Right. Some cop in Virginia was acting on orders from the “new regime”. Gotcha.
Here’s your card.
[quote]tme wrote:
Right. Some cop in Virginia was acting on orders from the “new regime”. Gotcha.
Here’s your card.
[/quote]
I never said he was, but since you seem so smart about the political environment and the prevailing attitudes of people at this point in time, explain to me how the cop in that video did not attack a private citizens ability to speak out against his government or express himself.
An explanation of what that cop meant by “This ain’t America no more” would be good too.
Ya know, just to assuage the fears of a right wing nut like my self, and because it seems a little more challenging than some glib response which assumes something that wan not stated.
That should be easy for someone as politically savvy and intelligent as yourself.
[quote]tom63 wrote:
jawara wrote:
HG Thrower wrote:
Yep, this piece of shit has been in the works for a while. This new version is even more vague, and open to interpretation/abuse. Can you imagine the hysteria that would ensue if this was proposed under a Republican administration?
Yeah, they’d call them Nazi’s.What i still don’t get is why is it that we have a guy in office with moves straight out of the Nazi playbook, but if you call him a Nazi or speak out against him your a racist???
Exactly![/quote]
No not exactly. It doesnt make them racist, just unbelievably stupid.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Oh Yeah?
Well get an eyefull of the enforcers for your new regime, you forward thinking genius.
[/quote]
Sorry, which part of that didn’t you say? Either you called him an “enforcer for your new regime” or you didn’t, but I think it’s pretty clear you did.
The video doesn’t show what the guy with the sign did to piss that cop off, he may have been asking for a beat down for all I know. I really doubt that it was all about the message on the sign, though.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
tom63 wrote:
Makavali wrote:
ephrem wrote:
This needs to be posted in nearly every thread started by these clowns. Comparing ANYONE to Hitler is pretty lulz.
The Nazi stuff was started by the left with Reagan and was silly then. It was applied to both Bushes, so now people are crying when the Dems are being called Nazis. It’s about time. Their beliefs are very similar. They put through a gun control law in 1968 in this country that is almost word for word a copy of the Nazi weapons law.
They are the party of similar ideas. I’ve never seen a commie or fascist or socialist regime, promote gun ownership, lower taxes ( the lynch pin of individual freedom), where to work, what to work and how to work.
It’s about time the left is called Nazis by some, because Nazism isn’t being a big meanie pants guy you don’t like. It’s a specific way to take away freedoms. the only thing the left does to promote freedom is in regards to abortion.
So those plans to kill 6,000,000+ people for inferior genes are definately on the table for the Obama Administration?
Reagan wasn’t a Nazi, Clinton wasn’t a Nazi, hell none of your fucking Presidents were Nazis. Let’s cut that shit out now. If you have a legitimate concern (which you don’t - the moment any administration pushes it too far you’d have mass revolts), then address it instead of going “zomg tey is teh nazees”.[/quote]
They have the same ideology, get it. I posted a law that was copied into US law, word for word. It was a Nazi law. the left did it. They copied a Nazi law into US law. Do I have to post this 6 times so your nitwhit ass understands this? They’ve made hay with calling any conservative Nazis for year, before your dumbass was born, get it.
So now they’re squealing with being called Nazis and I enjoy it. Show em a US law where the right got a copy of a Nazi law and word for word plagiarized it and wrote it into US law.
You won’t find one. Go smoke your dope, but some faggy jeans and sponge off your folks. I’m sure you’re good at all that stuff.
[quote]John S. wrote:
So my legitimate concern that is on the table know one on the left wants to talk about? Silly things these facts.[/quote]
Has anyone mentioned cyberterrorism? My guess would be that this bill is proposed in case there is a rampant virus or something. North Korea does a lot of stuff like this actually.
My thought is theirs probably nothing to worry about. Their are worse things to lose than the internet.
[quote]Schlenkatank wrote:
John S. wrote:
So my legitimate concern that is on the table know one on the left wants to talk about? Silly things these facts.
Has anyone mentioned cyberterrorism? My guess would be that this bill is proposed in case there is a rampant virus or something. North Korea does a lot of stuff like this actually.
My thought is theirs probably nothing to worry about. Their are worse things to lose than the internet.[/quote]
This bill would give him immediate control over the internet. The ability to take over private sector. This bill has nothing to do with cyberterrorism. How can you act so sheepishly to this?
[quote]Schlenkatank wrote:
John S. wrote:
So my legitimate concern that is on the table know one on the left wants to talk about? Silly things these facts.
Has anyone mentioned cyberterrorism? My guess would be that this bill is proposed in case there is a rampant virus or something. North Korea does a lot of stuff like this actually.
My thought is theirs probably nothing to worry about. Their are worse things to lose than the internet.[/quote]
Yeah, the internet is only the greatest tool to freedom of speech since the Gutenberg Press. No big loss there.
mike
OMG!11!!! Obama is a SUPER NAZI!!1!!
[quote]John S. wrote:
Schlenkatank wrote:
John S. wrote:
So my legitimate concern that is on the table know one on the left wants to talk about? Silly things these facts.
Has anyone mentioned cyberterrorism? My guess would be that this bill is proposed in case there is a rampant virus or something. North Korea does a lot of stuff like this actually.
My thought is theirs probably nothing to worry about. Their are worse things to lose than the internet.
This bill would give him immediate control over the internet. The ability to take over private sector. This bill has nothing to do with cyberterrorism. How can you act so sheepishly to this?[/quote]
Why does it have nothing to do with cyberterrorism? I think it probably has EVERYTHING to do with that. Why doesn’t someone find out the purpose of the bill?
