Britain's BNP: Is It Time?

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]RTJenforcer wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:
There have been articles about it in the news. But just use some common sense. Where do you think the bargain rate medical staff are coming from? America? Canada? Germany? I don’t think so. They are coming from places like India, Pakistan Egypt, etc…

The only beneficiary of this scheme are the socialists, who want to make as many of the British dependants of the state as they possibly can. By keeping people uneducated, lacking in job skills and economically inactive they make a person their bitch who cannot escape their grip. Because they have no ability to get out and go somewhere else.

No. They are talking about saving a maximum of 350 million pounds by cutting back on managers when the total deficit is over 610 million pounds. After Thursdays elections there are going to have to be massive cuts in the NHS in order to cover the massive increase in the foreign aid budget which the Tories are proposing.

[/quote]

It’s a good job I’m not voting Conservative then. You think these immigrants are actually medically trained in their country of origin?! They are trained over here, I thought that was the point of our discussion? I’m in university with a great deal of immigrants. They are there because they are arguably brighter than our own kids, and for no other reason. You want more British doctors, British kids need to shape up! [/quote]

If people are not coming in trained then it is costing the taxpayer money to train them. You are in a uniersity with a great deal of immigrants because the government is deliberately dumbing down the ethnic British. They do this by making it harder for them to get higher education and bringing in college educated immigrants to undermine wages in the labor market so the ones with education and job skills are forced to emigrate.

This is social engineering that is intended to achieve what the military call a decapitation strike. They are dumbing the British down into a nation of Vicky Pollard’s. With an educated immigrant upper class that will see the indiginous Brits as nothing but white trash who are to be avoided.

The reason why the immmigrant kids are there is because educated people who have job skills have independence and therefore greater autonomy from government control. While the uneducated who don’t have tranportable job skills are stuck in Britain at the mercy of the government.

It’s all about social engineering to achieve power and control and has nothing to do with your percieved racial inferiority if the indiginous British.

[quote]
I partly agree with you here in your middle paragraph; the people who do come in to exploit the system do not serve socialism, they exploit it. Socialist policies work on the assumption that everyone is working, which at the moment is a difficult prospect. [/quote]

I have to disagree with you here. I don’t blame the people who come in to exploit the system. You are missing something very important. The biggest abusers of the socialist system are the socialist politicians. They have created a system that is open to abuse and allow it to continue because they use it to hold on to power. Socialist policies work by making people weak and depedant upon the government.

That is why immigrants with no job skills who come in and go straight on the dole are just as useful and welcome as those who have job skills and will be economically active.

Cutting the beauracracy is not enough. Instead of cutting services they need to put an end to all the give aways. ie The foreign aid buget is 9 billion pounds of borrowed money and the Tories are promising to raise it to 16 billion pounds. [/quote]

Wait, you think the government is paying for university educations? It gives people loans that they have to pay back at a rate just above inflation. If our kids don’t want them or aren’t bright enough to qualify then that’s their problem.

I mostly agree with you about the socialist politicians and about people exploiting socialism. What I was getting at is that true socialist policies assume that everyone is working in order to account for the people that cannot. Obviously this doesn’t particularly apply if the system is being roundly abused from top to bottom.

I’m fairly in agreement with yourself and with HH about at least Labour and the Conservatives, I won’t be voting for either tomorrow.I disagree on the stance about immigrants and about turning to the BNP as “the only option for Britain’s survival”…I think its an easy option to be blaming the immigrant population. I’m all for tighter immigration laws, especially when there are few jobs to go around, btu the BNP isn’t the answer.

I’m the only one of the three of us who actually lives in the UK, which means that

A) I have to put up with the BNP’s woefully produced leaflets and gormless local reps.

B) I’ve seen the sort of damage the BNP and their kin can do to a community. Take a look at the Welsh Defence League for instance. Bunch of tossers.

