Black Lives Matter

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
As for what I meant when I said that my position is a blend of yours and theirs:

You are right about black men and crime – particularly violent crime. It takes the most ludicrously idiotic propagandist to fail to understand that higher proportional rates of violent crime will necessarily lead to higher proportional rates of cop-community interaction, including hostile/tense/dangerous interaction. BLM and Ta-Nehisi Coates and all the rest of them essentially remove moral agency from black people by sidestepping this entire aspect of the conversation. There are many related points, but I don’t feel like going into all of it, and I’m sure most people around here are pretty familiar with this stuff.

On the other hand, the BLM folks are right about many (not all – see Brown, Michael) of the individual cases they’ve chosen to highlight, and they are right that it ought to be our goal, as a civilized society concerned from the utter outset with things like individual liberties and rights (and opposed to the concept of collective guilt), to minimize outcomes like, e.g., Garner’s. Most conservatives I’ve met agree with this. Where they stumble is in failing to understand that the famous cases – the ones to which we can all refer by name – aren’t just bad-apple-cop narratives. They also tell stories of general and structural problems which contribute to and increase the likelihood of abuse, tension, etc. The Justice Department report I’ve been referring to evidences this in microcosm. There is a P.D. obsessed with revenue generation, aggressively pestering specifically black citizens in order to make up projected budgetary shortfalls. There is a ridiculously corrupt municipal court. There are actual, good old-fashioned racist emails exchanged among officials. Most importantly, there are daily interactions like this one:

[quote]
In the summer of 2012, a
32-year-old African-American man sat in his car cooling off after playing basketball in a
Ferguson public park. An officer pulled up behind the man?s car, blocking him in, and
demanded the man?s Social Security number and identification. Without any cause, the officer
accused the man of being a pedophile, referring to the presence of children in the park, and
ordered the man out of his car for a pat-down, although the officer had no reason to believe the
man was armed. The officer also asked to search the man?s car. The man objected, citing his
constitutional rights. In response, the officer arrested the man, reportedly at gunpoint, charging
him with eight violations of Ferguson?s municipal code. One charge, Making a False
Declaration, was for initially providing the short form of his first name (e.g., ?Mike? instead of
?Michael?), and an address which, although legitimate, was different from the one on his driver?s
license. Another charge was for not wearing a seat belt, even though he was seated in a parked
car. The officer also charged the man both with having an expired operator?s license, and with
having no operator?s license in his possession. The man told us that, because of these charges,
he lost his job as a contractor with the federal government that he had held for years.[/quote][/quote]

No one is saying, certainly not me, that black people have not been mistreated by law enforcement on occasion. My response to that is that all walks of life have been mistreated by law enforcement on occasion. The fact is there are some bad cops. While they represent less than 1% of the total they are certainly out there.

However, there is no denying that black on black crime harms far and away more black people than officers of the law have. Perhaps the ratio is 1000 to 1, perhaps 10,000 to 1, I have no idea but it is large. So, my question…oh wait you don’t like questions forget it. My point is there seems to be no outrage over blacks harming blacks.

Further, there seems to be no black community outrage over black males impregnating black women and then leaving the scene and like an amnesia victim forgetting all about what they just did.

Yes, black people are still singled out by some bad cops. And bad cops don’t discriminate they treat most very badly. But that pales in the face of what blacks are doing to each other on a daily basis and have been for decades.

Police are the least problem that black people have in the US. They have created the biggest problem and the second biggest problem is that many refuse to face it!

[quote]ZEB wrote:
So, my question…oh wait you don’t like questions forget it. [/quote]

PWI rule one: when asking a question, never expect it to be answered

[quote]ZEB wrote:
But that pales in the face of what blacks are doing to each other on a daily basis and have been for decades.[/quote]

Why face this problem when you can just blame the white man?

That, in itself, is the real problem and why it will never be resolved.

When a cop kills a black person (armed, unarmed, criminal, innocent) is it more or less of an outrage if the cop is white or black?

Any figures, statistics or news links about this?

Interesting development I heard about here today.

LAPD rolled out their body camera program for officers earlier this week, and they are instructed to tell those they are speaking with that they are being recorded. First observation seen was a recoil and deescalation by those police encountered. In other words, when people found out they were being filmed, they were less likely to act aggressive and provocative towards police.

I think we are at the stage where we need these for all police.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Interesting development I heard about here today.

LAPD rolled out their body camera program for officers earlier this week, and they are instructed to tell those they are speaking with that they are being recorded. First observation seen was a recoil and deescalation by those police encountered. In other words, when people found out they were being filmed, they were less likely to act aggressive and provocative towards police.

