[quote]Karado wrote:
As ALL Men would do if given half a chance when the grass is greener on the other side.
Being Rich doesn’t change one’s traits anyway, it reveals them.[/quote]
Money and fame simple provides opportunities for the poon-tang that mortals simple do not experience.
But would if given the opportunity.[/quote]
Money does not change a person it only accentuates their Demons. That is what I say at least.
[/quote]
I say it allows one’s demons more opportunities for creative expression.
[quote]Karado wrote:
As ALL Men would do if given half a chance when the grass is greener on the other side.
Being Rich doesn’t change one’s traits anyway, it reveals them.[/quote]
Money and fame simple provides opportunities for the poon-tang that mortals simple do not experience.
But would if given the opportunity.[/quote]
Money does not change a person it only accentuates their Demons. That is what I say at least.
[/quote]
I say it allows one’s demons more opportunities for creative expression.
[/quote]
Lets change it thne.
Money does not change a person, it only allows one’s demons more opportunities for creative “destruction”.
I like destruction more than expression, but both would work.
[quote]Karado wrote:
As ALL Men would do if given half a chance when the grass is greener on the other side.
Being Rich doesn’t change one’s traits anyway, it reveals them.[/quote]
Money and fame simple provides opportunities for the poon-tang that mortals simple do not experience.
But would if given the opportunity.[/quote]
Money does not change a person it only accentuates their Demons. That is what I say at least.
[/quote]
I say it allows one’s demons more opportunities for creative expression.
[/quote]
Lets change it thne.
Money does not change a person, it only allows one’s demons more opportunities for creative “destruction”.
I like destruction more than expression, but both would work.
[/quote]
“Creative destruction” is an oxymoron.
And don’t assume that everything your demons do is destructive.
Some of our greatest artists, writers and philosophers would have produced nothing of value without giving free rein to their demons once in a while.
[quote]Karado wrote:
As ALL Men would do if given half a chance when the grass is greener on the other side.
Being Rich doesn’t change one’s traits anyway, it reveals them.[/quote]
Money and fame simple provides opportunities for the poon-tang that mortals simple do not experience.
But would if given the opportunity.[/quote]
Money does not change a person it only accentuates their Demons. That is what I say at least.
[/quote]
I dont think it is a demon in this case.
If they want you because you have accomplished something, thats the deal they get.
You are a status object, they are a sex object and they get replaced when they no longer can hold up their side of the bargain, which happens to all of them, sooner or later.
Now, had they gone the old fashioned route “if you want to be married to a general, you need to marry a lieutenant”, fine, and yes I would have problems with a man discarding one of those, however, if they wanna be trophy whores, they should get the whole experience.
Which includes the same shallow treatment they would make their man experience if he lost his wealth and fame.
Creative destruction, a term coined by Schumpeter as far as I know, is a good thing.
We no longer need land lines by and large, or the fluids theory of Hippocrates and Galen or slavery for that matter, for we have found better ways of doing things.
For the new way to come in, the old one has to go, with all the problems that gp along with it.
I’m sure this happens to more ‘racially progressive people’ all the time but, when I hear the words ‘The Black NRA’, my mind immediately jumps to the idea of ‘covert tactical wing of the NRA’ (which would’ve been much more funny).
The same thing happens when I hear the words ‘The Black Church’, my mind immediately jumps to Satan worship. A Church that worships the Dark Prince.
It did strike me as funny that Sarah Silverman is, in the video, essentially a token.
Creative destruction, a term coined by Schumpeter as far as I know, is a good thing.
We no longer need land lines by and large, or the fluids theory of Hippocrates and Galen or slavery for that matter, for we have found better ways of doing things.
For the new way to come in, the old one has to go, with all the problems that gp along with it. [/quote]
You know, as soon as I posted that last night, I realized my error, and immediately started imagining all of the things I have creatively destroyed.
Creative destruction, a term coined by Schumpeter as far as I know, is a good thing.
We no longer need land lines by and large, or the fluids theory of Hippocrates and Galen or slavery for that matter, for we have found better ways of doing things.
For the new way to come in, the old one has to go, with all the problems that gp along with it. [/quote]
You know, as soon as I posted that last night, I realized my error, and immediately started imagining all of the things I have creatively destroyed.[/quote]
Well there is an element of destruction and nobody wants to hear that their skills are obsolete.
I have at least come to understand why people despise that part of economic progress.
[quote]lucasa wrote:
I’m sure this happens to more ‘racially progressive people’ all the time but, when I hear the words ‘The Black NRA’, my mind immediately jumps to the idea of ‘covert tactical wing of the NRA’ (which would’ve been much more funny).
The same thing happens when I hear the words ‘The Black Church’, my mind immediately jumps to Satan worship. A Church that worships the Dark Prince.
It did strike me as funny that Sarah Silverman is, in the video, essentially a token. [/quote]
I’m not sure if you’re serious or being funny. The Church of Satan is the name of that religious body/affiliation. And I assume if the NRA wanted to come up with some covert ops section of the NRA, they wouldn’t call it Black NRA. I’d imagine it would either be a cool acronym, or have the words Ops with Black.
I never watched the video so I could be completely wrong. But hey, if its a spade I call it a spade, if its a diamond I call it a diamond. Considering recent news, my theory makes sense based purely on the name.
Creative destruction, a term coined by Schumpeter as far as I know, is a good thing.
We no longer need land lines by and large, or the fluids theory of Hippocrates and Galen or slavery for that matter, for we have found better ways of doing things.
For the new way to come in, the old one has to go, with all the problems that gp along with it. [/quote]
You know, as soon as I posted that last night, I realized my error, and immediately started imagining all of the things I have creatively destroyed.[/quote]
Apollo and Dionysus work together as flip sides of the same coin.