[quote]Jab1 wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]Jab1 wrote:
The BNP are a laughing stock, they will never get in in this country, and if they do, then I am moving.[/quote]

If they are a laughing stock what is Labour? Or the Tories? Or the Lib Dems? Or UKIP?

Labour is going to poll in third place on Thursday, they are done as a party. Conservatives are not going to deliver. Lib dems are a joke. UKIP is going to be exposed. You better start making travel plans…[/quote]
Labour, Conservatives and UKIP all disgust me.

I’m voting Lib Dem because they actually have good policies on civil liberties, drug laws, vote reform and science and technology.

But I’ve been making travel plans for years anyway.[/quote]

The Libs ae not going to cut state spending which is the same mistake the Greeks made. Plus they want to give 600,000 failed asylum seekers amnesty so they can stay.

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:

[quote]redstar144 wrote:
BNP are filth.

BBC News | Programmes | Under the skin of the BNP

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/the-real-bnp/the-BNP-in-their-own-words.php[/quote]

from the bbc link:
[i]On the Holocaust
Between 1995 and 1997, Nick Griffin edited ‘The Rune’. Griffin referred to the Holocaust as a “Holohoax”.

In 1998 Nick Griffin said, “I am well aware that the orthodox opinion is that 6 million Jews were gassed and cremated and turned into lampshades. Orthodox opinion also also once held that the Earth was flat… I have reached the conclusion that the “extermination” tale is a mixture of Allied wartime propaganda, extremely profitable lie, and latter witch-hysteria.”[/i]

Anyone really surprised that some on PWI are supporting holocaust deniers?

Well trolled HH!!! [/quote]

I do not think they are saying that the Holocaust never happened, you should re-read.

First thing I always look hard at a party that has “National” in its name. This party has some good ideas, as all parties usually have at least one thing correct in the doctrine. However, they are doing it wrong, and have some crooked ideas. I do not deny human natures egotism, or prejudice towards others, and the holocaust is a touchy subject anyone that denies it never happened is crazy, however there are some facts that might be over blown.

[quote]RTJenforcer wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]RTJenforcer wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:
There have been articles about it in the news. But just use some common sense. Where do you think the bargain rate medical staff are coming from? America? Canada? Germany? I don’t think so. They are coming from places like India, Pakistan Egypt, etc…

The only beneficiary of this scheme are the socialists, who want to make as many of the British dependants of the state as they possibly can. By keeping people uneducated, lacking in job skills and economically inactive they make a person their bitch who cannot escape their grip. Because they have no ability to get out and go somewhere else.

No. They are talking about saving a maximum of 350 million pounds by cutting back on managers when the total deficit is over 610 million pounds. After Thursdays elections there are going to have to be massive cuts in the NHS in order to cover the massive increase in the foreign aid budget which the Tories are proposing.

[/quote]

It’s a good job I’m not voting Conservative then. You think these immigrants are actually medically trained in their country of origin?! They are trained over here, I thought that was the point of our discussion? I’m in university with a great deal of immigrants. They are there because they are arguably brighter than our own kids, and for no other reason. You want more British doctors, British kids need to shape up! [/quote]

If people are not coming in trained then it is costing the taxpayer money to train them. You are in a uniersity with a great deal of immigrants because the government is deliberately dumbing down the ethnic British. They do this by making it harder for them to get higher education and bringing in college educated immigrants to undermine wages in the labor market so the ones with education and job skills are forced to emigrate.

This is social engineering that is intended to achieve what the military call a decapitation strike. They are dumbing the British down into a nation of Vicky Pollard’s. With an educated immigrant upper class that will see the indiginous Brits as nothing but white trash who are to be avoided.

The reason why the immmigrant kids are there is because educated people who have job skills have independence and therefore greater autonomy from government control. While the uneducated who don’t have tranportable job skills are stuck in Britain at the mercy of the government.

It’s all about social engineering to achieve power and control and has nothing to do with your percieved racial inferiority if the indiginous British.

