Have to chime in here. I had this discussion with unreal a few months ago and I provided information on how studies showing this are flawed in setup. 15-20% is not correct and absolutely not with “the most rigorous of dietary intervention”. I’ll link it if I find it.
Edit: here
Unreal was once known to link studies to a large part of his posts. He knows how to read studies and he knows these databases well as far as I can see.
This is nice to know but of no worth in a forum like this. Being a medical professional does not qualify statements on here, correct statements qualify themselves. “Appeal to authority” may be a nice debate method but is of no worth for the quality of argument. If I’m reading your statements and they are shit, they are no matter who or what you are. A 19 year old good reader is of the same worth as a medical professional of 20 years because it’s not about who but about what someone says.
The last good appeal to authority was provided by a guy called physiolojik who later became known for being a scammer not a professional. Not saying this is the case for you obviously.