Betrayal: The Autoimmune Solution They're Not Telling You

Doubtful, I imagine they hold their money pretty tightly.

How does this work?

Why would a plant not be covered under a plant patent, or the process by which a stem cells are prepared for use not be covered by a utility patent?

If treatments that are more effective with less side effects and can’t be patent come to market, it will be the beginning of the end of their tyranny.

Don’t know the specifics. Just know that it is so. It is the reason why these treatments have been delayed from coming to the market. Maybe you can tell me the specifics? The cannabis plant and human stem cells cannot be patent and therefore Big Pharma cannot make the money they do on their garbage drugs. Great system. Delay therapies from coming to the market because you cannot gain control of it and exercise your monopoly power. Meanwhile the public suffers.

It’s lose not loose, brick.

Well, you have corrected a minor spelling error. So you aren’t completely useless.

It’s like the 3rd time I’ve pointed this out to you…

My hero!

Sums up so much of your empty speeches. Don’t know much.

1 Like

Cannabis plants can be patented.
http://cannabissativainc.com/cannabis-sativa-inc-awarded-patent-ecuadorian-sativa-cannabis-plant/

But the plant has to have some new or novel properties, not just ā€œthis weed gets you really high!ā€ or ā€œthis plant (charlottes web) doesn’t.ā€.

Then maybe you have answers genius. Why did Big Pharma lobby against medicinal cannabis?

So the plant can’t be copied. Like Marinol the patent won’t be as effective as the natural plant as the entourage effect won’t be as efficient.

Tell me, why do you think Big Pharma lobbied against it’s legalization?

In addition, this patent was grated 20 years after the legalization of marijuana in California. Why so long?

That’s not how contractions work.

1 Like

Well we do, but you won’t listen to anything that goes against your bias.

I’ve said it before, you’re a living illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

You don’t have ANY experience in research of any kind, and you don’t have ANY experience making corporate decisions at any level let alone a high one, but you feel confident berating others for having more experience in one or more of these areas and more informed opinions than yours based on years of experience when you have exactly zero.

If you want to criticize others for lacking corporate experience I suggest you post your extensive resume…but you can’t because you don’t have any.

You’re welcome to whatever opinions you want, but you’re not welcome to call your uninformed opinions ā€œevidence basedā€.

Again, why did Big Pharma lobby against it’s legalization?

So again, why was medicinal cannabis lobbied against by Big Pharma?

That’s still not how contractions work. If you’re going to call everyone who disagrees with you dumb, perhaps proofread your posts for errors. You seem less superior than us un-woke peasants when you can’t execute on grammar.

1 Like

You only point out his grammatical errors because you loose every debate because you have no answers, derelict.

2 Likes

I’m blinded by my grammar.

4 Likes