Briton Admits Plot to Behead Muslim Soldier

This headline is outrageous! A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things. The man holds British and Pakistani passports and is a radical Islamist and they simply label him a Briton.

Briton admits plot to behead Muslim soldier

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080129/wl_nm/britain_trial_soldier_dc_5

By Mark Trevelyan, Security Correspondent
2 hours, 19 minutes ago

A man has pleaded guilty to a plot to kidnap and kill a Muslim soldier in the British army by cutting off his head “like a pig,” a court was told on Tuesday.

Parviz Khan, 37, pleaded guilty this month to a series of charges including the beheading plot, which was foiled by police and the MI5 security service a year ago.

Media had been barred from reporting Khan’s plea until Tuesday when a trial of two other men opened in the central English city of Leicester.

A British and Pakistani passport holder, Khan was “a man who has the most violent and extreme Islamist views” and who wanted to get physically involved in acts of terrorism, prosecutor Nigel Rumfitt said.

He said Khan was “enraged” by the fact there were Muslims in the British army, which Islamist militants portray as fighting Islam in Afghanistan and Iraq, and formed a plan to kidnap a Muslim soldier in the central city of Birmingham.

With the help of drug dealers, the victim was to be seized while enjoying a night out and bundled into a car, Rumfitt said.

“He would be taken to a lockup garage and there he would be murdered by having his head cut off like a pig,” he said.

Prosecutors said the expression “like a pig” was Khan’s own.

He planned to tie up the victim, film his murder and release the video to Arab television station Al Jazeera, the jury was told, with the aim of sowing panic and fear in the British army and public.

“Young Blair is going to go crazy,” Khan was heard to say in a conversation bugged by British security services, referring to then prime minister Tony Blair.

Rumfitt said Khan had asked a Gambian man, Basiru Gassama, to help him find a suitable victim. There was no evidence Gassama had provided such help but he pleaded guilty this month to failing to disclose his knowledge of the plot to authorities.

BEHEADING PLOT

Another man, Amjab Mahmood, faces the same charge in the trial that opened on Tuesday. He and a co-defendant, Zahoor Iqbal, are charged with working alongside Khan and others to supply equipment to help militants on the Pakistan-Afghan border fighting Western coalition troops.

The men were “actively assisting terrorists who were trying to kill our soldiers, as well as those of our allies the United States and Canada,” Rumfitt said.

He said the shipments included sophisticated electronic and other equipment like computer hard drives, range finders, night vision gear and surveillance detectors. Some of the material was sent out under the guise of earthquake relief to Pakistan.

The jury was told how details of the beheading plot emerged from the bugging of Khan’s Birmingham home, where he lived with his wife, three children and elderly mother.

In a conversation at the end of 2006, Khan outlined to Mahmood two ways in which the soldier victim could be seized.

One way was “having a chitchat with him and winning his interest by the white stuff (cocaine), then afterwards we can ambush him or whatever,” Khan said in the bugged conversation.

The other way was “just tell us where he lives, we will sort it.” As the victim came out, three men would bundle him into a parked car. “It’s not going to take more than 30 seconds, it’s not as if we’re going to kill people there.”

Rumfitt said Mahmood should have told authorities but failed to do so. Iqbal is not charged in connection with the beheading plot. Two other men have pleaded guilty to lesser terrorism-related charges also unconnected to it.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things. [/quote]

You a Briton?

[quote]lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things.

You a Briton?[/quote]

Nope. I just don’t like to see the wrong people blamed for things.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things.

You a Briton?

Nope. I just don’t like to see the wrong people blamed for things.[/quote]

Then, how come do you use a possessive “our” when referring to a Reuters piece?

Maybe the following headline reflects more what you’d like to see in your media.

UK Muslim Confesses to Beheading Plot

Parviz Khan, the UK Muslim charged with planning to kidnap a British soldier, hack off his head, and distribute the video of the murder on the internet, has admitted to the plot.

Ey?

Well look Zap, he IS British.
Yes he’s also what we might call a British Asian, or a British Pakistani - but he is still British!

He might even have been born in the UK…

I know the point you’re making. But do you think that maybe the paper wrote the headline the way it did, precisely to express a sense of outrage…ie. He IS a Briton, trying to kill another fellow countryman?

[quote]lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things.

You a Briton?

