I was just reading over the much debated Sexy Female Training article by Chad.
Although the nuts and bolts of the article were debated for a long period, there is one point that I believe was missed.
Here are the two examples he used of Britney. One was thin and the other was described as thick.
Am I on my own here as I reckon she looks way hotter in the “Thick” shot?
thin… anything is better than the way she is now though.
Thin Britney is easier on the eyes, but she’s not exactly sexy. I’d much rather do thick Britney. Unfortunately we’re now stuck with crack-whore-lesbian Britney…
I am quite partial to the thick look.
Exhibit A.
thick or thin, she still looks like she has Down’s Syndrome. Ugly ass white trash.
[quote]Renegade XVI wrote:
They were obviously looking for the thicker look in that ad. A skin and bone super model would not have pulled off the Gladiator look at all.
[/quote]
I’m sure they would’ve said “Sorry, Britney Spears, we would’ve used you to promote our product, but clearly you lack a gladiatorial physique.”
[quote]wfifer wrote:
Thin Britney is easier on the eyes, but she’s not exactly sexy. I’d much rather do thick Britney. Unfortunately we’re now stuck with crack-whore-lesbian Britney… [/quote]
Man that is just nauseating.
[quote]nephorm wrote:
I’m sure they would’ve said “Sorry, Britney Spears, we would’ve used you to promote our product, but clearly you lack a gladiatorial physique.”[/quote]
Well, they picked 3 chunky sort of lasses for it.
I don’t think Kate Moss would have looked the part being all skin and bone trying to pull that sort of ad off.
[quote]Renegade XVI wrote:
And the other.[/quote]
Dam, Pink looks better then both beyonce and brit.
I’ll take a young brit in that school girl uniform when she first hit the scene anytime.
In the thin picture she looks like a child just starting to mature into an adult.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
In the thin picture she looks like a child just starting to mature into an adult.
[/quote]
Wait for it…
Too bad that never happened!
HARR!
[quote]buffalokilla wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
In the thin picture she looks like a child just starting to mature into an adult.
Wait for it…
Too bad that never happened!
HARR!
[/quote]
She’s not a girl…not yet a women…just a drunken mess, only two steps away from her trailer park roots.
She looked great in 2003 between these photos. In that skintight, flesh-toned body suit. She’d put on just a little muscle from the first pic and no real fat to speak of. Amazing back then!
Thick, for sure. I love me some thick-ass, shapely legs on a woman.
Oh, how the mighty have fallen.
Another. Bam.
Thin is in!
She looked hot when she did that number on MTV with the flesh-colored outfit. She was definitely at her hottest then.
[quote]CC wrote:
Thick, for sure. I love me some thick-ass, shapely legs on a woman.
Oh, how the mighty have fallen.[/quote]
God dam. I sometimes forget just how hot she used to be.
