Atheism-o-phobia Part 2

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

In the case of the Bible, though, the central premises are so outlandish that there really is no burden to disprove them. Whereas, there certainly is a burden of proof upon its proponents.

[/quote]

LOL, very transparent way to try to get out of proving the Bible is wrong. If you’re not up to proving that the Bible is wrong why don’t you go ahead and explain electricity, nuclear science, quantum physics and brain surgery to me. Some think that those things are so outlandish that they can’t be real. At least the ignorant think that way.
[/quote]

The difference between electricity, nuclear science, quantum physics and brain surgery and the central claims of the Bible is that electricity, nuclear science, quantum physics and brain surgery all have results and/or evidence of their existence or efficacy that can be observed, tested and repeated.[/quote]

Oh I’m sorry I didn’t think I had to explain the comparison. You see the things above and the Bible have in common this: Simply because they are not understood by someone (or large groups of people) does not mean that they are to be laughed at mocked, or simply dismissed. This may come as a surprise but humans don’t know everything. WOW—you okay? In fact it seems that science changes every few years. Remember pluto? Enough said?

As far as God, Christ and the Bible I’ve said many times that it takes faith. As the Bible says it is impossible to please God without faith. If someone sets out to prove the existence of God it will only end in frustration as faith is the key ingredient. I don’t suspect that the Bible would put so much emphasis on faith if it was going to be proven by human standards that there is a God. That would be contradictory now wouldn’t it? At that point I would be questioning the Bible and the rolls here would be reversed.

On a side note, how old are you? I read an interesting article about atheism and young males. Seems that about 90% are young males. Just wondering if you fall into that demographic. No big deal.

Zeb

[/quote]

And, this is where the debate ends. You have decided that “faith” is an acceptable tool for understanding. I will never agree to this.[/quote]

You don’t have to agree to anything, that’s why God gave you free will. The rest is between you and God someday.

[quote]I’m 35, married and have two kids. I didn’t acknowledge my atheism until I was 30… spent most of my life running from it. Reality is some scary shit, so I understand why most people choose religion over it.
[/quote]

You’re going to take the Obama tack I see. Wow you guys are so smart I just shudder in your presence. LOL. How does it go? we stupid people cling to our guns and religion, mostly because we’re scared. Is that it? Ha ha, I think it takes a great deal of courage to step out as a believer. If you don’t think it takes courage to believe in an unseen God then I don’t think you know what courage is. It takes less courage to live your life thinking that someday you will simple cease to exist. How is that courageous? I can do whatever I want in this lifetime, if someone strikes me on the cheek I don’t have to turn the other cheek I’m an atheist I write my own moral code - Bla Bla Bla…I hope you can do better than that. I could make a great argument that you are taking a very short-term gain (not courageous) for a long-term loss.
[/quote]

Go back to the sandbox, Zeb. The adults are having a conversation here.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

Living here, forever = does not sound that appealing.[/quote]

Another point we may just have to agree to disagree on. I kind of like the world that we’ve got going on here. It could use some work, but for the most part It’s bitchin’.
[/quote]

No doubt, but to me Earth and Heaven are like the local movie house. There is an arcade in front before you go into watch the movie. As much fun as the arcade is, that is not really why I am there.[/quote]

I can’t imagine that this universe would ever stop being interesting. It’s arguably infinite in its complexity and opportunities for discovery and progress.

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

Prove it[/quote]

Jesus Christ was as much an historical figure as any who lived thousands of years ago. And the evidence is as clear as those who lived around his time. One does not have to be a believer to acknowledge the fact that Christ lived.

Historical writers mentioning Jesus:
Following is a list of extra biblical (outside of the Bible) references of biblical events, places, etc. The list is not exhaustive but is very representative of what is available.

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?, a Jewish historian) mentions John the Baptist and Herod - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 5, par. 2

“Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod’s army came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to come to baptism; for that the washing [with water] would be acceptable to him, if they made use of it, not in order to the putting away [or the remission] of some sins [only], but for the purification of the body; supposing still that the soul was thoroughly purified beforehand by righteousness.”