Nope. I just don’t like to see the wrong people blamed for things.

Then, how come do you use a possessive “our” when referring to a Reuters piece?[/quote]

Because they serve us. This story was linked to Yahoo with the same headline. This is a globalized industry. If they report to me on my typical news pages it is my media.

[quote]lixy wrote:
Maybe the following headline reflects more what you’d like to see in your media.

UK Muslim Confesses to Beheading Plot

Parviz Khan, the UK Muslim charged with planning to kidnap a British soldier, hack off his head, and distribute the video of the murder on the internet, has admitted to the plot.

Ey?[/quote]

From the link.

And Reuters tries to cast it as a case of aggression against Muslims, with one of their patented Orwellian headlines: Briton admits plot to behead Muslim soldier.

Damn, you had me worried. I thought the world had gone plum crazy!..Oh, yea, well…

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things.

You a Briton?

Nope. I just don’t like to see the wrong people blamed for things.

Then, how come do you use a possessive “our” when referring to a Reuters piece?

Because they serve us. This story was linked to Yahoo with the same headline. This is a globalized industry. If they report to me on my typical news pages it is my media.[/quote]

Huh? Yahoo News is nothing but an aggregator. It gets stories from sources such as Al-Jazeera, the AFP, Xinhua and others. Shit, if this was the 80’s, chances are that they would return pieces from TASS.

I’m stomped by your piss poor logic.

[quote]lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things.

You a Briton?

Nope. I just don’t like to see the wrong people blamed for things.

Then, how come do you use a possessive “our” when referring to a Reuters piece?

Because they serve us. This story was linked to Yahoo with the same headline. This is a globalized industry. If they report to me on my typical news pages it is my media.

Huh? Yahoo News is nothing but an aggregator. It gets stories from sources such as Al-Jazeera, the AFP, Xinhua and others. Shit, if this was the 80’s, chances are that they would return pieces from TASS.

I’m stomped by your piss poor logic.[/quote]

What the fuck is your point? Because I am not British I am not allowed to refer to Reuters as part of our media? They are a major provider of media to all of us, therefore it is our media.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
A sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things.

You a Briton?

Nope. I just don’t like to see the wrong people blamed for things.

Then, how come do you use a possessive “our” when referring to a Reuters piece?

Because they serve us. This story was linked to Yahoo with the same headline. This is a globalized industry. If they report to me on my typical news pages it is my media.

Huh? Yahoo News is nothing but an aggregator. It gets stories from sources such as Al-Jazeera, the AFP, Xinhua and others. Shit, if this was the 80’s, chances are that they would return pieces from TASS.

I’m stomped by your piss poor logic.

What the fuck is your point? Because I am not British I am not allowed to refer to Reuters as part of our media? They are a major provider of media to all of us, therefore it is our media.[/quote]

No you can’t, bugsy. Not anymore than a Spaniard can bitch about their piss-poor media because her favorite news aggregator happened to get hits from CNN or Fox. She could bitch all she wants about state-owned media if they relayed the story without any editing, but that’s about it. If she doesn’t like what’s printed on a privately owned paper, she could always vote with her pesetas.

You wrote that you considered it a “sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things”, and that simply ain’t true. What’s next? Calling Air France “our piss poor airline” simply because it operates at JFK?

[quote]lixy wrote:

No you can’t, bugsy. Not anymore than a Spaniard can bitch about their piss-poor media because her favorite news aggregator happened to get hits from CNN or Fox. She could bitch all she wants about state-owned media if they relayed the story without any editing, but that’s about it. If she doesn’t like what’s printed on a privately owned paper, she could always vote with her pesetas.

You wrote that you considered it a “sign of our piss poor media trying to twist things”, and that simply ain’t true. What’s next? Calling Air France “our piss poor airline” simply because it operates at JFK?[/quote]

If I flew on Air France 50% of the time I would damn sure call it my airline.

Half the stories I read are from Reuters. It is mine.

Lixy haven’t you bitched about fox news being biased in the past?

Reuters just reported that your a biotch.

The headline should have read: “Muslim admits plot to behead Briton”.

Yet another one of the misunderstanders of Islam out there.

Reuters and the AP are very much “our” media - we are paying for their services.

Well it definitely got your attention, and that means it got a lot of other people’s attention.

I’m guessing newspaper sales that day were above average.

ElbowStrike