BenGals Cheerleader Indicted for Sex With Teen

[quote]waldo21212 wrote:

[/quote]

Haha I was going to post that, good episode.

However, I agree with Jewbacca. While I’m sure at that age I would’ve loved to do it too, it is wrong. A much more mature person in a position of authority taking advantage of an immature teenager with raging hormones. What if it was a male 34 year old teacher and a 16 year old girl?

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]niksamaras wrote:
How fucking hot must that mothafucking kid be in order for her to want to have sex with him? I want to see that kid.

No homo.[/quote]
I don’t know dude, that was a little too homo to claim no homo.[/quote]

Well, as long as I don’t look him in the eyes or kiss him it is not gay.

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

I agree because not all kids are the same some 16 yr old kids are not mature enough to be trusted to flush a toilet an yet some could manage the family budget. As a teacher she should be protecting as well as educating these kids.

But at 16 if she was my teacher and put it on the table. I would have hit that into coma.

[quote]niksamaras wrote:
Well, as long as I don’t look him in the eyes or kiss him it is not gay.[/quote]

Still quite gay…

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

I agree because not all kids are the same some 16 yr old kids are not mature enough to be trusted to flush a toilet an yet some could manage the family budget. As a teacher she should be protecting as well as educating these kids.

But at 16 if she was my teacher and put it on the table. I would have hit that into coma. [/quote]

Yup.

Most likely yours.

[quote]PimpBot5000 wrote:

[quote]niksamaras wrote:
Well, as long as I don’t look him in the eyes or kiss him it is not gay.[/quote]

Still quite gay…[/quote]

Excuse me?

Everyone knows that as long as you dont make eye contact its not gay!

Or if it happens when you are in college!

Or drunk!

[quote]niksamaras wrote:

[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:

[quote]niksamaras wrote:
How fucking hot must that mothafucking kid be in order for her to want to have sex with him? I want to see that kid.

No homo.[/quote]
I don’t know dude, that was a little too homo to claim no homo.[/quote]

Well, as long as I don’t look him in the eyes or kiss him it is not gay.[/quote]
.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]PimpBot5000 wrote:

[quote]niksamaras wrote:
Well, as long as I don’t look him in the eyes or kiss him it is not gay.[/quote]

Still quite gay…[/quote]

Excuse me?

Everyone knows that as long as you dont make eye contact its not gay!

Or if it happens when you are in college!

Or drunk!

[/quote]

To quote the great philosopher Matthew Lillard: “If there is a chick anywhere in the room, it is not gay.”

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]PimpBot5000 wrote:

[quote]niksamaras wrote:
Well, as long as I don’t look him in the eyes or kiss him it is not gay.[/quote]

Still quite gay…[/quote]

Excuse me?

Everyone knows that as long as you dont make eye contact its not gay!

Or if it happens when you are in college!

Or drunk!

[/quote]
It’s called “experimenting”.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

I agree because not all kids are the same some 16 yr old kids are not mature enough to be trusted to flush a toilet an yet some could manage the family budget. As a teacher she should be protecting as well as educating these kids.

But at 16 if she was my teacher and put it on the table. I would have hit that into coma. [/quote]

Yup.

Most likely yours.[/quote]

And woke up talking like Forrest Gump.

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]PimpBot5000 wrote:

[quote]niksamaras wrote:
Well, as long as I don’t look him in the eyes or kiss him it is not gay.[/quote]

Still quite gay…[/quote]

Excuse me?

Everyone knows that as long as you dont make eye contact its not gay!

Or if it happens when you are in college!

Or drunk!

[/quote]
It’s called “experimenting”.[/quote]

I thought that that report whose name somehow escapes me, Masters, Kinsley, Kinsey, both?

I dont know, but that “experimenting” thing seems to happen a lot.

So, what I am putting out there, what if you experiment and decide that you dont care for it?

How gay are you?

That whole topic is interesting insofar, as there are whole cultures where you are not gay if you penetrate a man, but you are if you take on a more “feminine” role.

For them it is about roles assigned to biological gender, men having sex in and of itself is more or less meh.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

I agree because not all kids are the same some 16 yr old kids are not mature enough to be trusted to flush a toilet an yet some could manage the family budget. As a teacher she should be protecting as well as educating these kids.

But at 16 if she was my teacher and put it on the table. I would have hit that into coma. [/quote]

Yup.

Most likely yours.[/quote]

And woke up talking like Forrest Gump.
[/quote]

A small price to pay and I would have paid it with interest.

edit: Wait, if a 16 year old started to talk like Forrest Gump,how would you know?

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

The mature adult part of me agrees with you whole-heartedly.

However, my dick says “STFU!!!”
[/quote]

Fair enough![/quote]

No doubt is is extremely wrong. A 34 year old authority figure had sex with one of their 16 year old subjects. It is also every kids dream.
[/quote]

Right, because as soon as the clock hit’s 12:01 and they turn 18, a magical fairy waves her wand and grants them maturity… Please, kids are having sex at the age of 13-14, it has been like this since humans have walked on this earth. If they both volunteered to have intercourse together, then I don’t see the problem. Now if she used her authority as a teacher to force the kid (Yeah right!!) into have a relationship with her, then she should be punished appropriately.