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Jesus - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 3, par. 3.

Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, (9) those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; (10) as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.

There is debate among scholars as to the authenticity of this quote since it is so favorable to Jesus. For more information on this, please see Regarding the quotes from the historian Josephus about Jesus

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions James, the brother of Jesus - Antiquities, Book 20, ch. 9.

“Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the sanhedrim of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or, some of his companions]; and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned: but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done.”

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Ananias the High Priest who was mentioned in Acts 23:2

Now as soon as Albinus was come to the city of Jerusalem, he used all his endeavors and care that the country might be kept in peace, and this by destroying many of the Sicarii. But as for the high priest, Ananias (25) he increased in glory every day, and this to a great degree, and had obtained the favor and esteem of the citizens in a signal manner; for he was a great hoarder up of money

Acts 23:2, “And the high priest Ananias commanded those standing beside him to strike him [Paul] on the mouth.”

Tacitus (A.D. c.55-A.D. c.117, Roman historian) mentions “christus” who is Jesus - Annals 15.44

“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.”

Ref. from http://classics.mit.edu/...s/annals.mb.txt

Thallus Circa AD 52, eclipse of the sun. Thallus wrote a history of the Eastern Mediterranean world from the Trojan War to his own time. His writings are only found as citations by others. Julius Africanus who wrote about AD 221 mentioned Thallus’ account of an eclipse of the sun.

“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.”

Is this a reference to the eclipse at the crucifixion? Luke 23:44-45, “And it was now about the sixth hour, and darkness fell over the whole land until the ninth hour, 45 the sun being obscured; and the veil of the temple was torn in two.”

The oddity is that Jesus’ crucifixion occurred at the Passover which was a full moon. It is not possible for a solar eclipse to occur at a full moon. Note that Julius Africanus draws the conclusion that Thallus’ mentioning of the eclipse was describing the one at Jesus’ crucifixion. It may not have been.

Julius Africanus, Extant Writings, XVIII in the Ante?Nicene Fathers, ed. by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1973), vol. VI, p. 130. as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Pliny the Younger mentioned Christ. Pliny was governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor and an avid writer who wrote 10 books.

“They (the Christians) were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food?but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”

Pliny, Letters, transl. by William Melmoth, rev. by W.M.L. Hutchinson (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1935), vol. II, X:96 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

The Talmud

“On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, “He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favor, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.” But since nothing was brought forward in his favor he was hanged on the eve of the Passover!”

Gal. 3:13, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.”

Luke 22:1, “Now the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which is called the Passover, was approaching. 2And the chief priests and the scribes were seeking how they might put Him to death; for they were afraid of the people.”

This quotation was taken from the reading in The Babylonian Talmud, transl. by I. Epstein (London: Soncino, 1935), vol. III, Sanhedrin 43a, p. 281 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Lucian (circa 120-after 180) mentions Jesus. Greek writer and rhetorician.

“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day?the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. . . . You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property.”

Lucian, The Death of Peregrine, 11?13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4, as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Though Lucian opposed Christianity, he acknowledges Jesus, that Jesus was crucified, that Christians worship him, and that this was done by faith.

The historical Jesus is debated by very, very few. You can find people that still believe the world is flat so just because you can find a few in a google search doesn’t mean that they hold much credit, regardless the above listing should answer your question.

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Ha ha, I think it takes a great deal of courage to step out as a believer.[/quote]

Yes it takes courage to be part of the masses.[/quote]

More so than part of the ruling class.
[/quote]

lol

Share whatever drugs you take man, I wanna be that high.[/quote]

Work for a living and then get back to me. Nice cartoon though, like I said just stick to those and you’ll be okay.

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

In the case of the Bible, though, the central premises are so outlandish that there really is no burden to disprove them. Whereas, there certainly is a burden of proof upon its proponents.

