[quote]four60 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]TDub301 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
“The medical report from George Zimmerman’s family doctor after the Trayvon Martin shooting shows that Zimmerman’s nose was broken, he also had a pair of black eyes, two lacerations on the back of his head, a bruised upper lip, and a back injury… Meanwhile, the Trayvon Martin autopsy shows that the skin on his knuckles was broken…”
That evil grafted white devil must’ve headbutted Trayvon’s hands.[/quote]
For a second there I thought this was going to be a biased post - then I read on and saw how Trayvon must have died of broken skin on his knuckles since that was the only injury recorded during the autopsy. Phew![/quote]
I don’t think anyone seriously doubts the black guy put a serious beating on the hispanic guy.
It all comes down to who instigated the actual fight.[/quote]
Doesn’t really matter. People are still going to say Zimmerman had a right to use his gun whoever instigated the fight. My opinion has been all along, that, yes he has a right to defend himself, but he also carries a responsibility not to put himself in a situation where he has to make that call.
One aspect of the case that can’t be disputed is that Zimmerman shouldn’t have been patrolling alone that night, especially when following suspects with unclear motives. [/quote]
I thought he wasn’t patrolling. Wasn’t he just coming back from the store like Trayvon was?[/quote]
That’s news to me. I was trying to avoid get dragged back into the semantic vortex of this thread, but one throwaway comment and here I am… [/quote]
Yeah, it’s like eating Chips or tipping Strippers you tell yourself you’ll only do it once.
[/quote]
Hey, I disappeared for the whole 2nd and 3rd sets of this thread, I didn’t want to be dragged into it either, haha. But since you said it can’t be disputed, I felt compelled to ask the question.