I think we are at the stage where we need these for all police.[/quote]

Great idea and I’m not surprised to hear that those who have been detained by police start behaving in a civil manner when they know later on they can’t lie their way out of it, or build a crusade around a lie such as, “hands up don’t shoot”.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Interesting development I heard about here today.

LAPD rolled out their body camera program for officers earlier this week, and they are instructed to tell those they are speaking with that they are being recorded. First observation seen was a recoil and deescalation by those police encountered. In other words, when people found out they were being filmed, they were less likely to act aggressive and provocative towards police.

I think we are at the stage where we need these for all police.[/quote]

I wear one at work. Once people realize they’re being recorded their tone changes. I’m all for them. My only concern is footage becoming the standard of proof.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
As for what I meant when I said that my position is a blend of yours and theirs:

You are right about black men and crime – particularly violent crime. It takes the most ludicrously idiotic propagandist to fail to understand that higher proportional rates of violent crime will necessarily lead to higher proportional rates of cop-community interaction, including hostile/tense/dangerous interaction. BLM and Ta-Nehisi Coates and all the rest of them essentially remove moral agency from black people by sidestepping this entire aspect of the conversation. There are many related points, but I don’t feel like going into all of it, and I’m sure most people around here are pretty familiar with this stuff.

On the other hand, the BLM folks are right about many (not all – see Brown, Michael) of the individual cases they’ve chosen to highlight, and they are right that it ought to be our goal, as a civilized society concerned from the utter outset with things like individual liberties and rights (and opposed to the concept of collective guilt), to minimize outcomes like, e.g., Garner’s. Most conservatives I’ve met agree with this. Where they stumble is in failing to understand that the famous cases – the ones to which we can all refer by name – aren’t just bad-apple-cop narratives. They also tell stories of general and structural problems which contribute to and increase the likelihood of abuse, tension, etc. The Justice Department report I’ve been referring to evidences this in microcosm. There is a P.D. obsessed with revenue generation, aggressively pestering specifically black citizens in order to make up projected budgetary shortfalls. There is a ridiculously corrupt municipal court. There are actual, good old-fashioned racist emails exchanged among officials. Most importantly, there are daily interactions like this one:

[quote]
In the summer of 2012, a
32-year-old African-American man sat in his car cooling off after playing basketball in a
Ferguson public park. An officer pulled up behind the man?s car, blocking him in, and
demanded the man?s Social Security number and identification. Without any cause, the officer
accused the man of being a pedophile, referring to the presence of children in the park, and
ordered the man out of his car for a pat-down, although the officer had no reason to believe the
man was armed. The officer also asked to search the man?s car. The man objected, citing his
constitutional rights. In response, the officer arrested the man, reportedly at gunpoint, charging
him with eight violations of Ferguson?s municipal code. One charge, Making a False
Declaration, was for initially providing the short form of his first name (e.g., ?Mike? instead of
?Michael?), and an address which, although legitimate, was different from the one on his driver?s
license. Another charge was for not wearing a seat belt, even though he was seated in a parked
car. The officer also charged the man both with having an expired operator?s license, and with
having no operator?s license in his possession. The man told us that, because of these charges,
he lost his job as a contractor with the federal government that he had held for years.[/quote][/quote]

No one is saying, certainly not me, that black people have not been mistreated by law enforcement on occasion.[/quote]

It isn’t just “on occasion.” I am sure you haven’t read the report I quoted from above, but if you’re going to have opinions on this matter, you should. For your own sake.

Agreed, and the fact that BLM won’t suffer this to be brought up without tossing the “racist” moniker around is, in part, why my first post in this thread accused Deray et alii of idiocy. However, one problem’s existence does not nullify another’s, particularly when the latter – unlike the former – revolves around public servants and government conduct.

[quote]Chushin wrote:
That is so well-put.

[/quote]

Thank you, sir. For what it’s worth, I agree with what you said about violent crime within black neighborhoods, and anyone who tries to downplay that part of the equation is an idiot or a hack.

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

No one is saying, certainly not me, that black people have not been mistreated by law enforcement on occasion.

It isn’t just “on occasion.” I am sure you haven’t read the report I quoted from above, but if you’re going to have opinions on this matter, you should. For your own sake.
[/quote]

Yes of course anyone who disagrees with you has certainly not read anything that has been posted. You have to stop this nonsense eventually–right?

[quote]However, there is no denying that black on black crime harms far and away more black people than officers of the law have. Perhaps the ratio is 1000 to 1, perhaps 10,000 to 1, I have no idea but it is large. So, my question…oh wait you don’t like questions forget it. My point is there seems to be no outrage over blacks harming blacks.