[/quote]

LOL, very transparent way to try to get out of proving the Bible is wrong. If you’re not up to proving that the Bible is wrong why don’t you go ahead and explain electricity, nuclear science, quantum physics and brain surgery to me. Some think that those things are so outlandish that they can’t be real. At least the ignorant think that way.
[/quote]

The difference between electricity, nuclear science, quantum physics and brain surgery and the central claims of the Bible is that electricity, nuclear science, quantum physics and brain surgery all have results and/or evidence of their existence or efficacy that can be observed, tested and repeated.[/quote]

Oh I’m sorry I didn’t think I had to explain the comparison. You see the things above and the Bible have in common this: Simply because they are not understood by someone (or large groups of people) does not mean that they are to be laughed at mocked, or simply dismissed. This may come as a surprise but humans don’t know everything. WOW—you okay? In fact it seems that science changes every few years. Remember pluto? Enough said?

As far as God, Christ and the Bible I’ve said many times that it takes faith. As the Bible says it is impossible to please God without faith. If someone sets out to prove the existence of God it will only end in frustration as faith is the key ingredient. I don’t suspect that the Bible would put so much emphasis on faith if it was going to be proven by human standards that there is a God. That would be contradictory now wouldn’t it? At that point I would be questioning the Bible and the rolls here would be reversed.

On a side note, how old are you? I read an interesting article about atheism and young males. Seems that about 90% are young males. Just wondering if you fall into that demographic. No big deal.

Zeb

[/quote]

And, this is where the debate ends. You have decided that “faith” is an acceptable tool for understanding. I will never agree to this.[/quote]

You don’t have to agree to anything, that’s why God gave you free will. The rest is between you and God someday.

[quote]I’m 35, married and have two kids. I didn’t acknowledge my atheism until I was 30… spent most of my life running from it. Reality is some scary shit, so I understand why most people choose religion over it.
[/quote]

You’re going to take the Obama tack I see. Wow you guys are so smart I just shudder in your presence. LOL. How does it go? we stupid people cling to our guns and religion, mostly because we’re scared. Is that it? Ha ha, I think it takes a great deal of courage to step out as a believer. If you don’t think it takes courage to believe in an unseen God then I don’t think you know what courage is. It takes less courage to live your life thinking that someday you will simple cease to exist. How is that courageous? I can do whatever I want in this lifetime, if someone strikes me on the cheek I don’t have to turn the other cheek I’m an atheist I write my own moral code - Bla Bla Bla…I hope you can do better than that. I could make a great argument that you are taking a very short-term gain (not courageous) for a long-term loss.
[/quote]

Go back to the sandbox, Zeb. The adults are having a conversation here.
[/quote]

That wasn’t that funny in the 90’s when I first heard it. You should stick to pontificating about meaningless philosophies that pump you up. You like that huh? :slight_smile:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Work for a living and then get back to me.[/quote]

What makes you think I don’t work? But then again, I should have expected nothing less from the king of stereotypes.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

Prove it[/quote]

Jesus Christ was as much an historical figure as any who lived thousands of years ago. And the evidence is as clear as those who lived around his time. One does not have to be a believer to acknowledge the fact that Christ lived.

Historical writers mentioning Jesus:
Following is a list of extra biblical (outside of the Bible) references of biblical events, places, etc. The list is not exhaustive but is very representative of what is available.

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?, a Jewish historian) mentions John the Baptist and Herod - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 5, par. 2

“Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod’s army came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to come to baptism; for that the washing [with water] would be acceptable to him, if they made use of it, not in order to the putting away [or the remission] of some sins [only], but for the purification of the body; supposing still that the soul was thoroughly purified beforehand by righteousness.”

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Jesus - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 3, par. 3.

Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, (9) those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; (10) as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.

