[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
I mean why do we need ‘‘experts’’ to state the obvious?[/quote]
Wasn’t ABC news the channel caught editing conversations, race baiting with partial information and basically making shit up? Anything from them is like taking info. from the corner crack whore screaming her delusions for all to hear. They are acting like a tabloid with this story. Nothing they write is believable.
NBC news is the one that edited the tape. Not ABC news.
[quote]
I heard George Bush called his brother and threatened to box his nuts at the next family reunion if he let’s Florida prosecute the white guy. I mean brown guy.[/quote]
I believe the term is white brown guy.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
NBC news is the one that edited the tape. Not ABC news.[/quote]
That’s correct. ABC doctored the VIDEO, NBC is the one with the doctored TAPE. (Do we have a newspaper called Pravda yet?)
Let’s be sure not to confuse the facts. Oh wait, nobody is worried about those, I keep forgetting…
So, has Spike Lee declared his intent to make a movie out of this whole ordeal yet? Or is the story of Trayvon Martin going to be turned into a BET Special Production?
[quote]JaseHxC wrote:
So, has Spike Lee declared his intent to make a movie out of this whole ordeal yet? Or is the story of Trayvon Martin going to be turned into a BET Special Production?[/quote]
First the Black Panthers have to lynch an innocent man upon receipt of a faulty address, and an as of yet nonguilty Zimmerman, the blacks supporting Zimmerman have to be shushed ( I believe DN referred to them as “uncle toms” in a race tirade) and a Jackson march needs to be shut down for enough pieces to create a conspiritorial puzzle using “artistic license” as the “who, me?” out when fact finally meets fiction.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
NBC news is the one that edited the tape. Not ABC news.[/quote]
Indeed.
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/06/nbc-fires-producer-of-misleading-zimmerman-tape/
Coincidence? Zimmfuck’s 911 calls – All for Black ‘‘suspicious’’ males.
Damn. The guy was so obsessed with racial profiling. All his previous 911 calls are just amazing.
So every time he saw a black guy walking through the neighborhood he’d freak out and report him assuming he’s a burglar. Why do I get the sneaking suspicion he never even caught all those ‘‘suspicious’’ people responsible for the break-ins? Only blacks were up to no good. Even 7-8 year old kids. A white teen would obviously never look suspicious.
God I can’t believe people can listen to that and STILL think 1) Zimmerman had no hostility towards black men in his neighborhood and 2) Trayvon was the aggressor.
‘‘He’s running away…’’ (wind and rustling indicates a chase begins). Nah, that part there is also ignored. Especially after how calm he sounded at the start of the call.
He chased an unarmed kid with a gun thinking he’s high on drugs and breaking into homes.
Had I been one of those 911 dispatchers, this is how our convo would have been like, Mr Zimmfuck:
‘‘Hello, 911. Yeah there’s a suspicious guy walking around. We’ve had break-ins recently. He looks suspicious.’’
‘‘Not that I have to ask you, but is he white, black, asian?’’
‘‘He’s BLAAACK!’’
‘‘Sir, this is the 30th time you’ve called in the past 5 months! Maybe if you’d stop freaking out only when you see black men in the neighborhood you’d find your burglar. Here’s a pro-tip; most break ins are not committed spontaneously by random people out of nowhere. They’re well planned and committed by other residents familiar with the neighborhood. Sometimes even a close friend or family of the victims. You sound like one of those crazed gun owners who would shoot and kill a black child because you assume all blacks are criminals. Stop wasting our fucking time and get some racial sensitivity training sir. And yes, please speak to my manager and report me, you racist son of a bitch!’’
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
NBC news is the one that edited the tape. Not ABC news.[/quote]
Indeed.
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/06/nbc-fires-producer-of-misleading-zimmerman-tape/[/quote]
Yet NBC edited video. Same bullshit reporting.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]four60 wrote:
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am still not sure what world someone lives in where the threat of death is over simply because the killer chasing you turned around and faced south.
