Bad Ideas

Training
569

You know what?? That’s an excellent point. Much as Robert Downey Jr really IS Tony Stark, so Christian Bale really IS Bruce Wayne.

I’m sure I’ve seen it put more eloquently elsewhere, but the key to a good superhero is getting people to care about the alter ego…not the superhero.

It’s one of the reasons that the Hulk has had mixed success on the big screen. Eric Bana, while a good actor, was not a good Bruce Banner. Edward Norton could have been, had he been allowed to spread his wings a little more, but he was still better than Bana.

Mark Ruffalo…to his credit, did the smart thing and played Banner the way he SHOULD be played…very similarly to the way Bill Bixby portrayed him in the TV series. See…Lou Ferrigno wasn’t as much a great Hulk as Bixby was a PHENOMENAL Banner. People fail to understand that. You cared about Banner in the series…ergo, you loved it when he truned into the Hulk. Ruffalo plays him the same way, and so you get a much better result in the end.

Hence, my concern for the upcoming Batman film. Affleck is a decent actor, honestly. The question is, can he make you give a damn about Bruce Wayne??? We shall see…

570

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]mapwhap wrote:
This is probably one of the most eclectic threads you’re likely to come across on this site. Take an hour or so and read through the whole thing. We jump around a lot, but it’s all good stuff.[/quote]

Yep, a lot of ground got covered in this one.

Batman Begins FTW. Christian Bale isn’t so much the best Batman as he is the best Bruce Wayne, which is the key.[/quote]

I had an aha moment when I read this.

Well played, Sir.

571

[quote]idaho wrote:
I was not allowed to take pictures of the interior of the Bushmaster due to OPSEC for their electronic systems. [/quote]

So they don’t want images of all the next-gen didgeridoos and those whirring things Crocodile Dundee used to be released yet. Makes sense…

The vehicle does look a lot more “user friendly” than the MRAP, of course that was kind of a stop gap, need it now, kind of affair.

So questions about the Steyr rifles:

How did they like them?

What is your opinion?

Do they present issues with shooting on the “off” shoulder? This seems to be one of the most persistent and valid criticisms of bullpups in general.

Would you ever prefer one over you M-6?

Thanks for posting.

Regards,

Robert A

572

800×600 65.2 KB

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Hey Idaho, how’s your personal training going?

I really wish you’d start a log. I’d be interested in seeing how you integrated sport fighting and combatives with your crazy ass schedule and military duties.[/quote]

Irish,
I apologize for the delay, I have been up in the Kabul area this past 5 days. Brother, I am suffering from sparring partner withdrawl since the Belgiums left last month. I had been training with two guys who were doing “Dutch Kickboxing”, which was a like blend of MT and western boxing, but, didnt really follow either one. Something different, I guess.

2014 was the most fucked training year I have had in a long time, mainly because I have been bounced to 4 different posts. I have trained with some Hungarians a few months on some type of Kempo, Jits with some SF guys, wrestling with some steppe Mongols ( sucked at that) and worked on my own. I really dont have a gym to set a routine in stone, so I decided to make a priority list and make sure that I tried to complete the list each week:

30 x 3 minute rounds of shadowboxing
30 x 3 minute rounds on heavy bag, pads or whatever is available (picture)

20 minutes of Katas a day. (TWD/Kali)

deadlifts twice a week
box squats twice a week
Lat and rotor cuff work twice a week

Cardio is a pick as you go where you are, rope skipping, stationary bike, bag work, ruck walks, etc.

Actually my training this last year has looked a lot like this: Total Athleticism: The Workout

Now for a little humor, this is what I am reduced to using until I can find something better. Even filled with sand, I believe they are better used to illustrate techinques than actually punching. And yes, since this all I have have right now, I am trying to learn how to use rings (LOL, not doing well either)

I have learned a lot from you, Sento, Robert, LB 123 and Donny on all the comments concerning punch techniques for Lofterman, good stuff.

573

800×600 91.6 KB

I have no chance at the summer games…

574

[quote]Robert A wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:
I was not allowed to take pictures of the interior of the Bushmaster due to OPSEC for their electronic systems. [/quote]

So they don’t want images of all the next-gen didgeridoos and those whirring things Crocodile Dundee used to be released yet. Makes sense…

The vehicle does look a lot more “user friendly” than the MRAP, of course that was kind of a stop gap, need it now, kind of affair.

So questions about the Steyr rifles:

How did they like them?

What is your opinion?

Do they present issues with shooting on the “off” shoulder? This seems to be one of the most persistent and valid criticisms of bullpups in general.

Would you ever prefer one over you M-6?

Thanks for posting.

Regards,

Robert A[/quote]

Robert,
I apologize for the delay, I have been up in the Kabul area the past 5 days. Well, I actually got to do some firing with one (300 + rounds) yesterday. Now, I have never been trained on this carbine/rifle and I am certainly not combat efficient on the system. This is a picture of the model I was shooting, except the stock was green for some reason and the trigger was bright yellow. Talk about a fashion statement.

