Doubtful, I imagine they hold their money pretty tightly.
How does this work?
Why would a plant not be covered under a plant patent, or the process by which a stem cells are prepared for use not be covered by a utility patent?
If treatments that are more effective with less side effects and canāt be patent come to market, it will be the beginning of the end of their tyranny.
Donāt know the specifics. Just know that it is so. It is the reason why these treatments have been delayed from coming to the market. Maybe you can tell me the specifics? The cannabis plant and human stem cells cannot be patent and therefore Big Pharma cannot make the money they do on their garbage drugs. Great system. Delay therapies from coming to the market because you cannot gain control of it and exercise your monopoly power. Meanwhile the public suffers.
Itās lose not loose, brick.
Well, you have corrected a minor spelling error. So you arenāt completely useless.
Itās like the 3rd time Iāve pointed this out to youā¦
My hero!
Sums up so much of your empty speeches. Donāt know much.
Cannabis plants can be patented.
http://cannabissativainc.com/cannabis-sativa-inc-awarded-patent-ecuadorian-sativa-cannabis-plant/
But the plant has to have some new or novel properties, not just āthis weed gets you really high!ā or āthis plant (charlottes web) doesnāt.ā.
Then maybe you have answers genius. Why did Big Pharma lobby against medicinal cannabis?
So the plant canāt be copied. Like Marinol the patent wonāt be as effective as the natural plant as the entourage effect wonāt be as efficient.
Tell me, why do you think Big Pharma lobbied against itās legalization?
In addition, this patent was grated 20 years after the legalization of marijuana in California. Why so long?
Thatās not how contractions work.
Well we do, but you wonāt listen to anything that goes against your bias.
Iāve said it before, youāre a living illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.
You donāt have ANY experience in research of any kind, and you donāt have ANY experience making corporate decisions at any level let alone a high one, but you feel confident berating others for having more experience in one or more of these areas and more informed opinions than yours based on years of experience when you have exactly zero.
If you want to criticize others for lacking corporate experience I suggest you post your extensive resumeā¦but you canāt because you donāt have any.
Youāre welcome to whatever opinions you want, but youāre not welcome to call your uninformed opinions āevidence basedā.
Again, why did Big Pharma lobby against itās legalization?
So again, why was medicinal cannabis lobbied against by Big Pharma?
Thatās still not how contractions work. If youāre going to call everyone who disagrees with you dumb, perhaps proofread your posts for errors. You seem less superior than us un-woke peasants when you canāt execute on grammar.
You only point out his grammatical errors because you loose every debate because you have no answers, derelict.
Iām blinded by my grammar.