There is debate among scholars as to the authenticity of this quote since it is so favorable to Jesus. For more information on this, please see Regarding the quotes from the historian Josephus about Jesus

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions James, the brother of Jesus - Antiquities, Book 20, ch. 9.

“Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the sanhedrim of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or, some of his companions]; and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned: but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done.”

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Ananias the High Priest who was mentioned in Acts 23:2

Now as soon as Albinus was come to the city of Jerusalem, he used all his endeavors and care that the country might be kept in peace, and this by destroying many of the Sicarii. But as for the high priest, Ananias (25) he increased in glory every day, and this to a great degree, and had obtained the favor and esteem of the citizens in a signal manner; for he was a great hoarder up of money

Acts 23:2, “And the high priest Ananias commanded those standing beside him to strike him [Paul] on the mouth.”

Tacitus (A.D. c.55-A.D. c.117, Roman historian) mentions “christus” who is Jesus - Annals 15.44

“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.”

Ref. from http://classics.mit.edu/...s/annals.mb.txt

Thallus Circa AD 52, eclipse of the sun. Thallus wrote a history of the Eastern Mediterranean world from the Trojan War to his own time. His writings are only found as citations by others. Julius Africanus who wrote about AD 221 mentioned Thallus’ account of an eclipse of the sun.

“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.”

Is this a reference to the eclipse at the crucifixion? Luke 23:44-45, “And it was now about the sixth hour, and darkness fell over the whole land until the ninth hour, 45 the sun being obscured; and the veil of the temple was torn in two.”

The oddity is that Jesus’ crucifixion occurred at the Passover which was a full moon. It is not possible for a solar eclipse to occur at a full moon. Note that Julius Africanus draws the conclusion that Thallus’ mentioning of the eclipse was describing the one at Jesus’ crucifixion. It may not have been.

Julius Africanus, Extant Writings, XVIII in the Ante?Nicene Fathers, ed. by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1973), vol. VI, p. 130. as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Pliny the Younger mentioned Christ. Pliny was governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor and an avid writer who wrote 10 books.

“They (the Christians) were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food?but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”

Pliny, Letters, transl. by William Melmoth, rev. by W.M.L. Hutchinson (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1935), vol. II, X:96 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

The Talmud

“On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, “He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favor, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.” But since nothing was brought forward in his favor he was hanged on the eve of the Passover!”

Gal. 3:13, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.”

Luke 22:1, “Now the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which is called the Passover, was approaching. 2And the chief priests and the scribes were seeking how they might put Him to death; for they were afraid of the people.”

This quotation was taken from the reading in The Babylonian Talmud, transl. by I. Epstein (London: Soncino, 1935), vol. III, Sanhedrin 43a, p. 281 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Lucian (circa 120-after 180) mentions Jesus. Greek writer and rhetorician.

“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day?the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. . . . You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property.”

Lucian, The Death of Peregrine, 11?13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4, as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Though Lucian opposed Christianity, he acknowledges Jesus, that Jesus was crucified, that Christians worship him, and that this was done by faith.

The historical Jesus is debated by very, very few. You can find people that still believe the world is flat so just because you can find a few in a google search doesn’t mean that they hold much credit, regardless the above listing should answer your question.

[/quote]

Brian Flemming does a great job of eviscerating these arguments. It’s worth a watch:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
No doubt, but to me Earth and Heaven are like the local movie house. There is an arcade in front before you go into watch the movie. As much fun as the arcade is, that is not really why I am there.[/quote]

That is a pretty terrible worldview to have.[/quote]

I don’t get it? How is that a terrible worldview to have? I don’t base my philosophy of life of a metaphor using a movie house.

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Work for a living and then get back to me.[/quote]

What makes you think I don’t work? But then again, I should have expected nothing less from the king of stereotypes.[/quote]

You’re confused, YOU are the King of stereotypes. Remember you thought you had me nailed and you were 100% in the wrong direction. It’s comical to read the endless platitudes tossed about by by your ilk. You and some of your brethren think you’ve got the entire universe figured out. That sort of arrogance is almost unthinkable.