[quote]Hellfrost wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

The mature adult part of me agrees with you whole-heartedly.

However, my dick says “STFU!!!”
[/quote]

Fair enough![/quote]

No doubt is is extremely wrong. A 34 year old authority figure had sex with one of their 16 year old subjects. It is also every kids dream.
[/quote]

Right, because as soon as the clock hit’s 12:01 and they turn 18, a magical fairy waves her wand and grants them maturity… Please, kids are having sex at the age of 13-14, it has been like this since humans have walked on this earth. If they both volunteered to have intercourse together, then I don’t see the problem. Now if she used her authority as a teacher to force the kid (Yeah right!!) into have a relationship with her, then she should be punished appropriately. [/quote]

There’s a HUGE difference between fucking a 16yo teenager and a fucking a 34 year old WOMAN.

[quote]Hellfrost wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

The mature adult part of me agrees with you whole-heartedly.

However, my dick says “STFU!!!”
[/quote]

Fair enough![/quote]

No doubt is is extremely wrong. A 34 year old authority figure had sex with one of their 16 year old subjects. It is also every kids dream.
[/quote]

Right, because as soon as the clock hit’s 12:01 and they turn 18, a magical fairy waves her wand and grants them maturity… Please, kids are having sex at the age of 13-14, it has been like this since humans have walked on this earth. If they both volunteered to have intercourse together, then I don’t see the problem. Now if she used her authority as a teacher to force the kid (Yeah right!!) into have a relationship with her, then she should be punished appropriately. [/quote]

Would you feel the same if the teacher was a 34yr old male and the kid a female?

I just want to say I think that chick is a very genetically average looking woman who works REALLY hard to look good.
I respect that and yes I’d bang. I actually prefer the beauty who doesn’t have to work at it though.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Hellfrost wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

The mature adult part of me agrees with you whole-heartedly.

However, my dick says “STFU!!!”
[/quote]

Fair enough![/quote]

No doubt is is extremely wrong. A 34 year old authority figure had sex with one of their 16 year old subjects. It is also every kids dream.
[/quote]

Right, because as soon as the clock hit’s 12:01 and they turn 18, a magical fairy waves her wand and grants them maturity… Please, kids are having sex at the age of 13-14, it has been like this since humans have walked on this earth. If they both volunteered to have intercourse together, then I don’t see the problem. Now if she used her authority as a teacher to force the kid (Yeah right!!) into have a relationship with her, then she should be punished appropriately. [/quote]

Would you feel the same if the teacher was a 34yr old male and the kid a female?[/quote]

Exactly. Im sure this 16 year old kid’s parents trusted his teacher to act in a professional way and educate (lol, take that however you want i guess) their child. Not to take advantage of him sexually. And yes, when a 34 year old fucks a 16 year old, it is taking advantage of. it doesn’t make it any different because she is hot.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

I agree because not all kids are the same some 16 yr old kids are not mature enough to be trusted to flush a toilet an yet some could manage the family budget. As a teacher she should be protecting as well as educating these kids.

But at 16 if she was my teacher and put it on the table. I would have hit that into coma. [/quote]

Yup.

Most likely yours.[/quote]

And woke up talking like Forrest Gump.
[/quote]

HauÊ»oli kÄ?ia hui Ê»ana o kÄ?ua

No hea mai ʻoe?

Who ever said that this teacher was mature? Just because she is 34 doesn’t mean she has grown up and is mentally mature.

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Hellfrost wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Am I the only one to find what she did very wrong?

And chiefly because, at 16, I had zero ability to control myself hormonally. So, yes, if this woman decided she wanted to have sex with me, I would have “hit that like the fist of an angry god” to quote the picture. I would have also fallen madly in (what I would have thought was) love.

And, at 16, probably like most men, I was also not ready for the emotional connection, nor, G-d forbid, a child.

To answer the question “why” : I think she did this because she wanted someone she could control, as she is out of control in her own life.[/quote]

The mature adult part of me agrees with you whole-heartedly.

However, my dick says “STFU!!!”
[/quote]

Fair enough![/quote]

No doubt is is extremely wrong. A 34 year old authority figure had sex with one of their 16 year old subjects. It is also every kids dream.
[/quote]

Right, because as soon as the clock hit’s 12:01 and they turn 18, a magical fairy waves her wand and grants them maturity… Please, kids are having sex at the age of 13-14, it has been like this since humans have walked on this earth. If they both volunteered to have intercourse together, then I don’t see the problem. Now if she used her authority as a teacher to force the kid (Yeah right!!) into have a relationship with her, then she should be punished appropriately. [/quote]

Would you feel the same if the teacher was a 34yr old male and the kid a female?[/quote]

Exactly. Im sure this 16 year old kid’s parents trusted his teacher to act in a professional way and educate (lol, take that however you want i guess) their child. Not to take advantage of him sexually. And yes, when a 34 year old fucks a 16 year old, it is taking advantage of. it doesn’t make it any different because she is hot.
[/quote]

So what is the difference between a 16 year old and an 18 year old in this case? A lot of states have age of consent at like 16. Would it have better if the kid was 18?