[/quote]
… You mean besides the part where they’re no longer perusing you? [/quote]
Again more maybes. But it seems that is all is needed.[/quote]
I am still trying to understand how ‘turning around’ equals ‘not pursuing you anymore’. The man was still on the same street as Trayvon meaning the threat was still there.
It makes no sense to say the threat was gone unless he drove away.
[/quote]
I don’t understand how somebody can think that “moving in the opposite direction” = “pursuing”.
Call me crazy, but that sounds like the opposite of pursuing.
[/quote]
UH, he was still looking for Trayvon and was still waiting on cops to look for Trayvon…so obviously he was still pursuing Trayvon even if he lost immediate sight of him for a second. If he was going back to his car, it isn’t like he was getting in it to go home. He would have been going back to it to look for Trayvon some more because the cops were still coming.
That means, yes, Zimmerman was still in pursuit of Trayvon IN THE GATED COMMUNITY even IF he was going back to his car which was closer to the entrance.
[/quote]
I think you’re only pretending to not understand. As soon as Trayvon lost Zimmerman, he had a choice. He made the wrong choice and got shot for it.
Zimmerman lost sight of Trayvon, so he stopped chasing him and went back to his car. Who knows, maybe he was getting his car so he could drive around looking for him, maybe he was just going back to wait for the police, but what I do know is that from the point where Zimmerman gave up and went back to his car to the time where Trayvon confronted him, he was absolutely not in pursuit.
Wanting to catch someone =/= pursuing them. You have to actually be pursuing them in order to be pursuing them.
Giving up and walking away =/= pursuing
Going back to your car so you can wait for the police =/= pursuing
Going back to you car so you can continue while driving =/= pursuing until you’re actually in the car, diving around looking for him
If Trayvon could manage to lose Zimmerman while Zimmerman was chasing him, he certainly could have gotten away while Zimmerman was not chasing him. He didn’t do that. He went back voluntarily in order to confront Zimmerman and then attacked him. This voids any self-defence claim Trayvon could make.
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Angry? Lol. I was grinning while typing. Just because I use ‘‘fuck’’, it doesn’t mean that I’m mad.
[/quote]
I don’t know whom you’re trying to fool. You’re clearly the most choleric person here.
[quote]Thuggish wrote:
[quote]four60 wrote:
[quote]Thuggish wrote:
Can we just sum this shit up? I think I can.
Either Zimmer-moron continued pursuing Trayvon (God I’m starting to hate that name) and deserves something between manslaughter or murder for causing him to feel threatened enough to turn and fight, which it doesn’t look like (especially the murder one, seeing as how even an idiot murderer shouldn’t get as hurt as Zimmer-moron did), or he stopped pursuit as he said, in which case Trayvon must have escalated things to violence BEYOND any “stand your ground” rules, which exonerates Zimmer-moron.
It has to be one of those scenarios.
THERE. THAT’S IT. DONE.[/quote]
Even a idot murderer shouldn’t get as hurt as Zim-Moron did? But a person going home from the store and is killed in the street is a victimless crime.
I believe Zim will get off but not because any evidence validates him. He will walk because reasonable doubt is a question around when they stood face to face. [/quote]
Do you not get what I was saying?
I’m saying that if he set out to kill some black kid in cold blood, premeditated, all that… even if he was a Forest Gump level idiot, he would not have been as injured as he was. I’m saying that in all likelihood his injuries alone mean that it wasn’t murder in the first degree.
What does
have to do with anything I said?
See? This is the problem with discussions like this…[/quote]
The last statement had nothing to do with your post. Just a statement that once someone is killed people forget they had rights also. ( stand your ground).
The other part was just about how we don’t know what Zims wounds really are yet.
At this point I think even the Feds are lost.
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Angry? Lol. I was grinning while typing. Just because I use ‘‘fuck’’, it doesn’t mean that I’m mad.