You are one heart beat away from leaving this life (as are we all) and all you can do with your time is attack Christians and Christianity on an Internet web site. That sort of behavior speaks volumes about you and your character.

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:
Brian Flemming does a great job of eviscerating these arguments. It’s worth a watch:

[/quote]

I’m sure he does a great job at eviscerating these arguments…

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]swoleupinya wrote:

Prove it[/quote]

Jesus Christ was as much an historical figure as any who lived thousands of years ago. And the evidence is as clear as those who lived around his time. One does not have to be a believer to acknowledge the fact that Christ lived.

Historical writers mentioning Jesus:
Following is a list of extra biblical (outside of the Bible) references of biblical events, places, etc. The list is not exhaustive but is very representative of what is available.

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?, a Jewish historian) mentions John the Baptist and Herod - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 5, par. 2

“Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod’s army came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to come to baptism; for that the washing [with water] would be acceptable to him, if they made use of it, not in order to the putting away [or the remission] of some sins [only], but for the purification of the body; supposing still that the soul was thoroughly purified beforehand by righteousness.”

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Jesus - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 3, par. 3.

Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, (9) those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; (10) as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.

There is debate among scholars as to the authenticity of this quote since it is so favorable to Jesus. For more information on this, please see Regarding the quotes from the historian Josephus about Jesus

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions James, the brother of Jesus - Antiquities, Book 20, ch. 9.

“Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the sanhedrim of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or, some of his companions]; and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned: but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done.”

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Ananias the High Priest who was mentioned in Acts 23:2

Now as soon as Albinus was come to the city of Jerusalem, he used all his endeavors and care that the country might be kept in peace, and this by destroying many of the Sicarii. But as for the high priest, Ananias (25) he increased in glory every day, and this to a great degree, and had obtained the favor and esteem of the citizens in a signal manner; for he was a great hoarder up of money

Acts 23:2, “And the high priest Ananias commanded those standing beside him to strike him [Paul] on the mouth.”

Tacitus (A.D. c.55-A.D. c.117, Roman historian) mentions “christus” who is Jesus - Annals 15.44

“Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular.”

Ref. from http://classics.mit.edu/...s/annals.mb.txt

Thallus Circa AD 52, eclipse of the sun. Thallus wrote a history of the Eastern Mediterranean world from the Trojan War to his own time. His writings are only found as citations by others. Julius Africanus who wrote about AD 221 mentioned Thallus’ account of an eclipse of the sun.

“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.”

Is this a reference to the eclipse at the crucifixion? Luke 23:44-45, “And it was now about the sixth hour, and darkness fell over the whole land until the ninth hour, 45 the sun being obscured; and the veil of the temple was torn in two.”

The oddity is that Jesus’ crucifixion occurred at the Passover which was a full moon. It is not possible for a solar eclipse to occur at a full moon. Note that Julius Africanus draws the conclusion that Thallus’ mentioning of the eclipse was describing the one at Jesus’ crucifixion. It may not have been.

Julius Africanus, Extant Writings, XVIII in the Ante?Nicene Fathers, ed. by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1973), vol. VI, p. 130. as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Pliny the Younger mentioned Christ. Pliny was governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor and an avid writer who wrote 10 books.

“They (the Christians) were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food?but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”

Pliny, Letters, transl. by William Melmoth, rev. by W.M.L. Hutchinson (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1935), vol. II, X:96 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

The Talmud

“On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, “He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favor, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.” But since nothing was brought forward in his favor he was hanged on the eve of the Passover!”

Gal. 3:13, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.”

Luke 22:1, “Now the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which is called the Passover, was approaching. 2And the chief priests and the scribes were seeking how they might put Him to death; for they were afraid of the people.”

This quotation was taken from the reading in The Babylonian Talmud, transl. by I. Epstein (London: Soncino, 1935), vol. III, Sanhedrin 43a, p. 281 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Lucian (circa 120-after 180) mentions Jesus. Greek writer and rhetorician.