Agreed, and the fact that BLM won’t suffer this to be brought up without tossing the “racist” moniker around is, in part, why my first post in this thread accused Deray et alii of idiocy. However, one problem’s existence does not nullify another’s, particularly when the latter – unlike the former – revolves around public servants and government conduct.[/quote]

Negative police confrontations are a infinitesimal part of the black problem in comparison to what blacks do to blacks. A much larger problem in fact is black on white crime. More whites die at the hands of blacks than they do at the hands of whites even though blacks comprise only about 13% of the population. Where is the White Lives Matter movement? Where are the protests when blacks kill whites while committing a crime? Seems to me that white people have a bigger beef with blacks than blacks do with “the system”.

The Black Lives Matter movement is illegitimate!

However, I will change my tune when they stop killing each other at such high rates, when black men decide to actually stay home and raise their children and when black men decide to stop committing crimes at such a high rate.

I could also tie the black problem to decades of left wing policies in major cities but that’s another post.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

No one is saying, certainly not me, that black people have not been mistreated by law enforcement on occasion.

It isn’t just “on occasion.” I am sure you haven’t read the report I quoted from above, but if you’re going to have opinions on this matter, you should. For your own sake.
[/quote]

Yes of course anyone who disagrees with you has certainly not read anything that has been posted. You have to stop this nonsense eventually–right?[/quote]

So you’ve read the report? Yes or no?

None of this has anything to do with what I’ve said in this thread. You appear to be confused. If you’re trying to say that government misconduct vis-a-vis a social group is unobjectionable if a constituent (and minority) portion of that social group is criminal, then I’ll just say you’re being ridiculous and suggest you go contemplate your ridiculousness in solitude. If you’re trying to say something else, you should be clear about it.

Edited.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
A much larger problem in fact is black on white crime. More whites die at the hands of blacks than they do at the hands of whites even though blacks comprise only about 13% of the population.
[/quote]

Either you wrote this incorrectly or you’re monumentally confused. To whom does “they,” in the second sentence, refer?

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

None of this has anything to do with what I’ve said in this thread. You appear to be confused. If you’re trying to say that government misconduct vis-a-vis a social group is unobjectionable if a constituent (and minority) portion of that social group is criminal, then I’ll just say you’re being ridiculous and suggest you go contemplate your ridiculousness in solitude. If you’re trying to say something else, you should be clear about it.

Edited.[/quote]

I was very clear to all but you, so who is the one confused?

But, I’ll hit it again more succinctly for you.

Yes there are bad cops, but those bad cops harm just about everyone. It is not a current problem as much as it has been a long standing problem. Some people think that the Earp’s were too harsh on the Clanton’s…seriously. We must give power to some so that there is no anarchy. So, there a few bad cops no one denies that. There are more than a few bad doctors…and lawyers etc. The facts will never change unless or until they can make robots to do Police work.

Do you really think that BLM is a positive force? How many cops have been killed because of this illegitimate movement? Do you think that’s a good thing? (Said it already in first post in case you didn’t READ it).

As for the black population they have far more and much larger problems than the police picking on them, which by the way they could dramatically reduce by committing less crimes. I said that already as well. Strange how those black, white, Hispanic folks who don’t commit crimes have such little contact with the local Police Officials. Odd huh? Launch a study :slight_smile:

I suggest if you have some sort of defense for BLM that you spit it out with your next post otherwise …

See You Later!

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
A much larger problem in fact is black on white crime. More whites die at the hands of blacks than they do at the hands of whites even though blacks comprise only about 13% of the population.
[/quote]

Either you wrote this incorrectly or you’re monumentally confused. To whom does “they,” in the second sentence, refer?[/quote]

more whites die at the hands of blacks than blacks do at the hands of whites.

Is that better Professor? I was just jotting down a post not a term paper.

I’m not sure you should be let out of your classroom.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Yes there are bad cops, but those bad cops harm just about everyone.
[/quote]

The problem isn’t just a few “bad cops,” and you’d know this if you could be bothered to learn about things before arguing a position. The report I summarized and excerpted is a fine place for you to begin. Or have you read it? You took issue with my highly reasonable assumption to the contrary, but you didn’t answer the question. Again: Have you read it or any of the thousands of other documents like it? If not, why are you talking about this at all? It’s a waste of your own time.

[quote]
Do you really think that BLM is a positive force?[/quote]

No, as I said in my very first post on this subject. This doesn’t mean that certain of its grievances are illegitimate.

[quote]
How many cops have been killed because of this illegitimate movement?[/quote]

None. Or is the pro-life movement responsible for the killing of George Tiller?