[quote]
I partly agree with you here in your middle paragraph; the people who do come in to exploit the system do not serve socialism, they exploit it. Socialist policies work on the assumption that everyone is working, which at the moment is a difficult prospect. [/quote]

I have to disagree with you here. I don’t blame the people who come in to exploit the system. You are missing something very important. The biggest abusers of the socialist system are the socialist politicians. They have created a system that is open to abuse and allow it to continue because they use it to hold on to power. Socialist policies work by making people weak and depedant upon the government.

That is why immigrants with no job skills who come in and go straight on the dole are just as useful and welcome as those who have job skills and will be economically active.

Cutting the beauracracy is not enough. Instead of cutting services they need to put an end to all the give aways. ie The foreign aid buget is 9 billion pounds of borrowed money and the Tories are promising to raise it to 16 billion pounds. [/quote]

Wait, you think the government is paying for university educations? It gives people loans that they have to pay back at a rate just above inflation. If our kids don’t want them or aren’t bright enough to qualify then that’s their problem.[/quote]

British students in the universities are subsidized by the government. Because of Britains membership in the EU students from EU countries are also recieve the same subsidy. The only students who pay the full price from outside of britain and the EU.

If British kids are lacking in the motivation and ambition to want to get ahead in life that is everyones problem. It means there is a serious problem in the society. Bringing in outsiders who haven’t been damaged by socialism is a band-aid solution that is only going to compound the situation when their kids grow in the same broken society as the British kid.

[quote]

I mostly agree with you about the socialist politicians and about people exploiting socialism. What I was getting at is that true socialist policies assume that everyone is working in order to account for the people that cannot. Obviously this doesn’t particularly apply if the system is being roundly abused from top to bottom.

I’m fairly in agreement with yourself and with HH about at least Labour and the Conservatives, I won’t be voting for either tomorrow.I disagree on the stance about immigrants and about turning to the BNP as “the only option for Britain’s survival”…I think its an easy option to be blaming the immigrant population. I’m all for tighter immigration laws, especially when there are few jobs to go around, btu the BNP isn’t the answer. [/quote]

There are over 8 million unemployed people and wages are stagnant or falling. It makes no sense to flood the country with millions of immigrants who are going to take jobs from people who already live there and undercut wages for the rest. The BNP are the only party that will do something about mass immigration.

[quote]

I’m the only one of the three of us who actually lives in the UK, which means that

A) I have to put up with the BNP’s woefully produced leaflets and gormless local reps.

B) I’ve seen the sort of damage the BNP and their kin can do to a community. Take a look at the Welsh Defence League for instance. Bunch of tossers. [/quote]

The official BNP leaflets are professionally produced. The BNP has had a problem with their enemies printing up leaflets that is part of a disinformation campaign meant to make the BNP look bad.

I’m not too familiar with the Welsh defense league, but I do know that the English defense league has been proscribed by the BNP. Any BNP members caught participating in the EDL will be thrown out.

I also know that the violence that has accompanied EDL marches has almost entirely been committed by the communist UAF and that most if not all of those arrested have been UAF members. BNP members have also been assaulted by the UAF while the police have stood by and done nothing to stop them.

[quote]RTJenforcer wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]Jab1 wrote:
Before the first world war I believe.

The Libs won’t get in power, but might force a coalition and bring electoral reform.[/quote]

Pointless. Britain will become an Islamic Republic by 2050. Only the BNP can stop this.

The economy will utterly collapse long before then, due to all the liberal policies and a government that is feeding off the carcass of a once great nation.

Only the BNP has the spine to save Britain. The other parties certainly don’t.
[/quote]

LOL. Do you live here? Have you seen how many actual muslims live in the UK, let alone how many muslims actually have any political sway? [/quote]

There were 1.3 million muslims back in 1997 when Labour came to power. Now the official is over 2.7 million, but noone really knows for sure because they stopped keeping track of how many people were entering the country years ago. That means their population has more than doubled in a decade. Their birthrate is ten times higher than that of the British. That’s why the number one name for newborn baby boys is Mohammad…

[quote]
The BNP are widely regarded as a joke party made up of morons and voted for by morons. [/quote]

That myth was destroyed last year when their membership list was released onto the internet.