“The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day?the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. . . . You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property.”

Lucian, The Death of Peregrine, 11?13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4, as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Though Lucian opposed Christianity, he acknowledges Jesus, that Jesus was crucified, that Christians worship him, and that this was done by faith.

The historical Jesus is debated by very, very few. You can find people that still believe the world is flat so just because you can find a few in a google search doesn’t mean that they hold much credit, regardless the above listing should answer your question.

[/quote]

Brian Flemming does a great job of eviscerating these arguments. It’s worth a watch:

[/quote]

Just say you don’t want to read the above because it’s to difficult to refute the many historical scholars who wrote about Jesus Christ, I understand, I do. :slight_smile:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Work for a living and then get back to me.[/quote]

What makes you think I don’t work? But then again, I should have expected nothing less from the king of stereotypes.[/quote]

You’re confused, YOU are the King of stereotypes. Remember you thought you had me nailed and you were 100% in the wrong direction. It’s comical to read the endless platitudes tossed about by by your ilk. You and some of your brethren think you’ve got the entire universe figured out. That sort of arrogance is almost unthinkable.

You are one heart beat away from leaving this life (as are we all) and all you can do with your time is attack Christians and Christianity on an Internet web site. That sort of behavior speaks volumes about you and your character.[/quote]

I’ll ask you again, what makes you think I don’t work?

But you won’t answer, you’re just a gutless piece of trash so convinced of his own superiority you assume everyone is an unemplyed liberal “kid” if they don’t agree with you. Your world view is so narrow it borders on sickening. The garbage you spew is amazing in its delusion and sheer quantity, and quite frankly, you take the internet far too seriously.

All in all, you seem like a sad little man.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Just say you don’t want to read the above because it’s to difficult to refute the many historical scholars who wrote about Jesus Christ, I understand, I do. :slight_smile:
[/quote]

What’s the matter little man, afraid of what you might watch?

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Would we really be that damn selfish, vain, to freeze human history at ourselves? Sounds…monstrous.[/quote]

Seems more and more that the Christian right wants to either freeze or revert human history.[/quote]

It’s not my social values turning inner cities into warzones, supporting the killing of the unborn, and producing a governmentally dependant population of increasingly older and lonlier geezers who have to replace themselves with more religious immigrants and their bigger families.

we (the atheist left) should be careful to not confuse our history and human history, and not take the recent history for granted.
we have made this mistake too many times in the past, with tragic consequences.

[quote]
It’s not my social values turning inner cities into warzones, supporting the killing of the unborn, and producing a governmentally dependant population of increasingly older and lonlier geezers who have to replace themselves with more religious immigrants and their bigger families. [/quote]

on the other hand, these issues are the result of phenomenas (urbanization, industrialization, globalization, technocracy) which started well before the spread of modern atheism and secularism.

modern atheism is not the origin of the dislocation of traditionnal societies. it’s merely an epiphenomenon.

if we really want to link these issues with religious preferences, then monotheism, especially protestantism, share a good part of the responsability.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Well, hold on now, in my above comments I was talking about the existence of God. Not that Jesus Christ lived. Jesus is as much an historical figure as Plato. As you know Christians believe that he was the personification of God on earth. That can be debated by non-Christians, but his existence, that’s a fact!
[/quote]

I’m sorry, Zeb. You can curse me as the day as long, but the odd non-eye-witness mention written a minimum of 37 years after his supposed death and references form the Bible and Talmud which are by definition circular in this respect do not come anywhere close to proving that the existence of Jesus is a “fact.”

What you have presented is certainly a body of scholarly work to support your opinion. I’ll give you that. But, they are not the kind of proof that renders your opinion fact.

[quote]kamui wrote:

we (the atheist left) should be careful to not confuse our history and human history, and not take the recent history for granted.
we have made this mistake too many times in the past, with tragic consequences.