575

The trigger is a blocky piece of plastic more suited to a kids “SuperSoaker squirt gun” than a combat weapon. It really is something you just have to experience to get the full meaning of the term “trigger squeeze”. I actually believe if someone had never fired a weapon before, would do better, because, if you are used to a decent trigger pull, this will really fuck you up. It can be overcome to the point of combat accuracy, if you have a healthy ammo budget.

576


Trigger:

577


The Bullpup design itself: I like this model better than the older models with the carrying handle and intergal scope. Like you said, I could not shoot them “off hand” being right handed with any sustained degree of accuracy. With an Aimpoint/EoTech, that has helped with that little problem. The pistol grip is ok, fits my little hands well, but, I cannot drop the magazine with first shifting the gun, which is a major problem.

Probaly due to my lack of training on the weapon,but, that magazine release buttton is a major problem for me, because anytime you have to shift your view from the enemy to change a mag, its the time you are going to get shot. The magazine in the rear is not for me, sweeping the gun up into shooting position with body armor, I kept catching the mag on other equipment , like mag pouches, pistol butts, carabineers, med kit, etc… I found myself actually swinging if out from my body, like I was trying to butt stroke someone:)). Again, lack of training on the weapon.

I would not even think about trading one for my M-6. Last month marked a year, I have been carrying the M-6 and I have come to really rely on its accuracy, efficiently and controllability in full auto mode.

The Steyr does have its good points:

According to people who should know and based on my limited experince, it is very reliable, accurate (once you master the trigger) and has extreme durability to work in the most extreme weather conditions.

It is very simple to break down and clean, always a postive for combat.

578

[quote]idaho wrote:
The Bullpup design itself: I like this model better than the older models with the carrying handle and intergal scope. Like you said, I could not shoot them “off hand” being right handed with any sustained degree of accuracy. With an Aimpoint/EoTech, that has helped with that little problem. The pistol grip is ok, fits my little hands well, but, I cannot drop the magazine with first shifting the gun, which is a major problem.

Probaly due to my lack of training on the weapon,but, that magazine release buttton is a major problem for me, because anytime you have to shift your view from the enemy to change a mag, its the time you are going to get shot. The magazine in the rear is not for me, sweeping the gun up into shooting position with body armor, I kept catching the mag on other equipment , like mag pouches, pistol butts, carabineers, med kit, etc… I found myself actually swinging if out from my body, like I was trying to butt stroke someone:)). Again, lack of training on the weapon.

I would not even think about trading one for my M-6. Last month marked a year, I have been carrying the M-6 and I have come to really rely on its accuracy, efficiently and controllability in full auto mode.

The Steyr does have its good points:

According to people who should know and based on my limited experince, it is very reliable, accurate (once you master the trigger) and has extreme durability to work in the most extreme weather conditions.

It is very simple to break down and clean, always a postive for combat.

         [/quote]
579

idaho,

Thank you and no need to apologize.

I am hoping you enjoyed all that sunny Kabul has to offer, well almost all.

Reading about the trigger I was thinking “I carry a Glock, how bad can it be?”, but I am guessing it is something else.

The rail for modern sights makes sense.

Is the brass ejection an issue when shooting “wrong” shouldered? The only video I have seen of someone doing it with a bullpup was Steyr promotional material where the shooter was basically doing the shooting one handed and blocking the ejecting brass with his “strong” hand.

Also, Browning Hi-Powers make great points for being awesome. Even if they aren’t first choice any more. Sort of like 3" .357 revolvers.

Regards,

Robert A

580

[quote]Robert A wrote:
idaho,

Thank you and no need to apologize.

I am hoping you enjoyed all that sunny Kabul has to offer, well almost all.

Reading about the trigger I was thinking “I carry a Glock, how bad can it be?”, but I am guessing it is something else.

The rail for modern sights makes sense.

Is the brass ejection an issue when shooting “wrong” shouldered? The only video I have seen of someone doing it with a bullpup was Steyr promotional material where the shooter was basically doing the shooting one handed and blocking the ejecting brass with his “strong” hand.

Also, Browning Hi-Powers make great points for being awesome. Even if they aren’t first choice any more. Sort of like 3" .357 revolvers.

Regards,

Robert A

[/quote]

I did not have any problem with ejecting brass on this one, but, I only fired it strong shoulder. You are right about off shoulder on the older model. One had to lean the head a certain degree to keep from being splattered with hot brass. If I get access to one again, I will fire it off shoulder and check for improvements and let you know.

Everybody has their own favorites in firearms, but, the Browning Hi-Power is a true classic and one of the finest “feeling” pistols I have ever owned. I have an older (80’s) model that I had throated and the magazine well beveled. If it was in .45, that would be my primary carry pistol, however, one must account for weight in UC carry, just like our 1911’s. Sometimes, I think the modern polymers have turned me into a wimp.

Speaking of firearms, I have soft spot for the classics and have been able to collect a few over the years, well, my version of “classics” anyway. I have a sickness and if I had the resouces, I would be weapons poor. I have added these gems to my small collection:

Colt 1911 .45: Made in 1943 by the Singer Sewing Machine Company, reworked internally by Wilson, original bluing still visible, if a little faded.

