Astrological Analysis of MMA, WWE, MLB

[quote]Lonnie123 wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:
It’s not necessarily the practice: it’s the practitioners.[/quote]

In this case, the PRACTICE itself is completely bankrupt.

That’s akin to saying “Sure, all those OTHER psychics are frauds… But not mine!”

It was an interesting idea, humans tried it for a while, but upon further investigation it just doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. No matter who is doing it.

[/quote]

You haven’t read any of my posts on this thread, I was agreeing with you until now…Please read my last post re real astrology’s INDIRECT effect on modern science. The PRACTICE has been bankrupted by the practitioners.

[quote]mattsavinar wrote:

yes there are lots of astro-boards. And very few folks on astro-boards are into the stuff I’m into. So I posted here thinking “lots open minded, intellectually curious folks on the T-Nation board. Charles Poliquin is into the five elements and TCM which is not that far from astrology, maybe some folks are also into astrology in addition to bodybuilding, supplements, etc.” But instead you replied.

[/quote]
So even the people who ARE into the nonsense don’t like your brand of it… Curious.

Yes, we are intellectually curious around here. So much so that I have researched astrology and come to my conclusions on it. We are intellectually curious enough to know that when someone posts opinions that we disagree with we understand that a civil discussion might break out. The intellectually curious WELCOME criticism of their ideas, in the hopes that deeper understanding and truth may reveal itself through the discussion.

We are also Intellectually curious enough to research those ideas when they conflict with ours. We are intellectually curious enough to back up our ideas when they are challenged, OR change our mind based on new evidence. The intellectually curious value that their beliefs are true, and welcome any information that gets them closer to that goal.

In any event, perhaps you and others have some food for thought now. I would urge you to at least go back to my list and consider how it is I arrived at my conclusions. If you value that the beliefs you hold are true and backed by evidence, you should do some research into opinions that are different than yours. My inbox is always open if you want resources, or if you want to send me data that I might not be aware of.

[quote]roybot wrote:

You haven’t read any of my posts on this thread, I was agreeing with you until now…Please read my last post re real astrology’s INDIRECT effect on modern science. The PRACTICE has been bankrupted by the practitioners.

[/quote]

I have read all of your posts, and I’m not sure why we are in disagreement at this point.

Astrology, in its modern form, is invalid. You disagree? At some point in the past, something called “astrology” may have influenced science, sure. But the idea that the planets, the moon, and the sun affect your personality is what we are calling “astrology” in THIS thread.

Thread is surprisingly entertaining.

Carry on… carry on…

[quote]Lonnie123 wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

You haven’t read any of my posts on this thread, I was agreeing with you until now…Please read my last post re real astrology’s INDIRECT effect on modern science. The PRACTICE has been bankrupted by the practitioners.

[/quote]

I have read all of your posts, and I’m not sure why we are in disagreement at this point.

Astrology, in its modern form, is invalid. You disagree? At some point in the past, something called “astrology” may have influenced science, sure. But the idea that the planets, the moon, and the sun affect your personality is what we are calling “astrology” in THIS thread.[/quote]

No,I agree that modern astrology is invalid (actually said so in a previous post that you read)… but I will say that I get very short tempered in sunny weather so there must be some truth in it.

I won’t get into the moon and lycanthrophy.

[quote]roybot wrote:

but I will say that I get very short tempered in sunny weather so there must be some truth in it.
[/quote]

Vitamin D. It’s the new roids.

[quote]cct wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

but I will say that I get very short tempered in sunny weather so there must be some truth in it.
[/quote]

Vitamin D. It’s the new roids.[/quote]

I know bro - true shit. I drank a gallon of milk last week and my stomach starts going all crazy. Next thing I know my bowels go into this lactose intolarant violent rage. Who knew milk could give you roid rage?

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

“MINE’S THE SUN!!” [/quote]

Bonez post of the year award.

Internet points 100,000

What I don’t agree with is predetermining what a person is, what they will work as, who they are merely on the date they were born. How is that possible?

I’ve challenged friends and families in the past on their “conviction” to what their astrological sign said. I realise it’s a part of modern culture but certainly not something intelligent, learned and practical people would follow.

One example is a very close family member who’s DOB according to documentation is 8/9 - BUT this was incorrectly entered since the actual DOB was 3/9. There was a mix-up in dates during school registration and the incorrect date stuck, along with “conviction” of following the incorrect star sign. Not to mention a year apart in dates!

[quote]roybot wrote:
Astrology isn’t witchcraft or superstition. Historically, astrology indirectly led to some very significant scientific breakthroughs, but it was only one part of the ancient hermetic practices that ironically eventually disproved astrology: Newton was a devoted alchemist; astrology was a branch of alchemy and it helped Newton to formulate his inverse square law.

Modern astrology, however, is new-age guff. [/quote]

I see what you mean, fair enough.

Astrobollocks!!!

[quote]XanderBuilt wrote:
What I don’t agree with is predetermining what a person is, what they will work as, who they are merely on the date they were born. How is that possible?