[quote]
It’s not my social values turning inner cities into warzones, supporting the killing of the unborn, and producing a governmentally dependant population of increasingly older and lonlier geezers who have to replace themselves with more religious immigrants and their bigger families. [/quote]

on the other hand, these issues are the result of phenomenas (urbanization, industrialization, globalization, technocracy) which started well before the spread of modern atheism and secularism.

modern atheism is not the origin of the dislocation of traditionnal societies. it’s merely an epiphenomenon.

if we really want to link these issues with religious preferences, then monotheism, especially protestantism, share a good part of the responsability.[/quote]

Well said

[quote]kamui wrote:
modern atheism is not the origin of the dislocation of traditionnal societies. it’s merely an epiphenomenon.
[/quote]

True, it’s more like a symptom of social liberalism.

[quote]
I’m sorry, Zeb. You can curse me as the day as long, but the odd non-eye-witness mention written a minimum of 37 years after his supposed death and references form the Bible and Talmud which are by definition circular in this respect do not come anywhere close to proving that the existence of Jesus is a “fact.”

What you have presented is certainly a body of scholarly work to support your opinion. I’ll give you that. But, they are not the kind of proof that renders your opinion fact. [/quote]

the vast majority of modern historians, regardless of their religion or lack of religion, does not dispute the existence of Jesus

not because there is hard rock proof of his existence, but because his inexistence would imply some kind of conspiracy which is highly improbable.
the Jesus-myth hypothesis does not extend our understanding of the birth of christianity, it grealty reduce it. and it’s enough to qualify it as a bad hypothesis.

[quote]Makavali wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Makavali wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Work for a living and then get back to me.

What makes you think I don’t work? But then again, I should have expected nothing less from the king of stereotypes.

You’re confused, YOU are the King of stereotypes. Remember you thought you had me nailed and you were 100% in the wrong direction. It’s comical to read the endless platitudes tossed about by by your ilk. You and some of your brethren think you’ve got the entire universe figured out. That sort of arrogance is almost unthinkable.

You are one heart beat away from leaving this life (as are we all) and all you can do with your time is attack Christians and Christianity on an Internet web site. That sort of behavior speaks volumes about you and your character.

I’ll ask you again, what makes you think I don’t work?[/quote]

Anyone who has the time an inclination to do what you do most likely lives in their parents basement and doesn’t have much of a life. Am I wrong? Ah never mind I can’t trust your word. I’ll assume I’m right until you begin to act normally. Will that happen?

Just did - So, you’re wrong, again.

Seems like you’re taking a little too seriously. But, I think this is all you have so I understand, I understand, talk to me, talk to me :slight_smile:

Anyway, you’re wrong again. How many times is that now? Ah who keeps track right? Suffice it to say you’ve got it all wrong again. Just like your view of God, all wrong…again. You’re the guy who looks for Christian threads to trash. You surf this site drooling at the prospect of finding a Christian you can attack (as you did above), or in some way trying to tarnish Christianity. Why are you not happy just strolling along believing in nothing? “Dum, dee dum dee dum, there is no God and I’m as happy as a lark.” Nope, not you. People like you expose yourself I didn’t have to do anything. When you pull down that thin veil that you hide behind what’s really there? What do you actually believe in? You do have a religion, you just call it something else. You are no better than the nonsensical fundamentalist who stands on the street corner spouting verse from the Bible and screaming at passers by. All he does is chase people from the word of God. And all you do constantly attack Christians and Christianity in pure fundamentalist fashion. Congratulations! You are guilty of exactly what you hate in those who are drunk with religion. And by being your overbearing high and mighty spite-filled self you’ve probably sent many a young man toward their Bible, or at least on a positive spiritual journey that will end with something positive. This is the exact opposite of what you wanted to do. How does that one feel? :slight_smile: They’re thinking, no doubt, “I sure don’t want to be like that guy.”

For this I thank you.