1872 Colt Peacemaker. 45 Long Colt: 1970’s model

Ruger Blackhawk .44 mag. : First year production

1876 Winchester Rifle .cal 40-60 : Modern Replica

1894 Winchester Rifle. cal 30-30: Pre-1964

Winchester Model 70. cal 30-06: Pre-1964

Winchester Model 12. 12 gauge: Pre-1964

Fox Double Barrel .12 gauge: Cannot vertify but research on serial number placed it in the late 50’s.

M1 Carbine.30 cal: Korean War Vintage, original.

1898 German Mauser action on a reworked stock for an early version of a military sniper rifle. Action is glass smooth and chambered for the 7.65 Argentine.

Colt Stagecoach .22 rifle: Mid-1970’s

Ruger 10-22 “Deluxe” Model (original checked stock from factory) .22 cal rifle: 80’s

Ruger Speed Six. 357 cal. : not sure that counts:)

Robert or anyone else interested…Got any classics you want to share?

581

As bad as it gets and the nations of this world, should bow their heads in shame for allowing this filth to live:

ISIS Terror: Yazidi Woman Recalls Horrors of Slave Auction

582

Idaho,

I read stories like this, and I shake my head at the levels of depravity that some “humans” are capable of. It’s hard to fathom that not only do some people live that way, but that some ideologies actually preach a lifestyle like that.

These morons actually believe that by reverting back to the Stone Age, that somehow life will be better, and that doing so is what Allah truly wants.

I don’t know what the Koran states about Hell, or if they even have an equivalent. I can only hope that for scum like these, there is literally an eternity of agony awaiting them in the afterlife.

583

[quote]idaho wrote:
As bad as it gets and the nations of this world, should bow their heads in shame for allowing this filth to live:

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/isis-terror-yazidi-woman-recalls-horrors-slave-auction-n305856[/quote]

If anybody ever needed killing, it’s these assholes.

584

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:
As bad as it gets and the nations of this world, should bow their heads in shame for allowing this filth to live:

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/isis-terror-yazidi-woman-recalls-horrors-slave-auction-n305856[/quote]

If anybody ever needed killing, it’s these assholes.[/quote]

Agreed. These people are right up there with the Nazis, Khmer Rouge, and Spanish Inquisition among the worst death cults in recorded history. I’m all for diplomacy when it’s a viable option, but these whack is are beyond reasoning with. Since we were discussing Christopher Nolan’s Batman series I think a quote from TDK is appropriate and accurate about the situation with ISIL, “Because some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the World burn.”

585

[quote]mapwhap wrote:
Idaho,

I read stories like this, and I shake my head at the levels of depravity that some “humans” are capable of. It’s hard to fathom that not only do some people live that way, but that some ideologies actually preach a lifestyle like that.

These morons actually believe that by reverting back to the Stone Age, that somehow life will be better, and that doing so is what Allah truly wants.

I don’t know what the Koran states about Hell, or if they even have an equivalent. I can only hope that for scum like these, there is literally an eternity of agony awaiting them in the afterlife.[/quote]

I think it’s important to separate these monsters from the actual Muslim religion though, just as the KKK and Spanish Inquisition are/were not truly representative of actual Christianity. These people are sadistic psychopaths who are simply twisting and manipulating the words of the Koran to justify their depravity because they understand the power that religion can have over people. Calling them Muslims is just giving their position legitimacy and worse creating undeserved hatred towards the billion peaceful members of that religion who are not burning people alive or beheading them.

586

I would be in for a mass extermination of IS and those that harbor or assist them. I hold those that assist in the same regard. Throughout history we have examples of periods of time where early action would save a lot of pain and suffering, we are again at one of those points in time. I hope that the other nations of the middle east get off there asses and get with the plan Jordan and Egypt can not do it alone. Really getting tired of the Saudis, to them I would say SDSTFU or be labeled as harboring terrorists.

587

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:

[quote]mapwhap wrote:
Idaho,

I read stories like this, and I shake my head at the levels of depravity that some “humans” are capable of. It’s hard to fathom that not only do some people live that way, but that some ideologies actually preach a lifestyle like that.

These morons actually believe that by reverting back to the Stone Age, that somehow life will be better, and that doing so is what Allah truly wants.

I don’t know what the Koran states about Hell, or if they even have an equivalent. I can only hope that for scum like these, there is literally an eternity of agony awaiting them in the afterlife.[/quote]

I think it’s important to separate these monsters from the actual Muslim religion though, just as the KKK and Spanish Inquisition are/were not truly representative of actual Christianity. These people are sadistic psychopaths who are simply twisting and manipulating the words of the Koran to justify their depravity because they understand the power that religion can have over people. Calling them Muslims is just giving their position legitimacy and worse creating undeserved hatred towards the billion peaceful members of that religion who are not burning people alive or beheading them.[/quote]

Absolutely, sir. I certainly don’t count ALL Muslims among their ranks.

588

Robert,
Have not seen anything from you lately, I sincerely hope you and yours are doing well. Just check in when you get some time.

Mapwrap,
Same for you. The way things are going for LEO’s in the states, I believe , I am safer where I am. I hope you and yours are well, check in when you get some down time.