[/quote]
I don’t know whom you’re trying to fool. You’re clearly the most choleric person here.[/quote]
And you’re still moaning like a battered pussy.
No grand Jury in Trayvon Martin case
http://www.chicagonewsreport.com/2012/04/daniel-adkins-killer-claims-self.html
A few days ago a black man shot an unarmed hispanic man in self defense, he hasn’t been arrested. Where is Al Sharpton? Where is Jesse Jackson? Where is Dark Ninja?
White people will probably be blamed for this one too.
[quote]overstand wrote:
http://www.chicagonewsreport.com/2012/04/daniel-adkins-killer-claims-self.html
A few days ago a black man shot an unarmed hispanic man in self defense, he hasn’t been arrested. Where is Al Sharpton? Where is Jesse Jackson? Where is Dark Ninja?
[/quote]
Not enough national media attention for them to roll into town.
I hope nobody interrupts their Black Panther party.
[quote]overstand wrote:
http://www.chicagonewsreport.com/2012/04/daniel-adkins-killer-claims-self.html
A few days ago a black man shot an unarmed hispanic man in self defense, he hasn’t been arrested. Where is Al Sharpton? Where is Jesse Jackson? Where is Dark Ninja?
White people will probably be blamed for this one too.[/quote]
SHIT JUST GOT REAL. HIDE YOUR WIVES! HIDE YOUR CHILDREN!
I just love how I’ve been rubbing some pussies the wrong way, so much they feel the need to mention me with the likes of AS and JJ.
Lol. The fuckers probably have nightmares about me.
It feels great to be fucking notorious.
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]overstand wrote:
http://www.chicagonewsreport.com/2012/04/daniel-adkins-killer-claims-self.html
A few days ago a black man shot an unarmed hispanic man in self defense, he hasn’t been arrested. Where is Al Sharpton? Where is Jesse Jackson? Where is Dark Ninja?
White people will probably be blamed for this one too.[/quote]
SHIT JUST GOT REAL. HIDE YOUR WIVES! HIDE YOUR CHILDREN!
I just love how I’ve been rubbing some pussies the wrong way, so much they feel the need to mention me with the likes of AS and JJ.
Lol. The fuckers probably have nightmares about me.
It feels great to be fucking notorious.
[/quote]
Don’t flatter yourself, you’re a joke. You are a caricature of the stereotypical angry black woman and I’m sure the majority of black people would be embarrassed by you.
[quote]overstand wrote:
Don’t flatter yourself, you’re a joke. You are a caricature of the stereotypical angry black woman and I’m sure the majority of black people would be embarrassed by you.[/quote]
I am fairly certain “it” is a troll, as it appeared right about when the other over-the-top fake black poster (Method Man), disappeared.
Most likely, it is some gay white bigoted (as in, actually bigoted, not cry-wolf bigoted) dude who plays over-the-top blacks in order to make blacks look stupid/evil. It was caught in too many lies early on to take seriously.
Sadly very effective.
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]overstand wrote:
Don’t flatter yourself, you’re a joke. You are a caricature of the stereotypical angry black woman and I’m sure the majority of black people would be embarrassed by you.[/quote]
I am fairly certain “it” is a troll, as it appeared right about when the other over-the-top fake black poster (Method Man), disappeared.
Most likely, it is some gay white bigoted (as in, actually bigoted, not cry-wolf bigoted) dude who plays over-the-top blacks in order to make blacks look stupid/evil. It was caught in too many lies early on to take seriously.
Sadly very effective.[/quote]
Nope.
A few people can vouch for DN, who is very much real. “Chushin”, for one.
[quote]overstand wrote:
Don’t flatter yourself, you’re a joke. You are a caricature of the stereotypical angry black woman and I’m sure the majority of black people would be embarrassed by you.[/quote]
Yeap. I did rub your pussy the wrong way. I’m glad it’s still aching.