[quote]
If you’re going to make sweeping comments like “Britain will become an Islamic Republic by 2050”, then you should really have some facts to back it up. You don’t, so my natural conclusion is not to believe you. The evidence to the contrary is on my doorstep, where are you getting your information from?[/quote]

I get a lot of mine from here. http://www.migrationwatch.co.uk/

[quote]florelius wrote:
is sad to see that people in here takes the europeen populist-rightwing parties serious. this partys are the real neo-fascist even dou they dont call themself fascist or have fascist symbols. if you guys check out the fascist retorics about immigration in the 1930`s, you will see a big resemblems in the retorics of the populist right.

and that they have national in there name says all.
[/quote]

Your choice, same here, is to rid yourselves of the welfare state (which has pretty much bankrupted Europe and the USA) or see an outright collapse followed by true dictatorships. That’s it.

I say, take the BNP option now. Read the BNP mission statement. The BNP seeks to undo all the damage but at a LOCAL LEVEL. Do that, or get someone like Mao or Stalin to restore order.

Those are the choices.

Totally agree about the UAF. Fighting fascism with fascism is not cool.

Everything else I can agree to disagree upon, people will make up their own minds just as the people in this discussion obviously have. The difference is, I get to vote today, you guys don’t.

[quote]John S. wrote:
I will research more into the BNP, I should get both sides of the story. Until then I will refrain from saying one thing or the other.[/quote]

What a common sense approach! People would do well to imitate you in this.

[/quote]

There were 1.3 million muslims back in 1997 when Labour came to power. Now the official is over 2.7 million, but noone really knows for sure because they stopped keeping track of how many people were entering the country years ago. That means their population has more than doubled in a decade. Their birthrate is ten times higher than that of the British. That’s why the number one name for newborn baby boys is Mohammad…

[/quote]

Did a quick search (not rigorous) and found this:
Top 2010 Baby Boy Names
1.Jack
2.Harry
3.Alfie
4.Thomas
5.Oliver
6.Daniel
7.Joshua
8.Charlie
9.Mohammed
10.George
11.Lewis
12.Dylan
13.William
14.Samuel
15.Ethan
16.Ben
17.Alexander

Mohammed appears at No. 9, NOT No.1!

BNP fisticuffs

The fact that HH supports a party that until last year, only let whites in, doesn’t surprise me.

Well, I’ve done my bit, lets see what happens tomorrow.

[quote]RSGZ wrote:
Well, I’ve done my bit, lets see what happens tomorrow.[/quote]

I’m sure it’ll be the same old snore. Nothing of substance will be done and Britain will sink further into general malaise. Most people still somehow want a magical genie to create welfare benefits, health care, pensions, and so on. They’ll keep spending and spending until you’re using a 100 pound note as a napkin. Conservative, Labour…no difference.

Pull the shades down and roll over back to sleep. Nothing new to see.

(FightinIrish would vote Labour btw…typical loser…)

Snore…

Seems like it wasn’t time for the BNP after all.

Makkun

[quote]makkun wrote:
Seems like it wasn’t time for the BNP after all.

Makkun[/quote]

rofl

[quote]makkun wrote:
Seems like it wasn’t time for the BNP after all.

Makkun[/quote]

The Green Party won a seat down on the south coast. Guess the British people have yet to learn their lesson. Or maybe all the intelligent Brits came to America long ago. The smart ones recognized they were surrounded by losers.

The future truly IS in the United States, the first moral country in the history of the world.

Where’s your Nick Griffin now?

Interesting results all round. Talks are going on now between Lib and Cons, lets see what happens!

Sad that this silly thread is the best T-Nation can do