You don’t get to decide which of their problems they’re allowed to worry about. Again, one problem’s existence does not nullify another’s, particularly when the latter – unlike the former – revolves around public servants and government conduct. If this latter problem is evidenced – which it is – then you’re shit out of luck with this they shouldn’t be worried about it twaddle.

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Yes there are bad cops, but those bad cops harm just about everyone.

The problem isn’t just a few “bad cops,” and you’d know this if you could be bothered to learn about things before arguing a position.[/quote]

“Learn about things” Yes, I need to learn about things. If I only knew about “things” I would then agree with smh. Ha ha, your ego is running away with you. Your arrogance knows no bounds.

[quote]
Do you really think that BLM is a positive force?

No, as I said in my very first post on this subject. This doesn’t mean that certain of its grievances are illegitimate.[/quote]

My point which you keep missing, the grievances which we both agree are there pale in the face of what blacks do to themselves. It would be like me burning my own house down and then getting mad at you for walking up to the ashes and throwing a match on it. That one little match doesn’t really matter because I just destroyed my own house!

[quote]
How many cops have been killed because of this illegitimate movement?

None. Or is the pro-life movement responsible for the killing of George Tiller?[/quote]

In a sense both movements are responsible for the outcome of those actions. I have to believe that the Police Officer who was gunned down filling his tank with gas would be alive today and home with his family had a crazed black person not heard the vicious words of the BLM movement and then acted on them. You’re not trying to say that a groups philosophy should not be held responsible for the actions that it may stir are you? It’s tantamount to saying that you can scream “fire” in a movie theatre and then not assume responsibility for the child who is trampled to death when the theatre goers run in panic for the exit.

Were you thinking that screaming for the death of cops was never going to cause the death of a cop? No, you wouldn’t think that…

[quote]
As for the black population they have far more and much larger problems than the police picking on them

You don’t get to decide which of their problems they’re allowed to worry about. [/quote]

That was perhaps the dumbest statement that I’ve read on T Nation in a long time. As a tax paying citizen I certainly do get to worry about which problems are serious. The color of my skin has nothing to do with my civic duty and sense of community responsibility.

Here they are the problems once again:

  1. almost 70% of black children grow up without a positive male role model.

  2. Black on Black crime takes more lives and harms more blacks than any other factor.

The fact that some in the black population refuse to admit the above two problems (there are others) does not make them magically go away. They choose to pick on the Cops because they can’t clean up their own act.

And I honestly think we got where we are today not because of the real Police but because of the PC police. People who have been bound and gagged from speaking the truth afraid to be called racists. This problem has been growing for decades. And will continue to grow until there can actually be a discussion about what’s really going on we drop the scapegoats.

Parts of the black community are broken and if we are not allowed to even speak about it how does it get better? Moreover, how do you fix the real problem when scapegoating is so very easy? I won’t allow (by my silence) the very group of people who have burned their own house down to suddenly point a finger at the Police and scream bloody murder.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Yes there are bad cops, but those bad cops harm just about everyone.

The problem isn’t just a few “bad cops,” and you’d know this if you could be bothered to learn about things before arguing a position.[/quote]

“Learn about things” Yes, I need to learn about things. If I only knew about “things” I would then agree with smh. Ha ha, your ego is running away with you. Your arrogance knows no bounds.[/quote]

You do seem to know very little about this topic on which you nonetheless insist on opining. I’ve now asked you a couple times whether or not you’ve read that report. You took issue with my guess that you hadn’t – but you won’t say whether you have or not. Assuming (as is undoubtedly wise) that you haven’t, it’s strange that you think yourself sufficiently informed to argue against something you haven’t taken the time to understand.

[quote]

[quote]
You don’t get to decide which of their problems they’re allowed to worry about. [/quote]

That was perhaps the dumbest statement that I’ve read on T Nation in a long time. As a tax paying citizen I certainly do get to worry about which problems are serious.[/quote]

I didn’t say “which problems are serious,” did I?

Again, the existence of one problem does not invalidate debate about another, particularly when the latter – unlike the former – involves government conduct. Someone objects to certain data-supported facts about law enforcement and municipal courts vis-a-vis black people in America. Is her argument supported? Yes. Then the objection is legitimate – full stop. Of course high violent crime rates are important and related…but many of us have the ability to analyze and express multiple views about multiple issues at a single time. Impressive, I know.

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
I’ve now asked you a couple times whether or not you’ve read that report. You took issue with my guess that you hadn’t – but you won’t say whether you have or not. [/quote]

Just in case you manage to miss this again.