Who brought up George? I don’t think the original poster did.
Man, some people are so touchy when anything is said that’s remotely related to GW.
I don’t like any politicians, but my views about Barbara’s statements have nothing to do with my dislike of them.
I’d feel the same if it were any ignorant person making those comments (ignorant to what she’s talking about, not ignorant in general).
If I heard Clinton saying anything about the tragity, I would think everything coming out of his mouth was complete BS too (I mean, come on, you can tell when any of these politicians speak that they are full of it).
[quote]rainjack wrote:
SWR-1222D wrote:
I thought this was about BARBARA Bush???
Who brought up George? I don’t think the original poster did.
Man, some people are so touchy when anything is said that’s remotely related to GW.
You didn’t read the first sentence of the link, did you? Evidently not, or you wouldn’t have had to ask that question.
Got Reading Lessons?
[/quote]
HAHAHA, LOL!
Okay, here’s the first sentence:
“Check this article out.”
Okay, now here’s the second sentence:
“This stupid cunt who has lived nothing but the high life since she was born, who lived a poor person’s dream of going to boarding school, gettin all she wanted, and marrying another cocksucker millionaire, SHE has all the authority in the world to even remotely talk about the poor.”
Okay, now for the third sentence:
““ITS WORKING OUT VERY WELL FOR THEM???””
And the fourth:
“This stupid bitch should be put in their position, waiting and praying for word from a loved one.”
Now after re-reading the post, I do realise that GW was brought up in the FIFTH sentence.
[quote]SWR-1222D wrote:
rainjack wrote:
SWR-1222D wrote:
I thought this was about BARBARA Bush???
Who brought up George? I don’t think the original poster did.
Man, some people are so touchy when anything is said that’s remotely related to GW.
You didn’t read the first sentence of the link, did you? Evidently not, or you wouldn’t have had to ask that question.
Got Reading Lessons?
HAHAHA, LOL!
Okay, here’s the first sentence:
“Check this article out.”
Okay, now here’s the second sentence:
“This stupid cunt who has lived nothing but the high life since she was born, who lived a poor person’s dream of going to boarding school, gettin all she wanted, and marrying another cocksucker millionaire, SHE has all the authority in the world to even remotely talk about the poor.”
Okay, now for the third sentence:
““ITS WORKING OUT VERY WELL FOR THEM???””
And the fourth:
“This stupid bitch should be put in their position, waiting and praying for word from a loved one.”
Now after re-reading the post, I do realise that GW was brought up in the FIFTH sentence.
Do you know any good reading teachers?
Obviously we both need the lessons.[/quote]
In all fairness, he’s talking about the first sentence in the article. Not the first sentence from the poster.
