, homosexuals and 18 year olds pretty much ready to accept anything. But when the adults start voting…

"The amendment prevents Alabama courts from forcing the state to recognize “gay marriages,” civil unions or domestic partnerships from other states. It also prevents Alabama courts from legalizing those unions in the state.

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=23414

But Alabama isn’t alone. Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin also are scheduled to vote on similar amendments this year."

When you total up the 6 states that will be banning gay marriage this year that will be a total of 26 states that have said NO to gay marriage.

Lorisco,

forlife has yet more negative data to look over. More polls not going his way. And yet one more state to join the ranks of those banning gay marriage. There are now fully 20 states with 6 more voting this year.

And to top it off it looks like they are going to lose Massachusetts as the people in that state are livid over liberal politically correct judges adopting gay marriage.

A huge petition drive has been overwhelmingly successful and a vote will be on the ballot in 2008.

Things are not looking up for forlife.

Please be kind to him.

And by the way forlife, your logic has failed you once again.

I know you can count, so what do you think?

About 22% of all Americans identify themselves as “fundamentalist Christians.”

That means that in states like Alabama where gay marriage was voted down by 81% that many many people who are not fundamentalist Christians voted against your little dream world of gay marriage.

Now how do you suppose that happened?

It could be that they don’t like the idea of homosexuality for one or more of the following:

-Health statistics provided by the CDC

-5000+ year old tradition should not be turned on it’s head for about 1% of the population.

-It is flatly against “NATURE” since one man and one woman can procreate, and that is the main purpose of marriage.

Keep watching the news forlife. There is more bad news (for you-good news for the country) coming your way!

Zeb, I really have nothing to say to you any more. You are a broken record with nothing creative to contribute to the discussion. Your constant spamming of selective statistics and blatant ignoring of points that don’t agree with your agenda win you nothing but a reputation for being a close-minded, loud-mouthed bigot. I know you don’t see yourself as such, but true bigots never do. Don’t bother addressing me in the future, as you’ve shown your true colors too many times for me to believe you were ever truly interested in objective facts.

I do enjoy this discussion though, so if anyone else has anything fresh to contribute feel free :slight_smile: