Bll Maher's New Rules

[quote]BBriere wrote:
The thing that kills me about Bill Maher and guys just like him is that he takes this stance of liberal, open mindedness yet woe to you if you disagree with his personal belief. He makes all sorts of assertions that you can either be smart and rational or you can believe in religion yet he backs these up with his own personal opinions. Sounds like a pretty closed minded conservative person to me.[/quote]

That’s pretty much the way the entire left believes. There is no open debate. As we speak the left is trying to silence talk radio. If he could Obama would pull FOX off the air as well. They want unquestioned and total authority. They’re actually very scary people.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]BBriere wrote:
The thing that kills me about Bill Maher and guys just like him is that he takes this stance of liberal, open mindedness yet woe to you if you disagree with his personal belief. He makes all sorts of assertions that you can either be smart and rational or you can believe in religion yet he backs these up with his own personal opinions. Sounds like a pretty closed minded conservative person to me.[/quote]

That’s pretty much the way the entire left believes. There is no open debate. As we speak the left is trying to silence talk radio. If he could Obama would pull FOX off the air as well. They want unquestioned and total authority. They’re actually very scary people.[/quote]

Unfortunately, this type of rhetoric has gained momentum in the past few years. It’s the idea that there is no right and wrong, you can’t know the truth except for me, and if you don’t agree with me, you’re wrong. Some people just don’t see the absurdity in it. I mean I have my beliefs, I can offer evidence for it, but if someone doesn’t believe in the evidence then that’s up to them. It’s their choice. We can debate it if they want, or we can just believe different things. You take a guy like Maher though who says religion is a “neurological disorder” and ask him to provide evidence for it, and he comes back by saying you’re an idiot for not believing it. Then some people truly view him as the open minded one.

[quote]BBriere wrote:
Bill Maher’s not a comedian. Have you ever heard him say anything funny?[/quote]

He is pretty weak. How the hell is he on the air?

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
When you cannot attack the argument, attack the guy who’s makin it.[/quote]

I didn’t watch the clip, with all the pot smoke that drifts out of his pie hole I didn’t want people to think I am getting stoned in my office.

Four pages and only one guy- Pat- made any reference to what he said and tried to prove it wrong.

Nothing changes in this shithole forum I see.

I watched it just for you. Wasn’t funny.

Not sure what his point was regarding Tea Party and Founding Fathers. Founding Fathers hated taxation. Disagreed on religion. Wanted minimal government. Very similar to the Tea Party. All in all they were brilliant men and would certainly be against the direction of government.

His pretending that his political opponents are stupid is lazy and inaccurate.

Just a lame clip.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Four pages and only one guy- Pat- made any reference to what he said and tried to prove it wrong.

Nothing changes in this shithole forum I see.[/quote]

Didnt need to see it, I saw the show.

Some points were true, others complete bullshit, both put forward with equal conviction.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
You have proof countering my proof or that’s just your opinion?

Denying doesn’t mean he did not know the bible, the trinity doctrine came in the early 3rd century. Ironically the bible came in 297 A.D. after the doctrine of the trinity. But you see, the trinity is not spelled out in the bible.

Because you parents were Catholic doesn’t make you one. [/quote]

Who cares if they knew it? It doesn’t mean they believed it. And my point, and Maher’s point, is that they clearly, clearly stated numerous times that they didn’t.

This wouldn’t matter so much if dickfors like Glen beck weren’t dressing up as Thomas Paine. Thomas Paine would be disgusted if he ever knew that a half-witted neocon moron like Beck was using his liklihood.

Yes, it’s something new: Xenophobic dinner theater.

You don’t have to watch the whole thing. If you’re white, and have an older relative you wish was dead, you know where it’s going. A bore’s litany of harrumphing clichÃ?©s. The greatest generation didn’t defend the Alamo just so a lot of special interests could overcrowd the emergency rooms. He’s going to say “We the people” a couple more times. If you’re waiting for “mad as hell,” it’s at 1:34 and 6:04.

You should check out his other videos. You’ve got to admire a guy who can say “the time for talk is over,” and then go on for six more minutes.

I wish I loved anything as much as this racist gasbag loves the sound of his own voice.

And now the scary part: This video has been viewed two-and-a-half million times on YouTube.

The clod in jodhpurs who says he’s Thomas Paine is actually a motivational speaker named Bob Basso. He’s the author of Don’t Let the Gerosofers Bite!, Never Wanted to Set the World on Fire But Now that I’m 50 Maybe it’s a Good Idea!, The Job Should be Fun!, Lighten Up Corporate America! and Spill Your Guts! Many of his book titles end in exclamation points! It’s like he’s overacting even when he’s just writing!

And that’s okay, too. (Although I didn’t know the tea bag tax protests had so much to do with deporting all the illegal aliens.) Bob Basso has heard quite a few things on the radio, and here they are again. But why drag Thomas Paine into it? Is it just because you want to wear the hat? Why not say you’re the Quaker Oats guy?

What did Thomas Paine ever do to you?

Besides, Bob Basso can’t be Thomas Paine. Glenn Beck is Thomas Paine.

Beck says he’s been “rewriting” Common Sense. He’s also made Paine the theme of his upcoming stage show. The one he describes as:

Fun for the whole family and it’s common sense. This time we may be joined on stage by a slightly crazy Founding Father… who’s got a few things to say!
You cringe and you never stop cringing.

Now, none of this means anything. Glenn Beck is just an asshole, and next week he’ll announce that he’s Sponge Bob and he lives in a pineapple under the sea. But before another sputtering doofus claims to be the author of the Rights of Man, he might want to check if they share a single belief.

Do you like estate taxes? Paine was pitching them in 1791.

How about progressive taxation? Paine wasn’t just for it, he made charts and graphs.

Welfare? Absolutely.

Government make-work programs? Yep. Pay for them with the estate tax.

Public education? Yes, please.

International organizations? Paine said we needed them. Thought they might be useful for preventing wars after we disarmed.

Feminism?

If a woman were to defend the cause of her sex, she might address him in the following manner … If we have an equal right with you to virtue, why should we not have an equal right to praise? … Our duties are different from yours, but they are not therefore less difficult to fulfill, or of less consequence to society … You cannot be ignorant that we have need of courage not less than you … Permit our names to be sometimes pronounced beyond the narrow circle in which we live. Permit friendship, or at least love, to inscribe its emblem on the tomb where our ashes repose; and deny us not that public esteem which, after the esteem of one’s self, is the sweetest reward of well doing. – T. Paine
Compare and contrast:

OK, so anyway, I was talking about ugly people. Ugly people, if you’re a guy, you can get past it. I don’t think you can as an ugly woman. I don’t – no, I don’t. If you’re an ugly woman, I apologize. Oh, you’ve got a double cross, because if you’re an ugly woman, you’re probably a progressive as well. --G. Beck
Animal Rights Nuts?

Everything of cruelty to animals is a violation of moral duty. – T. Paine
Religion?

Religion is under attack! – G. Beck
Priests and conjurors are of the same trade. – T. Paine
Clammy Tub Toys who Think Putting on a Tricorn Makes Them Thomas Paine?

I’m Thomas Paine. – G. Beck
The sublime and the ridiculous are often so nearly related, that it is difficult to class them separately. – T. Paine
[/quote]

LOL! How high or drunk were you when you rattled off this wall of words?
I wanted a counter argument, not a mission statement. But somewhere in there was a counter argument, so I counter your counter with more counter…

Why not use there own words?

Quote from TJ:
â?? The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man.â??

â??Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus.â??

“I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.”

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.”

Your favorite Thomas Paine said this:
“The evil that has resulted from the error of the schools, in teaching natural philosophy as an accomplishment only, has been that of generating in the pupils a species of atheism. Instead of looking through the works of creation to the Creator himself, they stop short, and employ the knowledge they acquire to create doubts of his existence. They labour with studied ingenuity to ascribe every thing they behold to innate properties of matter, and jump over all the rest by saying, that matter is eternal.”

I do not mean to belabor the point. But the bottom line is that these founding fathers most certainly did not regard the bible or God as bullshit. They came from the era where Puritanism was a dominant religion and there just flat a lot of ass-backwardness in their day. The 17th century was a mini dark ages in America. They most certainly rebelled against religiously fueled fanaticism, but not God himself or the bible. The FF were basically saying and proving that the bible doesn’t require you to be a backwards thinking asshole.

My beef with Maher is that he is getting his agenda here in California, and it is seriously failing.

Irish, I can understand why you get wood from his comments, but I live where he lives. I am telling you, he is nothing more than a bullshit liar.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Four pages and only one guy- Pat- made any reference to what he said and tried to prove it wrong.

Nothing changes in this shithole forum I see.[/quote]

He’s pretty much wrong. He sounds flat bitter at this point. A true grassroots movement such as the Tea Party is something that most of the FF would support as a beacon of freedom.
The flags and regalia of the the Revolution weren’t brought up to point out liberals as the enemy it’s to make the point that at the core of the revolution was liberty. It was a reminder of wear we came from as a nation. If he wants to make an enemy of himself for that, then he is. If he wants to take whats mine, he’s definitely in for a fight.

Anyhow, I have spent way to much time on a nimrod like Bill Maher. He’s as irrelevant as dried shit on a sidewalk to me.

If the Founding fathers wanted to keep political power out of the hands of the common, uneducated, or just plain stupid, as Maher would have us believe, then why did they construct system of government which allows Everybody the right to vote?

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
If the Founding fathers wanted to keep political power out of the hands of the common, uneducated, or just plain stupid, as Maher would have us believe, then why did they construct system of government which allows Everybody the right to vote?

[/quote]

See “electoral college.”

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
If the Founding fathers wanted to keep political power out of the hands of the common, uneducated, or just plain stupid, as Maher would have us believe, then why did they construct system of government which allows Everybody the right to vote?

[/quote]

See “electoral college.”[/quote]

That’s just for president. Congressmen were always voted on by people. At least white men land owners.

[quote]pat wrote:
… white men land owners.[/quote]

Most of the Tea Party?
The Founding Fathers would have hated them!

[quote]Big Banana wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
… white men land owners.[/quote]

Most of the Tea Party?
The Founding Fathers would have hated them![/quote]

Mebbe, but Ill take a government that hates me from a distance over a government that loves me up close and personally.

FightinIrish-

Disappointing. More of why this forum is a joke.

You’re a journalist with the means and experience to tease out facts of a story. I’ve read (and have enjoyed) your columns (you sent me a link way back and I’ve tried to keep up with them). By training, you’re supposedly objective with respect to multi-sided issues.

Beyond the mean-spirited satire and hyperbole, did you bother to actually check on the claims that Maher makes? Have you, in your professional capacity, or even out of curiosity, bothered to contact a local tea party coordinator or go to any of the rallies within 100 miles from you and actually talk to the people there? Have you talked to the people who attend these rallies? Of course, I don’t mean the fringe freaks that turn out at any rally regardless of “side” (that Big Media loves to put on camera), but the regular people?

Hell, even here in lilly-white Maine, the whitest state in the union, there’s people from all walks of life, race, and ethnicity at these rallies.

I’d be happy to put you in touch with a local tea party coordinator near me-- a well educated, atheist, science fiction author, musician, and columnist. He looks like he should be in Black Sabbath. Not quite fitting what Maher alludes to. He’s been on national media on the subject and would make a great interview if you’re up to actually learning about such things and not just taking the idiocy of comedians as Gospel (Stewart and Mahar-- the sum total and sole sources of modern Democrat intellectual direction).

I mean, if you can be bothered to waste so much time posting and defending meaningless talking-head drivel, why can’t you be bothered to use your God-given (ha) talent to actually talk to real people that are being character assassinated by blowhard jerkoff “comedians”

Lest I be accused, I don’t listen to any of the talking heads. Who needs to when you have face-to-face access to all your local representatives?

PM me if you’re up to the challenge, that’s all I got for this thread of fail.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
I’m glad you wrote all that, it was phenomenally done, very eloquent, worthy of a pulitzer for exposing frauds.

Too bad it had shit to do with what was said in that clip.

I see comprehension is still sorely lacking in this forum…[/quote]

Five posts later.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
When you cannot attack the argument, attack the guy who’s makin it.[/quote]

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
If they thought it was true, they would not abandon the traditional Christian thought process and have become deists.
[/quote]

You do realise that some of the most well known “traditional Christian” thinkers, hard logical men, like Aquinas, Augustine, Bonaventure, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, &c. not only understood God through revelation, but where the biggest mystics in the world? They saw God in the natural order.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
If the Founding fathers wanted to keep political power out of the hands of the common, uneducated, or just plain stupid, as Maher would have us believe, then why did they construct system of government which allows Everybody the right to vote?

[/quote]

See “electoral college.”[/quote]

That’s just for president. Congressmen were always voted on by people. At least white men land owners.[/quote]

I thought they set it up so state government picked Senators.

[quote]doogie wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
If the Founding fathers wanted to keep political power out of the hands of the common, uneducated, or just plain stupid, as Maher would have us believe, then why did they construct system of government which allows Everybody the right to vote?

[/quote]

See “electoral college.”[/quote]

That’s just for president. Congressmen were always voted on by people. At least white men land owners.[/quote]

I thought they set it up so state government picked Senators.
[/quote]
They did, originally.