Frankly man, Obama is not going to take over anything concerning the internet unless there is a safety concern. I’m not sure why you are so afraid about this.
[quote]Why does it have nothing to do with cyberterrorism? I think it probably has EVERYTHING to do with that. Why doesn’t someone find out the purpose of the bill?
Frankly man, Obama is not going to take over anything concerning the internet unless there is a safety concern. I’m not sure why you are so afraid about this.[/quote]
For the same reason the Patriot Act was and is scary fing shit. Yes, it has a purpose, but that does not make it right.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
tom63 wrote:
Makavali wrote:
ephrem wrote:
This needs to be posted in nearly every thread started by these clowns. Comparing ANYONE to Hitler is pretty lulz.
The Nazi stuff was started by the left with Reagan and was silly then. It was applied to both Bushes, so now people are crying when the Dems are being called Nazis. It’s about time. Their beliefs are very similar. They put through a gun control law in 1968 in this country that is almost word for word a copy of the Nazi weapons law.
They are the party of similar ideas. I’ve never seen a commie or fascist or socialist regime, promote gun ownership, lower taxes ( the lynch pin of individual freedom), where to work, what to work and how to work.
It’s about time the left is called Nazis by some, because Nazism isn’t being a big meanie pants guy you don’t like. It’s a specific way to take away freedoms. the only thing the left does to promote freedom is in regards to abortion.
So those plans to kill 6,000,000+ people for inferior genes are definately on the table for the Obama Administration?
Reagan wasn’t a Nazi, Clinton wasn’t a Nazi, hell none of your fucking Presidents were Nazis. Let’s cut that shit out now. If you have a legitimate concern (which you don’t - the moment any administration pushes it too far you’d have mass revolts), then address it instead of going “zomg tey is teh nazees”.[/quote]
no 6 million innocent fetuses, disabled vets and people over 65.
open the can and the worms will crawl out.
[quote]Mikeyali wrote:
Schlenkatank wrote:
John S. wrote:
So my legitimate concern that is on the table know one on the left wants to talk about? Silly things these facts.
Has anyone mentioned cyberterrorism? My guess would be that this bill is proposed in case there is a rampant virus or something. North Korea does a lot of stuff like this actually.
My thought is theirs probably nothing to worry about. Their are worse things to lose than the internet.
Yeah, the internet is only the greatest tool to freedom of speech since the Gutenberg Press. No big loss there.
mike[/quote]
Yes, what would we do without internet for several days while a critical issue was being fixed? Umm, I dunno… read a newspaper? Watch t.v.? Shop in a local store that ACTUALLY supports the economy???
It is possible to promote policies that were key planks in the platform of the national socialist party of 1930’s Germany short of overt genocide and to therefore warrant the comparison to that extent.
The charge of Nazism requires immediate qualification because all anybody remembers about the Nazis is the final solution which is something nobody is accusing anybody of. However, there was much more to Nazi policy than the wholesale extermination of inferior races.
Limbaugh has specifically rebuked at least one caller specifically for his comparison of Obama to Hitler. Beck, in his most ardent diatribes ALWAYS includes the appropriate qualifications anytime Hitler or the Nazis are mentioned on his show to name a couple of major voices. Even Hannity, who may be the least responsible major conservative at the moment still dials it back a bit, though he needs to be reminded on occasion.
Ad hominem arguments on their face don’t hold water. I’m pretty sure the Nazis believed that Germany was north of Italy which doesn’t make it not so, but some of the insidious practices and policies employed by them to gain a stranglehold on German society are held by some of these terrifying czars Obama is up to his armpits in.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
ephrem wrote:
This needs to be posted in nearly every thread started by these clowns. Comparing ANYONE to Hitler is pretty lulz.[/quote]
Stalin? Pol Pot? Mao? Attila the Hun? Ivan the terrible? Lincoln?
[quote]MikeyKBiatch wrote:
Why does it have nothing to do with cyberterrorism? I think it probably has EVERYTHING to do with that. Why doesn’t someone find out the purpose of the bill?
Frankly man, Obama is not going to take over anything concerning the internet unless there is a safety concern. I’m not sure why you are so afraid about this.
For the same reason the Patriot Act was and is scary fing shit. Yes, it has a purpose, but that does not make it right. [/quote]
Do you know how long German and Austrian “Ermächtigungsgesetze” slumbered in our law books until they were activated by you know who?
In part for 3-4 decades. The chancellor had the power in some sort of emergency to release executive edicts instead of laws made by the parliament.
It all was already there, it was just waiting for someone to declare an emergency.
This is somewhere between hilarious and frightening.
Definition of a Fascist- A conservative who is winning an argument.
[quote]Schlenkatank wrote:
…some stuff that will help him be one of the “boss jews” when we go to the camps…
[/quote]
mike
[quote]orion wrote:
Makavali wrote:
ephrem wrote:
This needs to be posted in nearly every thread started by these clowns. Comparing ANYONE to Hitler is pretty lulz.
Stalin? Pol Pot? Mao? Attila the Hun? Ivan the terrible? Lincoln?[/quote]
In the context of this thread, lets say what I meant by “anyone” was any American President.
[quote]JEATON wrote:
Definition of a Fascist- A conservative who is winning an argument. [/quote]
Amazing insight.
And from a guy with a fake pic of Nikola Tesla as his avatar.