I’ve challenged friends and families in the past on their “conviction” to what their astrological sign said. I realise it’s a part of modern culture but certainly not something intelligent, learned and practical people would follow.

One example is a very close family member who’s DOB according to documentation is 8/9 - BUT this was incorrectly entered since the actual DOB was 3/9. There was a mix-up in dates during school registration and the incorrect date stuck, along with “conviction” of following the incorrect star sign. Not to mention a year apart in dates![/quote]

A person is much more than just their Sun sign. And what people self report is often not a reflection of reality any more in the astrological world than in the bodybuilding world. Describe a person’s Moon sign (Moon ruling the unconscious. the emotions) to them and they’ll often deny it. Describe it to their spouse or long term romantic partner and they’ll respond, 99/100 times, “Wow, that is exactly what they’re like!” Then describe how they are in bed or in a fight by looking at their Mars sign. The person may or may not be in agreement but the spouse or partner will 99/100 times tell you “yep that is exactly how they are”.

A primer:

Sun = conscious identity
Moon = emotional needs
Risisng = physical representative
Mercury = how you speak, write, think
Mars = how you fight, how you fuck
Venus = what gets you in the mood for fighting or fucking
Jupiter = where you’re confident, generous
Saturn = where you’re fearful, where you work hard

and so forth . . . A person with their Moon, Mars, and Venus in Aries but their Sun in Cancer . . . well they’re going to have the emotional needs of an Aries, they’re going to fight and fuck like an Aries, they’re going to dress like an Aries, but they will derive their conscious identity from Cancerian themes.

Example: Barack Obama is a Leo Sun, Gemini Moon. But he has Mars (how he fights) in Virgo (the sign of precision and cleanliness). What are his weapon(s) of choice? Things like aerial drones and Seal Team Six, both of which are reputed for their “precision” and “cleanliess.” He’ll never launch nukes. Hilary Clinton, on the other hand, has Mars (how she fights) in Scorpio (extremes). She’d launch nukes if it came down to it.

Tim Lincecum is a Gemini Sun, Capricorn Moon. But his Mars is in Scorpio, the sign of extremes, and it is conjunct Saturn, the planet of hard work. Scorpio is also the sign associated with overwhelming power from small things. Nuclear energy, for instance, is considered Scorpionic. A 5’9’ guy at 150 pounds throwing 100 mph out of college after years of hard work to develop that delivery . . . that is what Mars (fighting) conjunct Saturn (hard work) in Scorpio (extremes, nuclear power) is capable of: “Hard Work (Saturn) Merged (Conjoined) with Fighting (Mars) Involving Extreme Levels of Power (Scorpio)” But you would never know that if you only looked at his Sun sign. You could have showed his chart to any half-decent astrologer at age 8 and while they would not have predicted 2 Cy Youngs by age 25 but they would have said “the kid has tremendous athletic potential, make sure it gets harnessed in some way.”

Then there are aspects, most people have 4-6 major ones which will then modify how those respective planets operate.

Then on top of that there are house positions which indicate what arenas of life which planets (psyche functions) with which traits (signs) will show up in which arenas of life.

Check the Sun/Moon profiles on my site to get just feel of how some of the 144 Sun/Moon combos work: http://www.savinarholistic.com There are plenty on there of folks that might be of interest to more open minded T-Nation readers.

[quote]cct wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

but I will say that I get very short tempered in sunny weather so there must be some truth in it.
[/quote]

Vitamin D. It’s the new roids.[/quote]

Vitamin D actually seems to be a steroid.

Who knew?

[quote]Mascherano wrote:
Truth.[/quote]

Lol, that’s a good funny ^^

[quote]mattsavinar wrote:
Check the Sun/Moon profiles on my site to get just feel of how some of the 144 Sun/Moon combos work: http://www.savinarholistic.com There are plenty on there of folks that might be of interest to more open minded T-Nation readers.
[/quote]

I don’t really lean either way on this stuff, but to be totally honest this probably isn’t the best place to be advertising your site…

So, you’re a lawyer and an astrologer.

If you get a client’s chart wrong, and something bad happens, do you have to sue yourself???

[quote]Yo Momma wrote:
So, you’re a lawyer and an astrologer.

If you get a client’s chart wrong, and something bad happens, do you have to sue yourself???[/quote]

Two separate practices my friend.

And I don’t get clients’ charts wrong.

I wish they offered Wizard Law at my law school.

Seems like it would be more fun to just make shit up willy nilly instead of having to rely on facts and reality.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

“MINE’S THE SUN!!” [/quote]

LMFAO Bonez! probably my favorite SNL skit. Few years ago I was on a fishing trip up north when I had the perfect opportunity to use that line. A bunch of guys were standing around talking about their favorite lures, tackle etc so I stumble up drunk as hell and do my best HK impression and declare “MINE’s the THUN”. They all look at me like an idiot accept for a guy one campsite over who’s pissing himself laughing. Yep, you guessed it, he had a cubbies hat on lol.

I loved these skits, best ever SNL